|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On February 28 2015 08:54 VayneAuthority wrote:
scum team is onegu, palmar, superbia prove me wrong some one, im bored.
Why palmar specifically?
|
On February 28 2015 08:56 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2015 08:54 VayneAuthority wrote:
scum team is onegu, palmar, superbia prove me wrong some one, im bored. Palmar is probably not mafia but neither are you so thank you. 
you dont think he would be trolling right after that shitty sentinel game we played?
I think he got mafia again lol.
|
On February 28 2015 07:54 KelsierSC wrote:
I'm waiting for prplhz to respond to my question.
6
There's really not much to it.
"I think I see where you and Oatsmaster and raynpelikoneet are coming from"
What I mean is. I think I see why you are voting him, I think I see the reason he is scum. You had made a one liner and I thought it was "alright", not good but it had the gist of "that's a weirdly serious first post" which I agreed with. Oatsmaster and raynpelikoneet hadn't explained their reads but that doesn't mean I cannot see they would think Trfel is scum.
|
On February 28 2015 08:55 ritoky wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2015 08:53 raynpelikoneet wrote:On February 28 2015 08:50 ritoky wrote:On February 28 2015 08:45 raynpelikoneet wrote:On February 28 2015 08:41 ritoky wrote:On February 28 2015 08:34 KelsierSC wrote:On February 28 2015 06:57 ritoky wrote:On February 28 2015 06:47 raynpelikoneet wrote:
he is town what do you think? the opposite as of now, I really liked his opening comment about making a read for the sake of making a read; but then I compared it to his previous game. he is less open with his opinions, doing less to actively solve the game, and his posts are shorter in length. I feel like he would care more about the lack of activity of most players if he were town. I guess I can respond to this as well. This is a post limit game what that means is that naturally.people will be more timid with their posting. This is not alignment indicative. Therefore the lack of activity is not surprising. I did comment on the first post of value.i saw, trefls long post. When I saw prplhz post about trefl that was a red flag and I'm asking him questions now to read him. I think your case is pretty terrible. When I was mafia with you in imperial, you did a similar thing to what you're doing now. Your style of posting is much different from last game, but the thing that stands out to me most is your scope. In the previous game when you were town you cast a very wide net on day 1 and really were invested in multiple people, determining their alignments, and figuring out the game. In Imperial, you cast a shallow net focusing on 3-4 people as your reads day 1. You have a similar narrow focus this game, and I think the differentiation of play is because you are not town. Why couldn't you just say this in the first place instead of acting like a massive dick? Because I gave a read, you openly stated you didn't read it, then I asked you questions and you refused to respond to any of them. So I decided to not respond to you. You were actually the one being the bag of dicks good sir. if you do not understand why i didn't read your case's justification further you are an idiot. srsly, you are. again, why didn't you provide full proof from the beginning? Show nested quote +On February 28 2015 08:50 ritoky wrote:On February 28 2015 08:45 raynpelikoneet wrote:On February 28 2015 08:41 ritoky wrote:On February 28 2015 08:34 KelsierSC wrote:On February 28 2015 06:57 ritoky wrote:On February 28 2015 06:47 raynpelikoneet wrote:
he is town what do you think? the opposite as of now, I really liked his opening comment about making a read for the sake of making a read; but then I compared it to his previous game. he is less open with his opinions, doing less to actively solve the game, and his posts are shorter in length. I feel like he would care more about the lack of activity of most players if he were town. I guess I can respond to this as well. This is a post limit game what that means is that naturally.people will be more timid with their posting. This is not alignment indicative. Therefore the lack of activity is not surprising. I did comment on the first post of value.i saw, trefls long post. When I saw prplhz post about trefl that was a red flag and I'm asking him questions now to read him. I think your case is pretty terrible. When I was mafia with you in imperial, you did a similar thing to what you're doing now. Your style of posting is much different from last game, but the thing that stands out to me most is your scope. In the previous game when you were town you cast a very wide net on day 1 and really were invested in multiple people, determining their alignments, and figuring out the game. In Imperial, you cast a shallow net focusing on 3-4 people as your reads day 1. You have a similar narrow focus this game, and I think the differentiation of play is because you are not town. Why couldn't you just say this in the first place instead of acting like a massive dick? Because I gave a read, you openly stated you didn't read it, then I asked you questions and you refused to respond to any of them. So I decided to not respond to you. You were actually the one being the bag of dicks good sir.
