EPTNewbie Student Mafia VII - Page 5
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Bourneq
Sweden800 Posts
| ||
|
Bourneq
Sweden800 Posts
| ||
|
Bourneq
Sweden800 Posts
What I wonder is how TBD can justify not doing anything what so ever to help town in any way shape or form? I can only justify it with a scum read. I was hopin to get some reads from him today but all I got was On April 11 2015 23:45 TheBloodyDwarf wrote: I dont find anybody really suspicious..  Stutters695. Checking his filter and I mostly see questions. Looks like he doesn't really have own opinion but is asking others what do they think. btw, I dont like you Tubesock, you have been chasing me from the beginning  ##Vote thebloodydwarf There is a lot of talk about stutters. Top of page 2 of his filter he says "Assume I'm town for a second(you'll see why d2)." and I have yet too see why. There is still quite a few hours left so I am interested in what he has got for us. | ||
|
Bourneq
Sweden800 Posts
On April 14 2015 20:52 Half the Sky wrote: Good afternoon Bourneq. Last night I did a VCA (vote count analysis) starting with the people I felt looked most suspicious. You were one of the most likely though I still need to look into the "less" suspicious individuals, but looking through you, my biggest beef with you was not your activity, but that you appeared to jump reads. The 15 hour gap between you wanting dwarf and Ace (now Shining) gone and then thread sentiment swung plotspot's way made me assess whether you were going along with the crowd when you'd been able to keep your options open by casing him earlier. I can see where you cased plotspot before and after ranking your scumreads, but Rasputin did point out ONE redeeming quote where you seemed to have original content and thought on prplhz. If you can answer the questions that I (and I know a few others posed for you) I think it would help greatly. Also if you can clarify where you stand on prplhz given his activity/etc D2, that would also help greatly. Good afternoon! Ill start with me "jumping to reads". My feelings on dwarf day 1 "I really like TBD's explenation of his behaviour but not reading the OP is really reckless and I would like fellow towns to know the rules and the pace of the game. But tbd seems as new as me at this so I will tread carefully here." Basicly I thought I should give TBD some time to give reads and get into the game before I jumped to a conclusion. Next up was Ace because he had not said a word all game. Since I did not have much to go on so early in the game I was concidering making a policy lynch. So when asked if I had to cast my vote right now who would I cast it on I said Ace. There was still plenty of time left of d1 so I was almost certain I would never acctualy cast that vote. As d1 went on and I got to read the cases against plotspot and my own personal reads of him I felt plotspot was the correct lynch. I had been keeping "my options open" because I did not feel I had very strong reads but that my strongest read was on plot. That was my first ever day of mafia so I would be a fool to trust my very first reads to much. So to answer "2 Was queried multiple times on the read switches from plotspot to TBD to Ace (who would be policy) to plotspot. Gives an answer to prplhz saying that TBD was most likely scum. " I am not sure what you meant by "read switches". Early on in the day I was getting bad vibes from tbd who was acting pretty suspicious to me. But it was early on in the day so I was going to give him time to redeem himself. He did not do much of anything for the rest of the day while plotspot was making a very bad case for himself and I thought that my reads on him were stronger than thoose I had on tbd. Somewhere in the middle of d1 I am asked who I would vote on if I had to vote that very second. I answered Ace because I did not feel enough information had surfaced on anybody so a policy lynch would be in good order. | ||
|
Bourneq
Sweden800 Posts
| ||
|
Bourneq
Sweden800 Posts
On April 15 2015 03:57 Tubesock wrote: First, I'm glad you're voting Dwarf. Second, the way I read your list post you basically scummed everysingle person on that list except for Breshke. Later you said you only have 2 scums...Can you update please? I was not aware of the expression of "nulling" somebody. I would have used that word instead on a few reads. What I was saying in that post was that I was leaning this or the other on that person at that time. Obviously since it was early on in the game I was not sure about anybody. | ||
