EPT[T] Cell (Mini?) Mafia III - Page 60
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
| ||
|
Amiko
United States1725 Posts
On August 31 2014 02:41 batsnacks wrote: @amiko If you don't understand why me, and others, voted BH then I won't be able to explain it to you. Sorry. Bunnies has been in the past more conversational as scum and less analytical. I voted BH at the beginning of the day because I thought ritoky and me were the towniest d1. I kept voting BH because there was no reason to switch. I'm fine with your explanation on Blazinghand. It seems to me that bunnies has been fairly conversational and not very analytical (sort of the reverse of what you are describing) - can you flesh that out a little bit? | ||
|
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
On August 31 2014 02:46 Holyflare wrote: Where has bunnies been analytical in the slightest??? Also if you are town and are voting for yourself i won't hesitate to follow you up for a ban HF you are a drag. Do you actually play mafia because it's the only place in your life where people let you get away with calling them retards? | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
On August 31 2014 02:48 Not really holyflare wrote: yes. I'm waiting for the 'NO YOU GUYS ARE FISH FOR THINKING BAT IS SCUM VOTE BH NOW' part, with 30 minutes left. I might have exaggerated that part a slight bit. I think you under-exaggerated. | ||
|
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
On August 31 2014 02:49 Amiko wrote: I'm fine with your explanation on Blazinghand. It seems to me that bunnies has been fairly conversational and not very analytical (sort of the reverse of what you are describing) - can you flesh that out a little bit? Her posts might not be very analytical by your standards but I would consider them more analytical than, for example, her posts in the last cell game. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On August 31 2014 02:49 batsnacks wrote: HF you are a drag. Do you actually play mafia because it's the only place in your life where people let you get away with calling them retards? Since i never mentioned that you were a retard i can only imagine that this is a self admittance of you playing terribly | ||
|
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
On August 31 2014 02:56 Holyflare wrote: Since i never mentioned that you were a retard i can only imagine that this is a self admittance of you playing terribly I was talking about in general. You like to call people retards, it's what you do in mafia. If someone asked me "how does Holyflare play mafia?" I would tell them "Well, he likes to call people retards." I've played enough games with you to know. | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25552 Posts
Other players have mentioned the inconsistencies and scumminess of his list/excel post and his followup, so I won't rehash that. Honestly, I'm completely sure batsnacks is scum, and I will do what it takes to prove that. We're not lynching me today. Not while I have a say in it. On August 31 2014 02:25 WaveofShadow wrote: Sorry for spam: Just had a breakthrough http://www.teamliquid.net/blogs/465889-how-to-succeed-in-evil BH totally scum this blog post was in the queue for 2 weeks. It was already written so I just copied it over from my reddit posts proof: http://www.reddit.com/r/rational/comments/2dn4gq/rt_how_to_succeed_in_evil_series_edwin_windsor/cjtfl4c | ||
|
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
BH will you take a picture of you next to your blog with the newspaper so that we know for sure that it's your blog? | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
BH how exactly has batsnacks been attempting to fly under the radar? | ||
|
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
On August 31 2014 03:02 Holyflare wrote: Yes well that is often the case. What's your point? Are you going to spend more than 5 minutes playing the game or are you going to continue to whine and qq that people are voting you? Bunnies did more analysis last cell game than anything here. There is 0 analysis in this game whatsoever Were you called retarded a lot in school? | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25552 Posts
On August 31 2014 03:05 WaveofShadow wrote: Uhh.... BH how exactly has batsnacks been attempting to fly under the radar? well, not NOW, obviously, but look at it this way. At the start of the day, like a million people vote me, including batsnacks, and he doesn't try to ask me questions, pressure me, or even mention ritoky. The first time he does this is about 24 hours ago (link). He makes a lot of posts, conversationally, and he's not afraid to step on toes, but they're all like this (link) or like this (link). I would consider batsnacks' early contributions during this day to be basically the same as mine: nonexistent. He certainly makes a lot of posts, but none with real meaning. Then, only after he comes under some pressure, he coughts up this hairball: (link) while at the same time trying to downplay his earlier play and focus you guys on his most recent play, so you think he's active. | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
