|
36/80
yeah you make no sense? what is townie about hammering town over scum, and what difference does it make if i vote before or after someone else in your little gb/rsoul scum world? i don't even -_- if anyone else wants to give him posts, feel free, but the last ones i gave him he wasted with lols and i don't feel inclined to give him any more just so he can spew more of this shit
|
On July 29 2015 13:14 Snickers wrote:
well im almost ouit of posts if someone wants to donate but i couldnt find one thing where gb said we need to lynch these four people and they are all in my town circle now also
WHOAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA LOOK AT THAT HE TOLD THE COP TO CHECK RSO IN THE NIGHT AFTER CLARITY AND HE ALSO MAGICALLY THOUGHT RSO WAS TOWN AFTER HER BIG POST OF SCUM. so rso godfather.
that is all my dear friends
There are several people who did this.
I don't understand how it equates rso with "godfather."
|
Snickers, keep whatever posts you want in a notepad file, i'll give you a couple posts tomorrow so you can avoid spamming the thread with your usual garbage. One concentrated dose that we can easily ignore would be just great though.
|
On July 29 2015 13:46 Hopeless1der wrote:
Snickers, keep whatever posts you want in a notepad file, i'll give you a couple posts tomorrow so you can avoid spamming the thread with your usual garbage. One concentrated dose that we can easily ignore would be just great though.
No pls.
|
Snickers has been warned for reaching the cycle limit of 80 posts.
He/she may not post unless granted additional posts by other players; if granted, he/she may not exceed aggregate limit.
Exceeding the aggregate limit after a warning will result in a modkill.
Votes in the voting thread do not count towards the limit.
|
On July 29 2015 13:47 ObiWanShinobi wrote:Show nested quote +On July 29 2015 13:46 Hopeless1der wrote:
Snickers, keep whatever posts you want in a notepad file, i'll give you a couple posts tomorrow so you can avoid spamming the thread with your usual garbage. One concentrated dose that we can easily ignore would be just great though.
No pls.
How the fuck is this productive in any way? Are you kidding me?
##vote: boxerfred
+ Show Spoiler [reasoning] +I am certain that one of boxerfred/GB are mafia, if not both. I'm much more inclined to lynch boxerfred atm. On July 27 2015 07:05 Half the Sky wrote:Night 1(edited for vote tracker) Final Day 1 Vote Count FirmTofu (6): raynpelikoneet, Onegu, KelsierSC, rsoultin, ObiWanShinobi, scott31337, GlowingBear, Palmar scott31337 (4): boxerfred, Hopeless1der, FirmTofu, GlowingBear, FirmTofuclarity_nl (1): rsoultin, Palmar, rsoultin, SnickersHopeless1der (1): raynpelikoneet, Clarity_nl, scott31337boxerfred (1): Snickers, Snickers KelsierSC (0): Snickers, GlowingBear, FirmTofuraynpelikoneet (0): Palmarrsoultin (0): Onegu, Snickerspalmar (0): FirmTofu
|
I don't understand what you're upset about.
|
On July 29 2015 12:55 Snickers wrote:GLOW BEAR IS MAFA
gb is mafia because he hard defended firm tofu day one and did not push scott. if you asked gb he would say snickers is a fucking dumbass and he pushed scott but lets look at the details.
gb comes with an interesting time with his kelsier push. it could be seen as a time to start a kelsier wagon in order to protect firm tofu. but thats not too scummy.
as the day goes on gb votes fly everywhere from keslier to firm tofu to scott. he also talks about wanting to lynch clarity.
at the end of the day here are the final votes
On July 27 2015 07:05 Half the Sky wrote:Night 1(edited for vote tracker) Final Day 1 Vote Count FirmTofu (6): raynpelikoneet, Onegu, KelsierSC, rsoultin, ObiWanShinobi, scott31337, GlowingBear, Palmar scott31337 (4): boxerfred, Hopeless1der, FirmTofu, GlowingBear, FirmTofu clarity_nl (1): rsoultin, Palmar, rsoultin, SnickersHopeless1der (1): raynpelikoneet, Clarity_nl, scott31337boxerfred (1): Snickers, Snickers KelsierSC (0): Snickers, GlowingBear, FirmTofuraynpelikoneet (0): Palmarrsoultin (0): Onegu, Snickerspalmar (0): FirmTofuAs the wind blows, FirmTofu is staring death in the face.
Day 1 ends in at 22:00 GMT (+00:00).
The voting thread is here. Only votes in the voting thread will be counted.
The live voting tracker is located here.