Like what the fuck is so hard with you?
You gave a meta read which said "here is this game, it's different than this town game but i have no scum game to compare". I asked you to give out a scumgame of his to compare, you called me dickbags.
So fuck you fuckface. What the fuck are you even arguing for you idiot?
|
On February 28 2015 08:51 KelsierSC wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2015 08:46 ritoky wrote:On February 28 2015 08:43 KelsierSC wrote:
I was town in imperial ugh, wrong game name. let me find the game name. A better use of your time is to look at my stuff on prplhz . Like your case is I'm focused on reading a few people here? No one has done anything where I'm confident giving a read. Except fir rayn and prpl
I read your stuff on prp, and I find it less compelling than rayn's stuff on trf. I like your point about palmar tucked in there though. That doesn't seem like something palmar normally gives a town read for.
|
prphlz is 100% town its not even a question, find something else kelsier. its obvious as fuck
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On February 28 2015 08:56 VayneAuthority wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2015 08:56 raynpelikoneet wrote:On February 28 2015 08:54 VayneAuthority wrote:
scum team is onegu, palmar, superbia prove me wrong some one, im bored. Palmar is probably not mafia but neither are you so thank you. you dont think he would be trolling right after that shitty sentinel game we played? I think he got mafia again lol.
In that game palmar felt more a force in the thread d1.
Imperial palmar just lurked basically and didn't really do anything d1.
Id say he lurks/trolls more as town based
|
Palmar prides himself on having one of the best day 1 towns on this site, i find that hard to believe unless im mixing him up with some one, he can say for himself i dont remember
|
On February 28 2015 08:58 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2015 08:55 ritoky wrote:On February 28 2015 08:53 raynpelikoneet wrote:On February 28 2015 08:50 ritoky wrote:On February 28 2015 08:45 raynpelikoneet wrote:On February 28 2015 08:41 ritoky wrote:On February 28 2015 08:34 KelsierSC wrote:On February 28 2015 06:57 ritoky wrote:On February 28 2015 06:47 raynpelikoneet wrote:
he is town what do you think? the opposite as of now, I really liked his opening comment about making a read for the sake of making a read; but then I compared it to his previous game. he is less open with his opinions, doing less to actively solve the game, and his posts are shorter in length. I feel like he would care more about the lack of activity of most players if he were town. I guess I can respond to this as well. This is a post limit game what that means is that naturally.people will be more timid with their posting. This is not alignment indicative. Therefore the lack of activity is not surprising. I did comment on the first post of value.i saw, trefls long post. When I saw prplhz post about trefl that was a red flag and I'm asking him questions now to read him. I think your case is pretty terrible. When I was mafia with you in imperial, you did a similar thing to what you're doing now. Your style of posting is much different from last game, but the thing that stands out to me most is your scope. In the previous game when you were town you cast a very wide net on day 1 and really were invested in multiple people, determining their alignments, and figuring out the game. In Imperial, you cast a shallow net focusing on 3-4 people as your reads day 1. You have a similar narrow focus this game, and I think the differentiation of play is because you are not town. Why couldn't you just say this in the first place instead of acting like a massive dick? Because I gave a read, you openly stated you didn't read it, then I asked you questions and you refused to respond to any of them. So I decided to not respond to you. You were actually the one being the bag of dicks good sir. if you do not understand why i didn't read your case's justification further you are an idiot. srsly, you are. again, why didn't you provide full proof from the beginning? On February 28 2015 08:50 ritoky wrote:On February 28 2015 08:45 raynpelikoneet wrote:On February 28 2015 08:41 ritoky wrote:On February 28 2015 08:34 KelsierSC wrote:On February 28 2015 06:57 ritoky wrote:On February 28 2015 06:47 raynpelikoneet wrote:
he is town what do you think? the opposite as of now, I really liked his opening comment about making a read for the sake of making a read; but then I compared it to his previous game. he is less open with his opinions, doing less to actively solve the game, and his posts are shorter in length. I feel like he would care more about the lack of activity of most players if he were town. I guess I can respond to this as well. This is a post limit game what that means is that naturally.people will be more timid with their posting. This is not alignment indicative. Therefore the lack of activity is not surprising. I did comment on the first post of value.i saw, trefls long post. When I saw prplhz post about trefl that was a red flag and I'm asking him questions now to read him. I think your case is pretty terrible. When I was mafia with you in imperial, you did a similar thing to what you're doing now. Your style of posting is much different from last game, but the thing that stands out to me most is your scope. In the previous game when you were town you cast a very wide net on day 1 and really were invested in multiple people, determining their alignments, and figuring out the game. In Imperial, you cast a shallow net focusing on 3-4 people as your reads day 1. You have a similar narrow focus this game, and I think the differentiation of play is because you are not town. Why couldn't you just say this in the first place instead of acting like a massive dick? Because I gave a read, you openly stated you didn't read it, then I asked you questions and you refused to respond to any of them. So I decided to not respond to you. You were actually the one being the bag of dicks good sir. Like what the fuck is so hard with you? You gave a meta read which said "here is this game, it's different than this town game but i have no scum game to compare". I asked you to give out a scumgame of his to compare, you called me dickbags. So fuck you fuckface. What the fuck are you even arguing for you idiot?
