|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On February 28 2015 09:13 prplhz wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2015 09:10 KelsierSC wrote:On February 28 2015 09:07 prplhz wrote:7 On February 28 2015 09:04 KelsierSC wrote:On February 28 2015 08:57 prplhz wrote:On February 28 2015 07:54 KelsierSC wrote: I'm waiting for prplhz to respond to my question.
6 There's really not much to it. "I think I see where you and Oatsmaster and raynpelikoneet are coming from" What I mean is. I think I see why you are voting him, I think I see the reason he is scum. You had made a one liner and I thought it was "alright", not good but it had the gist of "that's a weirdly serious first post" which I agreed with. Oatsmaster and raynpelikoneet hadn't explained their reads but that doesn't mean I cannot see they would think Trfel is scum. Hmm I guess that makes sense. Oats did actually vote him I didn't see that And you just saw that just now? I didn't mention in my post that Oatsmaster had voted. ...bolded How else would you know oats thought trefl was scum as he didn't mention him in the thread... That was my whole point 9 I don't get it. I'm scum because I think Oatsmaster thinks Trfel is scum even though Oatsmaster hasn't said so in the thread? How does that make me scum?
Because in that case you are making up reasons to justify your scum read on trfel.
|
On February 28 2015 09:13 prplhz wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2015 09:10 KelsierSC wrote:On February 28 2015 09:07 prplhz wrote:7 On February 28 2015 09:04 KelsierSC wrote:On February 28 2015 08:57 prplhz wrote:On February 28 2015 07:54 KelsierSC wrote: I'm waiting for prplhz to respond to my question.
6 There's really not much to it. "I think I see where you and Oatsmaster and raynpelikoneet are coming from" What I mean is. I think I see why you are voting him, I think I see the reason he is scum. You had made a one liner and I thought it was "alright", not good but it had the gist of "that's a weirdly serious first post" which I agreed with. Oatsmaster and raynpelikoneet hadn't explained their reads but that doesn't mean I cannot see they would think Trfel is scum. Hmm I guess that makes sense. Oats did actually vote him I didn't see that And you just saw that just now? I didn't mention in my post that Oatsmaster had voted. ...bolded How else would you know oats thought trefl was scum as he didn't mention him in the thread... That was my whole point 9 I don't get it. I'm scum because I think Oatsmaster thinks Trfel is scum even though Oatsmaster hasn't said so in the thread? How does that make me scum? He means why did you "get Oats" as you said?
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
So prpl just to clarify you didn't know the reasons why oats/rayn was voting trfel but you assumed they were good ones?
|
10
On February 28 2015 09:14 KelsierSC wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2015 09:13 prplhz wrote:On February 28 2015 09:10 KelsierSC wrote:On February 28 2015 09:07 prplhz wrote:7 On February 28 2015 09:04 KelsierSC wrote:On February 28 2015 08:57 prplhz wrote:On February 28 2015 07:54 KelsierSC wrote: I'm waiting for prplhz to respond to my question.
6 There's really not much to it. "I think I see where you and Oatsmaster and raynpelikoneet are coming from" What I mean is. I think I see why you are voting him, I think I see the reason he is scum. You had made a one liner and I thought it was "alright", not good but it had the gist of "that's a weirdly serious first post" which I agreed with. Oatsmaster and raynpelikoneet hadn't explained their reads but that doesn't mean I cannot see they would think Trfel is scum. Hmm I guess that makes sense. Oats did actually vote him I didn't see that And you just saw that just now? I didn't mention in my post that Oatsmaster had voted. ...bolded How else would you know oats thought trefl was scum as he didn't mention him in the thread... That was my whole point 9 I don't get it. I'm scum because I think Oatsmaster thinks Trfel is scum even though Oatsmaster hasn't said so in the thread? How does that make me scum? Because in that case you are making up reasons to justify your scum read on trfel.
Do you seriously think scum just intentionally straight up invent reads? What would I even gain from inventing an Oatsmaster read on Trfel in that situation?
|
purplehaze what did you mean when you said you "get Oats"?
|
11
On February 28 2015 09:17 KelsierSC wrote: So prpl just to clarify you didn't know the reasons why oats/rayn was voting trfel but you assumed they were good ones?
No. I didn't comment on Oatsmaster's or raynpelikoneet's reasons to vote Trfel. What I said is that I could see why they (or anyone else) could think Trfel was scum.
I didn't assume they were good or bad however. I assumed that Oatsmaster's was a bit hard to follow and that raynpelikoneet's was probably good.
|
12
On February 28 2015 09:20 raynpelikoneet wrote: purplehaze what did you mean when you said you "get Oats"?
"get Oats" is literally not in my filter.
|
On February 27 2015 22:28 prplhz wrote: I think I see where you and Oatsmaster and raynpelikoneet are coming from[...] ?????????????
|
13
On February 28 2015 09:24 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On February 27 2015 22:28 prplhz wrote: I think I see where you and Oatsmaster and raynpelikoneet are coming from[...] ?????????????
I mean I can see why you would vote for Trfel.
|
14
On February 28 2015 09:23 prplhz wrote:12 Show nested quote +On February 28 2015 09:20 raynpelikoneet wrote: purplehaze what did you mean when you said you "get Oats"? "get Oats" is literally not in my filter.