Please FORMAT YOUR VOTES CORRECTLY in the voting thread or the script will not pick your vote up!
before the final votes gb claims he pushed scott hard but in reality he defended firm tofu. Why?
because this is a list of the people he asked to not vote firm tofu and to go to scott.
Rayn, Palmar, kelsier
he also told rayn to vote clairty earlier and he told palmar to vote kelsier earlier. all over the place with who to lynch but not who to not lynch.
ALSO MORE IMPORTANTLY
he never asks me, clarity or rsoultin to switch are votes to scott. Why wouldnt he if he wanted scott to be lynched?
gb also claims kelsier can not be scum because firm tofu pushed him. but firmtofu also pushed scott.
i think this was a way to not seem like for it to be scummy to ask kelsier to switch to scott. cause why ask scum read from day one (who you posted a huge post on) to go to scott.
Like, really? Not like that is what I brought up earlier.
+ Show Spoiler +On July 28 2015 02:39 boxerfred wrote:I actually think we should go for someone who tried to stop the scum train: scott31337 (4): boxerfred, Hopeless1der, FirmTofu, GlowingBear, FirmTofu That would include me. So, regarding me: - I'm town. Har har, I can tell from my role PM. - I was the first on scott so technically, I didn't jump a train but instead stayed on who I chose to vote for. Hopeless1ider: Show nested quote +On July 25 2015 08:59 Hopeless1der wrote:
Anyone interested in contesting the claims or are we going to just ignore that? For reference, my thoughts are onegu good, rayn indifferent.
I also don't get how Palmar literally claiming Mafia is conducive to being "blunt and to the point" as town.
Or kenpachI ruling people. Someone teach me how to kenpachI rule.
This is really a concerning post. Like "interested in contesting" - the usage of this word implies that the claim is not legit. Also while it appears like a proactive thing, trying to raise interest, there is no follow up to it when such thoughts didn't get much grip. Reading his filter: He says something on palmar, then on scott (casts his vote on him), a bit on Onegut ("Null/town lean") and a bit of blabla ("can't read him") on Rayn. Lots of flailing, nothing that's really helpful for town, not in the slightest tbh. GlowingBear: Well he did a huge case on Kelsier D1, biggest argument being Show nested quote +4) HE IS VOTING TOFU INSTEAD OF SCOTT
HE IS FUCKING VOTING TOFU INSTEAD OF SCOTT. SCOTT WAS THE FIRST GUY TO ANNOY HIM (AND KELSIER WOULD LYNCH PEOPLE DOING THAT)! Why he doesn't prefer a scott lynch? Hell, a lot of people thinks he is mafia! Instead of going against the guy that certainly looked as mafia for him, he is going against questionmark!Tofu. More than that, he wasn't advocating for a lynch on Scott, but opened a range of possible lynches he would go against (tofu, scott, obi, clarity).
IT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE, PEOPLE! COME ON!!! Well. That'd be a bit of way-too-hardcore bussing wouldn't it? Although I think KSC actually is capable of doing it, he bussed and double bussed in Gaiden, too. However how likely is it to role scum twice in a row? Not too likely. I know this is not bullet proof but it's another indicator of KSC being town. However, his case doesn't get grip. But by that time, Tofu has 5 votes upon him and it becomes rather likely that he'd be the lynch! GB knows that, he already soft defends Tofu: Show nested quote +On July 27 2015 04:37 GlowingBear wrote:On July 27 2015 04:33 rsoultin wrote:
@ GB
1. he's used his posts to contribute and make reads - point is wrong
2. could be if the point is the very last sentence...but i interpreted it as him saying that (scott? i think it was?) shouldn't be shutting down my reads just because he thought ksc was "scummiest"
3. yeah, null read is null here still - point is wrong
4. you're still stuck on "annoyance" meaning that ksc thinks you're scum - point is wrong
the only point that holds any water here, gb, is the second, just as rayn said, and frankly i can still easily see it coming from town so it doesn't outweigh all the things that i think makes ksc town this game Well, I think point 2 is damning enough. I can get what you're saying about the others. But, as I stated, he repeatedly deflected pressure. It wasn't only on that post. He never answered my other pushes on him, he shut snickers down too. I think it's very damning I don't see the points on tofu. I do see the point on scott Show nested quote +On July 27 2015 05:00 GlowingBear wrote:
Rayn we have so much information to deal with tofu tomorrow. Scott and clarity are way better lynches Then, he joins the train: Show nested quote +On July 27 2015 05:15 GlowingBear wrote:
Nah actually I'm voting tofu
I just saw that he is clearly voting every other wagon other than him.
