|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
lol is your argument that I called you suspicious (without knowing if i thought you were scummy) in order to later push a lynch on you in case you caught me?
is that really it?
|
I've never seen someone get so defensive over a null read that they would omgus....
|
Marv, can I hear your opinion on batsnacks?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On January 02 2015 02:07 Lazermonkey wrote:
Lynching Marv is a terrible idea btw.
why?
I mean naturally I agree, but why
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
oh he answered. nvm for now.
|
On January 02 2015 04:36 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On January 02 2015 02:07 Lazermonkey wrote:
Lynching Marv is a terrible idea btw. why? I mean naturally I agree, but why
Do you agree that his defense of you looks fishy?
|
On January 02 2015 04:35 justanothertownie wrote:
Marv, can I hear your opinion on batsnacks?
I think batsnacks is scum. I hate all of his posts but i didnt want to lose on chyz for a while. I know you're not asking me but id be glad to discuss batsnacks as scum since chyz and geript are practically locked for me
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On January 02 2015 04:35 justanothertownie wrote:
Marv, can I hear your opinion on batsnacks?
I think his posting should mean he is mafia if we just go by meta, but I'm not really sure that he is after all. I'll try to explain more when I've finished reading the thread.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On January 02 2015 04:37 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On January 02 2015 04:36 marvellosity wrote:On January 02 2015 02:07 Lazermonkey wrote:
Lynching Marv is a terrible idea btw. why? I mean naturally I agree, but why Do you agree that his defense of you looks fishy?
i think it looks the sort of defence either alignment can make tbh.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On January 02 2015 02:57 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On January 02 2015 02:51 Lazermonkey wrote:On January 02 2015 02:38 justanothertownie wrote:On January 02 2015 02:32 Lazermonkey wrote:On January 02 2015 02:22 justanothertownie wrote:On January 02 2015 02:21 Lazermonkey wrote:On January 02 2015 02:15 justanothertownie wrote:On January 02 2015 02:07 Lazermonkey wrote:
Lynching Marv is a terrible idea btw. Elaborate. Basically what Artanis said. marv will be posting more on D2 no matter what alignment he is. We will be able to judge him better at that point. If he sucks then, sure I can kill him. To kill the strongest player because he is inactive D1, when there are legitimate reasons to be inactive, is hardly worth it. Besides, even if your really think he is a good target, do you really believe he is the BEST target? If marv is scum he will probably be happy to even survive day1. On January 02 2015 02:23 justanothertownie wrote:
You didn't even give a read on marv. I'm not super impressed by marvs play this fair but TBH I don't have a strong read on him nor do I prioritize getting a better read on him atm. My point still stands though, I'm not willing to kill the strongest player because he is playing bad/is inactive D1. I once thought so too but this logic is actually retarded. If he is the strongest player he may aswell show us that he is town. So you would rather kill someone for not playing the game the way you want it to be played than to actually kill the most likely scum? Besides, if you really think marv is playing that bad does it make him more scum? It doesn't make sense for scum marv to suck so I feel this is a flawed argument. Marvs towngame is to play well and very active. Marvs scumgame is to not do jackshit. What do you think he is doing this game?
jat this is so weak -.-
|
On January 02 2015 04:37 DoctorHelvetica wrote:Show nested quote +On January 02 2015 04:35 justanothertownie wrote:
Marv, can I hear your opinion on batsnacks? I think batsnacks is scum. I hate all of his posts but i didnt want to lose on chyz for a while. I know you're not asking me but id be glad to discuss batsnacks as scum since chyz and geript are practically locked for me
Noted.
On January 02 2015 04:38 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On January 02 2015 04:35 justanothertownie wrote:
Marv, can I hear your opinion on batsnacks? I think his posting should mean he is mafia if we just go by meta, but I'm not really sure that he is after all. I'll try to explain more when I've finished reading the thread.
