|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On September 06 2014 08:48 kushm4sta wrote:Show nested quote +On September 06 2014 08:45 kitaman27 wrote:On September 06 2014 08:24 kushm4sta wrote:
batsnacks i just looked at your filter closer pretty much.
kita leaving your options open much? On September 06 2014 01:08 kushm4sta wrote:
Honestly kits I don't know yet mostly do to lack of research. I think bat is scum. I don't have any opinions on your connection with him. I haven't filet dived you and I skimmed your long posts. So it's hard for me to have an opinion You accuse me of leaving my options open, yet you're the one that was incapable of answering my simple question. So do you think it's scummy that I couldn't answer your "simple question"? Don't you buy why I said I couldn't answer it at the time?
No....didn't I just say the opposite when I said I'm having second thoughts on a scum kush...hence seeing townie things?
Why are you suggestioning that I'm positioning myself to lynch you or something...
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On September 06 2014 09:04 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
Kita, you gonna pressure me or what?
Nope, I'm going to ignore you and you're not going to be able to resist posting an incredibly compelling case in order to gain my approval. However, no matter what you do, you're never going to be good enough to live up to your older brother. He's always going to be my favorite. Remember that.
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On September 06 2014 09:33 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
Seriously though, come at me Kita. I'm not happy with the fact that you're content to post some garbage on me that was taken completely out of context and then show no interest in following up on anything that you say.
I mean, I'm still probably going to tell you to fuck yourself, but it's the thought that counts. Why are you so disinterested in my responses to anything? You know that me posting a case isn't going to prove me town, especially if other players have already covered the topics I wanted to cover or if my case turns out to be bad. It could be intentionally bad, or unintentionally bad, so I don't know how you would even start to go about discerning the difference between the two when your request is for me to just post a case on anything.
PEdit: Apparently I have won over the crowd. That's always fun.
I did not post garbage about you. You went 24 hours at the start of day two after claiming to be disgusted about the lack of activity the previous day. You openly bragged about doing nothing and seemed quite proud of the fact that people saw you doing nothing and thought "lol yep, that's classic Obi".
If it weren't for the fact that you were voting damdred and batsnacks I would probably dislike you more. I'm not going to beg you for an explanation for your reads, but I would vote for your lynch if you're going to do nothing but troll this cycle 
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On September 06 2014 09:23 batsnacks wrote:
I don't even know who I'm voting for because the host lost interest after I broke his game or something. Just in case I'm still voting for kush, which I shouldn't be right now.
Here is the plan that we should take.
batsnacks is going with the idea that "the host lost interest after he broke his game", the only reason to think that is that if batsnack actually has a role related to voting that could actually involve the host being concerned about the votes.
I propose that batsnacks role claims. If he fails, we should lynch him because he is trolling about the idea that 3d put out there. There is zero reason to assume that the host is concerned about breaking the game as vanilla town.
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On September 06 2014 09:50 batsnacks wrote:
kitaman27 if I was right about you AND your mission d1 I am going to be really pleased with myself. I just want to throw that out there.
Role claim for post above?
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On September 06 2014 09:53 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On September 06 2014 09:52 kitaman27 wrote:On September 06 2014 09:23 batsnacks wrote:
I don't even know who I'm voting for because the host lost interest after I broke his game or something. Just in case I'm still voting for kush, which I shouldn't be right now. Here is the plan that we should take. batsnacks is going with the idea that "the host lost interest after he broke his game", the only reason to think that is that if batsnack actually has a role related to voting that could actually involve the host being concerned about the votes. I propose that batsnacks role claims. If he fails, we should lynch him because he is trolling about the idea that 3d put out there. There is zero reason to assume that the host is concerned about breaking the game as vanilla town. That is really, really optimistic of you.
So what are you saying?