##vote: FirmTofu He does that, being the 6th vote. He brings up a totally NEW reason though, like as if he had to justify why he jumps the train on Tofu. However 20 minutes later, he again starts soft defending Tofu, indirectly: Show nested quote +On July 27 2015 05:35 GlowingBear wrote:
Palmar, lynch Scott
Or, if you want to do the correct thing, lynch keksier Show nested quote +On July 27 2015 05:39 GlowingBear wrote:
Town isn't bad, any of these options are okay lynches, I just think we have better targets other than tofu (I.e. Scummy lurkers)
The possibility of having a Mafia between one of those is high Also, note how he says "scummy lurkers" without any follow up though. Like, 0 follow up. Next up, scott: Show nested quote +On July 27 2015 05:51 GlowingBear wrote:On July 27 2015 05:49 scott31337 wrote:On July 27 2015 05:25 Snickers wrote:
unless you have a very very very very strong read as scott mafia get off of him and vote clarity.
unless you have a very strong read on tofu get off of him.
if you have a smidgen of thought that clairty could possibly be scum vote him. Tofu is waffling pretty badly right now and I get this mafia feeling to try to pull off of him - so I do have a pretty strong (or strongest) at this time on him. I must say I also think it could be possible Scott, who are the Mafia doing that? So the guy he wants to hang (of course along with KSC) says something about an obscure feeling and GB simply asks who scott is referring to? Well, GB (as quoted above!) actually says quite a lot of times that Tofu is not a good lynch. That clarity is better. Kelsier is better. Scott is better. How is he so sure? He then goes on with some words on mafia trying to get another train than tofu running. And BOOM, GB tries to get another train starting: Show nested quote +On July 27 2015 06:28 GlowingBear wrote:On July 27 2015 05:40 scott31337 wrote:On July 27 2015 04:44 KelsierSC wrote:
I thought scott was scummy, I posted a quote of his that was scummy.
Yes superb evidence, it really makes me look "terrible"
can we lynch tofu already. [red]Why do I get this feeling we are right on Tofu and mafia are trying to get us to swap? On July 27 2015 05:49 scott31337 wrote:On July 27 2015 05:25 Snickers wrote:
unless you have a very very very very strong read as scott mafia get off of him and vote clarity.
unless you have a very strong read on tofu get off of him.
if you have a smidgen of thought that clairty could possibly be scum vote him. [red]Tofu is waffling pretty badly right now and I get this mafia feeling to try to pull off of him - so I do have a pretty strong (or strongest) at this time on him. On July 27 2015 05:57 scott31337 wrote:On July 27 2015 05:51 GlowingBear wrote:On July 27 2015 05:49 scott31337 wrote:On July 27 2015 05:25 Snickers wrote:
unless you have a very very very very strong read as scott mafia get off of him and vote clarity.
unless you have a very strong read on tofu get off of him.
if you have a smidgen of thought that clairty could possibly be scum vote him. Tofu is waffling pretty badly right now and I get this mafia feeling to try to pull off of him - so I do have a pretty strong (or strongest) at this time on him. I must say I also think it could be possible Scott, who are the Mafia doing that? I do not know if you are mafia but you seem to be fighting his lynch pretty strongly (posted your case on Kelsier a couple hours ago when it looked like Tofu's getting the noose when maybe it would be better for day 2, asked rayn to vote me, asked palmar to vote me, etc.) On July 27 2015 06:14 scott31337 wrote:
I have just re-read Clarity's filter, never mind it's really bad - a vote on me and a comment on Hopeless's post (although Hopeless did a bit better) and nothing much else.
I could vote for him too. Thought process does not compute. You think Tofu is Mafia Then you say Mafia is trying to take people out of the tofu wagon. The alternate wagon is clarity. I suppose you may think Mafia could be there. But you call Mafia people that were in other wagons and does not consider people that moved to the clarity wagon. You even raise suspicions on me but you don't call me Mafia (?), what's the point then? Then you dive clarity and suddenly he is bad? What about Mafia protecting tofu by forming another wagon????? Your thought process makes no sense and it completely fits Mafia perspective GUYS VOTE SCOTT PLEASE Show nested quote +On July 27 2015 06:35 GlowingBear wrote:
I mean, if you THINK Mafia is trying to take votes off of Mafia!Tofu you MUST consider they are forming the alternate wagon INSTEAD of ignoring people forming the alternate wagon and placing votes somewhere else. There is no other option
EVEN if you believed in what you just said, it would make me completely Mafia, and not just something you would say "I don't know you're Mafia". Then other Mafia are boxerfred (?) and PROBABLY A VET? Why a vet, which vet, why not me.