I would really love to hear that. I have a similar feeling about him.
|
On January 02 2015 04:42 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On January 02 2015 02:57 justanothertownie wrote:On January 02 2015 02:51 Lazermonkey wrote:On January 02 2015 02:38 justanothertownie wrote:On January 02 2015 02:32 Lazermonkey wrote:On January 02 2015 02:22 justanothertownie wrote:On January 02 2015 02:21 Lazermonkey wrote:On January 02 2015 02:15 justanothertownie wrote:On January 02 2015 02:07 Lazermonkey wrote:
Lynching Marv is a terrible idea btw. Elaborate. Basically what Artanis said. marv will be posting more on D2 no matter what alignment he is. We will be able to judge him better at that point. If he sucks then, sure I can kill him. To kill the strongest player because he is inactive D1, when there are legitimate reasons to be inactive, is hardly worth it. Besides, even if your really think he is a good target, do you really believe he is the BEST target? If marv is scum he will probably be happy to even survive day1. On January 02 2015 02:23 justanothertownie wrote:
You didn't even give a read on marv. I'm not super impressed by marvs play this fair but TBH I don't have a strong read on him nor do I prioritize getting a better read on him atm. My point still stands though, I'm not willing to kill the strongest player because he is playing bad/is inactive D1. I once thought so too but this logic is actually retarded. If he is the strongest player he may aswell show us that he is town. So you would rather kill someone for not playing the game the way you want it to be played than to actually kill the most likely scum? Besides, if you really think marv is playing that bad does it make him more scum? It doesn't make sense for scum marv to suck so I feel this is a flawed argument. Marvs towngame is to play well and very active. Marvs scumgame is to not do jackshit. What do you think he is doing this game? jat this is so weak -.-
No, it is simply the truth and you know it.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On January 02 2015 04:43 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On January 02 2015 04:42 marvellosity wrote:On January 02 2015 02:57 justanothertownie wrote:On January 02 2015 02:51 Lazermonkey wrote:On January 02 2015 02:38 justanothertownie wrote:On January 02 2015 02:32 Lazermonkey wrote:On January 02 2015 02:22 justanothertownie wrote:On January 02 2015 02:21 Lazermonkey wrote:On January 02 2015 02:15 justanothertownie wrote:On January 02 2015 02:07 Lazermonkey wrote:
Lynching Marv is a terrible idea btw. Elaborate. Basically what Artanis said. marv will be posting more on D2 no matter what alignment he is. We will be able to judge him better at that point. If he sucks then, sure I can kill him. To kill the strongest player because he is inactive D1, when there are legitimate reasons to be inactive, is hardly worth it. Besides, even if your really think he is a good target, do you really believe he is the BEST target? If marv is scum he will probably be happy to even survive day1. On January 02 2015 02:23 justanothertownie wrote:
You didn't even give a read on marv. I'm not super impressed by marvs play this fair but TBH I don't have a strong read on him nor do I prioritize getting a better read on him atm. My point still stands though, I'm not willing to kill the strongest player because he is playing bad/is inactive D1. I once thought so too but this logic is actually retarded. If he is the strongest player he may aswell show us that he is town. So you would rather kill someone for not playing the game the way you want it to be played than to actually kill the most likely scum? Besides, if you really think marv is playing that bad does it make him more scum? It doesn't make sense for scum marv to suck so I feel this is a flawed argument. Marvs towngame is to play well and very active. Marvs scumgame is to not do jackshit. What do you think he is doing this game? jat this is so weak -.- No, it is simply the truth and you know it.
yes, but it's weak as shit to be using it on this particular day. bad jat.
