Russia Today Mini Mafia - Page 39

On November 28 2014 08:52 Holyflare wrote:
I meant your previous points were a rehash. These new ones are pretty much just continuing to point out the same things in a different way. His elvis read was bad and scummy = his elvis read was bad because he's new.

Your only real new point is that he used bs meta and refused to respond about what he did being scummy which he did exactly tje same way to me already

On November 28 2014 09:07 GlowingBear wrote:
That's your opinion.

Btw, Superbia, I'm not a vet. Or am I? O.o

On November 28 2014 09:11 Superbia wrote:


I'm pretty sure you've played this game before. I've seen your name many times.

On November 28 2014 09:16 GlowingBear wrote:


Since May... Not sure if it make and a vet.

How do you read marv?

On November 28 2014 09:16 marvellosity wrote:
Playing game before != vet

On November 28 2014 09:20 marvellosity wrote:
damn son, i have a shedload of posts (many of them pointless i admit) and you don't have a read on me?

D:

On November 28 2014 09:22 Superbia wrote:


Leaning town if anything. I haven't really had a reason to care that much.

On November 28 2014 09:23 GlowingBear wrote:


Wait, what?? Why?

On November 28 2014 09:23 Superbia wrote:


Because he hasn't posted anything that stood out as scummy to me? Stop overacting.

On November 28 2014 09:25 GlowingBear wrote:


You're basically saying that you don't care for discovering people's alignment, only if they vote for you.

On November 28 2014 09:32 Superbia wrote:


I don't even think you genuinely believe this. I did look at people who voted on me first, mainly because I know my alignment and I thought I had been pretty damn townie. I initially read you scummy because of your meta-read on me, which I know for a fact to be a 100% false. That being said, my town play for d1 is not to discover everyone's alignments. I look for standout scummy things and push on those, you stood out, I'm pushing on you.

On November 28 2014 09:33 marvellosity wrote:

At what point did you think this? Your filter was literally full of absolutely nothing when I was talking about it with jat earlier. Before your GB stuff.

On November 28 2014 09:10 Superbia wrote:


Right. I'm not going to lie, I did not really register your points on GB at all. Let me give a quick recap:
1. GB says something regarding my meta, which I recognize as weak and wrong, I make an in-depth push on it.
2. I check out GB's filter and notice the following:
- Weak push on Elvis for a bad reason.
- Vote do not align correctly with reads (I did notice you pushed on this as well, but I do not recall seeing any follow up).
- Cursory reads with no conclusions.
- Trying to devalue your case for no good reason.

Hence I scum-read him and take up this in my case. My case was rather complete, so it makes sense that it would include points that might've been brought up before. Do you genuinely feel like my points were a complete or partial rehash of your points? What does this say about my alignment?

On November 28 2014 09:37 Holyflare wrote:


I think you're confusing things here. You asked why i was uninterested and I'm telling you because of smash and you saying things I've already said /agree with