|
On May 27 2014 12:01 HaruRH wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2014 11:59 27ninjabunnies wrote:On May 27 2014 11:56 HaruRH wrote:On May 27 2014 11:54 jabberwockzerg wrote:
Delicately, must I awkwardly introduce all of my posts and then just get on with them I think that doing anything else other than leaving the subject as it is will make you an even likelier target for scrumm. Change the topic quickly I dont understand how this post had anything to do with what my case was on him? Nothing to do with it at all, just a crap post with no meaning other than for jabber to not feel so awkward with every post he makes
To me, it seemed as if you were coaching him to change the topic in order to get pressure off of him.
Why would you want to do that?
|
On May 27 2014 12:01 27ninjabunnies wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2014 11:59 sqrtofneg1 wrote:On May 27 2014 11:58 27ninjabunnies wrote:On May 27 2014 11:55 sqrtofneg1 wrote:
You know what? I think that bunniez has the easiest rule so far. I don't know about that. Once the game gets started, watch how difficult it will be for me to start calling people killing off the birds. You could just say 'scum'. Just sayingz. Can i? Cause it seemed by his post that saying speaking of the vikings down under in anyway is against the rules.
Your euphemisms are fun, don't use the word scum!
|
On May 27 2014 12:02 27ninjabunnies wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2014 12:01 HaruRH wrote:On May 27 2014 11:59 27ninjabunnies wrote:On May 27 2014 11:56 HaruRH wrote:On May 27 2014 11:54 jabberwockzerg wrote:
Delicately, must I awkwardly introduce all of my posts and then just get on with them I think that doing anything else other than leaving the subject as it is will make you an even likelier target for scrumm. Change the topic quickly I dont understand how this post had anything to do with what my case was on him? Nothing to do with it at all, just a crap post with no meaning other than for jabber to not feel so awkward with every post he makes To me, it seemed as if you were coaching him to change the topic in order to get pressure off of him. Why would you want to do that?
You're doing an awful lot of finger pointing for day 1
|
On May 27 2014 12:02 27ninjabunnies wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2014 12:01 HaruRH wrote:On May 27 2014 11:59 27ninjabunnies wrote:On May 27 2014 11:56 HaruRH wrote:On May 27 2014 11:54 jabberwockzerg wrote:
Delicately, must I awkwardly introduce all of my posts and then just get on with them I think that doing anything else other than leaving the subject as it is will make you an even likelier target for scrumm. Change the topic quickly I dont understand how this post had anything to do with what my case was on him? Nothing to do with it at all, just a crap post with no meaning other than for jabber to not feel so awkward with every post he makes To me, it seemed as if you were coaching him to change the topic in order to get pressure off of him. Why would you want to do that?
I play with no targets in mind
For the first day where it is still fun
I only suspect
But I do not attack
I will not paint a target on the first day
Because tails only show at night
And thus we can hang those who
Are deduced to be one next day
No need to pressure in the first day, in my view
Lynching him is still our aim, thus I will
|
On May 27 2014 12:04 jabberwockzerg wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2014 12:02 27ninjabunnies wrote:On May 27 2014 12:01 HaruRH wrote:On May 27 2014 11:59 27ninjabunnies wrote:On May 27 2014 11:56 HaruRH wrote:On May 27 2014 11:54 jabberwockzerg wrote:
Delicately, must I awkwardly introduce all of my posts and then just get on with them I think that doing anything else other than leaving the subject as it is will make you an even likelier target for scrumm. Change the topic quickly I dont understand how this post had anything to do with what my case was on him? Nothing to do with it at all, just a crap post with no meaning other than for jabber to not feel so awkward with every post he makes To me, it seemed as if you were coaching him to change the topic in order to get pressure off of him. Why would you want to do that? You're doing an awful lot of finger pointing for day 1
It's not finger pointing.
It's how I get my reads.
If i find a post that seems like its sniffing the bishop, I'll point it out, question it, and get the reactions from whoever the post was pointed towards or the rest of people's reactions.
But how is his post not hugging the sandwich maker?!
He basically said you need to change the subject if you dont want to seem beating the chess game,
|
On May 27 2014 12:07 HaruRH wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2014 12:02 27ninjabunnies wrote:On May 27 2014 12:01 HaruRH wrote:On May 27 2014 11:59 27ninjabunnies wrote:On May 27 2014 11:56 HaruRH wrote:On May 27 2014 11:54 jabberwockzerg wrote:
Delicately, must I awkwardly introduce all of my posts and then just get on with them I think that doing anything else other than leaving the subject as it is will make you an even likelier target for scrumm. Change the topic quickly I dont understand how this post had anything to do with what my case was on him? Nothing to do with it at all, just a crap post with no meaning other than for jabber to not feel so awkward with every post he makes To me, it seemed as if you were coaching him to change the topic in order to get pressure off of him. Why would you want to do that? I play with no targets in mind For the first day where it is still fun I only suspect But I do not attack I will not paint a target on the first day Because tails only show at night And thus we can hang those who Are deduced to be one next day No need to pressure in the first day, in my view Lynching him is still our aim, thus I will
Sure day 1 is fun, but we also need to be hunting for the sloppy strawberry pop-tart.
