|
On September 28 2014 04:19 Holyflare wrote:
few fucks? i'm voting for the person that soft claimed seer with a red check on me, the person who literally wanted to vote me because "we agreed on too many stuff", one of the people who joined the hopeless wagon BEFORE i even made the case to switch onto hopeless and arguably the person with the biggest mafia agenda today by shitting up the thread instead of being openly transparent and ending this whole palmar thing immediately
WE WANTED TO KILL SKYDRAGON AND THEN YOU MADE THE SWITCH ONTO A NOW CONFIRMED TOWN. Why the fuck wouldn't he be suspicious of you? I had to in my town list AND EVEN I'M SUSPICIOUS OF YOU. Jesus fuck, this is just a circlejerk of OMGUS.
|
On September 28 2014 04:19 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
If one of them actually is scum, the "case" that you posted certainly isn't why.
Aimed at Batsnacks, naturally.
I'm not moving my vote unless you deliver some sort of ironclad case.
|
Canada11355 Posts
So palmar's line of thought seems like mental gymnastics to me. Batsnacks could have been a bit more cooperative, sure but all he said is "I feel like HF is mafia but idk why" I don't think that sounds like a redcheck. Why would seer even bother beating around the bush? If you really got a redcheck, wouldn't you claim it? The worst case, mafia counterclaims you and you have at least one guaranteed scum.
So from this, we can infer that batsnacks in not the seer. Good talk, everyone.
|
On September 28 2014 04:20 Killing wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2014 04:18 justanothertownie wrote:
Palmar was pushing Hopeless all fucking day. He in no way was responsible for any kind of switch. He was the first to bring him up and then complained about it for 3-4 posts.
Well, you said we should be looking at how Hopeless suddenly got more votes than Sky, right? Palmar had nothing to do with that.
|
On September 28 2014 04:20 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2014 04:19 Killing wrote:On September 28 2014 04:17 batsnacks wrote:On September 28 2014 04:15 Killing wrote:
They fact that they give so few fucks about it should also tell you something Maybe they'd give more fucks if you gave enough fucks to vote one of them. Sorry I'm not your standard forum player that just goes for spite lynches. It's not spite if you think they're mafia, which you said you do.
Good point actually.
|
On September 28 2014 04:21 Fecalfeast wrote:
So palmar's line of thought seems like mental gymnastics to me. Batsnacks could have been a bit more cooperative, sure but all he said is "I feel like HF is mafia but idk why" I don't think that sounds like a redcheck. Why would seer even bother beating around the bush? If you really got a redcheck, wouldn't you claim it? The worst case, mafia counterclaims you and you have at least one guaranteed scum.
So from this, we can infer that batsnacks in not the seer. Good talk, everyone.
The issue isn't that "batsnacks was annoying." The issue is "batsnacks is being deliberately obtuse despite everyone telling him to stop being a dillhole."
|
On September 28 2014 04:21 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2014 04:20 Killing wrote:On September 28 2014 04:18 justanothertownie wrote:
Palmar was pushing Hopeless all fucking day. He in no way was responsible for any kind of switch. He was the first to bring him up and then complained about it for 3-4 posts. Well, you said we should be looking at how Hopeless suddenly got more votes than Sky, right? Palmar had nothing to do with that.
Does saying "This guy is scum, we should be voting him" 8 times, not count as starting a BW?
|
On September 28 2014 04:21 Fecalfeast wrote:
So palmar's line of thought seems like mental gymnastics to me. Batsnacks could have been a bit more cooperative, sure but all he said is "I feel like HF is mafia but idk why" I don't think that sounds like a redcheck. Why would seer even bother beating around the bush? If you really got a redcheck, wouldn't you claim it? The worst case, mafia counterclaims you and you have at least one guaranteed scum.
So from this, we can infer that batsnacks in not the seer. Good talk, everyone.