|
Bourneq
Sweden800 Posts
| ||
|
Bourneq
Sweden800 Posts
On April 15 2015 04:44 rsoultin wrote: meh this is like the only smart thing bourne has posted since the beginning of n1 objectively i agree that prp's done almost jack all, and ignoring the hypocrisy of bourneq criticizing someone else's activity lol >< his statements are either really obvious or unverifiable...the one good thing is the last sentence also finished rereading tube...i suppose he could be scum, hts, if only because i'm used to him pushing things more than he has been, but there are so many good insights in his filter that i can't see myself wanting to lynch him over players like bourne/tbd/shining/prp xP Where in the world am I criticizing prplhz activity? I am not saying he has not been active I was saying he has not contributed anything of note. | ||
|
Bourneq
Sweden800 Posts
On April 15 2015 04:57 rsoultin wrote: considering the answer to your question "prplhz activity in d2 is really poor" is right in the quote i quoted? more to the point, unlike dwarf you actually started out day 1 with at least an opinion...as i said, that one post was pretty much the only contribution you actually made. got something to say to that or are you going to quibble over semantics ^^ cause i just looooove those sorts of arguments. they irritate me no end You are absolutely right it does say activity. What I meant to write was contributions, I absolutely don't think prplhz has not been active in the thread. My misstake. His activity doesnt really feel like its helping town in any way however. I am trying to contribute. I read peoples filters and really look for things that strike me and contribute best I can. D2 has been a little lackluster from my side purely due to real life obligations. The problem I have is that I dont feel confident in some of my reads because I have so little experiance in finding scum or scummy behaviour that it might just derail town from better reads. I will be more and more vocal as time goes on tho. | ||
|
Bourneq
Sweden800 Posts
On April 15 2015 05:30 TheBloodyDwarf wrote: I really feel bad tho. People asking me what I think and why I dont post scumhunting. Simple fact is that I don't really find anybody scummy. I only see if people are active or not and are they answering questions. Pretty bad at analyzing posts :/ I hardly remember who is scumhunting who and who they were scumhunting. This was almost reasonable if it was not for the fact that I dont get the feel that you even tried to scumhunt. Or to make a case for yourself. | ||
|
Bourneq
Sweden800 Posts
On April 15 2015 06:01 Stutters695 wrote: Breshke Prpl scum. Discuss. Well prplhz has been defending dwarf the entire game, do you think he would do that knowing he would be very likely to be lynched anyway? I give prpl a lot of town points for that. | ||
|
Bourneq
Sweden800 Posts
Well now I don't have any doubts about prplhz. I should of lynched him while I had the chance. | ||
|
Bourneq
Sweden800 Posts
| ||
|
Bourneq
Sweden800 Posts
| ||
|
Bourneq
Sweden800 Posts
On April 16 2015 07:01 Trfel wrote: Explain? So that I cant vote him first and get a lynch from being the first vote of course. | ||
|
Bourneq
Sweden800 Posts
lol no I want to lynch prplhz. He voted rsoultin I asume so that I could not kill prplhz on a tie, so he voted before I did. | ||
|
Bourneq
Sweden800 Posts
On April 16 2015 07:10 Trfel wrote: What? You realize that it would require more than one vote to lynch someone? Yea? he got 2 scum buddies ready to defend or vote to save him. So the odds of a tie is quite substantial even with all votes. | ||
|
Bourneq
Sweden800 Posts
On April 16 2015 07:13 Trfel wrote: I guarantee you that the timing of a vote made barely over an hour after the day began will not have any effect on a potential tiebreak for the lynch. How come? Quoted from OP "If there is a tie for most votes, whoever most recently had more votes than the other is the person who is up for the lynch." Concidering there is talk of not voting at all then there is quite the chance that it could matter. | ||
|
Bourneq
Sweden800 Posts
| ||
|
Bourneq
Sweden800 Posts
| ||
| ||