Then you simply say you could lynch clarity, man. You just said Mafia was taking votes off of tofu.
You can't me town.
PEOPLE PLEASE, SCOTT CAN'T BE TOWN Show nested quote +On July 27 2015 06:45 GlowingBear wrote:On July 27 2015 06:42 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
Yeah we don't have the people to switch to scott.
Even then I still want to lynch FT.
Let's go with that. This is bullshit, we only need 3 more votes on scott Show nested quote +On July 27 2015 06:54 GlowingBear wrote:
God!!! It's so clear his thought process is fabricsted!!!!! Fucking vote him!!!!! So yeah. I'm pretty convinced that GB is scum.
|
On July 29 2015 14:02 Hopeless1der wrote:Show nested quote +On July 29 2015 13:47 ObiWanShinobi wrote:On July 29 2015 13:46 Hopeless1der wrote:
Snickers, keep whatever posts you want in a notepad file, i'll give you a couple posts tomorrow so you can avoid spamming the thread with your usual garbage. One concentrated dose that we can easily ignore would be just great though.
No pls. How the fuck is this productive in any way? Are you kidding me?
##vote: boxerfred+ Show Spoiler [reasoning] +I am certain that one of boxerfred/GB are mafia, if not both. I'm much more inclined to lynch boxerfred atm. On July 27 2015 07:05 Half the Sky wrote:Night 1(edited for vote tracker) Final Day 1 Vote Count FirmTofu (6): raynpelikoneet, Onegu, KelsierSC, rsoultin, ObiWanShinobi, scott31337, GlowingBear, Palmar scott31337 (4): boxerfred, Hopeless1der, FirmTofu, GlowingBear, FirmTofuclarity_nl (1): rsoultin, Palmar, rsoultin, SnickersHopeless1der (1): raynpelikoneet, Clarity_nl, scott31337boxerfred (1): Snickers, Snickers KelsierSC (0): Snickers, GlowingBear, FirmTofuraynpelikoneet (0): Palmarrsoultin (0): Onegu, Snickerspalmar (0): FirmTofu
This is very good reasoning, I'm almost inclined to vote myself now. Almost as good as Onegu's reason to vote me.
|
I missed the Hope wagon starting but I joined it.
|
On July 29 2015 17:06 boxerfred wrote:Show nested quote +On July 29 2015 14:02 Hopeless1der wrote:On July 29 2015 13:47 ObiWanShinobi wrote:On July 29 2015 13:46 Hopeless1der wrote:
Snickers, keep whatever posts you want in a notepad file, i'll give you a couple posts tomorrow so you can avoid spamming the thread with your usual garbage. One concentrated dose that we can easily ignore would be just great though.
No pls. How the fuck is this productive in any way? Are you kidding me?
##vote: boxerfred+ Show Spoiler [reasoning] +I am certain that one of boxerfred/GB are mafia, if not both. I'm much more inclined to lynch boxerfred atm. On July 27 2015 07:05 Half the Sky wrote:Night 1(edited for vote tracker) Final Day 1 Vote Count FirmTofu (6): raynpelikoneet, Onegu, KelsierSC, rsoultin, ObiWanShinobi, scott31337, GlowingBear, Palmar scott31337 (4): boxerfred, Hopeless1der, FirmTofu, GlowingBear, FirmTofuclarity_nl (1): rsoultin, Palmar, rsoultin, SnickersHopeless1der (1): raynpelikoneet, Clarity_nl, scott31337boxerfred (1): Snickers, Snickers KelsierSC (0): Snickers, GlowingBear, FirmTofuraynpelikoneet (0): Palmarrsoultin (0): Onegu, Snickerspalmar (0): FirmTofu This is very good reasoning, I'm almost inclined to vote myself now. Almost as good as Onegu's reason to vote me.
You are jumping on easy lynches for no reason. Get rekt
|
On July 29 2015 17:11 boxerfred wrote:
I missed the Hope wagon starting but I joined it.
Plz lynch this guy
|
## 7 posts to Snickers
<3 You have to use one to talk about how great and correct my claim was though
|
Oh mighty onegu,
It is true your Claim was good. Only a fool would not believe in it. At its face value and its extended play it is marvelous. It is a gift from God that keeps on giving. We (believes of the Claim or the Enlightened lowers) knew that clairity is the protective role so i had to "doubt" the claim in order to protect you. Please spare me. Your claim is what proves that clarity is the protective role. Us lower than you know halfthesky is only fair. A sharp contrast compared to the giving like of you. So us lowers know that there is only three blue roles. It is obvious the save was on Snickers from claritys (lol). He told the vigilante to "shoot" him because he knew there was no vigilante thanks to you and your great gift. Clairty has been playing well but only because your gift allowed him to.
