[T] Cell (Mini?) Mafia III - Page 60

On August 31 2014 02:41 batsnacks wrote:
@amiko

If you don't understand why me, and others, voted BH then I won't be able to explain it to you. Sorry.

Bunnies has been in the past more conversational as scum and less analytical.

I voted BH at the beginning of the day because I thought ritoky and me were the towniest d1. I kept voting BH because there was no reason to switch.

On August 31 2014 02:46 Holyflare wrote:

Where has bunnies been analytical in the slightest???

Also if you are town and are voting for yourself i won't hesitate to follow you up for a ban

On August 31 2014 02:48 Not really holyflare wrote:


yes.
I'm waiting for the 'NO YOU GUYS ARE FISH FOR THINKING BAT IS SCUM VOTE BH NOW' part, with 30 minutes left.
I might have exaggerated that part a slight bit.

On August 31 2014 02:49 Amiko wrote:


I'm fine with your explanation on Blazinghand.

It seems to me that bunnies has been fairly conversational and not very analytical (sort of the reverse of what you are describing) - can you flesh that out a little bit?

On August 31 2014 02:49 batsnacks wrote:


HF you are a drag. Do you actually play mafia because it's the only place in your life where people let you get away with calling them retards?

On August 31 2014 02:56 Holyflare wrote:


Since i never mentioned that you were a retard i can only imagine that this is a self admittance of you playing terribly

On August 31 2014 02:25 WaveofShadow wrote:
Sorry for spam:

Just had a breakthrough

http://www.teamliquid.net/blogs/465889-how-to-succeed-in-evil

BH totally scum

On August 31 2014 03:02 Holyflare wrote:
Yes well that is often the case. What's your point? Are you going to spend more than 5 minutes playing the game or are you going to continue to whine and qq that people are voting you? Bunnies did more analysis last cell game than anything here. There is 0 analysis in this game whatsoever

On August 31 2014 03:05 WaveofShadow wrote:
Uhh....
BH how exactly has batsnacks been attempting to fly under the radar?

On August 31 2014 03:09 Blazinghand wrote:


well, not NOW, obviously, but look at it this way. At the start of the day, like a million people vote me, including batsnacks, and he doesn't try to ask me questions, pressure me, or even mention ritoky. The first time he does this is about 24 hours ago (link). He makes a lot of posts, conversationally, and he's not afraid to step on toes, but they're all like this (link) or like this (link). I would consider batsnacks' early contributions during this day to be basically the same as mine: nonexistent. He certainly makes a lot of posts, but none with real meaning.

Then, only after he comes under some pressure, he coughts up this hairball: (link) while at the same time trying to downplay his earlier play and focus you guys on his most recent play, so you think he's active.

On August 31 2014 03:09 Blazinghand wrote:


well, not NOW, obviously, but look at it this way. At the start of the day, like a million people vote me, including batsnacks, and he doesn't try to ask me questions, pressure me, or even mention ritoky. The first time he does this is about 24 hours ago (link). He makes a lot of posts, conversationally, and he's not afraid to step on toes, but they're all like this (link) or like this (link). I would consider batsnacks' early contributions during this day to be basically the same as mine: nonexistent. He certainly makes a lot of posts, but none with real meaning.

Then, only after he comes under some pressure, he coughts up this hairball: (link) while at the same time trying to downplay his earlier play and focus you guys on his most recent play, so you think he's active.

On August 31 2014 03:11 WaveofShadow wrote:

He was more active than you were, and what you described isn't what I'd call 'flying under the radar' in the slightest.
Lack of contribution isn't flying under the radar. He was around and in everyone's face.

On August 31 2014 03:11 WaveofShadow wrote:
How about this BH?
Get off your own cell for a bit.
Give some other reads.

On August 31 2014 03:14 Blazinghand wrote:


Yeah, but in everyone's face with what? Not cases, not analysis, with NOTHING. Look, if he was literally not posting, that wouldn't be flying under the radar, people would notice that. In a game of mafia, to not attract attention, you have to make posts. And if you're batsnacks, who's generally a caustic player, you don't make a bunch of milquetoast posts. How else would batsnacks try to avoid attention than what he's doing now? There's no way batsnacks could contribute less without people saying "wtf batsnacks is being really weird"



I'm glad to do so, but I'm not gonna stop paying attention to the fact that i'm leading the votes dude, and you're voting me for reasons that still are not clear to me.

On August 31 2014 03:16 WaveofShadow wrote:

But he WAS being really weird BH, wtf?
Like compare his posting to someone like bunnies for example, who isn't in today's cell

On August 31 2014 03:16 WaveofShadow wrote:
Go ahead and pay attention. I have all the reason to vote I need. Give me a reason to unvote.