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On September 06 2014 09:55 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On September 06 2014 09:54 kitaman27 wrote:On September 06 2014 09:53 batsnacks wrote:On September 06 2014 09:52 kitaman27 wrote:On September 06 2014 09:23 batsnacks wrote:
I don't even know who I'm voting for because the host lost interest after I broke his game or something. Just in case I'm still voting for kush, which I shouldn't be right now. Here is the plan that we should take. batsnacks is going with the idea that "the host lost interest after he broke his game", the only reason to think that is that if batsnack actually has a role related to voting that could actually involve the host being concerned about the votes. I propose that batsnacks role claims. If he fails, we should lynch him because he is trolling about the idea that 3d put out there. There is zero reason to assume that the host is concerned about breaking the game as vanilla town. That is really, really optimistic of you. So what are you saying? That that is really, really optimistic of you.
Can we be serious for just 60 seconds, that's all I ask.
Do you honestly believe that the host was upset with you about your votes for role related reasons?
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On September 06 2014 09:57 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On September 06 2014 09:55 kitaman27 wrote:On September 06 2014 09:55 batsnacks wrote:On September 06 2014 09:54 kitaman27 wrote:On September 06 2014 09:53 batsnacks wrote:On September 06 2014 09:52 kitaman27 wrote:On September 06 2014 09:23 batsnacks wrote:
I don't even know who I'm voting for because the host lost interest after I broke his game or something. Just in case I'm still voting for kush, which I shouldn't be right now. Here is the plan that we should take. batsnacks is going with the idea that "the host lost interest after he broke his game", the only reason to think that is that if batsnack actually has a role related to voting that could actually involve the host being concerned about the votes. I propose that batsnacks role claims. If he fails, we should lynch him because he is trolling about the idea that 3d put out there. There is zero reason to assume that the host is concerned about breaking the game as vanilla town. That is really, really optimistic of you. So what are you saying? That that is really, really optimistic of you. Can we be serious for just 60 seconds, that's all I ask. Do you honestly believe that the host was upset with you about your votes for role related reasons? I'm disappointed. Show nested quote +On September 06 2014 00:28 kitaman27 wrote:On September 06 2014 00:28 3d12 wrote:On September 06 2014 00:23 kitaman27 wrote:
I think you're leading down the wrong path there 3d. This is probably the strangest post I've seen from you yet, kita. Many potential missions have been pointed out by you and you've been really good at pointing out/heading off potential mission-like behavior. What makes you say this couldn't be true? Honestly, from the way your viewpoint changed without any clarification, it sounds like you're trying to pull me off of bat's trail. I'm townreading you so far, so give me a reason to keep doing so. Why is this mod warning irrelevant? You don't make reads off of mod warnings, ever.
Nope, I'm not making a read off the mod warning. I'm asking you if you were stated "because the host lost interest after I broke his game or something" as something that you actually believe to be true or you stated it to poke fun at 3d.
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On September 06 2014 10:01 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On September 06 2014 09:59 kitaman27 wrote:On September 06 2014 09:57 batsnacks wrote:On September 06 2014 09:55 kitaman27 wrote:On September 06 2014 09:55 batsnacks wrote:On September 06 2014 09:54 kitaman27 wrote:On September 06 2014 09:53 batsnacks wrote:On September 06 2014 09:52 kitaman27 wrote:On September 06 2014 09:23 batsnacks wrote:
I don't even know who I'm voting for because the host lost interest after I broke his game or something. Just in case I'm still voting for kush, which I shouldn't be right now. Here is the plan that we should take. batsnacks is going with the idea that "the host lost interest after he broke his game", the only reason to think that is that if batsnack actually has a role related to voting that could actually involve the host being concerned about the votes. I propose that batsnacks role claims. If he fails, we should lynch him because he is trolling about the idea that 3d put out there. There is zero reason to assume that the host is concerned about breaking the game as vanilla town. That is really, really optimistic of you. So what are you saying? That that is really, really optimistic of you. Can we be serious for just 60 seconds, that's all I ask. Do you honestly believe that the host was upset with you about your votes for role related reasons? I'm disappointed. On September 06 2014 00:28 kitaman27 wrote:On September 06 2014 00:28 3d12 wrote:On September 06 2014 00:23 kitaman27 wrote:
I think you're leading down the wrong path there 3d. This is probably the strangest post I've seen from you yet, kita. Many potential missions have been pointed out by you and you've been really good at pointing out/heading off potential mission-like behavior. What makes you say this couldn't be true? Honestly, from the way your viewpoint changed without any clarification, it sounds like you're trying to pull me off of bat's trail. I'm townreading you so far, so give me a reason to keep doing so. Why is this mod warning irrelevant? You don't make reads off of mod warnings, ever. Nope, I'm not making a read off the mod warning. I'm asking you if you were stated "because the host lost interest after I broke his game or something" as something that you actually believe to be true or you stated it to poke fun at 3d. If you're not making a read off of it then I don't understand why you want me to answer. 3d12 isn't scum. I have expressed this previously. You already had that information before this dialog.
