Newbie Mini Mafia LX - Page 10
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Tubesock
United States2726 Posts
| ||
Tubesock
United States2726 Posts
On January 11 2015 06:44 rsoultin wrote: I also disagree with you on that, Tube, about ExO. Scum or town can buddy up or cast doubt, and he never followed through on that post (that I recall). The follow-through from ExO is missing for scum-hunting, I think. You see HTS doing it. Asking questions. Reevaluating the answers. ExO seems to just throw it out there. I encourage you to read his filter. It seems very scattershot to me, especially on Day 1. I also don't like at all that he keeps on about you and him being the "Celestial push". No offense, but the majority of his argument were the things I already said looked scummy about Celestial's EoD play. And they did. However he conveniently forgets where he got those points from? I agree that his points probably weren't original. He didn't need to pursue the answer to my questions because just before I labelled Celestial mafia. Celestial even posted the exact post that ExO was talking to me about and it showed the answer was Celestial. It's WIFOM to think that Celestial wouldn't know the answer without a very tight noose around his neck, but I think the point is IF I didn't know who ExO was asking about, he would have said something further. I do this all the time, I'll ask someone something, and if they give a good answer, I leave them. I agree that buddying up isn't alignment indicative. My argument is that mafia wouldn't vet in thread who they are buddying up with, they'd ask in their QT. | ||
Tubesock
United States2726 Posts
I think ExO_ was seeing if I read Trfel's case critically and was paying attention, and trying to find information. My response told him I did infact see the same post, and am acting on it. Sadly, despite both you and ExO_ questioning/pushing whatever earlier than when I filter dove Trfel, I didn't suspect -Celestial- for a good halfway through my questioning of him. I started feeling weird, and then saw where you were suspicious of Cele and then I starting thinking more, and not liking Celestial's answers. Then I apparently was condescending to him and posted the baby seal post. Which, I wonder if he knows the significance of the baby seal and mafia. Celestial, I am not calling you fat. The Seal thing is a mafia reference to some play long ago a mafia guy did trying to look innocent. | ||
Tubesock
United States2726 Posts
| ||
Tubesock
United States2726 Posts
He may have asked it, but wouldn't mafiaExO also use that point in his argument? Did i miss it when he did? | ||
Tubesock
United States2726 Posts
On January 11 2015 07:07 rsoultin wrote: I just don't know how you could arrive at any different answer, is all. I'm not saying you're not critically thinking. Just not sure that ExO was doing anything but bringing up another point on Celestial, and really not seeing how that post was alignment indicative at all. Ah. It's mainly from my interactions in Carol with Alakaslam. It's how I reached out to him, and I was able to connect and use more interactions later to town him or not. He posted some flying post, and I nitpicked it to pieces in my head, so I wanted to know why he posted it. I guess I felt ExO was doing the same to me but with something in game and on case specific. | ||
Tubesock
United States2726 Posts
| ||
Tubesock
United States2726 Posts
That's the one, I'm finding it on day 2 and rereading. If he wasn't talking to me, then yeah I'm way off. | ||
Tubesock
United States2726 Posts
I posted something, then wihtout quoting a minute or two later he responds with the post we are talking about. | ||
Tubesock
United States2726 Posts
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/474146-newbie-mini-mafia-lx?page=39#765 | ||
Tubesock
United States2726 Posts
| ||
Tubesock
United States2726 Posts
On January 11 2015 09:40 -Celestial- wrote: Or at least that's how I read her posts. You are not getting lynched today. | ||
Tubesock
United States2726 Posts
Before Scott131337, the only people who I felt were helpful to me were ExO_, HTS, and Rsoultin. The people who are unhelpful to me were: -Celestial-, Jarjar, Shining, Silverarte, and I'd prefer to lynch Silverarte today. Let's keep the ExO and Shining conversation going though. | ||
Tubesock
United States2726 Posts
On January 11 2015 09:01 ExO_ wrote: I was the first to bring up Celestial rsoultin. Tube didn't start on him until after I did. Are you lying, or have you just not read the thread? I remember her talking to and questioning Celestial before you did Night 1. I assume she's speaking on that. | ||
Tubesock