On August 31 2014 03:09 Blazinghand wrote: well, not NOW, obviously, but look at it this way. At the start of the day, like a million people vote me, including batsnacks, and he doesn't try to ask me questions, pressure me, or even mention ritoky. The first time he does this is about 24 hours ago (link). He makes a lot of posts, conversationally, and he's not afraid to step on toes, but they're all like this (link) or like this (link). I would consider batsnacks' early contributions during this day to be basically the same as mine: nonexistent. He certainly makes a lot of posts, but none with real meaning. Then, only after he comes under some pressure, he coughts up this hairball: (link) while at the same time trying to downplay his earlier play and focus you guys on his most recent play, so you think he's active. He was more active than you were, and what you described isn't what I'd call 'flying under the radar' in the slightest. Lack of contribution isn't flying under the radar. He was around and in everyone's face. | ||
|
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
On August 31 2014 03:09 Blazinghand wrote: well, not NOW, obviously, but look at it this way. At the start of the day, like a million people vote me, including batsnacks, and he doesn't try to ask me questions, pressure me, or even mention ritoky. The first time he does this is about 24 hours ago (link). He makes a lot of posts, conversationally, and he's not afraid to step on toes, but they're all like this (link) or like this (link). I would consider batsnacks' early contributions during this day to be basically the same as mine: nonexistent. He certainly makes a lot of posts, but none with real meaning. Then, only after he comes under some pressure, he coughts up this hairball: (link) while at the same time trying to downplay his earlier play and focus you guys on his most recent play, so you think he's active. Want to know the difference between you and me? When I'm drunk I make dumb spreadsheets. When you're fake drunk you spell things wrong and pretend you were typing on your phone. Otherwise, I think we have a lot in common. | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
Get off your own cell for a bit. Give some other reads. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25552 Posts
On August 31 2014 03:11 WaveofShadow wrote: He was more active than you were, and what you described isn't what I'd call 'flying under the radar' in the slightest. Lack of contribution isn't flying under the radar. He was around and in everyone's face. Yeah, but in everyone's face with what? Not cases, not analysis, with NOTHING. Look, if he was literally not posting, that wouldn't be flying under the radar, people would notice that. In a game of mafia, to not attract attention, you have to make posts. And if you're batsnacks, who's generally a caustic player, you don't make a bunch of milquetoast posts. How else would batsnacks try to avoid attention than what he's doing now? There's no way batsnacks could contribute less without people saying "wtf batsnacks is being really weird" On August 31 2014 03:11 WaveofShadow wrote: How about this BH? Get off your own cell for a bit. Give some other reads. I'm glad to do so, but I'm not gonna stop paying attention to the fact that i'm leading the votes dude, and you're voting me for reasons that still are not clear to me. | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
On August 31 2014 03:14 Blazinghand wrote: Yeah, but in everyone's face with what? Not cases, not analysis, with NOTHING. Look, if he was literally not posting, that wouldn't be flying under the radar, people would notice that. In a game of mafia, to not attract attention, you have to make posts. And if you're batsnacks, who's generally a caustic player, you don't make a bunch of milquetoast posts. How else would batsnacks try to avoid attention than what he's doing now? There's no way batsnacks could contribute less without people saying "wtf batsnacks is being really weird" I'm glad to do so, but I'm not gonna stop paying attention to the fact that i'm leading the votes dude, and you're voting me for reasons that still are not clear to me. But he WAS being really weird BH, wtf? Like compare his posting to someone like bunnies for example, who has actually managed to fly under the radar by posting as you described above. His posting is erratic, completely nonsensical at times and he just doesn't seem to give a shit about what's going on anywhere for a lot of it. Go ahead and pay attention. I have all the reason to vote I need. Give me a reason to unvote. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25552 Posts
On August 31 2014 03:16 WaveofShadow wrote: But he WAS being really weird BH, wtf? Like compare his posting to someone like bunnies for example, who isn't in today's cell ftfy On August 31 2014 03:16 WaveofShadow wrote: Go ahead and pay attention. I have all the reason to vote I need. Give me a reason to unvote. Are you seriously voting me because of that blog post? please elaborate. | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
It was a joke because the title of it is how to succeed in evil. You know? Like mafia are evil? ha ha? I'm voting you because your early game was scummy as hell, amiko caught you slipping (which by the way I don't buy your explanation for) and then you didn't do dick all for a while. Now even assuming marv is wrong and you're not just being sneaky as all hell (and I know you are certainly capable of it), I have more than enough reason to find you scum today. | ||
| ||
