|
On March 28 2015 17:30 Holyflare wrote: He said it since that post and as you're going through the game it's compounded onto my weird feelings about you because you mention posts that aren't weird instead (crossfire)
...
i challenge you to read his filter and return with that same assessment
|
He did *kinda* say it if you take it that way.
On March 28 2015 08:02 Snarfs wrote:+ Show Spoiler +Snarfs' Recommended General Strategy
First, two general tips:
1. Lots of players = lots of confusion. Spam posts should be kept to a minimum as it will be VERY difficult to wade through all the distractions to determine alignment. 2. Role speculation on day 1 is spam. There is no point in trying to guess setup at this point, or talking about how wonderful the flavour text is. It is a distraction from finding mafia/3p.
Now, onto day 1 strategy:
Adventuring Party I believe our Adventuring Party should follow strict guidelines as to how they act. Everyone should either express their agreement or disagreement with these guidelines as soon as possible so that we can keep track of people's stances before they get voted in. Please let me know if you disagree, and why.
Warrior - Our warrior should be someone who agrees to nominate a lynch based on a plurality vote. He/she should agree that it is important to get lots of opinions on the candidate before deciding on who to vote and SHOULD NOT be someone who will just pick their gut target. ...snip... We need information from the day 1 lynch more than we need to hit mafia/3p. ...snip... + Show Spoiler + We need to know why people are for/against a certain lynch. A cowboy warrior will not give us that information.
Rogue - Our rogue should be someone who agrees NOT to no lynch. There is one circumstance I see a no lynch being acceptable on day 1, and that is only if the warrior goes rogue and chooses a target of their preference without listening to town. The rogue should agree to this as the ONLY circumstance for no lynch. Not based on their own 'gut' feelings.
I was trying to think of a way we can focus votes so that we guarantee we don't get a last minute swap of rogue/cleric. I think the only way this is possible is if we can find two candidates who agree to both of the above criteria and try to split our votes evenly to boost those two players.
Normally, this is where I'd nominate myself, but I can guarantee I will NOT be online for the first deadline.
Discuss!
|
On March 28 2015 17:38 Keirathi wrote:He did *kinda* say it if you take it that way. Show nested quote +On March 28 2015 08:02 Snarfs wrote:+ Show Spoiler +Snarfs' Recommended General Strategy
First, two general tips:
1. Lots of players = lots of confusion. Spam posts should be kept to a minimum as it will be VERY difficult to wade through all the distractions to determine alignment. 2. Role speculation on day 1 is spam. There is no point in trying to guess setup at this point, or talking about how wonderful the flavour text is. It is a distraction from finding mafia/3p.
Now, onto day 1 strategy:
Adventuring Party I believe our Adventuring Party should follow strict guidelines as to how they act. Everyone should either express their agreement or disagreement with these guidelines as soon as possible so that we can keep track of people's stances before they get voted in. Please let me know if you disagree, and why.
Warrior - Our warrior should be someone who agrees to nominate a lynch based on a plurality vote. He/she should agree that it is important to get lots of opinions on the candidate before deciding on who to vote and SHOULD NOT be someone who will just pick their gut target. ...snip... We need information from the day 1 lynch more than we need to hit mafia/3p. ...snip... + Show Spoiler + We need to know why people are for/against a certain lynch. A cowboy warrior will not give us that information.
Rogue - Our rogue should be someone who agrees NOT to no lynch. There is one circumstance I see a no lynch being acceptable on day 1, and that is only if the warrior goes rogue and chooses a target of their preference without listening to town. The rogue should agree to this as the ONLY circumstance for no lynch. Not based on their own 'gut' feelings.
I was trying to think of a way we can focus votes so that we guarantee we don't get a last minute swap of rogue/cleric. I think the only way this is possible is if we can find two candidates who agree to both of the above criteria and try to split our votes evenly to boost those two players.
Normally, this is where I'd nominate myself, but I can guarantee I will NOT be online for the first deadline.
Discuss!
that's fair? but i don't think it actually implies that there should be no scumhunting o.0 not unless you deliberately mean to infer it that way (i realize that's what you're saying with the "kinda", just lol talk about reading into a sentence if that's really where people are getting this scumhunting is secondary thing from)
cooooome oooooon holyflare you will disappoint me greatly if you can't see what bugs me about crossfire :/
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
His filter is crap but that doesn't say anything at all yet.
Also it was the other s guy that talked about not needing to find mafia and batsnacks pointed it out. Love you long time batsnacks.
|
There's not anything strange about that Crossfire post. It's a very....Crossfire type of post.
|
On March 28 2015 17:44 Holyflare wrote: His filter is crap but that doesn't say anything at all yet.
Also it was the other s guy that talked about not needing to find mafia and batsnacks pointed it out. Love you long time batsnacks.
it is
so excite! and not playing lol
approached the sl claim like he was town? very preachy
nothing at all that looks like he's making reads
you try to say i'm saying boring things xP and yet and yet and yet you don't notice this one?
bad holyflare :/ shame on thee!
are you scum this game? lol >< that would be sad
|
On March 28 2015 17:44 Keirathi wrote: There's not anything strange about that Crossfire post. It's a very....Crossfire type of post.
i was referring to crossfire in general, but explain? i haven't played with him
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
That's a stretch but can also be explained by sl referring to himself as a town vet and qqing about how town he is So I'm not jumping to your conclusion yet.
|
On March 28 2015 17:50 Holyflare wrote: That's a stretch but can also be explained by sl referring to himself as a town vet and qqing about how town he is So I'm not jumping to your conclusion yet.
what conclusion am i jumping to? xP
you're failing to notice the lack of anything productive in his filter while he instructs sicklucker how to play ^^ or failing to comment on it. one or the other
everyone was failing to comment on it
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On March 28 2015 17:46 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On March 28 2015 17:44 Holyflare wrote: His filter is crap but that doesn't say anything at all yet.
