I mean asserting that u win erry game as town or w/e just makes u look worse I think if ur play is meh because ur supposed to be some godly town or something.

Not that I think HF or geript have particularly good grasps on this game atm

Sn0_Man

Tebellong44238 Posts

November 27 2014 18:15 GMT

#618

well for one thing both of them have strange ideas about me being scum based on the literal nothings

asserting that ur play is godlike day 1 is questionable regardless of veracity. see: geripts earlier claims

Sn0_Man

Tebellong44238 Posts

November 27 2014 18:21 GMT

#625

On November 28 2014 03:20 geript wrote:

Show nested quote +

Like saying you're town and therefore we're way off base is ridiculous. Show us that you're town and show ushow and where else we've gone wrong then. Like all you're doing right now is shitting on people

see now ur putting words into my mouth too

Sn0_Man

Tebellong44238 Posts

November 27 2014 18:31 GMT

#628

On November 28 2014 03:25 geript wrote:

Show nested quote +

Is there a different way to take" neither big G nor HF have a good grasp on this game" than that we're both town and both pretty wrong in our suspects?

There's no assertion that either of you are town in my statement. Feel free to try re-reading what I said.

both of you started this game by being unreasonably rude to me without any particular reason and seem to believe that I'm scum because I had no desire to interact with you at game start when all you wanted to do was be offensive.

I don't see how any of that would be alignment indicative but it definitely means that at least one of your reads is bad and based on bullshit. Technically if you were scum you'd have perfect reads, but w/e.

If I had particular reason to believe that you are any given alignment that would probably make it into the thread

Sn0_Man

Tebellong44238 Posts

November 27 2014 18:37 GMT

#630

On November 28 2014 03:31 Sn0_Man wrote:
it definitely means that at least one of your reads is bad and based on bullshit.

Sn0_Man

Tebellong44238 Posts

November 27 2014 18:38 GMT

#632

you made up a read and offered to attack me if I didn't either vote with you or attack your read, neither of which provide any value to the game

Sn0_Man

Tebellong44238 Posts

November 27 2014 18:50 GMT

#636

On November 28 2014 03:45 Holyflare wrote:
I didn't make up a read i made a valuable case thati wanted you to comment on. Of course it's valuable to the game because it starts discussion.

hi everybody vote the person with 0 posts 1 hour into day 1
thats my exact definition of useless

On November 28 2014 03:46 geript wrote:

Show nested quote +

Except that being wrong doesn't equal being bad. Having one wrong read doesn't invalidate all reads. Am I wrong about you generally liking to mix it up early on and have fun joking around? Like having a scum read on you isn't being rude. Pressuring you to take a stance isn't rude.
Like I still don't get how your stance makes any sense whatsoever.

talk to me about how ur opening posts involve pressuring me to take a stance
keep in mind this is as some other retard is also voting me for no reason and everybody's busily being goddam wrong about russian politics.

Sn0_Man

Tebellong44238 Posts

November 27 2014 18:55 GMT

#639

On November 28 2014 03:53 Holyflare wrote:
Then why couldn't you just say that in the first place??????

On November 27 2014 09:08 Sn0_Man wrote:

Show nested quote +

i dont particularly subscribe to the "vote 60 mins into day 1" plan personally

Sn0_Man

Tebellong44238 Posts

November 27 2014 18:56 GMT

#641

?
I never said its based on nothing
I never said I dont agree
its simply useless. As is any vote in the first hour of day one

Sn0_Man

Tebellong44238 Posts

November 27 2014 18:57 GMT

#642

alright all my posts are getting highjacked

Sn0_Man

Tebellong44238 Posts

November 27 2014 18:59 GMT

#644

On November 28 2014 03:59 Holyflare wrote:
It's only useless if you don't agree?????????

whats so hard about reading comprehension?

Sn0_Man

Tebellong44238 Posts

November 27 2014 19:06 GMT

#648

see ur making up stuff in ur head again about me. you keep doing it and it's hella annoying

THERES NO VALUE TO RUNNING A LYNCH CAMPAIGN ON A NON-PRESENT PERSON 1 HOUR INTO DAY 1.

i thought that ur reason for voting jat was amusing, and not like utterly invalid even if i didn't assign it any weight myself. But that didn't incline me to vote, and it certainly didn't incline me to fight you for no fucking reason about it. so the options presented to me were basically to ignore you.

which unsurprisingly is the option i'm taking again.