I don't cooperate with someone I think is mafia.
|
Canada11355 Posts
On September 28 2014 04:23 ObiWanShinobi wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2014 04:21 Fecalfeast wrote:
So palmar's line of thought seems like mental gymnastics to me. Batsnacks could have been a bit more cooperative, sure but all he said is "I feel like HF is mafia but idk why" I don't think that sounds like a redcheck. Why would seer even bother beating around the bush? If you really got a redcheck, wouldn't you claim it? The worst case, mafia counterclaims you and you have at least one guaranteed scum.
So from this, we can infer that batsnacks in not the seer. Good talk, everyone. The issue isn't that "batsnacks was annoying." The issue is "batsnacks is being deliberately obtuse despite everyone telling him to stop being a dillhole."
All the dillholes last game were town
|
Canada11355 Posts
On September 28 2014 04:26 Fecalfeast wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2014 04:23 ObiWanShinobi wrote:On September 28 2014 04:21 Fecalfeast wrote:
So palmar's line of thought seems like mental gymnastics to me. Batsnacks could have been a bit more cooperative, sure but all he said is "I feel like HF is mafia but idk why" I don't think that sounds like a redcheck. Why would seer even bother beating around the bush? If you really got a redcheck, wouldn't you claim it? The worst case, mafia counterclaims you and you have at least one guaranteed scum.
So from this, we can infer that batsnacks in not the seer. Good talk, everyone. The issue isn't that "batsnacks was annoying." The issue is "batsnacks is being deliberately obtuse despite everyone telling him to stop being a dillhole." All the dillholes last game were town
except GB*
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On September 28 2014 04:26 Fecalfeast wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2014 04:23 ObiWanShinobi wrote:On September 28 2014 04:21 Fecalfeast wrote:
So palmar's line of thought seems like mental gymnastics to me. Batsnacks could have been a bit more cooperative, sure but all he said is "I feel like HF is mafia but idk why" I don't think that sounds like a redcheck. Why would seer even bother beating around the bush? If you really got a redcheck, wouldn't you claim it? The worst case, mafia counterclaims you and you have at least one guaranteed scum.
So from this, we can infer that batsnacks in not the seer. Good talk, everyone. The issue isn't that "batsnacks was annoying." The issue is "batsnacks is being deliberately obtuse despite everyone telling him to stop being a dillhole." All the dillholes last game were town
at least they were arguing about what they were doing in that game and other games, in this game he was intentionally dragging out the whole thing even though palmar was clearly impatient
|
On September 28 2014 04:26 Fecalfeast wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2014 04:26 Fecalfeast wrote:On September 28 2014 04:23 ObiWanShinobi wrote:On September 28 2014 04:21 Fecalfeast wrote:
So palmar's line of thought seems like mental gymnastics to me. Batsnacks could have been a bit more cooperative, sure but all he said is "I feel like HF is mafia but idk why" I don't think that sounds like a redcheck. Why would seer even bother beating around the bush? If you really got a redcheck, wouldn't you claim it? The worst case, mafia counterclaims you and you have at least one guaranteed scum.
So from this, we can infer that batsnacks in not the seer. Good talk, everyone. The issue isn't that "batsnacks was annoying." The issue is "batsnacks is being deliberately obtuse despite everyone telling him to stop being a dillhole." All the dillholes last game were town except GB*
Which should be proof enough that people being dillholes isn't a free townread.
|
Canada11355 Posts
Re-reading snacks' filter he is being obtuse but only to palmar, really. I think this is a fruitless pursuit unless someone can come up with a better reason than 'we was being a dick and we said stop but he didn't stop'
I personally wish SkyDragon would show up. His filter didn't get any better overnight.
|
On September 28 2014 04:28 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2014 04:26 Fecalfeast wrote:On September 28 2014 04:23 ObiWanShinobi wrote:On September 28 2014 04:21 Fecalfeast wrote:
So palmar's line of thought seems like mental gymnastics to me. Batsnacks could have been a bit more cooperative, sure but all he said is "I feel like HF is mafia but idk why" I don't think that sounds like a redcheck. Why would seer even bother beating around the bush? If you really got a redcheck, wouldn't you claim it? The worst case, mafia counterclaims you and you have at least one guaranteed scum.
