|
On November 24 2014 09:04 sicklucker wrote:
Wait what Serejai said she didnt have a coach and that was evident from her play. I think breske said the same thing. Not super relevant but you could be lying for some reason here
Breshke posted it after endgame and Serejai said she wasn't using her coach.
I'm lynchig you. You could have just take a look at the endgame. Lol.
|
Ya I dont understand this bait thing either. I looked through his filter again and I missed it.
|
On November 24 2014 09:08 ritoky wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2014 08:57 GlowingBear wrote:On November 24 2014 08:44 ritoky wrote:On November 24 2014 08:29 GlowingBear wrote:
Why don't you give a "deep" read then ritoky?
All you have done is scumreading me for the hopeless thing.
I'm mafia just for that?
And if yes, who are my partners? can't right now, watching sounders and seahawks game simultaneously, maybe later i will show you This is why I want to lynch you. You're forcing this lynch on me or at least drawing suspicions to me. But when asked to give other reads, you refuse. I'm almost sure you're scum. reads: VE - town rayn - still town lian - maybe town fecalfeast - very slight mafia lean damdred - leaning mafia templar - leaning mafia GB - mafia not particularly strong feelings on the rest, wouldnt be surprised if there's a mafia between slam and chez and i am wrong on someone.
I'm mafia calling 2 of my partners town when people are calling them scum.
Yeah, right.
Very deep reads you have here. Owait.
|
On November 24 2014 09:10 GlowingBear wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2014 09:08 ritoky wrote:On November 24 2014 08:57 GlowingBear wrote:On November 24 2014 08:44 ritoky wrote:On November 24 2014 08:29 GlowingBear wrote:
Why don't you give a "deep" read then ritoky?
All you have done is scumreading me for the hopeless thing.
I'm mafia just for that?
And if yes, who are my partners? can't right now, watching sounders and seahawks game simultaneously, maybe later i will show you This is why I want to lynch you. You're forcing this lynch on me or at least drawing suspicions to me. But when asked to give other reads, you refuse. I'm almost sure you're scum. reads: VE - town rayn - still town lian - maybe town fecalfeast - very slight mafia lean damdred - leaning mafia templar - leaning mafia GB - mafia not particularly strong feelings on the rest, wouldnt be surprised if there's a mafia between slam and chez and i am wrong on someone. I'm mafia calling 2 of my partners town when people are calling them scum. Yeah, right. Very deep reads you have here. Owait.
told you i couldn't and would later, you bitch and whine that i won't even give you a hint; then i give them to you with the promise of explanation later, and you whine some more. like srsly you have 0 agenda with this other than to piss me off.
|
On November 24 2014 09:11 ritoky wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2014 09:10 GlowingBear wrote:On November 24 2014 09:08 ritoky wrote:On November 24 2014 08:57 GlowingBear wrote:On November 24 2014 08:44 ritoky wrote:On November 24 2014 08:29 GlowingBear wrote:
Why don't you give a "deep" read then ritoky?
All you have done is scumreading me for the hopeless thing.
I'm mafia just for that?
And if yes, who are my partners? can't right now, watching sounders and seahawks game simultaneously, maybe later i will show you This is why I want to lynch you. You're forcing this lynch on me or at least drawing suspicions to me. But when asked to give other reads, you refuse. I'm almost sure you're scum. reads: VE - town rayn - still town lian - maybe town fecalfeast - very slight mafia lean damdred - leaning mafia templar - leaning mafia GB - mafia not particularly strong feelings on the rest, wouldnt be surprised if there's a mafia between slam and chez and i am wrong on someone. I'm mafia calling 2 of my partners town when people are calling them scum. Yeah, right. Very deep reads you have here. Owait. told you i couldn't and would later, you bitch and whine that i won't even give you a hint; then i give them to you with the promise of explanation later, and you whine some more. like srsly you have 0 agenda with this other than to piss me off.
Yeah, take your time to find reasons behind your reads.
|
I'm out people.
Reevaluate your reads. I want to lynch between sick lucker, ritoky, or slam today. Give thoughts.
Also, I want damdred to comment on Templar and Templar to comment on damdred. I also want both commenting on slam. You guys are refusing to do this awesome.
|
On November 24 2014 09:13 GlowingBear wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2014 09:11 ritoky wrote:On November 24 2014 09:10 GlowingBear wrote:On November 24 2014 09:08 ritoky wrote:On November 24 2014 08:57 GlowingBear wrote:On November 24 2014 08:44 ritoky wrote:On November 24 2014 08:29 GlowingBear wrote:
Why don't you give a "deep" read then ritoky?
All you have done is scumreading me for the hopeless thing.
I'm mafia just for that?
