|
On November 25 2014 12:25 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On November 25 2014 12:18 Oatsmaster wrote:
He has bad posts regarding a read ohf HTS, his policy lynch on kush is really bad and he is using that to avoid playing the game and doing actual useful things. This isn't a read. None of oats' posts contain reads. oats is play is like 80% asking questions that have already been answered and 20% badgering the host about issues he could fix himself. If my plynch on kush is bad give me something better. I've seen oats play a lot better than he is doing right now.
Completely not true.
Back up your stats or you are lying and should die.
I don't see why I have to play the game for you. Your mindset this game is totally off. You aren't interested in finding scum, you are interested in answering questions and posting for an okay amount.
From what you say here, my lynch has much more reason than kush's lynch but you don't consider that at all.
|
Man, what is this.
Whos scum Trefel?
|
|
|
|
|
On November 25 2014 12:41 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On November 25 2014 12:31 Oatsmaster wrote:On November 25 2014 12:25 batsnacks wrote:On November 25 2014 12:18 Oatsmaster wrote:
He has bad posts regarding a read ohf HTS, his policy lynch on kush is really bad and he is using that to avoid playing the game and doing actual useful things. This isn't a read. None of oats' posts contain reads. oats is play is like 80% asking questions that have already been answered and 20% badgering the host about issues he could fix himself. If my plynch on kush is bad give me something better. I've seen oats play a lot better than he is doing right now. Completely not true. Back up your stats or you are lying and should die. I don't see why I have to play the game for you. Your mindset this game is totally off. You aren't interested in finding scum, you are interested in answering questions and posting for an okay amount. From what you say here, my lynch has much more reason than kush's lynch but you don't consider that at all. If all of this is true then your vote is in the right place and you should keep it there. Show nested quote +On November 25 2014 12:33 Alakaslam wrote:On November 25 2014 12:25 batsnacks wrote:On November 25 2014 12:18 Oatsmaster wrote:
He has bad posts regarding a read ohf HTS, his policy lynch on kush is really bad and he is using that to avoid playing the game and doing actual useful things. This isn't a read. None of oats' posts contain reads. oats is play is like 80% asking questions that have already been answered and 20% badgering the host about issues he could fix himself. If my plynch on kush is bad give me something better. I've seen oats play a lot better than he is doing right now. Well PLZ just kusplain the Kush policy? I don't think anything interesting is happening in the thread so I vote kush because he has a habit of not playing as scum. I don't see any harm in giving him a hill to climb, especially after last game.
???? So your continuation is "you're right".
I dont see how kush being scum last game makes him scum this game.
|
|
|
On November 25 2014 13:13 batsnacks wrote:
##unvote
##vote: Oatsmaster
step it up oats
Now this makes no sense. Why not earlier? And how exactly do you expect me to step it up?
Trfel, why are sicklucker and hts even a little bit scum?
|
whats your read on batsnacks?
|
On November 25 2014 13:00 LightningStrike wrote:
I just got back from playing Pokemon Trading Card game with some friends and went to a late dinner at Red Robin so sorry about my activity T_T
Breshke just seems to be mad at sicklucker for what happened in our previous game :O
Batsnacks lost his mind or he is scum trying to go after kush but kush didn't post anything just yet so I don't got a read on kush.
Oatsmaster is town in my eyes as he is being very constructive on the agenda for Day 1.
Are we allow to sleep on anyday because I remember in my last game we had slept for 1 day and I wondering if we are allowed to becausee personally I don't think Day 1 lynching is a good idea because of possible afks or just having horrible reads.
What else do you think?
And whos scum?
|
On November 25 2014 14:54 kushm4sta wrote:
##vote batsnacks
yeah thats right.
OMGUS HIS FACE.
|
On November 25 2014 14:57 Trfel wrote:I'm honestly not sure if it is better to policy lynch or no lynch. Either way, there are definitely conflicting views in this thread (LightningStrike on the no lynch side, batsnacks on the policy lynch side, for example), so if there was clearly a right answer, there wouldn't be an argument over this, since the town could just prove that their answer was correct, and everyone else would either accept it or be lynched. Therefore, I can't read into his vote on kushm4sta. It's easy to unvote later if necessary. Meanwhile, if the vote causes him to post more, great. However, repeatedly asking others to also vote kushm4sta does seem strange, since we probably should be more interested in getting people to talk now. If policy lynching is the correct route (which I'm not sure), we can worry about that closer to the vote deadline. I would definitely like batsnacks to let up on kushm4sta, that is something to potentially return to later. I agree with batsnacks on his view of Half the Sky, as I previously stated. Definitely doesn't seem to me like as clear of a town read as some other people think. Batsnacks also seems to have slightly hinted that you (Oatsmaster) could be scum, which I suppose is possible, but I don't really see evidence for at the moment. Other than that, he hasn't really shared any constructive thoughts. Therefore, I would hope that he would start being more constructive in the near future, particularly by pushing for information on people who are posting (as opposed to kushm4sta), or I could definitely read him as scum.
The right answer is to lynch scum.
Bleh, this whole post is wishy washy.
Is your final conclusion that he isnt town but isnt scum too?
|
|
|
Its fine to post your thought process but its easier for me to read if you have some main points or posts(quote please) that you have some conclusions to.
Also solid conclusions are great.
|
On November 25 2014 15:40 kushm4sta wrote:
oats can you stop promoting spam. hts is obvious town and we don't need more content from him.
Dont be mean,
And its good to convince people by making them feel important. Basic sociology.
IANASM
|
On November 25 2014 17:13 rsoultin wrote:
Played with Damdred before on another site. He loves his questions.
Breshke vote comes off trying to pressure SL back into the game (which I believe is what was claimed).
What value does a no-lynch vote hold? Avoiding hitting cop/doc or whatever? I tend to like some form of solid information, since at least three players are blowing smoke and sometimes others are too concerned about meta to be of much use. A lynch can get that solid info.
Scummiest to me right now is Bats and/or Oats, though take that with a grain of salt because I'm not feeling strongly about anyone as scum at the moment. The back and forth over Kush and who is contributing what is very white noise. Lot of blah and little helpful being said. Could just be getting sidetracked, or the argument is possibly staged.
^ My take from reading this thread half-asleep. You guys waste no time; I'll give you that.
Whats wrong with my reasoning on why bat's policy vote on kush is bad and his continuing badness with his vote on me and the circumstances surrounding that? You must elaborate.
|
I dont see how Bats AND me are scum unless you are the most paranoid person alive.
|
On November 25 2014 17:40 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On November 25 2014 17:24 Oatsmaster wrote:
Whats wrong with my reasoning on why bat's policy vote on kush is bad and his continuing badness with his vote on me and the circumstances surrounding that? You must elaborate. This I find worth answering. Neither you nor Bat have inherently bad reasoning why to vote or not to vote Kush. As I said above, it's the back and forth nothing argument that I protest to.
How the fuck is bats "I'm voting kush because of something he said in a different game" reasoning good??
Blows my mind.
What are your reads for the other active players?
|
On November 25 2014 22:36 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On November 25 2014 22:30 Breshke wrote:
Bats do you disagree with kush that oats is being pro town? Kush said he was acting pro-town, not being pro-town. I agree with what kush said. 
kush said probably town.
So you are voting a townread? Nice.
|
You know bats, calling me mafia with no reason doesnt make people want to vote for me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