So from this, we can infer that batsnacks in not the seer. Good talk, everyone. The issue isn't that "batsnacks was annoying." The issue is "batsnacks is being deliberately obtuse despite everyone telling him to stop being a dillhole." All the dillholes last game were town at least they were arguing about what they were doing in that game and other games, in this game he was intentionally dragging out the whole thing even though palmar was clearly impatient
This, basically.
|
Canada11355 Posts
I never said free townread! I just mean this isn't very alignment indicative. He didn't push the conflict, he just didn't answer palmar and it turned into an interrogation.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On September 28 2014 04:21 Killing wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2014 04:19 Holyflare wrote:
few fucks? i'm voting for the person that soft claimed seer with a red check on me, the person who literally wanted to vote me because "we agreed on too many stuff", one of the people who joined the hopeless wagon BEFORE i even made the case to switch onto hopeless and arguably the person with the biggest mafia agenda today by shitting up the thread instead of being openly transparent and ending this whole palmar thing immediately WE WANTED TO KILL SKYDRAGON AND THEN YOU MADE THE SWITCH ONTO A NOW CONFIRMED TOWN. Why the fuck wouldn't he be suspicious of you? I had to in my town list AND EVEN I'M SUSPICIOUS OF YOU. Jesus fuck, this is just a circlejerk of OMGUS.
where on earth did he say that was the reason for him being suspicious of me? he isn't just suspicious, he voted for me and called me mafia! that's not suspicion that's a flat out accusation based on absolutely nothing but his reason of agreeing with me and not what you are stating
|
On September 28 2014 04:23 Killing wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2014 04:21 justanothertownie wrote:On September 28 2014 04:20 Killing wrote:On September 28 2014 04:18 justanothertownie wrote:
Palmar was pushing Hopeless all fucking day. He in no way was responsible for any kind of switch. He was the first to bring him up and then complained about it for 3-4 posts. Well, you said we should be looking at how Hopeless suddenly got more votes than Sky, right? Palmar had nothing to do with that. Does saying "This guy is scum, we should be voting him" 8 times, not count as starting a BW?
We will continue this discussion when you start reading my post. Deal?
|
On September 28 2014 04:31 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2014 04:23 Killing wrote:On September 28 2014 04:21 justanothertownie wrote:On September 28 2014 04:20 Killing wrote:On September 28 2014 04:18 justanothertownie wrote:
Palmar was pushing Hopeless all fucking day. He in no way was responsible for any kind of switch. He was the first to bring him up and then complained about it for 3-4 posts. Well, you said we should be looking at how Hopeless suddenly got more votes than Sky, right? Palmar had nothing to do with that. Does saying "This guy is scum, we should be voting him" 8 times, not count as starting a BW? We will continue this discussion when you start reading my post. Deal?
You start lynching mafia, I'll start reading posts. Deal?
|
On September 28 2014 04:32 Killing wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2014 04:31 justanothertownie wrote:On September 28 2014 04:23 Killing wrote:On September 28 2014 04:21 justanothertownie wrote:On September 28 2014 04:20 Killing wrote:On September 28 2014 04:18 justanothertownie wrote:
Palmar was pushing Hopeless all fucking day. He in no way was responsible for any kind of switch. He was the first to bring him up and then complained about it for 3-4 posts. Well, you said we should be looking at how Hopeless suddenly got more votes than Sky, right? Palmar had nothing to do with that. Does saying "This guy is scum, we should be voting him" 8 times, not count as starting a BW? We will continue this discussion when you start reading my post. Deal? You start lynching mafia, I'll start reading posts. Deal?
That is hard. I would have to find and lynch your teammates to make this work and it seems as if they aren't as obvious as you are.
|
Cowards. Put your votes where your mouths are.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
