Mini Mafia Down Under - Page 3

raynpelikoneet

Finland43268 Posts

February 28 2015 00:06 GMT

#292

no i n fact go ahead and quote the whole interaction between me and you so i can just fucking lynch you after it, and you made it to yourself.

raynpelikoneet

Finland43268 Posts

February 28 2015 00:09 GMT

#296

On February 28 2015 09:07 IAmRobik wrote:

Show nested quote +

I'm somewhere between you/rayn/va today

then you're scum because we are all town and you can't have such bad reads. right robert?

raynpelikoneet

Finland43268 Posts

February 28 2015 00:13 GMT

#300

On February 28 2015 09:09 ritoky wrote:

Show nested quote +

On February 28 2015 09:03 raynpelikoneet wrote:

On February 28 2015 09:01 ritoky wrote:

On February 28 2015 08:58 raynpelikoneet wrote:

On February 28 2015 08:55 ritoky wrote:

On February 28 2015 08:53 raynpelikoneet wrote:

On February 28 2015 08:50 ritoky wrote:

On February 28 2015 08:45 raynpelikoneet wrote:

On February 28 2015 08:41 ritoky wrote:

On February 28 2015 08:34 KelsierSC wrote:
[quote]

I guess I can respond to this as well.

This is a post limit game what that means is that naturally.people will be more timid with their posting. This is not alignment indicative. Therefore the lack of activity is not surprising. I did comment on the first post of value.i saw, trefls long post. When I saw prplhz post about trefl that was a red flag and I'm asking him questions now to read him.

I think your case is pretty terrible.

When I was mafia with you in imperial, you did a similar thing to what you're doing now. Your style of posting is much different from last game, but the thing that stands out to me most is your scope. In the previous game when you were town you cast a very wide net on day 1 and really were invested in multiple people, determining their alignments, and figuring out the game. In Imperial, you cast a shallow net focusing on 3-4 people as your reads day 1. You have a similar narrow focus this game, and I think the differentiation of play is because you are not town.

Why couldn't you just say this in the first place instead of acting like a massive dick?

Because I gave a read, you openly stated you didn't read it, then I asked you questions and you refused to respond to any of them. So I decided to not respond to you. You were actually the one being the bag of dicks good sir.

if you do not understand why i didn't read your case's justification further you are an idiot. srsly, you are.
again, why didn't you provide full proof from the beginning?

On February 28 2015 08:50 ritoky wrote:

On February 28 2015 08:45 raynpelikoneet wrote:

On February 28 2015 08:41 ritoky wrote:

On February 28 2015 08:34 KelsierSC wrote:

On February 28 2015 06:57 ritoky wrote:
[quote]

the opposite as of now, I really liked his opening comment about making a read for the sake of making a read; but then I compared it to his previous game. he is less open with his opinions, doing less to actively solve the game, and his posts are shorter in length. I feel like he would care more about the lack of activity of most players if he were town.

I guess I can respond to this as well.

This is a post limit game what that means is that naturally.people will be more timid with their posting. This is not alignment indicative. Therefore the lack of activity is not surprising. I did comment on the first post of value.i saw, trefls long post. When I saw prplhz post about trefl that was a red flag and I'm asking him questions now to read him.

I think your case is pretty terrible.

Why couldn't you just say this in the first place instead of acting like a massive dick?

Like what the fuck is so hard with you?
You gave a meta read which said "here is this game, it's different than this town game but i have no scum game to compare". I asked you to give out a scumgame of his to compare, you called me dickbags.

So fuck you fuckface. What the fuck are you even arguing for you idiot?

You asked badgering and leading questions, made no comment on a refuted accusation, attempted a new accusation, did not read the responses, did not respond to questions on why you disagreed, and then flipped out. So I trolled you, deal with it.

quote my fucking posts where your post here stands any fucking ground.

Here is your accusation:

Show nested quote +

Here is my response:

Show nested quote +

Here is your response:

oh wait it doesn't exist. instead you move toward forcing your way into me asking a question to robik.

Show nested quote +

do I need to display the rest for you? you clearly lack self-awareness and we are both running out of posts.

BWHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!H!H!H!H!H!H!!!!!!
^^^^A^^SA^SÂÂÂ^^^^^^

raynpelikoneet

Finland43268 Posts

February 28 2015 00:15 GMT

#302

On February 28 2015 09:13 prplhz wrote:

Show nested quote +

9

I don't get it. I'm scum because I think Oatsmaster thinks Trfel is scum even though Oatsmaster hasn't said so in the thread? How does that make me scum?

He means why did you "get Oats" as you said?

raynpelikoneet

Finland43268 Posts

February 28 2015 00:20 GMT

#305

purplehaze what did you mean when you said you "get Oats"?

raynpelikoneet

Finland43268 Posts

February 28 2015 00:24 GMT

#308

On February 27 2015 22:28 prplhz wrote:
I think I see where you and Oatsmaster and raynpelikoneet are coming from[...]

