EPT[T][M] Resistance V - Section 31 - Page 117
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
sicklucker
Canada16987 Posts
| ||
|
ShoCkeyy
7815 Posts
 | ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12971 Posts
| ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12971 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
On November 11 2015 17:56 Artanis[Xp] wrote: What the hell is wrong with you rayn? That's no way to treat anyone. + Show Spoiler + I don't actually mean that. I literally quoted someone else from another game. Nobody had a problem with a post like that there. | ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12971 Posts
On November 11 2015 18:26 raynpelikoneet wrote: + Show Spoiler + I don't actually mean that. I literally quoted someone else from another game. Nobody had a problem with a post like that there. + Show Spoiler + | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + It's okay. I just don't like the fact that when i post something the same rules do not apply to me than to other people. Funnily enough HtS was one of the hosts in that game and i had been warned for something nearly not as bad before. The hosts had also said "the discussion about this stops now". After this, someone else uses those exact words to describe another player, nobody... absolutely nobody cares about that for a single bit. | ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12971 Posts
On November 11 2015 18:47 raynpelikoneet wrote: + Show Spoiler + It's okay. I just don't like the fact that when i post something the same rules do not apply to me than to other people. Funnily enough HtS was one of the hosts in that game and i had been warned for something nearly not as bad before. The hosts had also said "the discussion about this stops now". After this, someone else uses those exact words to describe another player, nobody... absolutely nobody cares about that for a single bit. + Show Spoiler + Well, I wasn't in that game so I can't really judge on it. I just call out what I think is unacceptable when I see it. Had I been in that game, I might've said something myself. | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
On November 11 2015 11:22 raynpelikoneet wrote: For most people you, HtS, you are just a pain to play with as a player and as a human being. Yeah, I guess referencing marv's lashing out on me in the Vanilla game.... Tbh he made many similar posts.... But I also provoked him by blaming the mislynch on him, so I don't really hold a grudge or anything. I don't think this post should have been made though, even as a reference. | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
Meh, I guess a fail is more likely. Even if that happens, it would at least tell us quite a bit about the potential scumteams (kind of like solving a Mastermind puzzle  ). | ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12971 Posts
On November 11 2015 20:38 Xatalos wrote: Well, let's see what happens with the mission. Even if probably 2+ scum voted YES, it could be WIFOM too... To avoid the revelation of the team or something? Meh, I guess a fail is more likely. Even if that happens, it would at least tell us quite a bit about the potential scumteams (kind of like solving a Mastermind puzzle ).Probably not since if it is a 4-player scum-free team we'll just send it again two more times and win the game. Also, the 4th mission is pretty dumb once the 3-player mission fails since we can just send the same team of mission 3 +1 if it passes and mission 4 will always pass. Mind as well skip it | ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
| ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12971 Posts
I look forward to the read evaluations. | ||
|
Half the Sky
Germany9029 Posts
On November 11 2015 09:57 sicklucker wrote: Like rels and shockey .HOW DO YOU VOTE YES HERE? Not only do you get to pick next, but I had already promised to put you on the garanteed team fi your teams you submitted did not pass. IT MAKES NO SENSE maybe you guys are just the mafia afterall sicklucker - tbf you wanted to put rels on your team, now you absolutely know you cannot. Like I said there is some information gained from this. rayn even queried some suspicion on Rels JUST before this vote on this team passed that I think might warrant paying some attention. I am reading and re-reading. Pay attention to that and Artanis' follow on Rels. I am at Xatalos/Rels/TBD Final mafia is between Kitaman/Vivax. It is not Shockey based on previous votes, and it's not you (especially with this vote). And I cannot see it being Artanis at all at this point particularly with this vote. Now between Kita and Vivax, I had associative reasons that it's probably not Vivax's slot based on Xata's early game play but Superbia's lurkiness, even if NAI in the end, which you pushed SL, gave you some pause, so it might be worth it to at least re-eval his posts before he went completely afk. I'm going to find the third mafia and then work backwards in constructing the cases. Right now, a team I know that will pass a mission based on everything I've looked through: rayn/sicklucker/Artanis/Shockey So if I absolutely cannot decide between Kita and Vivax (if Kita is mafia, then it's the point where I have to pretty much save Kita's filter somewhere and then try and solve the game on my flight tomorrow, which is about 8h) then we can start constructing the teams leaving both players out. Since the entire game is scumreading me, I am purposely leaving myself off. but only because I know my own alignment, I'd swap myself for the individual I've least sure on (at this point Shockey) but I am sure the above four are clean. rayn/sicklucker/Artanis/myself, I would be 100% confident the team would pass a 4-person mission. This is where my head is. | ||
|
Half the Sky
Germany9029 Posts
| ||
|
Half the Sky
Germany9029 Posts
| ||
|
Rels
France13467 Posts
On November 11 2015 08:03 Fidei86 wrote: Day 2 raynpelikoneet's Nomination (raynpelikoneet, kitaman, Rels, Vivax) Vote Result Half the Sky - YES Xatalos - YES Artanis[Xp] - NO raynpelikoneet - YES ShoCkeyy - YES Rels - YES sicklucker - NO kitaman27 - YES Vivax - YES MISSION IS APPROVED raynpelikoneet, kitaman, Rels and Vivax will be embarking on Mission 2 Mission will be completed in at 23:00 GMT (+00:00) on 11 November 2015. Alright so either the game is won, or the team is infected. Let's go with the infiltrated theory since we won in the other case anyway. I know why SL voted NO, but I think Arta didn't scumread anyone before deadline. I need to check that. | ||
|
Rels
France13467 Posts
On November 11 2015 09:48 sicklucker wrote: rels, hts, shockey how did you guys all vote there... Cause I thought it was a clean team. Still could be the case and we won already ... the fact that there are only two NO votes makes this unlikely though. | ||
|
Rels
France13467 Posts
On November 11 2015 10:13 Half the Sky wrote: I accepted the fact that Rels could be town after a fresh (and attempt at being unbiased after seeing hsi filter), but upon seeing these votes, I very well could have been wrong - the fact that Artanis voted this team down and Rels upvoted it....IDK. My first thought - if this team fails and it likely will - is that the Rels/Artanis interaction is more likely that the former of the two is more likely scum. (I'm thinking the most likely scum in this group is between Rels/Vivax.) Why am I more likely scum than Arta ? | ||
|
Rels
France13467 Posts
On November 11 2015 01:56 Rels wrote: So is kita scum or not ? If yes can you expand on him being vague ? Your reason for scumreading me are bad. Is that it ? | ||
| ||