You asked badgering and leading questions, made no comment on a refuted accusation, attempted a new accusation, did not read the responses, did not respond to questions on why you disagreed, and then flipped out. So I trolled you, deal with it.
|
On February 28 2015 09:01 ritoky wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2015 08:58 raynpelikoneet wrote:On February 28 2015 08:55 ritoky wrote:On February 28 2015 08:53 raynpelikoneet wrote:On February 28 2015 08:50 ritoky wrote:On February 28 2015 08:45 raynpelikoneet wrote:On February 28 2015 08:41 ritoky wrote:On February 28 2015 08:34 KelsierSC wrote:On February 28 2015 06:57 ritoky wrote:On February 28 2015 06:47 raynpelikoneet wrote:
he is town what do you think? the opposite as of now, I really liked his opening comment about making a read for the sake of making a read; but then I compared it to his previous game. he is less open with his opinions, doing less to actively solve the game, and his posts are shorter in length. I feel like he would care more about the lack of activity of most players if he were town. I guess I can respond to this as well. This is a post limit game what that means is that naturally.people will be more timid with their posting. This is not alignment indicative. Therefore the lack of activity is not surprising. I did comment on the first post of value.i saw, trefls long post. When I saw prplhz post about trefl that was a red flag and I'm asking him questions now to read him. I think your case is pretty terrible. When I was mafia with you in imperial, you did a similar thing to what you're doing now. Your style of posting is much different from last game, but the thing that stands out to me most is your scope. In the previous game when you were town you cast a very wide net on day 1 and really were invested in multiple people, determining their alignments, and figuring out the game. In Imperial, you cast a shallow net focusing on 3-4 people as your reads day 1. You have a similar narrow focus this game, and I think the differentiation of play is because you are not town. Why couldn't you just say this in the first place instead of acting like a massive dick? Because I gave a read, you openly stated you didn't read it, then I asked you questions and you refused to respond to any of them. So I decided to not respond to you. You were actually the one being the bag of dicks good sir. if you do not understand why i didn't read your case's justification further you are an idiot. srsly, you are. again, why didn't you provide full proof from the beginning? On February 28 2015 08:50 ritoky wrote:On February 28 2015 08:45 raynpelikoneet wrote:On February 28 2015 08:41 ritoky wrote:On February 28 2015 08:34 KelsierSC wrote:On February 28 2015 06:57 ritoky wrote:On February 28 2015 06:47 raynpelikoneet wrote:
he is town what do you think? the opposite as of now, I really liked his opening comment about making a read for the sake of making a read; but then I compared it to his previous game. he is less open with his opinions, doing less to actively solve the game, and his posts are shorter in length. I feel like he would care more about the lack of activity of most players if he were town. I guess I can respond to this as well. This is a post limit game what that means is that naturally.people will be more timid with their posting. This is not alignment indicative. Therefore the lack of activity is not surprising. I did comment on the first post of value.i saw, trefls long post. When I saw prplhz post about trefl that was a red flag and I'm asking him questions now to read him. I think your case is pretty terrible. When I was mafia with you in imperial, you did a similar thing to what you're doing now. Your style of posting is much different from last game, but the thing that stands out to me most is your scope. In the previous game when you were town you cast a very wide net on day 1 and really were invested in multiple people, determining their alignments, and figuring out the game. In Imperial, you cast a shallow net focusing on 3-4 people as your reads day 1. You have a similar narrow focus this game, and I think the differentiation of play is because you are not town. Why couldn't you just say this in the first place instead of acting like a massive dick? Because I gave a read, you openly stated you didn't read it, then I asked you questions and you refused to respond to any of them. So I decided to not respond to you. You were actually the one being the bag of dicks good sir. Like what the fuck is so hard with you? You gave a meta read which said "here is this game, it's different than this town game but i have no scum game to compare". I asked you to give out a scumgame of his to compare, you called me dickbags. So fuck you fuckface. What the fuck are you even arguing for you idiot? You asked badgering and leading questions, made no comment on a refuted accusation, attempted a new accusation, did not read the responses, did not respond to questions on why you disagreed, and then flipped out. So I trolled you, deal with it.