|
On January 02 2015 04:44 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On January 02 2015 04:43 justanothertownie wrote:On January 02 2015 04:42 marvellosity wrote:On January 02 2015 02:57 justanothertownie wrote:On January 02 2015 02:51 Lazermonkey wrote:On January 02 2015 02:38 justanothertownie wrote:On January 02 2015 02:32 Lazermonkey wrote:On January 02 2015 02:22 justanothertownie wrote:On January 02 2015 02:21 Lazermonkey wrote:On January 02 2015 02:15 justanothertownie wrote:
[quote]
Elaborate. Basically what Artanis said. marv will be posting more on D2 no matter what alignment he is. We will be able to judge him better at that point. If he sucks then, sure I can kill him. To kill the strongest player because he is inactive D1, when there are legitimate reasons to be inactive, is hardly worth it. Besides, even if your really think he is a good target, do you really believe he is the BEST target? If marv is scum he will probably be happy to even survive day1. On January 02 2015 02:23 justanothertownie wrote:
You didn't even give a read on marv. I'm not super impressed by marvs play this fair but TBH I don't have a strong read on him nor do I prioritize getting a better read on him atm. My point still stands though, I'm not willing to kill the strongest player because he is playing bad/is inactive D1. I once thought so too but this logic is actually retarded. If he is the strongest player he may aswell show us that he is town. So you would rather kill someone for not playing the game the way you want it to be played than to actually kill the most likely scum? Besides, if you really think marv is playing that bad does it make him more scum? It doesn't make sense for scum marv to suck so I feel this is a flawed argument. Marvs towngame is to play well and very active. Marvs scumgame is to not do jackshit. What do you think he is doing this game? jat this is so weak -.- No, it is simply the truth and you know it. yes, but it's weak as shit to be using it on this particular day. bad jat.
It is weaker than usual but I can't just ignore it because it is a holiday now, can I?
|
What jumped out to me about snacks at first is this:
On January 01 2015 06:02 batsnacks wrote:Has anyone played with DrH before? Is this normal? I feel like I would be more likely to vote TheChyz if DrH wasn't pushing him. The thread is about 30 pages long. DrH has about about a 5 page filter, of which ~90% of his filter is tunneling TheChyz. So ~16% of the game is DrH tunneling TheChyz. First, I think that's way too much focus on a single person in a 20 person game. DrH is the only person voting TheChyz, and I haven't heard anyone say "I agree with your case DrH," so he's obviously not reaching people. Second, this post is really townie imo: Show nested quote +On January 01 2015 03:52 TheChyz wrote:
I'm having some trouble with koshi after thinking it some. Basically once koshi started defending me, thats mostly all that koshi has contributed to the thread. Just talks about me being town and dr.H being wrong in his read. Like the first time seeing it it felt fine but the longer this game goes, that is all that koshi has been really on. Nothing much else apart from saying "this person is fine, these people are on my scum list, etc". I haven't really felt like I have gotten anything from koshi.
And his read on me just seems to good to not have a decent enough read on somebody else. Again I don't get why a scum would poke their head out this early to defend a lynch that doesn't have traction yet but the longer he does it the more it seems like koshi just knows im town but hasn't added too much to the thread other than that. Just seems suspicious to me.
So I think my conclusion would be that DrH's tunnel is not helping town.
First off I feel very uncomfortable when people suggest lynching for other reasons than believing in the read. I also feel uncomfortable when people talk about a vote like they think of it as leverage or something.
He picked out a post that eden had already thought made chyz seem town. I see no reason why a scum player would have a problem saying they changed their mind about a player who defended them. He wasn't under any real pressure and it's not like Koshi was gonna save him or anything lol. The thread already had major heat on Koshi at the time too.
|
In looking at some of Lazer's past games, he's probably an ok lynch. Marv is right on that he's pretty much a background player.
|
Superbia/batsnacks/geript/Lazermonkey/GlowingBear
ezgame ezlife
|
Yall need to be lynching geript
|
On January 02 2015 04:48 Koshi wrote:
Superbia/batsnacks/geript/Lazermonkey/GlowingBear
ezgame ezlife
Why is Superbia scum and RoL isn't?
|
On January 02 2015 04:49 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On January 02 2015 04:48 Koshi wrote:
Superbia/batsnacks/geript/Lazermonkey/GlowingBear
ezgame ezlife Why is Superbia scum and RoL isn't?
1 posted and 1 didn't.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
