|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On October 16 2014 15:30 Alakaslam wrote:Show nested quote +On October 15 2014 18:37 marvellosity wrote:
I hope you're mafia BH because if you're town you're being poopy :x And you thought my earlier statement was totally uninformed. If we say no all the time we lose but you are mad I voted yes on an incredibly likely team. PFFT, scumread me I need not go. I would rather go but if I must sit by and throw out my 2¢ and vote obstinately impartially, I will. Heck that probably isn't a bad thing.
Explain the reasons for thinking this. For lian, for me, for Plam.
|
On October 16 2014 19:04 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On October 16 2014 17:21 Oatsmaster wrote:
Is this happening?
1 day gone and 12 pages.
Ok.... Tbh it's actually quite comfortable pace.
its so boring though.
f5
f5
f5
f5
nothing.
Nothing whatsoever.
48 hours way too long for the vote
|
|
|
Thread has over 2500 views and there's 8 people. So I think you're not the only one f5ing nothing oats.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Roughly 1912 of them are mine, though.
|
maybe we should shorten the time for votes and make it so that if there are 4 nay votes we automatically go over to the next team leader regardless of the deadline. It is kinda slow...
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Looking at the OP, the 2nd is down to 36h for vote, then 3rd onwards is 24h.
So it's not too bad.
|
we have 5 missions...so take that into consideration as well.
|
On October 16 2014 21:18 marvellosity wrote:
Looking at the OP, the 2nd is down to 36h for vote, then 3rd onwards is 24h.
So it's not too bad.
oh ok.
meh the 48 hours feels completely unnecessary.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On October 16 2014 22:20 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On October 16 2014 21:18 marvellosity wrote:
Looking at the OP, the 2nd is down to 36h for vote, then 3rd onwards is 24h.
So it's not too bad. oh ok. meh the 48 hours feels completely unnecessary.
But in another game in another time, the 48h might have been totally necessary :>
Everyone have a joint, or a glass of port, or a long slow fuck, or whatever you fellows do to relax.
|
On October 16 2014 22:34 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On October 16 2014 22:20 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 16 2014 21:18 marvellosity wrote:
Looking at the OP, the 2nd is down to 36h for vote, then 3rd onwards is 24h.
So it's not too bad. oh ok. meh the 48 hours feels completely unnecessary. But in another game in another time, the 48h might have been totally necessary :> Everyone have a joint, or a glass of port, or a long slow fuck, or whatever you fellows do to relax.
Why would it ever take 48 hours for a non discussing yay/nay?
I mean, its like you discuss after the vote not during the vote.
|
I think oats' comments on the pace of the game are a little scummy. Even though I agree.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On October 16 2014 22:42 batsnacks wrote:
I think oats' comments on the pace of the game are a little scummy. Even though I agree.
Explain?
|
On October 16 2014 22:42 batsnacks wrote:
I think oats' comments on the pace of the game are a little scummy. Even though I agree.
In general more time is town favored.
but thats only when people use the time.
So no, its not scummy. and you so hypocrite.
|
Yeah... I'm hypocrating. That's no good.
All this #deadgame talk is probably just bringing back bad memories.
|
|
|
Tbh game is probably mostly easy. Don't include BH/Slam/Kelsier all that much and if one of the others is spy we'll find him fast enough.
|
On October 16 2014 19:21 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On October 16 2014 15:30 Alakaslam wrote:On October 15 2014 18:37 marvellosity wrote:
I hope you're mafia BH because if you're town you're being poopy :x And you thought my earlier statement was totally uninformed. If we say no all the time we lose but you are mad I voted yes on an incredibly likely team. PFFT, scumread me I need not go. I would rather go but if I must sit by and throw out my 2¢ and vote obstinately impartially, I will. Heck that probably isn't a bad thing. Explain the reasons for thinking this. For lian, for me, for Plam.
Lian is the one i want to vett with this trip, I townreAd you and palmar because your plans make sense.
Also, the fact that you both read Lian as town makes me feel the mission will likely succeed.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On October 17 2014 00:45 Alakaslam wrote:Show nested quote +On October 16 2014 19:21 marvellosity wrote:On October 16 2014 15:30 Alakaslam wrote:On October 15 2014 18:37 marvellosity wrote:
I hope you're mafia BH because if you're town you're being poopy :x And you thought my earlier statement was totally uninformed. If we say no all the time we lose but you are mad I voted yes on an incredibly likely team. PFFT, scumread me I need not go. I would rather go but if I must sit by and throw out my 2¢ and vote obstinately impartially, I will. Heck that probably isn't a bad thing. Explain the reasons for thinking this. For lian, for me, for Plam. Lian is the one i want to vett with this trip, I townreAd you and palmar because your plans make sense. Also, the fact that you both read Lian as town makes me feel the mission will likely succeed.
Are mafia not able to townread townies?
Did you read my post this (very short) game about how it's easy for players like me and Palmar to make good sounding plans/ideas/strategies?
|
Yeah tbh marv needs to step it up to become palmar level confirmed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