Oh mighty Onegu forgive me for not respecting the gift that keeps on giving.
I realize you gave me seven posts because seven symbolizes many great things.
There are the Seven Heavens. Your Claim is indeed one of the seven heavens.
In addition there are seven wonders of the world. Australia was given the Claim from God Onegu in order to redeem it from being at once littered with prisoners.
Thank you mighty Onegu
|
On July 29 2015 13:30 rsoultin wrote:
35/80
lol >< there was once a coach. and this coach he says to me, rsoul, i've got something i like to call the gb read. and i said, hey, coach eden, what's the gb read? and he says to me, well rsoul my awesome pupil, the gb read is this thing where town bounces all over the place with his votes in response to new info. and to this day this is part of how i read the bear (and several other players, in truth)...it has yet to fail me
your case is not really a case, snickers
you weren't there to ask. clarity wasn't there to ask. i was already saying i didn't want to lynch scott
lol, gb, you've been glowingbeared ><
No it is a case. I was there. And you were there and you prefered to lynch scott over firm tofu.
And good job bringing ogi info into the game as scum. If you were really town you would realize the case is a lot more than switching his post. The main point of it is that he is defending scum and wants to "lynch" three people while only defending one. His actions show a huge defense of firm tofu instead of actively trying to lynch.
On July 29 2015 13:39 rsoultin wrote:
36/80
yeah you make no sense? what is townie about hammering town over scum, and what difference does it make if i vote before or after someone else in your little gb/rsoul scum world? i don't even -_- if anyone else wants to give him posts, feel free, but the last ones i gave him he wasted with lols and i don't feel inclined to give him any more just so he can spew more of this shit
its consolidation that is towny. Its so scum cant sway the vote at the end. It matters a lot i dont feel like looking into it because you or gb are probably getting lynched without. I just spent a few hours reading the game I am not going to look at every fucking detail.The bigger point is you would rather lynch scott than firm tofu.
On July 29 2015 13:44 ObiWanShinobi wrote:Show nested quote +On July 29 2015 13:14 Snickers wrote:
well im almost ouit of posts if someone wants to donate but i couldnt find one thing where gb said we need to lynch these four people and they are all in my town circle now also
WHOAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA LOOK AT THAT HE TOLD THE COP TO CHECK RSO IN THE NIGHT AFTER CLARITY AND HE ALSO MAGICALLY THOUGHT RSO WAS TOWN AFTER HER BIG POST OF SCUM. so rso godfather.
that is all my dear friends There are several people who did this. I don't understand how it equates rso with "godfather."
obi this is where you trust the person that is read as town. you trust the person who looked into onegu day one when you said so. you look at the interaction between rso and gb during the night. the posts between them feel off when i read them but maybe you could pick stuff out cause i am tired.
On July 29 2015 13:46 Hopeless1der wrote:
Snickers, keep whatever posts you want in a notepad file, i'll give you a couple posts tomorrow so you can avoid spamming the thread with your usual garbage. One concentrated dose that we can easily ignore would be just great though.
Thanks?
On July 29 2015 17:04 boxerfred wrote:Show nested quote +On July 29 2015 12:55 Snickers wrote:GLOW BEAR IS MAFA
gb is mafia because he hard defended firm tofu day one and did not push scott. if you asked gb he would say snickers is a fucking dumbass and he pushed scott but lets look at the details.
gb comes with an interesting time with his kelsier push. it could be seen as a time to start a kelsier wagon in order to protect firm tofu. but thats not too scummy.
as the day goes on gb votes fly everywhere from keslier to firm tofu to scott. he also talks about wanting to lynch clarity.
at the end of the day here are the final votes
On July 27 2015 07:05 Half the Sky wrote:Night 1(edited for vote tracker) Final Day 1 Vote Count FirmTofu (6): raynpelikoneet, Onegu, KelsierSC, rsoultin, ObiWanShinobi, scott31337, GlowingBear, Palmar scott31337 (4): boxerfred, Hopeless1der, FirmTofu, GlowingBear, FirmTofu clarity_nl (1): rsoultin, Palmar, rsoultin, SnickersHopeless1der (1): raynpelikoneet, Clarity_nl, scott31337boxerfred (1): Snickers, Snickers KelsierSC (0): Snickers, GlowingBear, FirmTofuraynpelikoneet (0): Palmarrsoultin (0): Onegu, Snickerspalmar (0): FirmTofuAs the wind blows, FirmTofu is staring death in the face.