quote my fucking posts where your post here stands any fucking ground.
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On February 28 2015 08:57 prplhz wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2015 07:54 KelsierSC wrote:
I'm waiting for prplhz to respond to my question.
6 There's really not much to it. "I think I see where you and Oatsmaster and raynpelikoneet are coming from" What I mean is. I think I see why you are voting him, I think I see the reason he is scum. You had made a one liner and I thought it was "alright", not good but it had the gist of "that's a weirdly serious first post" which I agreed with. Oatsmaster and raynpelikoneet hadn't explained their reads but that doesn't mean I cannot see they would think Trfel is scum.
Hmm I guess that makes sense.
Oats did actually vote him I didn't see that
|
no i n fact go ahead and quote the whole interaction between me and you so i can just fucking lynch you after it, and you made it to yourself.
|
7
On February 28 2015 09:04 KelsierSC wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2015 08:57 prplhz wrote:On February 28 2015 07:54 KelsierSC wrote:
I'm waiting for prplhz to respond to my question.
6 There's really not much to it. "I think I see where you and Oatsmaster and raynpelikoneet are coming from" What I mean is. I think I see why you are voting him, I think I see the reason he is scum. You had made a one liner and I thought it was "alright", not good but it had the gist of "that's a weirdly serious first post" which I agreed with. Oatsmaster and raynpelikoneet hadn't explained their reads but that doesn't mean I cannot see they would think Trfel is scum. Hmm I guess that makes sense. Oats did actually vote him I didn't see that
And you just saw that just now? I didn't mention in my post that Oatsmaster had voted.
|
On February 28 2015 08:23 KelsierSC wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2015 08:00 ritoky wrote:On February 28 2015 07:54 KelsierSC wrote:
I'm waiting for prplhz to respond to my question.
That's cool, talk about something else in the game. Hmm i can give you some initial thoughts i had. Trefels post was where the game started. It looked like a lot of waffle sort of trying to make a read on rsoultin based on very little. Especially considering the size of the post. I don't really buy the"making a play to read her." I dont know how trefl plays but someone mentioned he.likes to make.giant posts I think rayns pressure and follow up has been excellent, he is by far the towniest person in the thread and my only town read. Prplhz entry seemed opportunistic and his reason to scum read trefl was very poor. He has also said he liked the thoughts of myself, rayn and oats. At the time he said this oats hadn't mentioned trefl , i had made some.one liner that wasn't brilliantly.incisive and rayn had only.just made his point. I think prplhz has been scummy. Robik are you still on the Lync Va life or you got something
I'm somewhere between you/rayn/va today
|
8
On February 28 2015 08:59 VayneAuthority wrote:
prphlz is 100% town its not even a question, find something else kelsier. its obvious as fuck
Can you explain this read?
|
On February 28 2015 09:07 IAmRobik wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2015 08:23 KelsierSC wrote:On February 28 2015 08:00 ritoky wrote:On February 28 2015 07:54 KelsierSC wrote:
I'm waiting for prplhz to respond to my question.
