|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On May 03 2014 06:13 justanothertownie wrote: VE could totally be town but that you would chose him over someone like austin is just plain retarded/scummy in my eyes. And you scummers might just not shoot Cephiro tonight. What then? Especially since he claims to not get a new check before night 4.
I have private reasons for choosing VE over Austin that I can't share with you.
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
So, the wait a day strategy is substantially worse if we have to wait 2 days. Game might be effectively over by then. This also explains why Ceph claimed today instead of tomorrow, since he'd have only one comparison. His reasoning is internally consistent. Without a constant chain-link between checks an "anchor" check doesn't make sense either. This basically means that there's no longer a reason to think ceph is scum. We should not lynch him today.
If I end up getting lynched before slam, my wish is now that slam be lynched next, not cephiro. Claim is believable.
##unvote ##vote alakaslam
I am the OG Mason.
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On May 03 2014 08:32 WaveofShadow wrote:Show nested quote +On May 03 2014 08:26 Foolishness wrote:On May 03 2014 07:52 WaveofShadow wrote:On May 03 2014 07:38 Foolishness wrote:On May 03 2014 07:26 prplhz wrote: Hey Foolishness who do we lynch today? Blazinghand has a better chance of flipping mafia. ##Unvote: RebirthOfLegend ##Vote: Blazinghand Oh really? Care to explain the rationale behind this? Are we ever going to be let in on your super secret dealings? How much of what BH has talked about re: your QT jives with you? There's no dealings. He's just been saying a lot of weird things. I never made a conscious effort to try to figure out his alignment. Nor did I ever really pay close attention to the things he said. I didn't let him influence any of my thoughts this game. I was the first one to suggest the strongandbig lynch (other people in the QT can confirm this) and he ran with it. I take full responsibility for the mislynch on day 1 (minus what Koshi did). My gut tells me that alakaslam is town. I don't really have evidence to back that up other than I thought his justification for his vigi shot came from a town mindset. Really either lynch sounds good depending on how you look at it. Your thoughts on this BH?
I'll deal with him in private.
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
##donate 5 posts to WoS
Look, I haven't played great, and I've been on the wrong side of the D1 lynch and looked for shenannies on the D2 Lynch. I'll admit it! But when it comes down to it, I've actually been putting in effort to this game. I haven't had amazing reads, but that's all in the past. I could still catch scum here. It'll be even easier if slam is the scum and not ceph.
The level of detail in ceph's claims and the weirdness in his role (though it's consistent with previous ver games) leads me to believe it's a real claim. Like, the whole thing abou this target choices and claim timing make sense because a D4 claim doesn't let him bring more info to the table than a D3 claim and this kind of parity cop, the kind Ver uses, doesn't benefit from anchoring checks. It makes sense.
I'll offer a bit of defense that I think is worthwhile.
1. Foolishness Defense: If I were a scum masoner and not a town masoner, it would not make a lot of sense to recruit Foolishness D1 then hard-defend him. If he's town, scum-me wouldn't want to defend him QUITE so hard. I stuck my neck in the noose with his to get him out, and that's because I really do think the guy is town. If I get lynched for that, at least he's alive and I got something done. I don't see any advantage for me to do this as scum. And if Foolishness is somehow my scumbuddy and I recruited him D1, it would be supremely obvious to my subsequent mason-buddies that he and I were scum together. We've genuinely done good work together. Or at least bounced ideas. Maybe as scum I'd still recruit a town Foolishness and hard defend him, but not like this. Not in a way that turns the entire town against me and makes them want to lynch me before him. You can WIFOM this all you want but really, my hard defenses (like GK that one time I was scum and he was town) as scum don't put my life in danger like this. I'm typically the most valuable member of any scumteam.
