Mini Mafia Down Under - Page 16

On February 28 2015 09:13 prplhz wrote:

9

I don't get it. I'm scum because I think Oatsmaster thinks Trfel is scum even though Oatsmaster hasn't said so in the thread? How does that make me scum?

On February 28 2015 09:13 prplhz wrote:

9

I don't get it. I'm scum because I think Oatsmaster thinks Trfel is scum even though Oatsmaster hasn't said so in the thread? How does that make me scum?

On February 28 2015 09:14 KelsierSC wrote:


Because in that case you are making up reasons to justify your scum read on trfel.

On February 28 2015 09:17 KelsierSC wrote:
So prpl just to clarify you didn't know the reasons why oats/rayn was voting trfel but you assumed they were good ones?

On February 28 2015 09:20 raynpelikoneet wrote:
purplehaze what did you mean when you said you "get Oats"?

On February 27 2015 22:28 prplhz wrote:
I think I see where you and Oatsmaster and raynpelikoneet are coming from[...]

On February 28 2015 09:24 raynpelikoneet wrote:

?????????????

On February 28 2015 09:23 prplhz wrote:
12



"get Oats" is literally not in my filter.

On February 28 2015 09:24 raynpelikoneet wrote:

?????????????

On February 28 2015 09:25 prplhz wrote:
13



I mean I can see why you would vote for Trfel.

On February 28 2015 09:28 raynpelikoneet wrote:
If i have to waste one more post on this you are dead prplhz.
Why Oatsmaster? You literally said you "think you see where Oatsmaster is coming from".

so explain, what was the point?

On February 28 2015 09:28 raynpelikoneet wrote:
If i have to waste one more post on this you are dead prplhz.
Why Oatsmaster? You literally said you "think you see where Oatsmaster is coming from".

so explain, what was the point?

On February 28 2015 09:31 prplhz wrote:
16


I could just as well have said "I agree with you guys that Trfel is scummy". That would mean the exact same thing I meant in my post.

On February 28 2015 09:30 KelsierSC wrote:


Mafia reads aren't real so they have to make them up. They can make mistakes/panic. That's why it seems scummy
Like your language just seems wrong. You can see where we're coming from implies we made cases or had opinions and you're justifying your scum read.

But now it feels like you are backtracking. "I see why your voting".
Then you say you assume oats has a hard to follow reason..but how can you get where he js coming from...especially as you didn't even know his hard to follow reason

On February 28 2015 09:33 prplhz wrote:
17


Guy #1: "I don't like it when my nuts get trapped in a dutch oven"

Guy #2: "I can understand that"

Guy #3: "How can you understand that when I didn't explain why I don't like it when my nuts get trapped in a dutch oven?"

This is literally the conversation I think we're having.

On February 28 2015 09:33 raynpelikoneet wrote:

Can you quote Oats' post(s) from which you get this?