[M][N]Holy Guardians Chapter 1

On June 03 2015 08:09 milo109 wrote:
Now that I have a second to evaluate the game without immediate fear of being lynched...

I don't think that Chocolate is necessarily mafia for his one post. It's possible he had to go, and he was basing his read on Tiktok off of two posts. It seems a fine opener. Not sure if I like VE attempting to turn attention to someone unable to defend himself.

Nydus is my white knight, and I'm sure that will skew my opinion of him but he seems town just from the irreverent way he gave his reads.

I still don't like Kickstarter. I didn't like the tone of his accusation, and the way he quickly attempted to insure he wasn't thought of 'bandwagoning on me' as if he knew I would flip town.

On June 03 2015 07:33 NydusHerMain wrote:
Okay so I was formatting and pressed the wrong button.... to save myself the embarassment... I'm just going to barebone the rest -_- ....

Even though I said I didn't like Kickstarter, I also, funny enough, don't like Ritoky. His playstyle is just something I'm willing to vote on irrelevant of alignment. If we lynch him and he flips mafia, I'll gladly take the credit. If he flips town, I gladly take the blame.

I have a town read on Milo, I liked his reaction to Damdred and I liked that he was pressuring Ritoky (or at least attempting to). I don't see what's scummy about him to Kickstarter. Everything he says seems genuine to me.

Also, I'm kind of glad I pressed post by accident because I'm not a very frequent poster (I usually just post big WoTs or at least plan to) and I was scared I wouldn't meet the 10 posts per 72 hours rule. Phew.... See you guys again in 9 hours since I just need to make 1 post per 9 hours to meet the quota for this cycle. PEACE

On June 03 2015 06:05 sicklucker wrote:
##Vote Tictock I feel morally ok policy voting in non newbie games untill he proves hes town

On June 03 2015 06:17 Tictock wrote:
In regards to kicks question.

I am pretty new to TL forums. Have played in 2 of the newbie games (the 2 most recent ones, including the ongoing one).

I see a few familiar names, but most of you I don't know... and am HIGHLY suspicious of...

And of course I know SL, who I may have to ignore. I apologize in advance if I start tunneling him, I have a tendency to do that.

On June 04 2015 05:25 Damdred wrote:
So basically almost 24 hours in game you only have a strong opinion that 2 people are town one lean and the rest is null. Meh that post just irks me, it says a lot without actually doing much bah.

On June 04 2015 06:56 Damdred wrote:


I think most people in this game who've played with me will attest that I don't generally omgus. And this isn't at this point.

However your posts fit very much into the vein of Lots of Words with little content.

Like your big post that irkd me, a simple question was asked to you yet you turned it into a wall of text without any real explanation on why certain people are town. Instead you threw scum on certain people and then said "if they dont' do x before Y". That's not real content nor is that actual reads if you think something is scummy its scummy, not this half whishy washy things that permeate your posts at points.

On June 04 2015 05:14 Kickstart wrote:


Well me OMGUSing everything is a stretch. I went on milo and sl before they even mentioned me, and my read on GGT is the same with or without him directing anything at me. I am generally of the opinion that town reads aren't of much use D1, but I was pressured to name some earlier and I named yourself and VE, for basically the same reasons. I felt that you were both applying pressure when needed, you were both driving discussion, and both were being open and honest with your thoughts - all of which I think is helpful and thus I feel that you have been helpful for town up to this point. Does that mean I think you are both 100% town? No, but I feel confident in saying that I would not vote on either of you this cycle. To be honest the only other person I feel is slightly town atm is Nydus, but definitely not on the same level as you two. I have real issues with almost everyone else who I havent mentioned because I just feel their posts are void of strong feelings and I don't like that style of play. Namely I feel like Damdred, scott, Onegu, and Fideu (just off the top of my head) are not giving us anything to work with, their posts are void of reads and strong opinions, and while Damdred has asked a lot of questions and put a bit of pressure on at times, he is still guilty of not giving us his thoughts (though he said this is how he plays and that he will wait to make a stronger case when he is ready - which I intend to hold him too, if Day 1 ends and he is still guilty of what I outlined above I will have some real questions about him because he has been active enough and seems experiences and good enough to give some solid reads but has yet to do so). I think scott and fideu are new so I can understand the reluctance to stick their necks out on anything but I don't feel that is a real excuse, they still need to share their thoughts on things. Onegu seems to have arrived late on the scene but already his posting style is suspicious to me, much too much joking around; while this is normal and understandable at the start of the game, I feel like there is plenty of content to actually address, which he has not done. Can anyone tell me if this is normal posting from Onegu?

On June 05 2015 03:53 Damdred wrote:
Can we lynch ks for voting GG dissapearing and not caring leading up to voe and having no real reads of his own. The nylis read he discarded under pressure and honestly besides shit fighting with me which he called omgus he has 0 follow up at this point or seemed to care that the people he wanted to give reads have given reads or not instead pushing a thread sentiment wagon onto GG

On June 04 2015 16:31 Kickstart wrote:


milo and SL, did mention my issues with chocolate before and it seems he is getting a lot of heat atm, will see that happens there.

My "willing to lynch" list is going to be quite long, not sure if that is good or bad D:.

GGT, milo, SL, chocolate, and possibly damdred but it all depends on what he posts before the end of the day. That is probably the order I would choose as well, SL and chocolate kind of the same in the order though, SL for the reasons I stated earlier and for now just afking and chocolate because I had already been suspicious of him and it seems that the two people I think are town (ritocky and VE) are both going on him.

On June 05 2015 04:22 Kickstart wrote:
and I agree that while SL does seem off, there should be enough information to work with to go for someone else at the moment.

On June 05 2015 04:48 Damdred wrote:
Case on kick start:

Posts are quite large but lack a lot of content that the length of posts shoud curtail.

Hounds people for reads but when confronted for his own reads he gives only smoke scum read that is rehashed fom others in the thread, sl scum read at this point is an afterthought and feels contrived.

When asks about a town read gives a weak list post, and when confronted on another read that doesn't make sense he backs off of it completely.

Shit fights me with for calling his posts out. Instead of concluding I'm scum from such things he concludes I just don't like him.

Talks to me like I'm town and just tunneled on him instead of one of his top scum reads.

Has sheeped thread sentiment almost at every turn.

condensed feelings

On June 07 2015 03:01 Damdred wrote:
Anyway i'm mostly caught up.

Firstly I don't think the oneg/Chezinu rule applies to me here. Firstly I wasn't the first person to put scum on oneg or to vote oneg I believe. (the chez rule is a fine rule XD) Secondly I have/had a decent reason to vote on oneg at that moment in time. He had a scum read on me, then pushed someone else next phase without a mention of me.

VE is obvious town here, his case on GG isn't horrible its decent to sheep. I'm still not sure that it makes GG mafia personally I think that Nyus is more mafia than GG at this point. But VE seems so sure i'm just willing to trust him here.

On June 08 2015 08:41 Damdred wrote:
You said that there were at least two scum on Templars right?

On June 14 2015 06:16 Damdred wrote:
Well there is one other theory.

Scott could be scum still or technically ve. And could of,been waiting,last minute Tom switch to,me or Scott but oneg ruined it by consolidating.

I think 've is super unlikely though