2. Oatsmaster stuff: Look, 100% Oats was gonna get lynched. He was the 2ndary wagon D1 and the primary wagon flipped town. His scumbuddies knew that his lynch was inevitable. Yes, I was on the wrong side and had ugly timing on all the Oats wagons. I guarantee you though that as scum I would either hard bus him. The shennanies were weak and shitty, but that's mostly because shenannies rely on lots of little posts and organizing an active town, ideally in a plurality, not majority game. As scum, I would position myself not to look quite so disgusting after an oats flip. Look at me. I'm BH. Do you really think I consider Oats' life ANYWHERE near as valuable as mine? Of course not. As scum, I'd bus him in a heartbeat. I might do it for no reason just to get rid of the guy. He can't be relied on. Now, if I'm scum right now, I could be saying this to throw you off, but if I'm scum 100% I bus oats, not because I think it's some great strat, but because I disdain him. He is trash. He doesn't deserve to share a QT with a god.
You know me. I'm the guy who claims survivor and sticks to it after another guy flips survivor. I'm the guy who talks about emotional breakdowns to get out of the noose. I don't care about my scumteammates, all I care about is winning, and since I'm the best player, that means bussing, not putting myself in the noose to save anyone. Not Foolishness, and certainly not Oats. Really guys, you think I tried to save Oats?
3. Cephiro. Ok, yes, I admit, I was overly suspicious of his claim. But at the time he claimed it, you gotta admit: It was a shit claim. If he was a normal parity cop, those checks would be shit checks and this would be a shit time to claim. He'd be scum. Since he's a Verparity cop, or Verity cop as I call them, then his claim makes sense. But you know who didn't question Ceph's claim? Slam. Slam just accepted it, voted me, and gave away posts. Just like he KNEW that the claim was true, and he KNEW that our alignments are different, because he's scum.
When I'm town, I'm a paranoid motherfucker. I don't trust anyone. I double-check everything. I have been supremely careful about who I let in the QT, and I am pretty sure it's actually all town in there. The only guy who I didn't super check out was this last guy we added, but he's so town it hurts. Look: I doubted the claim, and I did so not cause I'm scum, but because if you were me and in my shoes and that claim came through, looking dodge as fuck, you would question it too. Slam knew the claim was real immediately, because he's scum and knows I'm town. This is my mindset, and it's just how I operate. I don't trust people. You know that about me. You know I'd lie for any reason to win a mafia game, and that's how I view others, and that's how I viewed this claim before the extra deets.
All of these points you're gonna look at and thing "oh BH is saying it though"-- but stop for a minute and take an outside view and look at it objectively. It's not "too scummy to be scum", it's "too strategically ineffective at furthering scum goals to be scum".
I doubt people. I put my neck out for a guy I thought was town (remember, I thought he was town enough to MASON him). I soft-defended a guy who flipped scum, but that guy was Oatsmaster, possibly the most useless player that I don't WoTC. Maybe my mindset seems foreign to you, but those of you who know me:
this aint my scum play.
Vote slam. I'll have an extra 96 hours as conftown, since scum is presumably shooting ceph first. I'll make it worth your while.
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
I held a snake once as a child. Someone in class brought him to school as a show and tell. During elementary school I had a turtle named "Rough". He was green. I held him several times.
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
My sister also had a turtle, which she named, and I kid you not, "Golden Retriever" because she wanted a dog. ._.
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
You asked for some posts, I gave them because I have like a million. You don't have any excuse for not commenting now that you can give after I flip
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On May 04 2014 09:30 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On May 04 2014 09:14 Blazinghand wrote: ##donate 5 posts to WoS
Look, I haven't played great, and I've been on the wrong side of the D1 lynch and looked for shenannies on the D2 Lynch. I'll admit it! But when it comes down to it, I've actually been putting in effort to this game. I haven't had amazing reads, but that's all in the past. I could still catch scum here. It'll be even easier if slam is the scum and not ceph.