And if yes, who are my partners? can't right now, watching sounders and seahawks game simultaneously, maybe later i will show you This is why I want to lynch you. You're forcing this lynch on me or at least drawing suspicions to me. But when asked to give other reads, you refuse. I'm almost sure you're scum. reads: VE - town rayn - still town lian - maybe town fecalfeast - very slight mafia lean damdred - leaning mafia templar - leaning mafia GB - mafia not particularly strong feelings on the rest, wouldnt be surprised if there's a mafia between slam and chez and i am wrong on someone. I'm mafia calling 2 of my partners town when people are calling them scum. Yeah, right. Very deep reads you have here. Owait. told you i couldn't and would later, you bitch and whine that i won't even give you a hint; then i give them to you with the promise of explanation later, and you whine some more. like srsly you have 0 agenda with this other than to piss me off. Yeah, take your time to find reasons behind your reads.
w/e done talking to you, you're scum just trying to piss people off. don't even give a shit what you say for the rest of the game.
but just to show your antagonistic ass:
http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/arizona-cardinals-seattle-seahawks-20141123026/
http://sports.yahoo.com/soccer/mls/la-galaxy-seattle-sounders-fc-21730/
oh wow, look at that! someone not lying about doing shit irl! imagine that.
|
@temp
was your SL case bait?
You said you don't like meta reads and yet you did a case based on one.
And you make a "sarcastic" post saying gb found the flaw in your case. WTF is this all about?
Personally, I don't trust meta reads done by other people, but I trust my own meta reads on people I've played with before. I don't trust your meta read on SL. Unless other people can back up your meta read on SL i'm not taking that case into consideration.
|
|
|
He was the co host for my game This isint a bait he believes what he wrote if he did backtrack on it thats super scummy. His reads are bad tho as I said. You get so much better from your first game to your second you learn alot ask yourselfs if any of your metas were the same from your 1st and second game. And I just found the post where he backtracks wtf.
On November 24 2014 01:31 The_Templar wrote:
Thank god someone actually saw that hole in the logic. It was intentional.
I am not having fun this game.
|
Damn those graphs are legit ty.
|
Ok i wanna know what VE, damd and slam think about temp.
|
lian is so town like who puts that much effort into a graph that gives town a clear picture if their mafia
|
On November 24 2014 09:30 liancourt wrote:![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/PZpFdpI.png)
missing my scum read on damdred
|
On November 24 2014 09:38 ritoky wrote:missing my scum read on damdred
nvm i am blind
|
your Country52798 Posts
On November 24 2014 09:24 liancourt wrote:
@temp
was your SL case bait?
You said you don't like meta reads and yet you did a case based on one.
And you make a "sarcastic" post saying gb found the flaw in your case. WTF is this all about?
Personally, I don't trust meta reads done by other people, but I trust my own meta reads on people I've played with before. I don't trust your meta read on SL. Unless other people can back up your meta read on SL i'm not taking that case into consideration.
No, my post before emphasizing how much I dislike meta reads was the 'bait'. The primary purpose was to see who was actually reading. Unfortunately, GB found it too quickly so it was pointless
|
Canada11355 Posts
I would lunch SL or slam too
|
On November 24 2014 10:03 The_Templar wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2014 09:24 liancourt wrote:
@temp
was your SL case bait?
You said you don't like meta reads and yet you did a case based on one.
And you make a "sarcastic" post saying gb found the flaw in your case. WTF is this all about?
Personally, I don't trust meta reads done by other people, but I trust my own meta reads on people I've played with before. I don't trust your meta read on SL. Unless other people can back up your meta read on SL i'm not taking that case into consideration. No, my post before emphasizing how much I dislike meta reads was the 'bait'. The primary purpose was to see who was actually reading. Unfortunately, GB found it too quickly so it was pointless
This doesn't make sense.
1) What can you draw from people actually reading?
2) Why is it unfortunately, as it proved someone was reading?
|
On November 24 2014 10:13 Fecalfeast wrote:
I would lunch SL or slam too
Ya I know you would
On November 23 2014 07:12 Serejai wrote:
fecalfiesta
11-19-2014
02:20 PM ET (US)
If sicklucker ends up being town, I'm gonna try to policy lynch him in the paint mafia
lol.
|
your Country52798 Posts
On November 24 2014 10:15 GlowingBear wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2014 10:03 The_Templar wrote:On November 24 2014 09:24 liancourt wrote:
@temp
was your SL case bait?
You said you don't like meta reads and yet you did a case based on one.
And you make a "sarcastic" post saying gb found the flaw in your case. WTF is this all about?
Personally, I don't trust meta reads done by other people, but I trust my own meta reads on people I've played with before. I don't trust your meta read on SL. Unless other people can back up your meta read on SL i'm not taking that case into consideration. No, my post before emphasizing how much I dislike meta reads was the 'bait'. The primary purpose was to see who was actually reading. Unfortunately, GB found it too quickly so it was pointless This doesn't make sense. 1) What can you draw from people actually reading? 2) Why is it unfortunately, as it proved someone was reading?
I was trying to figure out who wasn't paying any attention. So, someone actually reading didn't help.
In retrospect, it was a really bad idea, but I was not lying about it, I would have done exactly the same thing without thinking about it except I wouldn't have made that comment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