I'm not asking about 3d. I'm asking, do honestly think that it's possible that the host is worried that you broke his game or were you saying it as a joke?
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
I'm asking you. This doesn't need to be so difficult.
On September 04 2014 07:42 batsnacks wrote:
Given that, my vote was in an excellent spot I stand by the decisions I made day 1
On September 05 2014 08:17 batsnacks wrote:duh
On September 04 2014 03:56 batsnacks wrote:
That's two down.
On September 04 2014 07:05 batsnacks wrote:
Do you think I was right about kitaman27?
On September 04 2014 06:50 batsnacks wrote:
there is at least 1 scum between the two of you.
On September 05 2014 07:34 batsnacks wrote:
I think I will vote obiwan or kitaman today.
Considering you were so completely confident that I am mafia, why does it take a random 1 liner from kush and a joke vote from Obi for you to finally vote me. Weren't you in an "excellent spot" yesterday and you stand by you're decision? Now you're voting me in passing, saying that you'll probably end up on kush.
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On September 06 2014 10:04 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
"Posting a case" isn't going to make me town or not, and you know it, so why would you make such an asinine request?
Giving a read on essentially anyone is an "asinine" request?
You said that you were going to sheep Vivax and don't care to do anything at the time. It's not like I posted this right after you made your post. You went 24 hours with NOTHING. You state that making a case isn't going to make you town. Well how exactly do you expect us to make a read if you post NOTHING for more than the first half of the cycle.
If you're looking for specifics, what is your read on Kush, Damdred, Bunnies and batsnacks and why?
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On September 06 2014 10:08 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On September 06 2014 10:07 kitaman27 wrote:I'm asking you. This doesn't need to be so difficult. On September 04 2014 07:42 batsnacks wrote:
Given that, my vote was in an excellent spot I stand by the decisions I made day 1 On September 05 2014 08:17 batsnacks wrote:On September 05 2014 08:17 Vivax wrote:
Anyone here who thinks kita is scum? duh On September 04 2014 03:56 batsnacks wrote:
That's two down. On September 04 2014 07:05 batsnacks wrote:
Do you think I was right about kitaman27? On September 04 2014 06:50 batsnacks wrote:
there is at least 1 scum between the two of you. On September 05 2014 07:34 batsnacks wrote:
I think I will vote obiwan or kitaman today. Considering you were so completely confident that I am mafia, why does it take a random 1 liner from kush and a joke vote from Obi for you to finally vote me. Weren't you in an "excellent spot" yesterday and you stand by you're decision? Now you're voting me in passing, saying that you'll probably end up on kush. Quote where I said I will probably end up on kush today and I will unvote you.
Misread that. The point still stands, why have you completely ignored your number one scumread. Is your case still that you think I had to be on the majority day one or are there any posts today that lead you to your conclusion?
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On September 06 2014 08:09 kitaman27 wrote:
I'm having second thoughts on a scum kush, but I'm in wait and see mode.
To elaborate on this one, from the games I've looked at, kush appears to shut down as mafia once he becomes a legitimate lynch target. He commonly lashes out at people stating that there is obviously nothing he can do, so why should he work for people who aren't willing to listen.