We need a lynch for today, so why not pressure with reads?
|
On May 27 2014 12:12 27ninjabunnies wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2014 12:04 jabberwockzerg wrote:On May 27 2014 12:02 27ninjabunnies wrote:On May 27 2014 12:01 HaruRH wrote:On May 27 2014 11:59 27ninjabunnies wrote:On May 27 2014 11:56 HaruRH wrote:On May 27 2014 11:54 jabberwockzerg wrote:
Delicately, must I awkwardly introduce all of my posts and then just get on with them I think that doing anything else other than leaving the subject as it is will make you an even likelier target for scrumm. Change the topic quickly I dont understand how this post had anything to do with what my case was on him? Nothing to do with it at all, just a crap post with no meaning other than for jabber to not feel so awkward with every post he makes To me, it seemed as if you were coaching him to change the topic in order to get pressure off of him. Why would you want to do that? You're doing an awful lot of finger pointing for day 1 It's not finger pointing. It's how I get my reads. If i find a post that seems like its sniffing the bishop, I'll point it out, question it, and get the reactions from whoever the post was pointed towards or the rest of people's reactions. But how is his post not hugging the sandwich maker?! He basically said you need to change the subject if you dont want to seem beating the chess game,
You dont want to seem beating the chess game ON THE FIRST MOVE though. Just throwing that out
|
On May 27 2014 12:12 27ninjabunnies wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2014 12:04 jabberwockzerg wrote:On May 27 2014 12:02 27ninjabunnies wrote:On May 27 2014 12:01 HaruRH wrote:On May 27 2014 11:59 27ninjabunnies wrote:On May 27 2014 11:56 HaruRH wrote:On May 27 2014 11:54 jabberwockzerg wrote:
Delicately, must I awkwardly introduce all of my posts and then just get on with them I think that doing anything else other than leaving the subject as it is will make you an even likelier target for scrumm. Change the topic quickly I dont understand how this post had anything to do with what my case was on him? Nothing to do with it at all, just a crap post with no meaning other than for jabber to not feel so awkward with every post he makes To me, it seemed as if you were coaching him to change the topic in order to get pressure off of him. Why would you want to do that? You're doing an awful lot of finger pointing for day 1 It's not finger pointing. It's how I get my reads. If i find a post that seems like its sniffing the bishop, I'll point it out, question it, and get the reactions from whoever the post was pointed towards or the rest of people's reactions. But how is his post not hugging the sandwich maker?! He basically said you need to change the subject if you dont want to seem beating the chess game,
If we're both mafia, wouldn't he have told me that in the QT?
|
On May 27 2014 12:14 HaruRH wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2014 12:12 27ninjabunnies wrote:On May 27 2014 12:04 jabberwockzerg wrote:On May 27 2014 12:02 27ninjabunnies wrote:On May 27 2014 12:01 HaruRH wrote:On May 27 2014 11:59 27ninjabunnies wrote:On May 27 2014 11:56 HaruRH wrote:On May 27 2014 11:54 jabberwockzerg wrote:
Delicately, must I awkwardly introduce all of my posts and then just get on with them I think that doing anything else other than leaving the subject as it is will make you an even likelier target for scrumm. Change the topic quickly I dont understand how this post had anything to do with what my case was on him? Nothing to do with it at all, just a crap post with no meaning other than for jabber to not feel so awkward with every post he makes To me, it seemed as if you were coaching him to change the topic in order to get pressure off of him. Why would you want to do that? You're doing an awful lot of finger pointing for day 1 It's not finger pointing. It's how I get my reads. If i find a post that seems like its sniffing the bishop, I'll point it out, question it, and get the reactions from whoever the post was pointed towards or the rest of people's reactions. But how is his post not hugging the sandwich maker?! He basically said you need to change the subject if you dont want to seem beating the chess game, You dont want to seem beating the chess game ON THE FIRST MOVE though. Just throwing that out
Anyone can slip. As ive pointed out.
|
On May 27 2014 12:15 jabberwockzerg wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2014 12:12 27ninjabunnies wrote:On May 27 2014 12:04 jabberwockzerg wrote:On May 27 2014 12:02 27ninjabunnies wrote:On May 27 2014 12:01 HaruRH wrote:On May 27 2014 11:59 27ninjabunnies wrote:On May 27 2014 11:56 HaruRH wrote:On May 27 2014 11:54 jabberwockzerg wrote:
Delicately, must I awkwardly introduce all of my posts and then just get on with them I think that doing anything else other than leaving the subject as it is will make you an even likelier target for scrumm. Change the topic quickly I dont understand how this post had anything to do with what my case was on him? Nothing to do with it at all, just a crap post with no meaning other than for jabber to not feel so awkward with every post he makes To me, it seemed as if you were coaching him to change the topic in order to get pressure off of him. Why would you want to do that? You're doing an awful lot of finger pointing for day 1 It's not finger pointing. It's how I get my reads. If i find a post that seems like its sniffing the bishop, I'll point it out, question it, and get the reactions from whoever the post was pointed towards or the rest of people's reactions. But how is his post not hugging the sandwich maker?! He basically said you need to change the subject if you dont want to seem beating the chess game, If we're both mafia, wouldn't he have told me that in the QT?