Day 1 ends in at 22:00 GMT (+00:00).
The voting thread is here. Only votes in the voting thread will be counted.
The live voting tracker is located here.
Please FORMAT YOUR VOTES CORRECTLY in the voting thread or the script will not pick your vote up!
before the final votes gb claims he pushed scott hard but in reality he defended firm tofu. Why?
because this is a list of the people he asked to not vote firm tofu and to go to scott.
Rayn, Palmar, kelsier
he also told rayn to vote clairty earlier and he told palmar to vote kelsier earlier. all over the place with who to lynch but not who to not lynch.
ALSO MORE IMPORTANTLY
he never asks me, clarity or rsoultin to switch are votes to scott. Why wouldnt he if he wanted scott to be lynched?
gb also claims kelsier can not be scum because firm tofu pushed him. but firmtofu also pushed scott.
i think this was a way to not seem like for it to be scummy to ask kelsier to switch to scott. cause why ask scum read from day one (who you posted a huge post on) to go to scott. Like, really? Not like that is what I brought up earlier. + Show Spoiler +On July 28 2015 02:39 boxerfred wrote:I actually think we should go for someone who tried to stop the scum train: scott31337 (4): boxerfred, Hopeless1der, FirmTofu, GlowingBear, FirmTofu That would include me. So, regarding me: - I'm town. Har har, I can tell from my role PM. - I was the first on scott so technically, I didn't jump a train but instead stayed on who I chose to vote for. Hopeless1ider: Show nested quote +On July 25 2015 08:59 Hopeless1der wrote:
Anyone interested in contesting the claims or are we going to just ignore that? For reference, my thoughts are onegu good, rayn indifferent.
I also don't get how Palmar literally claiming Mafia is conducive to being "blunt and to the point" as town.
Or kenpachI ruling people. Someone teach me how to kenpachI rule.
This is really a concerning post. Like "interested in contesting" - the usage of this word implies that the claim is not legit. Also while it appears like a proactive thing, trying to raise interest, there is no follow up to it when such thoughts didn't get much grip. Reading his filter: He says something on palmar, then on scott (casts his vote on him), a bit on Onegut ("Null/town lean") and a bit of blabla ("can't read him") on Rayn. Lots of flailing, nothing that's really helpful for town, not in the slightest tbh. GlowingBear: Well he did a huge case on Kelsier D1, biggest argument being Show nested quote +4) HE IS VOTING TOFU INSTEAD OF SCOTT
HE IS FUCKING VOTING TOFU INSTEAD OF SCOTT. SCOTT WAS THE FIRST GUY TO ANNOY HIM (AND KELSIER WOULD LYNCH PEOPLE DOING THAT)! Why he doesn't prefer a scott lynch? Hell, a lot of people thinks he is mafia! Instead of going against the guy that certainly looked as mafia for him, he is going against questionmark!Tofu. More than that, he wasn't advocating for a lynch on Scott, but opened a range of possible lynches he would go against (tofu, scott, obi, clarity).
IT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE, PEOPLE! COME ON!!! Well. That'd be a bit of way-too-hardcore bussing wouldn't it? Although I think KSC actually is capable of doing it, he bussed and double bussed in Gaiden, too. However how likely is it to role scum twice in a row? Not too likely. I know this is not bullet proof but it's another indicator of KSC being town. However, his case doesn't get grip. But by that time, Tofu has 5 votes upon him and it becomes rather likely that he'd be the lynch! GB knows that, he already soft defends Tofu: Show nested quote +On July 27 2015 04:37 GlowingBear wrote:On July 27 2015 04:33 rsoultin wrote:
@ GB
1. he's used his posts to contribute and make reads - point is wrong
2. could be if the point is the very last sentence...but i interpreted it as him saying that (scott? i think it was?) shouldn't be shutting down my reads just because he thought ksc was "scummiest"
3. yeah, null read is null here still - point is wrong
4. you're still stuck on "annoyance" meaning that ksc thinks you're scum - point is wrong
the only point that holds any water here, gb, is the second, just as rayn said, and frankly i can still easily see it coming from town so it doesn't outweigh all the things that i think makes ksc town this game Well, I think point 2 is damning enough. I can get what you're saying about the others. But, as I stated, he repeatedly deflected pressure. It wasn't only on that post. He never answered my other pushes on him, he shut snickers down too. I think it's very damning I don't see the points on tofu. I do see the point on scott Show nested quote +On July 27 2015 05:00 GlowingBear wrote:
Rayn we have so much information to deal with tofu tomorrow. Scott and clarity are way better lynches Then, he joins the train: Show nested quote +On July 27 2015 05:15 GlowingBear wrote:
Nah actually I'm voting tofu
I just saw that he is clearly voting every other wagon other than him.
