EPTbut because she’s bought some town cred i’d like to listen to her thoughts:
A. please give specific reads on boxerfred/fidei/superbia/breshke
B. who you think is mafia
Newbie Student Mafia XIV: Firefly - Page 12
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
but because she’s bought some town cred i’d like to listen to her thoughts: A. please give specific reads on boxerfred/fidei/superbia/breshke B. who you think is mafia | ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
raynpelikoneet alakaslam town lean: scott31337 nocturnemage superbia null: breshke people to look into: copcake boxerfred fidei86 this is where i am at right now although i am probs a bit too focused on people that were questioning me. some specific thoughts and questions: copcake - please answer questions i asked above boxerfred - actually read the thread, stop posting baseless accusations, and actually present something with some evidence fidei86 - i don't like how he drops suspicion on me immediately. he did this to n00bking as well - almost as if he scumreads then backs off at the last moment to buy town cred as if he knew we were town. even if you think i'm too dumb to be mafia, i don't think this should immediately drop me from the list of people you are looking into. - i'd like specific reads on the people that you listed when you come back. breshke - i need to look into him but he hasn't made much of an impact on me which is worrying. superbia - you ask a lot of questions, give reads that have some more questions, and then end up with a question on people's alignments. although your tone is townie and your questions are good, i'd like to see some more solid stances please. | ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
On September 10 2015 09:19 Breshke wrote: Moosey what is the difference between null and need to look into? "people to look into" is my way of saying i think they're mafia and i just need to do a combination of scrape together tone reads/find thread evidence/ask more questions. null is my way of saying...no real opinion. i've been doing this for a while now from previous games if you'd care to check. | ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
On September 10 2015 09:25 Breshke wrote: No I believe you it was just confusing because I'm the breakdown of your read on me you said you needed to look into me so I assumed I should have just been in the other category What do you think about that fact that fidel was voting GB fairly earlyish when the wagon had only 5 votes. Do you think he would bus that early nope i just need to take a look at ur filter because to be frank, and whether this is good or not, i don't really remember you. huh? fidei was 2nd on gb for d2. it's WIFOM at best, but it's within the realm of a bus. d1 fidei just really sheeped rayn and his voting was rather low profile. d2 was an easy way to buy town cred looking at how rayn was going at glowingbear and a lot of people were already expressing doubt about glowingbear's claim. but as i said, i might be focusing too much on people that were looking into me and i'll have to relook at filters. i still want answers to my questions from fidei as well. | ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
On September 10 2015 09:44 Fidei86 wrote: MD: "Bussing" is thrown around a lot here, but honestly I've seen mafia pile on to plenty of mafia wagons. The thing to look out for is: 1. Does their vote feel organic and well supported by reasoning, or does it seem opportunistic; AND 2. Was their vote early enough that it actually made a difference, either in gaining the lynch momentum or pushing it over the edge? For me, I honestly had a pretty poor read on GB d1. I did post that his reads were all over the place, but it wasn't a hard read or anything. My reasoning for switching onto him was basically "I hate the Cake and the Rayn lynches", and GB seemed like the much better option to me. I was fourth or fifth onto him. So I was either the hammer, or I was near enough. On d1. I think it was fairly obvious that a big wagon was going to build on him (scott, for example, hadn't voted yet but he was scum reading GB), so I get less town cred than otherwise. But yeah, I think I should get a fair bit. I was also the only one making the obvious argument that GB's claim was rubbish and rayn's claim was correct. I get WAY less credit for that, because it was so frikkin' obvious. I've been playing voice all evening, so I'll have to follow-up the filters in the morning. mmm...ok. On September 10 2015 09:44 Fidei86 wrote: Whoops - Cake and n00b lynches. Not Cake and n00b. obviously. ... | ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
| ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
On September 10 2015 09:50 Fidei86 wrote: It's probably because my posts have been riddled with typos this game. THAT is probably because I've been doing most of my playing at 2am, when I should have gone to bed a long time ago  i will hold u to ur promise on reads for copcake/nocturnemage/breshke/superbia. just make sure ur coherent when u do it. | ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
| ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