On February 28 2015 09:24 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On February 27 2015 22:28 prplhz wrote: I think I see where you and Oatsmaster and raynpelikoneet are coming from[...] ????????????? Like, there were quotes so I went into my filter and Ctrl+f "get Oats" and it said no matches.
|
If i have to waste one more post on this you are dead prplhz. Why Oatsmaster? You literally said you "think you see where Oatsmaster is coming from".
so explain, what was the point?
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On February 28 2015 09:25 prplhz wrote:13 Show nested quote +On February 28 2015 09:24 raynpelikoneet wrote:On February 27 2015 22:28 prplhz wrote: I think I see where you and Oatsmaster and raynpelikoneet are coming from[...] ????????????? I mean I can see why you would vote for Trfel.
Mafia reads aren't real so they have to make them up. They can make mistakes/panic. That's why it seems scummy Like your language just seems wrong. You can see where we're coming from implies we made cases or had opinions and you're justifying your scum read.
But now it feels like you are backtracking. "I see why your voting". Then you say you assume oats has a hard to follow reason..but how can you get where he js coming from...especially as you didn't even know his hard to follow reason
|
15
On February 28 2015 09:28 raynpelikoneet wrote: If i have to waste one more post on this you are dead prplhz. Why Oatsmaster? You literally said you "think you see where Oatsmaster is coming from".
so explain, what was the point? I'm sorry, I didn't read that post. Could you repeat it?
|
16
On February 28 2015 09:28 raynpelikoneet wrote: If i have to waste one more post on this you are dead prplhz. Why Oatsmaster? You literally said you "think you see where Oatsmaster is coming from".
so explain, what was the point? I could just as well have said "I agree with you guys that Trfel is scummy". That would mean the exact same thing I meant in my post.
|
On February 28 2015 09:31 prplhz wrote:16 Show nested quote +On February 28 2015 09:28 raynpelikoneet wrote: If i have to waste one more post on this you are dead prplhz. Why Oatsmaster? You literally said you "think you see where Oatsmaster is coming from".
so explain, what was the point? I could just as well have said "I agree with you guys that Trfel is scummy". That would mean the exact same thing I meant in my post. Can you quote Oats' post(s) from which you get this?
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
Alright then prplhz what do you think of oats right now? And Robik
|
17
On February 28 2015 09:30 KelsierSC wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2015 09:25 prplhz wrote:13 On February 28 2015 09:24 raynpelikoneet wrote:On February 27 2015 22:28 prplhz wrote: I think I see where you and Oatsmaster and raynpelikoneet are coming from[...] ????????????? I mean I can see why you would vote for Trfel. Mafia reads aren't real so they have to make them up. They can make mistakes/panic. That's why it seems scummy Like your language just seems wrong. You can see where we're coming from implies we made cases or had opinions and you're justifying your scum read. But now it feels like you are backtracking. "I see why your voting". Then you say you assume oats has a hard to follow reason..but how can you get where he js coming from...especially as you didn't even know his hard to follow reason Guy #1: "I don't like it when my nuts get trapped in a dutch oven"
Guy #2: "I can understand that"
Guy #3: "How can you understand that when I didn't explain why I don't like it when my nuts get trapped in a dutch oven?"
This is literally the conversation I think we're having.
|
18
Meh, Guy #1 and Guy #3 are the same guy and they're both Oatsmaster and KelsierSC. I hoped that cleared something up.
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On February 28 2015 09:33 prplhz wrote:17 Show nested quote +On February 28 2015 09:30 KelsierSC wrote:On February 28 2015 09:25 prplhz wrote:13 On February 28 2015 09:24 raynpelikoneet wrote:On February 27 2015 22:28 prplhz wrote: I think I see where you and Oatsmaster and raynpelikoneet are coming from[...] ????????????? I mean I can see why you would vote for Trfel. Mafia reads aren't real so they have to make them up. They can make mistakes/panic. That's why it seems scummy Like your language just seems wrong. You can see where we're coming from implies we made cases or had opinions and you're justifying your scum read. But now it feels like you are backtracking. "I see why your voting". Then you say you assume oats has a hard to follow reason..but how can you get where he js coming from...especially as you didn't even know his hard to follow reason Guy #1: "I don't like it when my nuts get trapped in a dutch oven" Guy #2: "I can understand that" Guy #3: "How can you understand that when I didn't explain why I don't like it when my nuts get trapped in a dutch oven?" This is literally the conversation I think we're having.
No because oats didn't say anything. You said you got where he was.coming from. Then you said you assumed he had a hard to follow opinion. So how can you get it? Less dodging
|
On February 28 2015 09:33 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2015 09:31 prplhz wrote:16 On February 28 2015 09:28 raynpelikoneet wrote: If i have to waste one more post on this you are dead prplhz. Why Oatsmaster? You literally said you "think you see where Oatsmaster is coming from".
so explain, what was the point? I could just as well have said "I agree with you guys that Trfel is scummy". That would mean the exact same thing I meant in my post. Can you quote Oats' post(s) from which you get this?
|
|
|
|