##vote: FirmTofu He does that, being the 6th vote. He brings up a totally NEW reason though, like as if he had to justify why he jumps the train on Tofu. However 20 minutes later, he again starts soft defending Tofu, indirectly: Show nested quote +On July 27 2015 05:35 GlowingBear wrote:
Palmar, lynch Scott
Or, if you want to do the correct thing, lynch keksier Show nested quote +On July 27 2015 05:39 GlowingBear wrote:
Town isn't bad, any of these options are okay lynches, I just think we have better targets other than tofu (I.e. Scummy lurkers)
The possibility of having a Mafia between one of those is high Also, note how he says "scummy lurkers" without any follow up though. Like, 0 follow up. Next up, scott: Show nested quote +On July 27 2015 05:51 GlowingBear wrote:On July 27 2015 05:49 scott31337 wrote:On July 27 2015 05:25 Snickers wrote:
unless you have a very very very very strong read as scott mafia get off of him and vote clarity.
unless you have a very strong read on tofu get off of him.
if you have a smidgen of thought that clairty could possibly be scum vote him. Tofu is waffling pretty badly right now and I get this mafia feeling to try to pull off of him - so I do have a pretty strong (or strongest) at this time on him. I must say I also think it could be possible Scott, who are the Mafia doing that? So the guy he wants to hang (of course along with KSC) says something about an obscure feeling and GB simply asks who scott is referring to? Well, GB (as quoted above!) actually says quite a lot of times that Tofu is not a good lynch. That clarity is better. Kelsier is better. Scott is better. How is he so sure? He then goes on with some words on mafia trying to get another train than tofu running. And BOOM, GB tries to get another train starting: Show nested quote +On July 27 2015 06:28 GlowingBear wrote:On July 27 2015 05:40 scott31337 wrote:On July 27 2015 04:44 KelsierSC wrote:
I thought scott was scummy, I posted a quote of his that was scummy.
Yes superb evidence, it really makes me look "terrible"
can we lynch tofu already. [red]Why do I get this feeling we are right on Tofu and mafia are trying to get us to swap? On July 27 2015 05:49 scott31337 wrote:On July 27 2015 05:25 Snickers wrote:
unless you have a very very very very strong read as scott mafia get off of him and vote clarity.
unless you have a very strong read on tofu get off of him.
if you have a smidgen of thought that clairty could possibly be scum vote him. [red]Tofu is waffling pretty badly right now and I get this mafia feeling to try to pull off of him - so I do have a pretty strong (or strongest) at this time on him. On July 27 2015 05:57 scott31337 wrote:On July 27 2015 05:51 GlowingBear wrote:On July 27 2015 05:49 scott31337 wrote:On July 27 2015 05:25 Snickers wrote:
unless you have a very very very very strong read as scott mafia get off of him and vote clarity.
unless you have a very strong read on tofu get off of him.
if you have a smidgen of thought that clairty could possibly be scum vote him. Tofu is waffling pretty badly right now and I get this mafia feeling to try to pull off of him - so I do have a pretty strong (or strongest) at this time on him. I must say I also think it could be possible Scott, who are the Mafia doing that? I do not know if you are mafia but you seem to be fighting his lynch pretty strongly (posted your case on Kelsier a couple hours ago when it looked like Tofu's getting the noose when maybe it would be better for day 2, asked rayn to vote me, asked palmar to vote me, etc.) On July 27 2015 06:14 scott31337 wrote:
I have just re-read Clarity's filter, never mind it's really bad - a vote on me and a comment on Hopeless's post (although Hopeless did a bit better) and nothing much else.
I could vote for him too. Thought process does not compute. You think Tofu is Mafia Then you say Mafia is trying to take people out of the tofu wagon. The alternate wagon is clarity. I suppose you may think Mafia could be there. But you call Mafia people that were in other wagons and does not consider people that moved to the clarity wagon. You even raise suspicions on me but you don't call me Mafia (?), what's the point then? Then you dive clarity and suddenly he is bad? What about Mafia protecting tofu by forming another wagon????? Your thought process makes no sense and it completely fits Mafia perspective GUYS VOTE SCOTT PLEASE Show nested quote +On July 27 2015 06:35 GlowingBear wrote:
I mean, if you THINK Mafia is trying to take votes off of Mafia!Tofu you MUST consider they are forming the alternate wagon INSTEAD of ignoring people forming the alternate wagon and placing votes somewhere else. There is no other option
EVEN if you believed in what you just said, it would make me completely Mafia, and not just something you would say "I don't know you're Mafia". Then other Mafia are boxerfred (?) and PROBABLY A VET? Why a vet, which vet, why not me.
