Battle of the Drams Mafia - Page 73

On September 30 2015 11:25 rsoultin wrote:
@damdy



tbf one of the reasons i'm revisiting this is i keep looking at people i think could be scum then finding reasons that they don't seem that scummy, after all @.@ kinda lost here a bit

On September 30 2015 21:26 rsoultin wrote:
to be more clear cause i fail at that a lot

mav continued to do very little

AFTER THE POINT WHERE I FIRST TOWNREAD HIM AND UNVOTED HIM (not when the hosts noticed but when i actually unvoted him many hours earlier) FOR HIS REACTION TO THE PRESSURE

^^

and i'm pretty sure i said something to this effect when i first started talking about marv as scum again, cause i know i was thinking it

On September 30 2015 21:32 Rels wrote:

oh you mean after the sexy marv post

On September 30 2015 21:33 rsoultin wrote:


no i don't actually mean after the sexy marv post

On September 29 2015 20:03 rsoultin wrote:
meh

marv is probably not scum which means whoever is scum is probably cackling into their cheerios

especially since damdy isn't scum either

marv, you should probably step away or something, though :/

On September 30 2015 21:33 rsoultin wrote:
okay, rels, reads and reasons

your ls read has been static, that i remember distinctly

so has your truffle read

what was good about scott's list post?

who else do you think is scum and why?

townreads?

i want it all...i'd rather push scum as a counterwagon so if you're town, help me out here

On September 30 2015 21:33 rsoultin wrote:
okay, rels, reads and reasons

your ls read has been static, that i remember distinctly

so has your truffle read

what was good about scott's list post?

who else do you think is scum and why?

townreads?

i want it all...i'd rather push scum as a counterwagon so if you're town, help me out here

On September 30 2015 21:36 rsoultin wrote:


this was where i townread him for his reaction, early yesterday morning over 24 hours ago, and when i actually unvoted

the sexy post was like 6-8 hours after that between classes cause i liked his vote on moosy and i thought rayn's bitching over semantics was just as asinine as marv's post suggested

On September 30 2015 21:46 Rels wrote:

LS is probably town for being serious at the beginning of the game. I'm concerned about him not doing anything since, but you validated his school excuse
GB, marv, rayn, Shining, Damdred are all probably town
Moosy is probably town because he is making sense
sicklucker brings points I understand. I liked his attack on Trfel. I failed reading him in the two games I try so I'll need help on this one
scott list matched my reads so I found it good. I was scumreading JRoc though so I'm not sure about hm
Trfel may be scum, I liked his answer to the LS stuff and I liked the fact that he was catching up and commenting things. We need to talk about his read on you
coolTLname is probably scum, and I don't know why you're protecting him so much
you are probably scum

On September 30 2015 21:48 Rels wrote:

OK let me check if that makes sense

On September 29 2015 23:27 marvellosity wrote:

i'm sure i might just be mad, but they don't seem that similar to me at all

1. scumreading someone (seriously) all game -> saying you need to look at them/forgetting what it is
2. scumreading someone with no particular pretense of a read -> weird waffle

On September 30 2015 00:40 marvellosity wrote:
##unvote
##vote: moosydoosy

for the shit tlname read and the shitty vote on me, a null player placing really unwarranted implicit trust in Damdred's metaread

On September 30 2015 21:55 rsoultin wrote:
scott's list had one scumread in it

mostly townreads and maybe a couple nulls

you don't say it's good just cause it's good i want real reasons...why do you think a list of a ton of weakly reasoned town and null reads is good?

On September 30 2015 21:58 Rels wrote:

It doesn't fucking make sense
marv did things between this post and your scumread of him. The two main things are him defending Trfel and attacking Moosy, both things you're in agreement with!



How can you scumread marv on this series of posts when the two maings things he's done are in agreement with your reads ?

On September 30 2015 21:54 rsoultin wrote:


at most you have one scum in here so you're already failing hard if you're town

why is cool probably scum? cause you think he's lying about not being a smurf? i'm not protecting him so much as no one's arguments are very convincing at all through the prism that he's new, and i know that he's new and not a smurf based on student mafia V @.@

he was town in that game making horrendous mistakes and got modkilled for it...they were not veteran mistakes. there is NO REASON to think he is a smurf and i refuse to lynch people for stupid arguments like that

On September 30 2015 05:52 Rels wrote:
still this more or less:

without the Moosy part
Plus he has refused to explain his weird GF read on you, so I cannot know if he has a reasonning behind it
Plus he's clearly trolling, I don't know why a town under suspicion would act like that. But Dandel did exactly that last game, so that makes me wary of lynching him

On September 30 2015 22:00 Rels wrote:

'cause he did exactly that type of list every game I've seen him play as town, and I agreed with the scum and town reads he gave

On September 30 2015 22:01 Rels wrote:

you are not reading the game

On September 30 2015 22:01 rsoultin wrote:


i was no longer sure on moosy's being scum at the time i started reevaluating and regardless, him saying things that i agree with does not make him town by default which is why your scott's list post is good cause i agree with the reads assertion is weak as shit

my assertion

which you are not evaluating while seeing if i say things that make "sense"

was that he hadn't done much of anything productive all game...even after he responded to the pressure. specifically i asked damdy if he made any pushes worth pushing

this you just quoted has nothing to do with that