Mafia in the Himalayas - Page 133

On June 20 2015 08:35 Onegu wrote:
Really you found him calm and collected? I call BS, he threatend to replace out... And claimed blue role when he was getting pressured

On June 19 2015 08:46 LightningStrike wrote:

I am VT this game and I unclaimed because everyone questioned my claim I didn't really expect to much on and decided enough was enough. I prob just replace out because I just can't play this game as last Friday a friend of mine from High School died in a Car Accident and I only found out after I signed up. I thought that I can play but then with the shit happening this game I can't play it anymore and will commit Sudoku.

On June 20 2015 08:19 ruXxar wrote:
Some controversy seems to be surround LS.
I also got suspicious of him wanting people to read his his thoughts on another website.

Here's my analysis of him:

-----------------------------------
Pro town:

Active.
Carefree.

Composes an early reads list
Reads on gwb and rsoultin with reasons
Goes through the effort of reading filters from another game.
Makes some Observations on GB
Puts together a solid reads list

-----------------------------------
Pro mafia:

Votes shockey without reason
Sheeps GWB and votes for GB
-----------------------------------

Conclusion :

Long filter, a lot of it is fluff.

Active.
Not timid or afraid to express himself.
Calm and collected, does not seem to be pushing any agenda.
Has some okay reads, but not as many as I'd like to see compared to his filter length.

I get a town vibe off LS.

town lean

On June 20 2015 08:32 Damdred wrote:
Idk why me being alive d3 is indicative as I survive late a lot anyway

On June 20 2015 08:41 Onegu wrote:
Also his VA post is BS also. VA list with me in it was a joke post. His reasons for voting yamato were BM replacing out.

On June 18 2015 09:28 Fidei86 wrote:
@Mig - I have looked over the filters of the two most likely lynch candidates, since that seemed as good a place as any to start trying to break things down.

BF - He has been totally lost in a discussion about meta, whether people can change their meta and whether people have changed their meta. He's had some odd use of language (saying "musclin'", for example) which shows a level of attention to how something sounds that is scummy to me. His vote on HF was based on a single post from rsoult, and was justified by "I don't like that". He has also checked into the thread a couple of times to say he would be on later, but then hasn't delivered. His writing is quite dense and WOTy, even when he writes short things.

Slight scum read - I would be okay with lynching him D1.

ShoCkeyy - His intial read on Onegu is just weird. Claiming VT early says very little about your alignment. If asked, everyone would claim it. It's also the easiest thing in the world to change up. His list post was just odd - it contained no reasoning whatsoever, and was mostly just full of jokes. He also had RL excuses for why he couldn't be around, but then continued to post anyway. He then later says that he's not making up reads, even though he hasn't really given any yet. His reasoning about his activity resonates with me though - he essentially says that you can't measure alignment based upon activity alone. I'm getting a town-y vibe from the way he has responded to criticism.

Slight town read.

On June 20 2015 09:01 GlowingBear wrote:
I've finished reading Fidei's filter and I hate every single part of it.

I don't see someone trying to catch scum, I see a guy faking contribution. His strongest scumread was on VA, but he never actually tried to get VA lynched.

He scumread boxer for a very bad reason and kept his vote on him instead of voting VA? It is not making sense to me.

His constant need to tell thread should brake the post frenesi and agreeing with a lynch all lurkers policy (which isn't exactly what I was saying, but whatever) gives me the same "I am contributing, guys!" impression.

On June 20 2015 08:50 ritoky wrote:
You didn't say you were ignoring him fake claiming a blue role under very light pressure and then unclaiming it. So that didn't stand out to you as relevant? That also doesn't seem "calm or collected"....Voting shockeyy without reason? He was LS's primary scum read for the majority of the day, then when shockeyy actually started to accrue votes he refused to vote on him and flipped his read over a post I read as scummy. Also, non-specific list posts aren't town indicative of anyone....this is....he is new....could this just be bad play?

On June 20 2015 09:15 ruXxar wrote:


Read from the LS' filter a lot of information is lost when posts are standalone without quotes encapsulating the context.

Also the calm and collected comment was in relation to the other filters I've read so far, particularly GB's.
GB's filter is like opening the hose on raw emotion, compared to LS' more shielded and emotionally controlled filter.

I didnt notice the blue claim before onegu mentioned it, I'll have to go back and read the situation in context to get a better understanding.

On June 20 2015 08:32 Damdred wrote:
Idk why me being alive d3 is indicative as I survive late a lot anyway

On June 20 2015 09:08 Damdred wrote:
Here's the deal I won't ever lynch fid or rs. I really don't want to say why necessarily but it's there.

And Ritoky I have had no internet and behind like 60 pages I'll do stuff but I'd rather interact while I can as well

On June 20 2015 09:58 VayneAuthority wrote:
nightkill means pussies are playing mafia, pretty useful to know

On June 20 2015 11:50 rsoultin wrote:

Pretend i'm an idiot and spell this out for me? Pussies?

On June 20 2015 09:58 VayneAuthority wrote:
nightkill means pussies are playing mafia, pretty useful to know

On June 20 2015 09:59 VayneAuthority wrote:
kinda reinforces the fact that GB is probably scum, he talks a lot in QT and has weird commitment issues on nightkills and actions. likes to second guess. A clear protection dodge on the nightkill.