Also it was the other s guy that talked about not needing to find mafia and batsnacks pointed it out. Love you long time batsnacks. it is so excite! and not playing lol approached the sl claim like he was town? very preachy
nothing at all that looks like he's making readsyou try to say i'm saying boring things xP and yet and yet and yet you don't notice this one? bad holyflare :/ shame on thee! are you scum this game? lol >< that would be sad
If you say anything other than this being a conclusion that he's mafia then you're a liar
|
On March 28 2015 17:47 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On March 28 2015 17:44 Keirathi wrote: There's not anything strange about that Crossfire post. It's a very....Crossfire type of post. i was referring to crossfire in general, but explain? i haven't played with him It's been a while (and it's 4am so I'm way too lazy to actually go look up quotes), but my memory says that Crossfire is a very careful kind of poster. A lot of things he says don't really "feel" natural. Being coach-y, weird plans, etc. And he doesn't tend to post a lot I think.
Granted, I don't think i've played with scum Crossfire, but nothing about his posts so far feel out of the ordinary. Basically I'm more than fine with waiting for him to post more.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On March 28 2015 17:50 Holyflare wrote: That's a stretch but can also be explained by sl referring to himself as a town vet and qqing about how town he is So I'm not jumping to your conclusion yet.
This is the appropriate response based on how little of the game he has played.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
If it helps i don't think you're very mafia-y anymore
|
On March 28 2015 18:00 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On March 28 2015 17:46 rsoultin wrote:On March 28 2015 17:44 Holyflare wrote: His filter is crap but that doesn't say anything at all yet.
Also it was the other s guy that talked about not needing to find mafia and batsnacks pointed it out. Love you long time batsnacks. it is so excite! and not playing lol approached the sl claim like he was town? very preachy
nothing at all that looks like he's making readsyou try to say i'm saying boring things xP and yet and yet and yet you don't notice this one? bad holyflare :/ shame on thee! are you scum this game? lol >< that would be sad If you say anything other than this being a conclusion that he's mafia then you're a liar
no, i think that very clearly implies that i think your honing in on two of my posts while ignoring an entire filter of talking about plans and making other obvious posts might mean you're mafia ^^
why would i be calling him mafia already based on 4 or 5 posts?
it's more interesting to me that no one has commented on it, and particularly you or jat
also interesting that y'all are apparently fine with a lackluster koshi ![](/mirror/smilies/wink.gif)
@keirathi
i'll have to poke through the database at some point then
okay, insomnia over @.@ another attempt at bed
|
On March 28 2015 18:05 Holyflare wrote: If it helps i don't think you're very mafia-y anymore
lol don't really care, frankly xP
though i do love me a nice town circle. would be hella nice if you gave me a reason to trust you :/ so far you've said nothing i haven't already noticed and missed a few things i have. but i'll give you some time
|
TBH, it's a bit weird how you make a point of pointing out the post, saying why it's scummy, then refusing to call him scum.
|
On March 28 2015 18:11 Keirathi wrote: TBH, it's a bit weird how you make a point of pointing out the post, saying why it's scummy, then refusing to call him scum.
reread my filter and try again keirathi
one thing i am is precise. if i think someone is scum or something is scummy i will say it directly
when i say "when is someone gonna talk about this guy?" that is precisely what i mean. not that the post is scummy. not that he is scum. but that i'm wondering why no one has commented on him yet.
anything else?
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
i don't know when you want me, koshi or jat to be productive somehow when we're asleep. I was also more concerned about that snarf thing but spent more time finding out it wasn't snarf and it was sep(w/e his name is) and batsnacks to try and prove you were mafia ![](/mirror/smilies/puh2.gif)
i don't like making plans because plans always end up being useless when the end goal is to just lynch mafia regardless so it's far better to just poe down some mafia and hope people aren't stupid and vote with me/someone i think is towny
On March 28 2015 18:10 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On March 28 2015 18:05 Holyflare wrote: If it helps i don't think you're very mafia-y anymore lol don't really care, frankly xP though i do love me a nice town circle. would be hella nice if you gave me a reason to trust you :/ so far you've said nothing i haven't already noticed and missed a few things i have. but i'll give you some time
I also don't see how this is true at all. If you DON'T think crossfire is actually scummy like I just said then you're actually agreeing with ME that his post doesn't mean anything at all so I got there first and now you're just my parrot.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On March 28 2015 16:42 Holyflare wrote: I'm taking ls as my partner for life, rsoul is scummy.
My opening is absolutely nothing like carol...? Scummy obi and more scummy for shitting on ls. Don't read anything into the ve/yamato/wave team cz seems pretty jokey. For now.
Keirathi pretty ok. Maybe bit intense but like it so far. Jat seems ok but mehish, koshi bro for liking ls rsoul read.
Rest are forgettable. Hapa/didbhspeak? Forgettable = bad
this nicely sums up everyone else, including crossfire
|
On March 28 2015 18:14 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On March 28 2015 18:11 Keirathi wrote: TBH, it's a bit weird how you make a point of pointing out the post, saying why it's scummy, then refusing to call him scum. reread my filter and try again keirathi one thing i am is precise. if i think someone is scum or something is scummy i will say it directly when i say "when is someone gonna talk about this guy?" that is precisely what i mean. not that the post is scummy. not that he is scum. but that i'm wondering why no one has commented on him yet. anything else? Fine. You can say you don't think it was scummy.
Then what, exactly, is the point in talking about it? Why do we need to talk about things that aren't scummy?
|
|
|
|