|
On June 03 2015 07:33 NydusHerMain wrote:
Okay so I was formatting and pressed the wrong button.... to save myself the embarassment... I'm just going to barebone the rest -_- ....
Even though I said I didn't like Kickstarter, I also, funny enough, don't like Ritoky. His playstyle is just something I'm willing to vote on irrelevant of alignment. If we lynch him and he flips mafia, I'll gladly take the credit. If he flips town, I gladly take the blame.
I have a town read on Milo, I liked his reaction to Damdred and I liked that he was pressuring Ritoky (or at least attempting to). I don't see what's scummy about him to Kickstarter. Everything he says seems genuine to me.
Also, I'm kind of glad I pressed post by accident because I'm not a very frequent poster (I usually just post big WoTs or at least plan to) and I was scared I wouldn't meet the 10 posts per 72 hours rule. Phew.... See you guys again in 9 hours since I just need to make 1 post per 9 hours to meet the quota for this cycle. PEACE
I think this post is very towny and confident.
|
Hmmmm...I DID get that timeline wrong. I'm not sure why that happened, I think maybe I got the sense that milo was typing his response to me WHILE Chocolate posted and maybe I took that and ran with it. Meh.
Meh. I still loathe the way milo reacted to my voting for him, but I guess it's possible he was just too incensed by my posting to realize I'd made a pretty fundamental mistake and we both missed it.
Ehhhhhh...I can unvote for now. Good start boys, I'll see you tomorrow!
|
On June 03 2015 13:04 GGTeMpLaR wrote:Show nested quote +On June 03 2015 07:33 NydusHerMain wrote:
Okay so I was formatting and pressed the wrong button.... to save myself the embarassment... I'm just going to barebone the rest -_- ....
Even though I said I didn't like Kickstarter, I also, funny enough, don't like Ritoky. His playstyle is just something I'm willing to vote on irrelevant of alignment. If we lynch him and he flips mafia, I'll gladly take the credit. If he flips town, I gladly take the blame.
I have a town read on Milo, I liked his reaction to Damdred and I liked that he was pressuring Ritoky (or at least attempting to). I don't see what's scummy about him to Kickstarter. Everything he says seems genuine to me.
Also, I'm kind of glad I pressed post by accident because I'm not a very frequent poster (I usually just post big WoTs or at least plan to) and I was scared I wouldn't meet the 10 posts per 72 hours rule. Phew.... See you guys again in 9 hours since I just need to make 1 post per 9 hours to meet the quota for this cycle. PEACE I think this post is very towny and confident.
Why?
On June 03 2015 09:50 GGTeMpLaR wrote:Show nested quote +On June 03 2015 06:05 sicklucker wrote:
##Vote Tictock I feel morally ok policy voting in non newbie games untill he proves hes town My gut tells me the specific diction you chose with regards to being 'morally' okay with it inclines me to believe you are townie. Show nested quote +On June 03 2015 06:17 Tictock wrote:
In regards to kicks question.
I am pretty new to TL forums. Have played in 2 of the newbie games (the 2 most recent ones, including the ongoing one).
I see a few familiar names, but most of you I don't know... and am HIGHLY suspicious of...
And of course I know SL, who I may have to ignore. I apologize in advance if I start tunneling him, I have a tendency to do that. I think your intentional emphasis on the fact that you are 'HIGHLY' suspicious of people is scum-indicative. You are making sure we all know you are 'suspicious' of people, aka have imperfect information aka are town. A very roundabout and subtle way to go about telling people you are town. I think this is an excellent policy vote. ##Vote Tictock
Whats the point of this? You don't really seem to do anything with this or push your policy lynch. Why is it even a policy vote when you seem to feel like he has done something scummy? After you post this theres one more post that is closely behind but you don't interact with ticktock nor do you push the idea instead you mark other posts and don't really explain anything?
Your posts lack any form of concrete reasoning or thought and lack real thought process it seems. I don't think I like them
|
Was just checking in before bed, game has been somewhat dead past few hours, so I'll just leave a few of my thoughts.
GG is my top scum right now. No questions. Was expecting him to at least react to my response or something...
I'm unsure of Damdred, though he's earning town points in my book for reacting the same way I did to GG.
I'd really like to hear from Onegu and def need to see more out of Scott. I hate to say it but scott could be scum atm. I've seen him lynched D1 twice now, when he was town he was active until he got tunneled and when he was scum he posted very much like he's doing this game. Quick little reads and short response posts. Also half his posts atm are just stating facts, nothing game relevant.
