|
On November 06 2015 08:53 Xatalos wrote:Show nested quote +On November 06 2015 08:48 Xatalos wrote:On November 03 2015 03:15 ShoCkeyy wrote:
I'm pretty much going to reject the xata/rayn combo wombo. I'd rather see the first team mentioned - hts,super,xata go through. At least if a sabotage happens, we definitely have a good chance of finding the mafia until the next mission. Hmmm... I guess there is an explanation at least.... Of some sort... So if I got this right... shockeyy would only vote for missions where there's one of me/rayn, but not both......? shockeyy?
Yes, but if you used your brain, you would understand why... If both of you are on a mission together and one mission gets sabotaged, then it's hard to differentiate wether or not you both sabotaged it. If you go on solo missions, rather than together, it makes it easier to see if you or rayn are mafia. Obviously you both got you wanted and are now butt buddies on the same team.
|
On November 06 2015 08:56 ShoCkeyy wrote:Show nested quote +On November 06 2015 08:53 Xatalos wrote:On November 06 2015 08:48 Xatalos wrote:On November 03 2015 03:15 ShoCkeyy wrote:
I'm pretty much going to reject the xata/rayn combo wombo. I'd rather see the first team mentioned - hts,super,xata go through. At least if a sabotage happens, we definitely have a good chance of finding the mafia until the next mission. Hmmm... I guess there is an explanation at least.... Of some sort... So if I got this right... shockeyy would only vote for missions where there's one of me/rayn, but not both......? shockeyy? Yes, but if you used your brain, you would understand why... If both of you are on a mission together and one mission gets sabotaged, then it's hard to differentiate wether or not you both sabotaged it. If you go on solo missions, rather than together, it makes it easier to see if you or rayn are mafia. Obviously you both got you wanted and are now butt buddies on the same team.
LOL
I mean, I can kind of understand the principle... But where does this boundless confidence that we're scum come from? Just from the fact that we've defended each other? Wouldn't scum instead want to avoid direct "teaming up" or anything like that?
|
On November 06 2015 08:50 Xatalos wrote:Show nested quote +On November 06 2015 08:41 Half the Sky wrote:
Ah got it James. <3
I'd say at least 2. I think maayyyybe one was smart enough to suck it up and pass? Could be SL for all we know.
And that's a really good question to Shockey, Xata. How would it make sense for only scum SL to pass and for the others to reject? Wouldn't they want him on the mission?
Disassociation. Obviously this violates Ockham's razor but it's something to come back to in the event of a sabotage.
|
On November 06 2015 08:59 Xatalos wrote:Show nested quote +On November 06 2015 08:56 ShoCkeyy wrote:On November 06 2015 08:53 Xatalos wrote:On November 06 2015 08:48 Xatalos wrote:On November 03 2015 03:15 ShoCkeyy wrote:
I'm pretty much going to reject the xata/rayn combo wombo. I'd rather see the first team mentioned - hts,super,xata go through. At least if a sabotage happens, we definitely have a good chance of finding the mafia until the next mission. Hmmm... I guess there is an explanation at least.... Of some sort... So if I got this right... shockeyy would only vote for missions where there's one of me/rayn, but not both......? shockeyy? Yes, but if you used your brain, you would understand why... If both of you are on a mission together and one mission gets sabotaged, then it's hard to differentiate wether or not you both sabotaged it. If you go on solo missions, rather than together, it makes it easier to see if you or rayn are mafia. Obviously you both got you wanted and are now butt buddies on the same team. LOL I mean, I can kind of understand the principle... But where does this boundless confidence that we're scum come from? Just from the fact that we've defended each other? Wouldn't scum instead want to avoid direct "teaming up" or anything like that?
Why does it matter when a good portion of the town already thinks you're town?
|
On November 06 2015 09:00 Half the Sky wrote:Show nested quote +On November 06 2015 08:50 Xatalos wrote:On November 06 2015 08:41 Half the Sky wrote:
Ah got it James. <3
I'd say at least 2. I think maayyyybe one was smart enough to suck it up and pass? Could be SL for all we know.
And that's a really good question to Shockey, Xata. How would it make sense for only scum SL to pass and for the others to reject? Wouldn't they want him on the mission? Disassociation. Obviously this violates Ockham's razor but it's something to come back to in the event of a sabotage.
