Aperture Mafia 4: This Time it's Personal - Page 21

On April 01 2015 03:23 Blazinghand wrote:
Mfw anyone listens to koshi

So... where us all you'd resistance to the VA lynch coming from? We should probably consolidate onto the red check, just saying

On April 01 2015 03:33 yamato77 wrote:
I have a hypothesis on who killed Hapa, but it's not really important.

I also have reservations about lynching VA, and they are important. This feels like a horrible idea. Unfortunately majority lynch makes this game hard.

Would people be opposed to lynching someone like damdred/batsnacks/BH? I have bad feelings about all 3.

On April 01 2015 03:35 rsoultin wrote:
LISTEN TO SLAM

WE NEED TO VOTE GLADOS

IF WE CAN'T AGREE TO VOTE VA THEN THERE IS NO REASON NOT TO VOTE GLADOS

jat will you help me on this -_-

i have every reason to trust slam. if you trust me, help me

On April 01 2015 03:36 Half the Sky wrote:


EBWOP - I was typing my last post when you posted this.

So I stand corrected then, this would be a possibility. JAT, what were the consequences of voting a mechanic? Town favoured, scum favoured or neutral?

On April 01 2015 03:38 yamato77 wrote:

Because we have no real concrete evidence suggesting that he's mafia. He also pinged crossfire literally all of D1. Yes he's capable of that as mafia but I remain thoroughly unconvinced.

AT THE VERY LEAST, we should be talking about other people anyway, as wasting the day by sitting on this VA lynch is a poor idea.

On April 01 2015 03:38 Blazinghand wrote:


ok, for #1, let me say that I think we can agree that only one of me + morty is scum at most, right? So if I were scum, why wouldn't town morty show up and be like "actually it wans't a red check"

the check could have been tampered with but it's still a red check, even if there's like a 20% chance of it being tampered with, a 80% chance of lynching scum is pretty great

On April 01 2015 03:44 WaveofShadow wrote:
I have reason to trust slam as well btw

On April 01 2015 03:49 Blazinghand wrote:


Barring someone having a peeking role, I'm gonna say "no". The other cop is Morty and almost certainly mafia-aligned, he's not gonna come forward and confirm that Marv got a red check. If someone did have a peeking role and got to read my night results, feel free to claim because it seems like without your help VA won't get lynched. I can't imagine what these people are thinking.

On April 01 2015 03:56 Blazinghand wrote:


OK, so now that you accept Morty is scum what reason could you possibly think I have for lying about the red check? Heck, at the time I claimed it I hadn't even pieced together that Marv probably checked VA, that was someone else, so it's not like I've carried over some wierd anti-VA bias from the last game, you can't even accuse me of that

On April 01 2015 04:00 Koshi wrote:
BH is Moriarty

There is 0 resistance VA is mafia.

On April 01 2015 04:13 kitaman27 wrote:


Yeah I think I'm going to ignore night actions for the rest of the cycle as well since we aren't getting anywhere with them.

On April 01 2015 05:40 rsoultin wrote:


he's cool

he also does this...disappear for long chunks of time thing...on a regular basis. not alignment indicative

On April 01 2015 05:42 kitaman27 wrote:


He told me he was going to post some reads, but didn't want to share them privately with me and then proceeded to afk -_-

On April 01 2015 05:43 rsoultin wrote:


he has lol i've been pming him

he's cool -flicks-

On April 01 2015 05:44 rsoultin wrote:


not here. pm

On April 01 2015 05:46 Alakaslam wrote:
But do you expect people to just openly want to share everything with possible scum? You have to consider the possibility that you are not 100% townread, or that even if you are (which you both should be based on your aggression alone XD), your pursuit of specific info on people may be causing them concern about word getting too far around.