On September 10 2015 10:06 raynpelikoneet wrote: moosy + superbia mafia. ok. :3 I expect reasoning at end of night then. | ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
On September 10 2015 10:14 Fidei86 wrote: Like, what even is this post? You've been scum reading Cake all game, and I feel like you've been softing me for a while. Then you come out after Rayn says he thinks we're both town (idk how doctor would even confirm someone when the night kill went through n1), and basically say "oh cool, I've been wrong all game, but happy to take your word for it!" And then you include yourself in the possible scum list?!? ... Ugh. If you're town, you're playing such a weird game, I don't even know. I thought you were too dumb to be Mafia, but you're testing that read now. i never said i completely agreed with rayn. "cool" was my way of acknowledging his thoughts and saying i read the post as well as asking a follow-up question. acknowledgement =/= agreement | ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
On September 10 2015 10:20 raynpelikoneet wrote: Like the short reasoning is Moosy for his shit read on noobking and not realizing GB has to be mafia FOR the counterclaim AND not dying. Both of those are no-brainer things and Moosy is intelligent enough to understand that. Superbia is mafai for the sole fact that he made a post where he says "my next post is going to solve the game most likely". His next post has FOUR scumreads AND three null-reads. i already explained this but you're still tunneled. A. my read on n00bKing was perfectly fine but you're refusing to accept it. B. i was that much more confident in my CopCake read. i still don't see how you think she's so confirmed town in ur eyes. | ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
On September 10 2015 10:19 scott31337 wrote: I'm drawn to this post for some reason, like two truths and a lie. I bet one of these three names are scum buddies. what do you think of this post? On September 07 2015 02:03 GlowingBear wrote: Can someone explain to me what's the case on Cake? I've just read her filter and I saw nothing wrong. In fact, some posts looks really townie, like the early ones. Her posts are fluid and directly to the point. Her reads have a clear progression. Also, she has 4 pages of filter on day1. this post is gr8 too.[/QUOTE] | ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
On September 10 2015 10:19 scott31337 wrote: I'm drawn to this post for some reason, like two truths and a lie. I bet one of these three names are scum buddies. what do you think about this post? this post is gr8 too. | ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
On September 10 2015 10:19 scott31337 wrote: I'm drawn to this post for some reason, like two truths and a lie. I bet one of these three names are scum buddies. what do you think about this post? (last fix prmise) On September 08 2015 09:01 MoosyDoosy wrote: this post is gr8 too. | ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
On September 10 2015 10:31 raynpelikoneet wrote: Yeah it would be fine if you did not go consistently against it. ? i've already explained my thought process behind the "inconsistencies" you've pointed out but you just don't accept it. like sure, i've accepted that you're tunneled so just make a case on end of night and hopefully you're at least right on superbia. either way, it's pretty dumb of mafia to kill you here because your claim about being a doctor was obviously false. | ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
On September 10 2015 10:31 Alakaslam wrote: Moosy you see not with the eyes of CHUPAZI um...hello? reference plz~ | ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
On September 10 2015 11:15 Breshke wrote: Wait so if Ryan's claim about being the doctor was false why were you fine with people lynching GB???? rayn was confident enough in his read on GB to do his doc claim shenanigans. i also thought that what had been said about gb was actually pretty spot on. | ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
no but GB basically let it slip that we do have a doctor. | ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
On September 10 2015 11:32 MoosyDoosy wrote: no but GB basically let it slip that we do have a doctor. the rest is self explanatory but since gb let it slip we have a doc, that means we also have a cop. and i was saying and agreeing with you that the cop shouldn't claim in order to have 2 more nights. | ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
On September 10 2015 11:44 raynpelikoneet wrote: I believe GB convinced you of this in your scum QT.  I seriously do and you are making it worse every moment. ok. i already provided reasoning early on as to why your claim would have been false which apparently also falls into your whole timeline of GB convincing me about you. like sure if you want to think that lol. it’s completely in your character to do a fake claim in order to force a lynch that you’re positive in whether you think that of yourself or not. -shrugs- if this was your case i’m kind of disappointed. all it provides is: “lynch these people and then do this based on the results” i’d also like your reasoning as to why you think copcake is the cop? | ||
| ||