I suppose you have a point there.... But i still find that interaction quite weird.
|
On May 27 2014 12:16 27ninjabunnies wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2014 12:15 jabberwockzerg wrote:On May 27 2014 12:12 27ninjabunnies wrote:On May 27 2014 12:04 jabberwockzerg wrote:On May 27 2014 12:02 27ninjabunnies wrote:On May 27 2014 12:01 HaruRH wrote:On May 27 2014 11:59 27ninjabunnies wrote:On May 27 2014 11:56 HaruRH wrote:On May 27 2014 11:54 jabberwockzerg wrote:
Delicately, must I awkwardly introduce all of my posts and then just get on with them I think that doing anything else other than leaving the subject as it is will make you an even likelier target for scrumm. Change the topic quickly I dont understand how this post had anything to do with what my case was on him? Nothing to do with it at all, just a crap post with no meaning other than for jabber to not feel so awkward with every post he makes To me, it seemed as if you were coaching him to change the topic in order to get pressure off of him. Why would you want to do that? You're doing an awful lot of finger pointing for day 1 It's not finger pointing. It's how I get my reads. If i find a post that seems like its sniffing the bishop, I'll point it out, question it, and get the reactions from whoever the post was pointed towards or the rest of people's reactions. But how is his post not hugging the sandwich maker?! He basically said you need to change the subject if you dont want to seem beating the chess game, If we're both mafia, wouldn't he have told me that in the QT? I suppose you have a point there.... But i still find that interaction quite weird.
Given my noobiness, it just send like he's helping out
|
directly fixing my post:
It's just likely
Autocorrect
You're killing me
|
On May 27 2014 12:20 jabberwockzerg wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2014 12:16 27ninjabunnies wrote:On May 27 2014 12:15 jabberwockzerg wrote:On May 27 2014 12:12 27ninjabunnies wrote:On May 27 2014 12:04 jabberwockzerg wrote:On May 27 2014 12:02 27ninjabunnies wrote:On May 27 2014 12:01 HaruRH wrote:On May 27 2014 11:59 27ninjabunnies wrote:On May 27 2014 11:56 HaruRH wrote:On May 27 2014 11:54 jabberwockzerg wrote:
Delicately, must I awkwardly introduce all of my posts and then just get on with them I think that doing anything else other than leaving the subject as it is will make you an even likelier target for scrumm. Change the topic quickly I dont understand how this post had anything to do with what my case was on him? Nothing to do with it at all, just a crap post with no meaning other than for jabber to not feel so awkward with every post he makes To me, it seemed as if you were coaching him to change the topic in order to get pressure off of him. Why would you want to do that? You're doing an awful lot of finger pointing for day 1 It's not finger pointing. It's how I get my reads. If i find a post that seems like its sniffing the bishop, I'll point it out, question it, and get the reactions from whoever the post was pointed towards or the rest of people's reactions. But how is his post not hugging the sandwich maker?! He basically said you need to change the subject if you dont want to seem beating the chess game, If we're both mafia, wouldn't he have told me that in the QT? I suppose you have a point there.... But i still find that interaction quite weird. Given my noobiness, it just send like he's helping out
You totally messed up on your abc thing btw.
And yeah... Idk about that, but i suppose ill just file it under "for later".
|
Help, I forgot the alphabet
Sincerely thought d came after g.
I'm not a smart man
|
On May 27 2014 12:23 jabberwockzerg wrote:
Help, I forgot the alphabet
Sincerely thought d came after g.
I'm not a smart man
That's US schooling for ya.
|
On May 27 2014 12:26 27ninjabunnies wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2014 12:23 jabberwockzerg wrote:
Help, I forgot the alphabet
Sincerely thought d came after g.
I'm not a smart man That's US schooling for ya.
It's late and the alphabet is hard
In going to bed
See y'all later
|
I guess, since everyone else is going to bed, i might as well too.
For those who show up in the night time (well my night time) look at the case I made on Jabber.
Also, see if the interaction between haru and jabber was just my imagination.
Hopefully more people start posting soon.
|
##Vote: jabberwockzerg
Proof is in bunnies filter. Weeeeee D1~
|
Vote count:
jabberwockzerg (3) - 27ninjabunnies, HaruRH, fuba
Not voting: Everyone else
Currently jabberwockzerg is set to be lynched!
Day ends in
As a reminder, votes not bolded and with ## in front of them won't count. Not trying to be a hard-ass, but it makes finding votes difficult when they aren't formatted properly. Thanks!
|
Hello, I am Amiko.
I have played games with sqrtofneg1, 27ninjabunnies, Epishade, Alakaslam, and Palmar; that ordering also probably reflects how familiar I am with them as players.
At this moment I haven't read the thread- I will get on that shortly and probably put some initial thoughts into a post.
I'll be around a fair amount tomorrow too, if you want me to answer some specific question or talk about something in particular, just let me know.
|
|
|
|
|
|
38884
1537
1525
EPT