That's cool, talk about something else in the game. Hmm i can give you some initial thoughts i had. Trefels post was where the game started. It looked like a lot of waffle sort of trying to make a read on rsoultin based on very little. Especially considering the size of the post. I don't really buy the"making a play to read her." I dont know how trefl plays but someone mentioned he.likes to make.giant posts I think rayns pressure and follow up has been excellent, he is by far the towniest person in the thread and my only town read. Prplhz entry seemed opportunistic and his reason to scum read trefl was very poor. He has also said he liked the thoughts of myself, rayn and oats. At the time he said this oats hadn't mentioned trefl , i had made some.one liner that wasn't brilliantly.incisive and rayn had only.just made his point. I think prplhz has been scummy. Robik are you still on the Lync Va life or you got something I'm somewhere between you/rayn/va today
then you're scum because we are all town and you can't have such bad reads. right robert?
|
On February 28 2015 09:03 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2015 09:01 ritoky wrote:On February 28 2015 08:58 raynpelikoneet wrote:On February 28 2015 08:55 ritoky wrote:On February 28 2015 08:53 raynpelikoneet wrote:On February 28 2015 08:50 ritoky wrote:On February 28 2015 08:45 raynpelikoneet wrote:On February 28 2015 08:41 ritoky wrote:On February 28 2015 08:34 KelsierSC wrote:On February 28 2015 06:57 ritoky wrote:
[quote]
the opposite as of now, I really liked his opening comment about making a read for the sake of making a read; but then I compared it to his previous game. he is less open with his opinions, doing less to actively solve the game, and his posts are shorter in length. I feel like he would care more about the lack of activity of most players if he were town. I guess I can respond to this as well. This is a post limit game what that means is that naturally.people will be more timid with their posting. This is not alignment indicative. Therefore the lack of activity is not surprising. I did comment on the first post of value.i saw, trefls long post. When I saw prplhz post about trefl that was a red flag and I'm asking him questions now to read him. I think your case is pretty terrible. When I was mafia with you in imperial, you did a similar thing to what you're doing now. Your style of posting is much different from last game, but the thing that stands out to me most is your scope. In the previous game when you were town you cast a very wide net on day 1 and really were invested in multiple people, determining their alignments, and figuring out the game. In Imperial, you cast a shallow net focusing on 3-4 people as your reads day 1. You have a similar narrow focus this game, and I think the differentiation of play is because you are not town. Why couldn't you just say this in the first place instead of acting like a massive dick? Because I gave a read, you openly stated you didn't read it, then I asked you questions and you refused to respond to any of them. So I decided to not respond to you. You were actually the one being the bag of dicks good sir. if you do not understand why i didn't read your case's justification further you are an idiot. srsly, you are. again, why didn't you provide full proof from the beginning? On February 28 2015 08:50 ritoky wrote:On February 28 2015 08:45 raynpelikoneet wrote:On February 28 2015 08:41 ritoky wrote:On February 28 2015 08:34 KelsierSC wrote:On February 28 2015 06:57 ritoky wrote:On February 28 2015 06:47 raynpelikoneet wrote:
he is town what do you think? the opposite as of now, I really liked his opening comment about making a read for the sake of making a read; but then I compared it to his previous game. he is less open with his opinions, doing less to actively solve the game, and his posts are shorter in length. I feel like he would care more about the lack of activity of most players if he were town. I guess I can respond to this as well. This is a post limit game what that means is that naturally.people will be more timid with their posting. This is not alignment indicative. Therefore the lack of activity is not surprising. I did comment on the first post of value.i saw, trefls long post. When I saw prplhz post about trefl that was a red flag and I'm asking him questions now to read him. I think your case is pretty terrible. When I was mafia with you in imperial, you did a similar thing to what you're doing now. Your style of posting is much different from last game, but the thing that stands out to me most is your scope. In the previous game when you were town you cast a very wide net on day 1 and really were invested in multiple people, determining their alignments, and figuring out the game. In Imperial, you cast a shallow net focusing on 3-4 people as your reads day 1. You have a similar narrow focus this game, and I think the differentiation of play is because you are not town. Why couldn't you just say this in the first place instead of acting like a massive dick? Because I gave a read, you openly stated you didn't read it, then I asked you questions and you refused to respond to any of them. So I decided to not respond to you. You were actually the one being the bag of dicks good sir. Like what the fuck is so hard with you? You gave a meta read which said "here is this game, it's different than this town game but i have no scum game to compare". I asked you to give out a scumgame of his to compare, you called me dickbags. So fuck you fuckface. What the fuck are you even arguing for you idiot? You asked badgering and leading questions, made no comment on a refuted accusation, attempted a new accusation, did not read the responses, did not respond to questions on why you disagreed, and then flipped out. So I trolled you, deal with it. quote my fucking posts where your post here stands any fucking ground.
