TL Mafia LXXI: Gaiden - Page 155

On July 07 2015 16:42 geript wrote:
I want to be clear. I think Vivax is a pretty terrible player. But this level of incompetence is really pretty stunning. Any vigi who doesn't shoot him is not clearly thinking through their shot.

On July 08 2015 08:32 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:

Geript do you still feel this way?

On July 08 2015 08:37 geript wrote:

He's not a bad shot at all. If you don't step up, I'd still rather you be shot on policy alone.

On July 08 2015 08:33 KelsierSC wrote:


you hav 1 minute to tell me why this q s relevant

On July 08 2015 07:52 rsoultin wrote:


do you even begin to realize how difficult it is for me to even bother finish reading this pile of shit when it's clear you didn't bother to actually READ our interaction?

go away, or actually fact check your own fucking claims

i've answered all your leading questions already

i've formed my judgment on truffle and until i actually see anything to indicate otherwise, you can bite me

i was right on gb. i was right on damdy. i was right on bugs. i was right on hf. i was right on you. and i was right on wave and oats. but instead of CONSIDERING after seeing my play last game and losing the game while ignoring my advice in your newbie, that i might actually have a good fucking toneread on truffle you try to paint it as me denying information?

lol ><

On July 08 2015 08:50 ruXxar wrote:


I read your interaction just fine.
Let me recap my view of it, just so you can correct me if I'm missing something.

1st interaction: Starts here
Recap:
HF: "Trfel you are playing like burnt out mafia"
RS: "I don't think he is, but I'll find out soon for sure"
HF: "I don't need your opinion RS"
RS: "Trfel is town, your reads are wrong!".
HF: "I don't need you go away".
Mod: Interrupts.

2nd interaction: Starts here
Recap:
HF: "I wanted to force Trfel to present his argument in a logical manner"
RS: "HF is misrepresenting me and being a dick, I don't mind if you question Trfel"
HF: (Posts quotes where you disrupted him from questioning)
RS: "You were trying to shit on me!"
HF: "I don't deny being a dick, but I was trying to pressure trfel to gain information"
RS: "Stop questioning him so early! Let's talk about something else"
(topic changed)

3rd interaction: Starts here
Recap:
HF: "Trfel there's an inconsistency in your read on LS, explain why".
RS: "HF, you can't read!"
RS: "I want to let trfel answer for himself, but you guys are too stupid!"
HF: "How is that not reading?"
RS: "Trfel already explained it!"
HF: "Explained it how?"
RS: "HTS saw the questioning, why don't you get it?"
HF: "How does that explain him changing his stance?"
RS: "You are stupid HF!"
(Shitfight ensues, questioning derailed)

It's all pretty obvious disruption from my point of view.
Once again you're derailing.

I'm not going away anytime soon.

On July 08 2015 09:08 KelsierSC wrote:
mae did you died

On July 08 2015 09:11 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:

Are you referring to me?

I'm here, currently on page 112 which means if my memory serves I should be getting close to where I first posted.

On July 08 2015 08:33 KelsierSC wrote:


you hav 1 minute to tell me why this q s relevant

On July 08 2015 09:16 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:

This question?

Because I came across Geript's statement as I was reading and wanted to see if he still felt that way since I myself have been struggling with Vivax's alignment (spoiler: I now think he's scum).

On July 08 2015 09:18 KelsierSC wrote:


alrightt why?

On July 08 2015 09:22 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:

Why what?
Why did I want to see if Geript still thought that?
Why was I struggling with Vivax's alignment
Why do I now think he's scum?

If you're gonna try and question someone at least make the questions direct and with a purpose.

On July 08 2015 09:23 KelsierSC wrote:


the 4th one

On July 07 2015 03:03 Vivax wrote:
All this shit about Trfel is so distracting. All that's being discussed is Trfel and HF claimed the spotlight for himself.

Can we talk about geript? Or Damdred. I actually didn't like the way Damdred tried to bait LS into saying something damning earlier and then turned it into a scumread. It's not bad per se as it's a legit town strategy but my feels tingled with malicious intentions given that I don't get a scummy feeling from LS.

On July 08 2015 03:07 Vivax wrote:
I decided that Trfel can die too, so if HF wants a lynch on him he can have my vote.

I saw no elaboration on his scott scumread and the talk about LS looks like he just needed that read to have something to talk about. His HF suspicion fell into the water as well.

Instead what we get are a bunch of apologetic posts and empty promises.

On July 08 2015 05:06 Vivax wrote:
This game is insane, at the start of the day with plenty of room to do things, some people go nuts about Trfel. When at the end of the day it turns out he didn't deliver jack for real, they start lynching into cop claims.

On July 08 2015 09:36 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:

I think geript is town and trfel is scum. Vivax chainsaws trfl by attacking geript but then when the heat is off of trfl vivax decides now it's ok for trfl to die in one single cop out post.



chainsaw



about face

Honestl vivax just can't keep his story straight, I could right a longer analysis but I have a bigger fish to fry that I'll spend y time on but I'll leave you with this:



If you remember, vivax himself was one of those people going nuts about trfl but now he's trying to set himself up for an "I told you so" moment after trfl doesn't deliver.