The level of detail in ceph's claims and the weirdness in his role (though it's consistent with previous ver games) leads me to believe it's a real claim. Like, the whole thing abou this target choices and claim timing make sense because a D4 claim doesn't let him bring more info to the table than a D3 claim and this kind of parity cop, the kind Ver uses, doesn't benefit from anchoring checks. It makes sense.
I'll offer a bit of defense that I think is worthwhile.
1. Foolishness Defense: If I were a scum masoner and not a town masoner, it would not make a lot of sense to recruit Foolishness D1 then hard-defend him. If he's town, scum-me wouldn't want to defend him QUITE so hard. I stuck my neck in the noose with his to get him out, and that's because I really do think the guy is town. If I get lynched for that, at least he's alive and I got something done. I don't see any advantage for me to do this as scum. And if Foolishness is somehow my scumbuddy and I recruited him D1, it would be supremely obvious to my subsequent mason-buddies that he and I were scum together. We've genuinely done good work together. Or at least bounced ideas. Maybe as scum I'd still recruit a town Foolishness and hard defend him, but not like this. Not in a way that turns the entire town against me and makes them want to lynch me before him. You can WIFOM this all you want but really, my hard defenses (like GK that one time I was scum and he was town) as scum don't put my life in danger like this. I'm typically the most valuable member of any scumteam.
2. Oatsmaster stuff: Look, 100% Oats was gonna get lynched. He was the 2ndary wagon D1 and the primary wagon flipped town. His scumbuddies knew that his lynch was inevitable. Yes, I was on the wrong side and had ugly timing on all the Oats wagons. I guarantee you though that as scum I would either hard bus him. The shennanies were weak and shitty, but that's mostly because shenannies rely on lots of little posts and organizing an active town, ideally in a plurality, not majority game. As scum, I would position myself not to look quite so disgusting after an oats flip. Look at me. I'm BH. Do you really think I consider Oats' life ANYWHERE near as valuable as mine? Of course not. As scum, I'd bus him in a heartbeat. I might do it for no reason just to get rid of the guy. He can't be relied on. Now, if I'm scum right now, I could be saying this to throw you off, but if I'm scum 100% I bus oats, not because I think it's some great strat, but because I disdain him. He is trash. He doesn't deserve to share a QT with a god.
You know me. I'm the guy who claims survivor and sticks to it after another guy flips survivor. I'm the guy who talks about emotional breakdowns to get out of the noose. I don't care about my scumteammates, all I care about is winning, and since I'm the best player, that means bussing, not putting myself in the noose to save anyone. Not Foolishness, and certainly not Oats. Really guys, you think I tried to save Oats?
3. Cephiro. Ok, yes, I admit, I was overly suspicious of his claim. But at the time he claimed it, you gotta admit: It was a shit claim. If he was a normal parity cop, those checks would be shit checks and this would be a shit time to claim. He'd be scum. Since he's a Verparity cop, or Verity cop as I call them, then his claim makes sense. But you know who didn't question Ceph's claim? Slam. Slam just accepted it, voted me, and gave away posts. Just like he KNEW that the claim was true, and he KNEW that our alignments are different, because he's scum.
When I'm town, I'm a paranoid motherfucker. I don't trust anyone. I double-check everything. I have been supremely careful about who I let in the QT, and I am pretty sure it's actually all town in there. The only guy who I didn't super check out was this last guy we added, but he's so town it hurts. Look: I doubted the claim, and I did so not cause I'm scum, but because if you were me and in my shoes and that claim came through, looking dodge as fuck, you would question it too. Slam knew the claim was real immediately, because he's scum and knows I'm town. This is my mindset, and it's just how I operate. I don't trust people. You know that about me. You know I'd lie for any reason to win a mafia game, and that's how I view others, and that's how I viewed this claim before the extra deets.
All of these points you're gonna look at and thing "oh BH is saying it though"-- but stop for a minute and take an outside view and look at it objectively. It's not "too scummy to be scum", it's "too strategically ineffective at furthering scum goals to be scum".