Here is your accusation:
On February 28 2015 06:33 raynpelikoneet wrote:
ritoky why are you doing this:
1) commenting on something x hours ago
2) commenting on y hours ago (when x is kinda resolved)
3) come in just now and comment on X again?
Here is my response:
On February 28 2015 06:37 ritoky wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2015 06:33 raynpelikoneet wrote:
ritoky why are you doing this:
1) commenting on something x hours ago
2) commenting on y hours ago (when x is kinda resolved)
3) come in just now and comment on X again? last night I read part of the thread on painkillers, I woke up and realized I had no fucking memory of what I read. so I read it again, commented on something I didn't like, who gives a shit if someone else commented on it already?
Here is your response:
oh wait it doesn't exist. instead you move toward forcing your way into me asking a question to robik.
On February 28 2015 06:47 raynpelikoneet wrote:
he is town what do you think?
do I need to display the rest for you? you clearly lack self-awareness and we are both running out of posts.
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On February 28 2015 09:07 prplhz wrote:7 Show nested quote +On February 28 2015 09:04 KelsierSC wrote:On February 28 2015 08:57 prplhz wrote:On February 28 2015 07:54 KelsierSC wrote:
I'm waiting for prplhz to respond to my question.
6 There's really not much to it. "I think I see where you and Oatsmaster and raynpelikoneet are coming from" What I mean is. I think I see why you are voting him, I think I see the reason he is scum. You had made a one liner and I thought it was "alright", not good but it had the gist of "that's a weirdly serious first post" which I agreed with. Oatsmaster and raynpelikoneet hadn't explained their reads but that doesn't mean I cannot see they would think Trfel is scum. Hmm I guess that makes sense. Oats did actually vote him I didn't see that And you just saw that just now? I didn't mention in my post that Oatsmaster had voted.
...bolded
How else would you know oats thought trefl was scum as he didn't mention him in the thread...
That was my whole point
|
On February 28 2015 09:10 KelsierSC wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2015 09:07 prplhz wrote:7 On February 28 2015 09:04 KelsierSC wrote:On February 28 2015 08:57 prplhz wrote:On February 28 2015 07:54 KelsierSC wrote:
I'm waiting for prplhz to respond to my question.
6 There's really not much to it. "I think I see where you and Oatsmaster and raynpelikoneet are coming from" What I mean is. I think I see why you are voting him, I think I see the reason he is scum. You had made a one liner and I thought it was "alright", not good but it had the gist of "that's a weirdly serious first post" which I agreed with. Oatsmaster and raynpelikoneet hadn't explained their reads but that doesn't mean I cannot see they would think Trfel is scum. Hmm I guess that makes sense. Oats did actually vote him I didn't see that And you just saw that just now? I didn't mention in my post that Oatsmaster had voted. ...bolded How else would you know oats thought trefl was scum as he didn't mention him in the thread... That was my whole point
9
I don't get it. I'm scum because I think Oatsmaster thinks Trfel is scum even though Oatsmaster hasn't said so in the thread? How does that make me scum?
|
On February 28 2015 09:09 ritoky wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2015 09:03 raynpelikoneet wrote:On February 28 2015 09:01 ritoky wrote:On February 28 2015 08:58 raynpelikoneet wrote:On February 28 2015 08:55 ritoky wrote:On February 28 2015 08:53 raynpelikoneet wrote:On February 28 2015 08:50 ritoky wrote:On February 28 2015 08:45 raynpelikoneet wrote:On February 28 2015 08:41 ritoky wrote:On February 28 2015 08:34 KelsierSC wrote:
[quote]
I guess I can respond to this as well.
