TL Mafia LXIX: Carol Of The Bells - Page 2

On December 09 2014 04:50 Fecalfeast wrote:

Why are you asking templar what he thinks? What do you think?

On December 09 2014 07:36 Vivax wrote:
Protip for anyonewho didn't play a Palmar game: NEVER POST AFTER A DEADLINE, no matter what happens, you will get modkilled.

On December 09 2014 07:38 Palmar wrote:


Well you claim and stop being a miller, but you also die from the shot, so I don't see the point.




No they won't. He can only fire his staff, not people pretending to be his staff.

On December 09 2014 08:20 froggynoddy wrote:
Gogogo.

RNG sounds pretty silly. Though at least it would create some content and stop people from lurking.

On the subject of lurking. having not played in a while... when I did play, town usually spent Day 1 arguing on whether to lynch lurkers, I assume this is still the case. I have to go to bed now (work in the morning) but pre-empting this topic lets just cut to the chase and all agree nicely that policy lynching is stupid, however in the absence of a decent slip to go on, lurkers are the best of bad lynch options.

On December 09 2014 08:27 KelsierSC wrote:


i like how you can already split your town and tentative town

On December 09 2014 08:27 27ninjabunnies wrote:


Curious on your thought process here hun.

What did Froggy do, or not do, to be put into your scum pile?

On December 09 2014 08:32 27ninjabunnies wrote:
@ Slam
@ Damdred

Didn't HF basically do just the same thing? Except more of he came into the thread with "Omgerd we have cap posts. Im town, follow me later" and then leaves.

And yet, Damdred, you have him as town for basically a shit post?

While I agree, people talking about policy lynching and lurkers seem off, he seems just an easy target for people to scum read because of that.

On December 09 2014 08:44 Fecalfeast wrote:

Grab the sumo suits, I'm down for a rumble.

Why are you wasting posts trying to get people to talk about you wasting posts?

On December 09 2014 08:35 Vivax wrote:
What froggy said is simple common sense but also something that never matters cause at the end of the day it's mostly some scummy looking person getting lynched.

I don't see it as scummy, just as something useless to talk about which isn't scummy at this stage of the game.
The biggest accusation you could make is that he's so serious in a setting where people are kinda joking, but that's not enough to go with in my book. It's more like he's annoyed that people are discussing policies when in past games it always led to that statement of his making the most sense.

Null for me.

On December 09 2014 08:54 Vivax wrote:


Why? It's my opinion that stands against yours, with all reasons given for it. Please give your reason for finding this scummy.

3/60

On December 09 2014 09:03 Half the Sky wrote:


I don't lol, that was mainly an introduction to her saying possible other girls. I read her first post, and then just now stumbled into the whole discussion of her comment on lurkers and such that is being debated right now.

Now I had to read all those posts a few times, but I can see where Holyflare is coming from.

Slam, no you are not creepy.

On December 09 2014 09:18 Vivax wrote:


Well he got to the lurker topic through the rng topic, saying it would produce content which is good against lurkers.
It is a very generic post that does however fit into the context of town starting discussion and posting unseriously, so I don't want to judge it as scummy, if I were asked about lurker lynching I would reach the same conclusion.

Your point that he starts talking about it spontaneously without lurker lynches being discussed still fits into the context in my opinion:

One quick post before going to bed with some opinion on policy lynching, at the start of the game.

So no, I won't scumread him for it.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

Things I find more interesting:

27nb putting froggy into the iffy pile after saying she didn't find his post alignment indicative.
This happens after suspicion piles onto her. Deffo scummy cause seems like a way of aligning her reads with the guys suspecting her in some attempt to look less scummy cause of her deviant opinion.





Number 2:



Ritoky attacks the post in discussion in a...passive way but doesn't actually try to draw conclusions from it in later posts, or take part in the discussion revolving around that post, this suggests he doesn't try to get alignment indicative information from the game.