|
Read page 56. That's all the explanation anyone needs.
On September 28 2014 00:56 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2014 00:54 batsnacks wrote: @HF most of the reason I am scum reading you So you're think he's mafia, but you don't claim to have a red check on him? Can you confirm?
He never thought I was claiming.
|
I believe that we are losing the game
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On September 28 2014 03:47 batsnacks wrote:Read page 56. That's all the explanation anyone needs. Show nested quote +On September 28 2014 00:56 Palmar wrote:On September 28 2014 00:54 batsnacks wrote: @HF most of the reason I am scum reading you So you're think he's mafia, but you don't claim to have a red check on him? Can you confirm? He never thought I was claiming.
yes he did think you were claiming hence why he said you should come out and say it if you had a check, what bull shit are you trying to pull???
|
On September 27 2014 22:59 Holyflare wrote: It's not a soft claim and if it is he's mafia.
I guess now that it's convenient it is a soft claim, right? Scum.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On September 28 2014 03:48 Killing wrote: I believe that we are losing the game
you haven't done a single thing today
|
On September 28 2014 03:47 batsnacks wrote:Read page 56. That's all the explanation anyone needs. Show nested quote +On September 28 2014 00:56 Palmar wrote:On September 28 2014 00:54 batsnacks wrote: @HF most of the reason I am scum reading you So you're think he's mafia, but you don't claim to have a red check on him? Can you confirm? He never thought I was claiming. He just tried to understand what you are saying? I don't see how that makes him mafia at all.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On September 28 2014 03:56 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On September 27 2014 22:59 Holyflare wrote: It's not a soft claim and if it is he's mafia. I guess now that it's convenient it is a soft claim, right? Scum. Oh look my vote is on you, must be because I think you are mafia.
|
On September 28 2014 03:58 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2014 03:47 batsnacks wrote:Read page 56. That's all the explanation anyone needs. On September 28 2014 00:56 Palmar wrote:On September 28 2014 00:54 batsnacks wrote: @HF most of the reason I am scum reading you So you're think he's mafia, but you don't claim to have a red check on him? Can you confirm? He never thought I was claiming. He just tried to understand what you are saying? I don't see how that makes him mafia at all.
I don't buy it at all.
|
On September 28 2014 03:57 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2014 03:48 Killing wrote: I believe that we are losing the game you haven't done a single thing today
I called everyone bad and said that we should probably be looking at sky + the flip from sky onto hopeless. Does that not count? I mean you're just blindly lynching people left and right.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On September 28 2014 04:03 Killing wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2014 03:57 Holyflare wrote:On September 28 2014 03:48 Killing wrote: I believe that we are losing the game you haven't done a single thing today I called everyone bad and said that we should probably be looking at sky + the flip from sky onto hopeless. Does that not count? I mean you're just blindly lynching people left and right.
you said that's because the wagon was probably mafia driven but it wasn't and you never followed it up, you never really interact with anything and when people make cases you don't say a single thing about them until it's far too late and then you still do absolutely nothing about it
|
On September 28 2014 04:03 Killing wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2014 03:57 Holyflare wrote:On September 28 2014 03:48 Killing wrote: I believe that we are losing the game you haven't done a single thing today I called everyone bad and said that we should probably be looking at sky + the flip from sky onto hopeless. Does that not count? I mean you're just blindly lynching people left and right. Ok. So you think Sky is scum and scum "flipped" the lynch onto hopeless. How did they do that? And who are they?
|
On September 28 2014 04:10 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2014 04:03 Killing wrote:On September 28 2014 03:57 Holyflare wrote:On September 28 2014 03:48 Killing wrote: I believe that we are losing the game you haven't done a single thing today I called everyone bad and said that we should probably be looking at sky + the flip from sky onto hopeless. Does that not count? I mean you're just blindly lynching people left and right. Ok. So you think Sky is scum and scum "flipped" the lynch onto hopeless. How did they do that? And who are they?
How did they do that Sorcery
Who are they Probably one of palmar or HF
|
They fact that they give so few fucks about it should also tell you something
|
On September 28 2014 04:15 Killing wrote: They fact that they give so few fucks about it should also tell you something
Maybe they'd give more fucks if you gave enough fucks to vote one of them.
|
Palmar was pushing Hopeless all fucking day. He in no way was responsible for any kind of switch.
|
On September 28 2014 04:17 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2014 04:15 Killing wrote: They fact that they give so few fucks about it should also tell you something Maybe they'd give more fucks if you gave enough fucks to vote one of them.
Sorry I'm not your standard forum player that just goes for spite lynches.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
few fucks? i'm voting for the person that soft claimed seer with a red check on me, the person who literally wanted to vote me because "we agreed on too many stuff", one of the people who joined the hopeless wagon BEFORE i even made the case to switch onto hopeless and arguably the person with the biggest mafia agenda today by shitting up the thread instead of being openly transparent and ending this whole palmar thing immediately
|
If one of them actually is scum, the "case" that you posted certainly isn't why.
|
On September 28 2014 04:18 justanothertownie wrote: Palmar was pushing Hopeless all fucking day. He in no way was responsible for any kind of switch.
He was the first to bring him up and then complained about it for 3-4 posts.
|
On September 28 2014 04:19 Killing wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2014 04:17 batsnacks wrote:On September 28 2014 04:15 Killing wrote: They fact that they give so few fucks about it should also tell you something Maybe they'd give more fucks if you gave enough fucks to vote one of them. Sorry I'm not your standard forum player that just goes for spite lynches.
It's not spite if you think they're mafia, which you said you do.
|
|
|
|