United States2726 Posts
I need advice. I can't help it as on paper I know it's bad, but I think Shining is Town based on my tinfoil hat. After N2, a couple people including Rsoultin said the tinfoil hat may not be so bad. Scott comes in with 2 posts and at first I think I can easily sheep him. Then I think that -Celestial- who is still alive, and I think is super scummy, built a case on Shining. Rsoultin towned Jarjar who was my "strongest" scum behind Celestial minus his un-CC claim. This leaves as the mafia team: Celestial, Silverarte, and Scott/Gumdrops. Rsoultin died because she's the most important player to town. For me, this gives credence to towning Jarjar. It also would theoretically set up a mlynch of ExO_. | ||
Tubesock
United States2726 Posts
On January 11 2015 10:57 scott31337 wrote: Tubesock - I'm trying to feel your point of view on Silverante (beyond the uselessness I see). Do you think she's a better lynch then Shining? At this second, yes. I'm having trust issues at the moment and I typically use the Night phases and first half the day to absorb and think. I didn't get to do that during this night phase. I need time to think about worlds. I like your case. I could easily sheep it. I don't see anything really wrong with it persay, but I have a really hard time thinking Shining is scum due my theory, and D2 he sounded pretty towny to me. Even in N2 I didn't think his posts were scummy or anything. Granted I don't remember them, but I was focused on different things. I have a lot of things I think are mafia from Silverarte. I think I've mentioned basically all of them. I really need to marinate a bit here. If you have questions, I'll be happy to answer them. I'm just digesting right now. | ||
Tubesock
United States2726 Posts
| ||
Tubesock
United States2726 Posts
On January 11 2015 11:12 Half the Sky wrote: Regarding Shining, there are three different people that are scumreading him. Review the reasons why, review also when they are scumreading as their views could have changed. Scott has the (obviously) most recent case. Rasputin who is confirmed town has her reasons, and we need to crosscheck against Shining's filter for that. Personally, my thoughts on ExO at face value (prior to the exchange with Rasputin and exploring a world where he could be scum) are that he's a low-post high content type player. To me, postcount is NOT alignment indicative in of itself, but some people here make the argument that scum tend to drop off in posting over the course of the game, which is a valid concern. I don't know ExO's play style/meta, etc. but prior to today's exchange I did not feel any problems with him. Additionally, in the Carol post-game, I can't remember which vet it was, but someone said there are multiple ways of scumhunting. Regardless I'm going to review the exchange between him and Rasputin and see if there are any red flags. If there are, I will point them out and simply ask. Regarding Scott, a replacement player should always start as null until they make an impression. Gumdrop posted even less than Silverarte, but it's a new player now. and from what I can tell, I assume you are scumreading him based on POE. I am going to judge Scott on content and if I don't like his case I will question it. It is based on PoE. Which is why I wanted some advice from you two. That and I don't know how to deal with the situation where Scott and Celestial case Shining. Jarjar hasn't really interacted with me and avoided several questions from me, and you it turns out. I'm less concerned with his methodology, but I want to know at what % is someone lynch worthy? I mean at his last post it was 46% for his lead. Is that high or low or what? Why couldn't someone take away from that that he had essentially all town reads since they are less than 50% chance of being scum? | ||
Tubesock
United States2726 Posts
ExO has been very upfront with the fact he would have hammered WarWaffle if people shenanied off. In what world would mafia admit that? | ||
Tubesock
United States2726 Posts
On January 11 2015 11:29 jarjarbinks wrote: HTS on the equation thing added 2% scum based on what I was thinking his quotes were at the time I remember telling myself, I will laugh wen all of us think he's scum and he turns town. Not as funny now that we are in trouble of losing without even getting 1 right. I'm busy but I will spin my equation stuff up and post my thoughts. Based on knowledge of it I would guess exo and shining are top 2 with a very large dropoff before #3 Can you also elaborate on how to use that information? I don't think professional numbers people and laymen see numbers in any of the same manner. | ||
| ||