This game he at least seems willing to give opinions, rather than accepting his fate and going dark.
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
I'd like you to post it within the next 60 seconds. Thanks.
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
poofter, do you agree that batsnacks should post his "case in notepad" against me as proof that he is not lying?
If he continues to wait, that just gives him time to make one up,
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On September 06 2014 10:18 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
Reads are not the same things as cases, so don't turn around and try to change what your initial request was into trying to get my view on things when you're goading me into pushing for literally anyone's lynch.
I asked you for your reads and why. Are you honestly arguing semantics now?
On September 06 2014 10:18 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
Furthermore, what does me being afk for 24 hours have to do with anything? Do you know why I was afk? Did you think I had the ability to check the thread? Why or why not?
You yourself pointed out that you loved how you could get away with doing nothing and nobody would care. I called you out on it in attempt for you to give us something and now you complain about it?
On September 06 2014 10:18 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
I can get the fact that going away and doing nothing for extended periods of time can be considered scummy, but I came back into the thread wanting to engage you and you just didn't care enough to figure out why. What gives?
I asked you for your opinions on four different players and you refused. What gives?
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On September 06 2014 10:24 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On September 06 2014 10:23 kitaman27 wrote:
poofter, do you agree that batsnacks should post his "case in notepad" against me as proof that he is not lying?
If he continues to wait, that just gives him time to make one up, Dude you should do motivational speaking. Your optimism is off the charts.
poofter, will you vote with me on him if he refuses to post it?
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On September 06 2014 10:25 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 06 2014 10:24 batsnacks wrote:On September 06 2014 10:23 kitaman27 wrote:
poofter, do you agree that batsnacks should post his "case in notepad" against me as proof that he is not lying?
If he continues to wait, that just gives him time to make one up, Dude you should do motivational speaking. Your optimism is off the charts. poofter, will you vote with me on him if he refuses to post it?
You stated that you have decided that I'm mafia and that the only reason you withheld it was because you had second thoughts. What reason is there not to post it?
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On September 06 2014 10:26 Tehpoofter wrote:Show nested quote +On September 06 2014 10:23 kitaman27 wrote:
poofter, do you agree that batsnacks should post his "case in notepad" against me as proof that he is not lying?
If he continues to wait, that just gives him time to make one up, that was post 6666 of you soo...... scum claim?  I saw what batsnacks posted at the start of the game that was total shit and his case I'd love to see I don't know why he would keep it in notepad. If he had to make one up it probably will be shitty anyways.
So you agree if he doesn't post it now that he should be lynched?
Otherwise, he has time to fabricate one. It's already been like 6 minutes.
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On September 06 2014 10:28 ObiWanShinobi wrote:Show nested quote +On September 06 2014 10:24 kitaman27 wrote:On September 06 2014 10:18 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
Reads are not the same things as cases, so don't turn around and try to change what your initial request was into trying to get my view on things when you're goading me into pushing for literally anyone's lynch. I asked you for your reads and why. Are you honestly arguing semantics now? On September 06 2014 10:18 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
Furthermore, what does me being afk for 24 hours have to do with anything? Do you know why I was afk? Did you think I had the ability to check the thread? Why or why not? You yourself pointed out that you loved how you could get away with doing nothing and nobody would care. I called you out on it in attempt for you to give us something and now you complain about it? On September 06 2014 10:18 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
I can get the fact that going away and doing nothing for extended periods of time can be considered scummy, but I came back into the thread wanting to engage you and you just didn't care enough to figure out why. What gives? I asked you for your opinions on four different players and you refused. What gives? You didn't ask me for reads. You asked me for a case. Call it semantics all you want, but you know for a fact that they're two completely different things and pretending that they aren't is bullshit. And it isn't even the fact that I do nothing. It's that I claimed that I was doing nothing, and then clearly showed that I was doing plenty of things.
You can't clearly show that you were doing plenty of things if you admit you're sheeping vivax and then go afk for 24 hours.
So are you not going to give opinions about those 4 players....or what?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