Milo does look kinda scummy but I'm not sure yet, I'd like to see more out of him. Right now I cant tell if he is actually scum or if he just looks out of place because he isn't used to this style of mafia. His frustration over being insta-scummed by several people is understandable, especially being new here.
|
Hey guys I'm back online.
I have to admit, I'm a little blown away by how much back and forth there was. I guess there's no other way to do forum mafia, but still, it's tough. I sort of feel like I should print out all of your names on a big A3 page and then draw lines between each of you representing defences and accusations. In fact, if anyone has the time to do that, I think it would be helpful (especially later in the game, when nobody can be bothered to go through a bazillion pages of text).
My only reads, and I admit they are very weak, are on Kickstarter and Viscera. I thought that both have taken a somewhat 'holier-than-thou' tone in their posts. Kickstarter started off with a very lecture-y post which felt to me like an attempt to stake out his town credentials before the mud began to fly. Then again, maybe that's just how he is as town, I dunno. Viscera has similarly been very confident in his/her posts, which is suspicious to me because I'm just not sure about anything at this point.
|
I should also say that I'm not totally convinced about milo still, I'm just giving my 'new' thoughts above.
|
I don't think being firm in your points is suspicious at all, it leaves no room for people to not know where you stand, which in my opinion is always a good thing. People may not like when I target them, but everyone is always sure of what I think and who I am suspicious of, which again, I don't see how that can be a bad thing.
It seems everyone is asleep/away anyways as there has been hardly any posts for several hours while I been dotaing, so I'm going to go to sleep and be back on tomorrow. Will probably be awhile before I am back on as I got to do things tomorrow. I might be able to quickly read through things and post a few things but won't be able to be as active as I was earlier until later in the day (probably a few hours before what our start time was or so). See everyone later and hope I have a lot to read when I get back!
|
On June 03 2015 08:16 Fidei86 wrote:Show nested quote +On June 03 2015 07:18 milo109 wrote:
I'm not exactly sure how to defend myself here. I decided to vote because I didn't like ritoky's play style. I made it clear that it was not for reasons of reads. I cannot justify my vote in terms of reads, as I've already said. If you lynch me for that, it's fine. Actual reads so far that I can justify:
I don't like the use of the word 'Unfortunately' in Kickstart's accusation of me. It seems to be an attempt to come from the point of view of a paternal town, who only sadly pronounces judgement. It's possible that he actually feels that way, but it feels scummy to me.
I'll read Damdred town for now just based off his questioning of me. He caught my mistake of logic, while Ritoky and Kickstart both seem to just dislike my vote.
Ritoky is still null for me. Still don't like the playstyle. Still keeping my vote.
No idea on the others.
Hi all I've read through the thread just now. I only have one thought immediately off the bat, which is that I find it suspicious that milo comes out with the "if you lynch me for XXX, that's fine". The only thing that regular townies know is that we are not mafia, and that means that the one thing we cannot do is let ourselves be lynched without giving everything first. It's possible milo just felt a bit band-wagoned, but I thought I'd point that out. @milo - I'd like to hear your reasoning for why you said that.
I also find your suspicion of milo to be very townie. I disagree with the read, but respect where it is coming from and think you are town for it.
|
I suspect I'm going to spend a lot of this game with people saying "I don't agree at all with what you've said, but you're clearly misguided town" :-\
|
On June 03 2015 14:39 VisceraEyes wrote:
Hmmmm...I DID get that timeline wrong. I'm not sure why that happened, I think maybe I got the sense that milo was typing his response to me WHILE Chocolate posted and maybe I took that and ran with it.
You're right. I did start typing the post before Chocolate posted, which is why I didn't bring it up.
|
Templars totally ignores my post to tell someone who said nothing really ij their post that they are town.
|
In fairness, I am actually town...
|
Although you're right, by my count over half his posts so far have been to tell people that they are town. Which is weird. I don't know if that's a usual mafia play, or just an over-eager town?
|
I think it's scummy. What good is it to say "X player seems town"? There's no risk at all in that situation. Overeager lynching is bad for town but playing it safe is even worse. For town to win action must be taken on imperfect information
|
Ok...but what in that post was so towny that it deserved a town read?
|
|
|
On June 03 2015 23:17 Chocolate wrote:
I think it's scummy. What good is it to say "X player seems town"? There's no risk at all in that situation. Overeager lynching is bad for town but playing it safe is even worse. For town to win action must be taken on imperfect information
and who exactly should we lynch today chocolate
|
Scott
VE
Onegu
GG
I would pick Scott as my #1
|
|
|
General inactivity
His only contribution of note was to call a very active player town which seems way too conservative
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