Then you simply say you could lynch clarity, man. You just said Mafia was taking votes off of tofu.
You can't me town.
PEOPLE PLEASE, SCOTT CAN'T BE TOWN Show nested quote +On July 27 2015 06:45 GlowingBear wrote:On July 27 2015 06:42 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
Yeah we don't have the people to switch to scott.
Even then I still want to lynch FT.
Let's go with that. This is bullshit, we only need 3 more votes on scott Show nested quote +On July 27 2015 06:54 GlowingBear wrote:
God!!! It's so clear his thought process is fabricsted!!!!! Fucking vote him!!!!! So yeah. I'm pretty convinced that GB is scum.
this is hilarious. Post game someone with a lot of patience try to teach boxer something. He thinks a case about a person he made a case on is the same thing. lol
Anyway this game was fun
|
On July 29 2015 18:10 Snickers wrote:
Oh mighty onegu,
It is true your Claim was good. Only a fool would not believe in it. At its face value and its extended play it is marvelous. It is a gift from God that keeps on giving. We (believes of the Claim or the Enlightened lowers) knew that clairity is the protective role so i had to "doubt" the claim in order to protect you. Please spare me. Your claim is what proves that clarity is the protective role. Us lower than you know halfthesky is only fair. A sharp contrast compared to the giving like of you. So us lowers know that there is only three blue roles. It is obvious the save was on Snickers from claritys (lol). He told the vigilante to "shoot" him because he knew there was no vigilante thanks to you and your great gift. Clairty has been playing well but only because your gift allowed him to.
Oh mighty Onegu forgive me for not respecting the gift that keeps on giving.
I realize you gave me seven posts because seven symbolizes many great things.
There are the Seven Heavens. Your Claim is indeed one of the seven heavens.
In addition there are seven wonders of the world. Australia was given the Claim from God Onegu in order to redeem it from being at once littered with prisoners.
Thank you mighty Onegu
This is too long to be my sig... But it should be.
|
On July 29 2015 17:51 Onegu wrote:Show nested quote +On July 29 2015 17:06 boxerfred wrote:On July 29 2015 14:02 Hopeless1der wrote:On July 29 2015 13:47 ObiWanShinobi wrote:On July 29 2015 13:46 Hopeless1der wrote:
Snickers, keep whatever posts you want in a notepad file, i'll give you a couple posts tomorrow so you can avoid spamming the thread with your usual garbage. One concentrated dose that we can easily ignore would be just great though.
No pls. How the fuck is this productive in any way? Are you kidding me?
##vote: boxerfred+ Show Spoiler [reasoning] +I am certain that one of boxerfred/GB are mafia, if not both. I'm much more inclined to lynch boxerfred atm. On July 27 2015 07:05 Half the Sky wrote:Night 1(edited for vote tracker) Final Day 1 Vote Count FirmTofu (6): raynpelikoneet, Onegu, KelsierSC, rsoultin, ObiWanShinobi, scott31337, GlowingBear, Palmar scott31337 (4): boxerfred, Hopeless1der, FirmTofu, GlowingBear, FirmTofuclarity_nl (1): rsoultin, Palmar, rsoultin, SnickersHopeless1der (1): raynpelikoneet, Clarity_nl, scott31337boxerfred (1): Snickers, Snickers KelsierSC (0): Snickers, GlowingBear, FirmTofuraynpelikoneet (0): Palmarrsoultin (0): Onegu, Snickerspalmar (0): FirmTofu This is very good reasoning, I'm almost inclined to vote myself now. Almost as good as Onegu's reason to vote me. You are jumping on easy lynches for no reason. Get rekt
Hahahahahaha yeah EVERY SINGLE LYNCH THAT HAPPENED SO FAR WAS ME JUMPING ON EASY TRAINS
wow /ignore
|
wtf onegu like you ignore pretty much everything in the thread for the sake of your rsoultin thing. when that doesn't take off, you go for me. holy crap you're a shitty af town or a genius scum
|
|
|
also my fucking points on GB are valid bras but hey noone cares so why should i, got enough for this cycle already
##give 40 posts to whoever cares bye
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