Right... That's quite far into the tinfoil land  I mean, in the first place, it's a bit hard to organize something like that with no scumQT...
|
In the event that the mission passes, can we use this same exact team for mission 4? K thanks.
|
On November 06 2015 09:01 ShoCkeyy wrote:Show nested quote +On November 06 2015 08:59 Xatalos wrote:On November 06 2015 08:56 ShoCkeyy wrote:On November 06 2015 08:53 Xatalos wrote:On November 06 2015 08:48 Xatalos wrote:On November 03 2015 03:15 ShoCkeyy wrote:
I'm pretty much going to reject the xata/rayn combo wombo. I'd rather see the first team mentioned - hts,super,xata go through. At least if a sabotage happens, we definitely have a good chance of finding the mafia until the next mission. Hmmm... I guess there is an explanation at least.... Of some sort... So if I got this right... shockeyy would only vote for missions where there's one of me/rayn, but not both......? shockeyy? Yes, but if you used your brain, you would understand why... If both of you are on a mission together and one mission gets sabotaged, then it's hard to differentiate wether or not you both sabotaged it. If you go on solo missions, rather than together, it makes it easier to see if you or rayn are mafia. Obviously you both got you wanted and are now butt buddies on the same team. LOL I mean, I can kind of understand the principle... But where does this boundless confidence that we're scum come from? Just from the fact that we've defended each other? Wouldn't scum instead want to avoid direct "teaming up" or anything like that? Why does it matter when a good portion of the town already thinks you're town?
Quite likely you're just scum and it doesn't matter much. Still worth it trying to understand your logic (or lack of it), in a way.
If you happened to be town, it would also be good to stop the impossible association scumread...
|
On November 06 2015 09:05 ShoCkeyy wrote:
In the event that the mission passes, can we use this same exact team for mission 4? K thanks.
That's mission impossible though, since this is the only mission with 3 people I think.
|
Yeah:
Mission 1 - 3 people
Mission 2 - 4 people
Mission 3 - 4 people
Mission 4 - 5 people*
Mission 5 - 5 people
|
On November 06 2015 09:06 Xatalos wrote:Show nested quote +On November 06 2015 09:05 ShoCkeyy wrote:
In the event that the mission passes, can we use this same exact team for mission 4? K thanks. That's mission impossible though, since this is the only mission with 3 people I think.
You're pretty slow, we use the same exact team + 2, what's the issue? lol...
|
In any case, I'm paranoid of the scenario where rayn/Xata/SL passes and then rayn/Xata/SL/Artanis fails, but we'll cross that bridge if that comes to that. Right now, I don't think that's the case, as mafia Rels is downvoting that first team and he was holding out at the end on Artanis.
I'll just keep my tinfoil hat but hopefully I won't need it Xata
I'm just hoping we can get a good core of 4 that will pass reliably. If people don't trust me to be on the team, then I'm hoping I can figure out the final town player if we go to the five person missions.
|
In any case, past midnight. I'm going to collapse. Now it's night, night lovelies.
|
Haha^^
GJ town game is gg.
|
So who thinks artanis is scum?
|
Is there a reason why you think he's scum?
|
|
|
On November 06 2015 00:36 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Well he's gonna vote yes since we are all mafia, then we just don't send any of us into next missions and his town wins.
EZPZ. Unless he wants to claim scum ofc..
ya he better have voted yes or hes 100% scum since he thinks all 3 of us are scum caatching up
|
On November 06 2015 01:25 Rels wrote:Leaving work soon. Voting no atm. Going to the theater tonight so won't be active tonigth! My vote won't change unless this happen: Show nested quote +On November 06 2015 01:18 Rels wrote:On November 06 2015 01:15 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Like Rels, the fucking conversation you referred to is really fucking straight forward. Somehow you manage to not understand it at all.
This is why i don't answer stupid questions. I don't want to waste time on fucking bullshit that doesn't have anything to do with anything. THE POST I WAS REFERRING TO IS IN THE NESTED QUOTES AND IT WAS VERY FUCKING CLEAR WHERE I WAS REFERRING TO BECAUSE IT IS IN THE SAME FUCKING CONVERSATION.
You make easy things hard. Stop. No. You are either wrong or scum. You cannot think my scum game is PUSHING THREAD LEADERS. So if you're town, go reread my scum games and come back admitting you've made a mistake. If you're scum, feel free to do whatever. + SL explains the kita's question, 'cause actually his explanation makes no sense. Superbia you have one question waiting for you.
SL you have one question from kita waiting for you.
rayn you have one admittance + 3 questions just for you. Lucky you!
you will have to start it from the beginning I have no idea what your talking about
|
This "qeustion" so dumb I dont know what angle your trying to pull here but it does not make me scum.
Artanis/me/rayn is the team I wanted and xata is the team I got. I explained why I somewhat townread xata and was happy with voting.
|
like even now rels im posting about things you asked 5 pages back without reading pages 63-68 you cant be this niave
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