?????????????

raynpelikoneet

Finland43268 Posts

February 28 2015 00:28 GMT

#311

If i have to waste one more post on this you are dead prplhz.
Why Oatsmaster? You literally said you "think you see where Oatsmaster is coming from".

so explain, what was the point?

raynpelikoneet

Finland43268 Posts

February 28 2015 00:33 GMT

#315

On February 28 2015 09:31 prplhz wrote:
16

Show nested quote +

I could just as well have said "I agree with you guys that Trfel is scummy". That would mean the exact same thing I meant in my post.

Can you quote Oats' post(s) from which you get this?

raynpelikoneet

Finland43268 Posts

February 28 2015 00:36 GMT

#320

On February 28 2015 09:33 raynpelikoneet wrote:

Show nested quote +

Can you quote Oats' post(s) from which you get this?

raynpelikoneet

Finland43268 Posts

February 28 2015 13:34 GMT

#415

Onegu
rsoultin
prplhz
Palmar
Oatsmaster
Alakaslam
IAmRobik
ritoky
VayneAuthority
Trfel
Superbia
KelsierSC

raynpelikoneet

Finland43268 Posts

February 28 2015 13:59 GMT

#418

Like all my townreads are clearly town. Robert is confirmed town because whenever a mod steps in with an irrelevant comment about someone's post that person is always town as people ARE going to make a read on it anyways. If Robert was mafia the co-host would not have said what he did because there is a possibility that someone makes a scumread on Robik out of the out-game comment of them, and mods do not wanna out who is mafia. That is ALWAYS it.

Trfel is mafia, it is quite clear at this point. He isn't doing anything, he hasn't got any reads.

Onego goes to the same boat, and he should have a townread on me by now. I dislike every post of his.

Oats focuses on irrelevant stuff and is not pushing anything for real. He is too passive and doesn't talk about the stuff i would expect him to. His ritoky comment was good but meh.. that's a fucking obvious conclusion about ritoky's terrible case. I am not sure if it makes ritoky mafia and i am torn on these two because i can't get a decent read on either of them. I'd say it's like 60/40 in favor of ritoky being scum, ritoky's latest posts were a bit better.

Palmar is clearly doing nothing and unfortunately that is not alignment indicative because he is Palmar. If he continues doing nothing and we can't find the last mafia just lynch the fuck outta him.

Slam's posting looks like town but because of the low quantity of his posts i can't tell for 100% sure. I actually read a lot of Slam game filters from past games yesterday because the second last game i misread him on D1 and that is something that should not happen. I kinda got it back again, i mean what makes him scum and what makes him town but i don't wanna out that yet. Leaning town on him anyways.

I got about 10 posts left and i am going to save them for tonight closer to the lynch, but this is where i stand at the moment.

raynpelikoneet

Finland43268 Posts

February 28 2015 14:58 GMT

#421

Palmar i'll look into your case more closely after sauna.

On the first glance it looks good and now, reading Superbia's filter again, i honestly didn't even realize how nonsensical that looks. That being said i wanna do some research on that. One thing to note though, you saying him linking rsoultin & Trfel alignments together is not necessarily scummy. I mean, that's how i caught austin in the first place in Titanic III (when he made a conclusion of one of me & Coagulation having to be mafia from our argument at the start of the game). But surprise surprise, he did the same thing in the very next game... as town. I don't think that necessarily makes anyone mafia. But in the end, the conclusion and the way Superbia ends up on it in this game looks fake. Not necessarily for the reasons you presented but for the fact that rsoultin is like the towniest townie in this town and his meta comparison on Trfel is really bad because i myself did the same thing (looked at Trfel's past games) and ended up in the opposite conclusion.

raynpelikoneet

Finland43268 Posts

February 28 2015 15:15 GMT

#424

One thing before i go though:

On February 28 2015 23:31 Oatsmaster wrote:
What do you expect me to talk about?

BTW Palmar is town and Super is totes scum.

This post is bullshit just because there is no fucking way Oats read and understood the case from Palmar in max 2 minutes.

No, fucking, way...

raynpelikoneet

Finland43268 Posts

February 28 2015 15:51 GMT

#427

Superbia when you meta'd Trfel which games did you read?

raynpelikoneet

Finland43268 Posts

February 28 2015 18:40 GMT

#442

lol

raynpelikoneet

Finland43268 Posts

February 28 2015 18:40 GMT

#443

On March 01 2015 03:40 KelsierSC wrote:
Seriously just delete this game and start a new one or just replace me out the game. Its fucking stupid.

raynpelikoneet

Finland43268 Posts

February 28 2015 19:14 GMT

#467

On March 01 2015 03:58 KelsierSC wrote:
Trefl,oats ,superbia scumteam inb4 reroll.

Oats is not scum. Onegu is.

raynpelikoneet

Finland43268 Posts

February 28 2015 19:15 GMT

#470

On March 01 2015 04:04 KelsierSC wrote:
Fine I'm mafia alongside Va and onegu.

Endgame now

lol srsly?

I kinda thought Trfel is not scum for a moment but never got to that point yet.
Onegu was scum because if he was town why would no scum push him (aside from other reasons)?