This is a post limit game what that means is that naturally.people will be more timid with their posting. This is not alignment indicative. Therefore the lack of activity is not surprising. I did comment on the first post of value.i saw, trefls long post. When I saw prplhz post about trefl that was a red flag and I'm asking him questions now to read him.
I think your case is pretty terrible. When I was mafia with you in imperial, you did a similar thing to what you're doing now. Your style of posting is much different from last game, but the thing that stands out to me most is your scope. In the previous game when you were town you cast a very wide net on day 1 and really were invested in multiple people, determining their alignments, and figuring out the game. In Imperial, you cast a shallow net focusing on 3-4 people as your reads day 1. You have a similar narrow focus this game, and I think the differentiation of play is because you are not town. Why couldn't you just say this in the first place instead of acting like a massive dick? Because I gave a read, you openly stated you didn't read it, then I asked you questions and you refused to respond to any of them. So I decided to not respond to you. You were actually the one being the bag of dicks good sir. if you do not understand why i didn't read your case's justification further you are an idiot. srsly, you are. again, why didn't you provide full proof from the beginning? On February 28 2015 08:50 ritoky wrote:On February 28 2015 08:45 raynpelikoneet wrote:On February 28 2015 08:41 ritoky wrote:On February 28 2015 08:34 KelsierSC wrote:On February 28 2015 06:57 ritoky wrote:
[quote]
the opposite as of now, I really liked his opening comment about making a read for the sake of making a read; but then I compared it to his previous game. he is less open with his opinions, doing less to actively solve the game, and his posts are shorter in length. I feel like he would care more about the lack of activity of most players if he were town. I guess I can respond to this as well. This is a post limit game what that means is that naturally.people will be more timid with their posting. This is not alignment indicative. Therefore the lack of activity is not surprising. I did comment on the first post of value.i saw, trefls long post. When I saw prplhz post about trefl that was a red flag and I'm asking him questions now to read him. I think your case is pretty terrible. When I was mafia with you in imperial, you did a similar thing to what you're doing now. Your style of posting is much different from last game, but the thing that stands out to me most is your scope. In the previous game when you were town you cast a very wide net on day 1 and really were invested in multiple people, determining their alignments, and figuring out the game. In Imperial, you cast a shallow net focusing on 3-4 people as your reads day 1. You have a similar narrow focus this game, and I think the differentiation of play is because you are not town. Why couldn't you just say this in the first place instead of acting like a massive dick? Because I gave a read, you openly stated you didn't read it, then I asked you questions and you refused to respond to any of them. So I decided to not respond to you. You were actually the one being the bag of dicks good sir. Like what the fuck is so hard with you? You gave a meta read which said "here is this game, it's different than this town game but i have no scum game to compare". I asked you to give out a scumgame of his to compare, you called me dickbags. So fuck you fuckface. What the fuck are you even arguing for you idiot? You asked badgering and leading questions, made no comment on a refuted accusation, attempted a new accusation, did not read the responses, did not respond to questions on why you disagreed, and then flipped out. So I trolled you, deal with it. quote my fucking posts where your post here stands any fucking ground. Here is your accusation: Show nested quote +On February 28 2015 06:33 raynpelikoneet wrote:
ritoky why are you doing this:
1) commenting on something x hours ago
2) commenting on y hours ago (when x is kinda resolved)
3) come in just now and comment on X again? Here is my response: Show nested quote +On February 28 2015 06:37 ritoky wrote:On February 28 2015 06:33 raynpelikoneet wrote:
ritoky why are you doing this:
1) commenting on something x hours ago
2) commenting on y hours ago (when x is kinda resolved)
3) come in just now and comment on X again? last night I read part of the thread on painkillers, I woke up and realized I had no fucking memory of what I read. so I read it again, commented on something I didn't like, who gives a shit if someone else commented on it already? Here is your response: oh wait it doesn't exist. instead you move toward forcing your way into me asking a question to robik. Show nested quote +On February 28 2015 06:47 raynpelikoneet wrote:
he is town what do you think? do I need to display the rest for you? you clearly lack self-awareness and we are both running out of posts.
BWHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!H!H!H!H!H!H!!!!!!
^^^^A^^SA^SÂÂÂ^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
