Avogadro's Number Mini Mafia - Page 69

On October 15 2014 19:00 raynpelikoneet wrote:

You call it defending. I call it pointing out statements that are ridiculous and have no proof behind them.
Could you post the proof?
Or let's do it this way...

Question to everyone:
Who thinks what ritoky says about me has proof behind it and/or has he clearly pointed out the proof he is claiming is there?
Do you think his accusations towards me are reasonable for someone who is properly reading the game?

On October 15 2014 12:03 Damdred wrote:
Ok, so i need clarification on a few things, you can choose to answer now or when you wake up.
On your list post, even though you say it might change today you have you will probably vote on sqr depending on how his day goes. But you have him under probably mafia, but you have myself and ritoky higher...if you know where your vote will probably go why isn't he higher on the list at that point?
Why is kush so low on the list considering his pretty firm town read on you, and the "reaction Test" that you did?

On October 15 2014 14:26 VisceraEyes wrote:

Like here's my thing - while thinking Hopeless was Damdred he tried to leverage his claim plus Hopeless' activity to get Damdred to vote for Hopeless. Once he fucked this up, THEN he unclaims.

All townies MUST vote for GlowingBear today. I've even convinced Geript the Mafia to bus this guy, everyone use your heads and do the right thing.

On October 15 2014 14:29 VisceraEyes wrote:
Like, that's why he bails on the claim. NOT because he was reaction testing, but because he fucked up and tried to manipulate someone who wasn't even here. If he is trying to get a READ on Hopeless, then he doesn't MISTAKE Hopeless for DAMDRED and try and get him to lynch HIMSELF man! If he's trying to get a read on Hopeless that post would be directed AT Hopeless or whatever.

Guys VOTE FOR GLOWINGBEAR!

On October 16 2014 01:20 VisceraEyes wrote:
The only other person I'll consider voting for today is geript.

On October 16 2014 01:27 VisceraEyes wrote:
I don't understand your point on geript. All you say is his reaction looks "out of context" which doesn't make sense - regardless of his alignment, he thought you were town on D1, then you claimed, so he questioned his read of you. What is out of context about his quote?

On October 12 2014 17:19 Chairman Ray wrote:
I'm pretty confident that sqrt is scum atm.

Sqrt entered the thread with a joke scumclaim (which is fine imo), but then left for a few hours, and re-entered the thread with some really bad reads after some people were pushing on him. There's a clear difference when town is giving bad reads and when scum is giving bad reads, and it's clear that his reads show a scum mindset. His reasonings are all just "this person did X, therefore he's mafia", without any regard to why X is scummy.

I will summarize all his reads:

CR is mafia because he made 2 filler posts
VE is mafia because he gave a townread on geript and himself
Geript is mafia because he's buddying DP
GB is mafia because he didn't want to discuss one of his scumreads

What else do those 4 reads have in common? Firstly, they are barely relevant to the game with everything else that's happened. Secondly, they all appear near the start of their filters.

So what does this mean? This means that sqrt probably just clicked on a few people's filter, read until he could comment on one thing, and then stopped there. Scummy as hell.

One other thing that I find interesting. When I defended sqrt's read on GB, he responded to me normally. Let's take a step back and look at this. Sqrt thinks I'm mafia. That means when I ask him something, it should cross his mind that I'm mafia with an agenda other than getting more information. He should have noticed that I asked him about GB, and didn't respond at all on his reads on me. That's one very obvious thing a town sqrt should have noticed. What's more interesting is that he has both GB an I as scumreads, but when I defended GB, he responded to me like he's trying to convince me of his read. For someone who accused geript and DP of buddying, it should have been 1000% obvious that I'm buddying GB, but nope, not at all. Scum scum scummy scummy scum scum.

##Vote: sqrtofneg1

On October 14 2014 05:44 Chairman Ray wrote:
The case on Oats is pretty solid

You have my vote

On October 16 2014 01:41 VisceraEyes wrote:
sqrt why aren't you voting for geript? You say I raise excellent points against him, lynch him with me.