I doubt people. I put my neck out for a guy I thought was town (remember, I thought he was town enough to MASON him). I soft-defended a guy who flipped scum, but that guy was Oatsmaster, possibly the most useless player that I don't WoTC. Maybe my mindset seems foreign to you, but those of you who know me:
this aint my scum play.
Vote slam. I'll have an extra 96 hours as conftown, since scum is presumably shooting ceph first. I'll make it worth your while. 1. As long as nobody confirms this and there is something brought to the thread about your qt (you don't need to include roles) this defense is invalid. Also you didn't put your life in danger with it. You are on the chopping block mainly because of the cop check. You couldn't know it would turn out this way. 2. WIFOM. Also your attitude just makes me want to lynch you even more.
honestly JAT I have zero respect for you as a human being so not even gonna bother with you
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On May 04 2014 09:45 austinmcc wrote: Anyone in particular pushed you in a scummy manner? Defended you in a scummy manner?
I'll leave some instructions behind for my QT brothers that they can use. Ultimately, I shouldn't be drawing associative tells between unflipped players anyways
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On May 16 2014 12:03 Ace wrote:Show nested quote +On May 16 2014 11:59 Hapahauli wrote:Night 7: Gumshoe (Mafia Day Vigilante) has been lynched!Night ends in . ![[image loading]](http://cdn.niketalk.com/8/80/80cd6984_iymn3a.gif)
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On May 22 2014 12:38 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On May 22 2014 12:35 WaveofShadow wrote:On May 22 2014 12:30 justanothertownie wrote: Things to note:
BH had godly scumreads somehow.
Koshi sucked this game ^^
I voted for scum every single day except for the Foolishness mislynch. How so? He had Oats and then he tried to get gumshoe lynched who had literally done nothing in the game at all. The only parts of my play I truly regret this game are the unnecessary negativity and voting SnB just to get a lynch. I don't feel too bad about Foolishness because he could have done more at the time and I was already getting ready to waffle. He guessed 3/3 scum correctly night 1 and got recruited afaik. Yeah, Foolishness lynch is mainly his own fault.
Yeah this was one of my good games. Too bad I rolled traitor. At least I got to wow scum N1.
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
Thanks to the hosts for good hosting!
Props to JAT for opposing me in all things.
I wish I had rolled town, I had pretty great reads this game. I think as scum we were lucky to get as far as we did, and foolish not to win when we could.
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On May 23 2014 13:12 prplhz wrote: On another note, I really really enjoyed this post restriction thing. I think it would be awesome if we tried having more of these on TLMafia. I don't think it hurt this game at all and made it a lot easier for people to keep up. 7 day 20 player game with only 110 pages? That's pretty nice.
I also enjoyed the post restriction thing and thought it was well enforced
PS here is the scumteam trying to fire their bullets-- dayvigi OR nk
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/yGTWHjj.gif)
Do you have no idea what's going on here? welcome to the club
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
What might make more sense would instead of a daily limit, have a filter length limit. You're allowed one page of filter, plus 10 posts per 24 hours. So for example, by the end of D1 you can have 40 posts, by the end of N1 you can have 50, by the end of D2 you can have 70, by the end of N2 you can have 80, and so on.
By making it 10 posts per 24 hours, but then giving everyone a 1-page "buffer" we ensure:
1. it's not "use it or lose it"-- if you come in to the game late or lurk for a few days and need to catch up and make posts in a short span, you can. 2. in addition to the gradual linear post progression, you also have a 20-post buffer you can dip in to. This is kind of the opposite of the previous point, but basically if you have been making 10 posts per 24 hours and need to make more posts, you can.
E:
an ideal setup targets spammers (like me rofl) and people who just do a ton of activity. Like, in a game you might have 6 or 7 players with 10 page filters, then like 2 dudes with 30 page filters who account for like half the game. We really only need to worry about the 2 dudes imo. we want a solution which targets them and lets normal people play normally
|
|
|
|