EPTCatastrophe Mafia - Page 5
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
yamato77
11589 Posts
| ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
| ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
| ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
On April 06 2014 08:00 Holyflare wrote: Or like hogwarts where he was scum with little time Don't get me wrong, he could DEFINITELY still be mafia. You know, I've been throwing out reads all night, and this is the only thing you want to comment on? | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
Holy mafia? | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
On April 06 2014 08:35 Holyflare wrote: Also yamato you made a really fail post about me, some quote you mentioned about me saying "anyone who mentions they are voting for paperscraps for not marv reasoning looks bad". That is legitimately true. People who were sheeping along with the vote but addng their own 2 cents about their special reasoning for voting paperscraps should be scrutinised because it's a mafia trait to overjustify a reason to vote when there was a perfectly sheepable reason already. Not to mention paperscraps had no other reasoning to be voted for other than being shit/talking backwards It's a terrible, scummy thing to do when you're criticizing people that are trying to achieve a majority on a player that YOU are voting. | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
On April 06 2014 08:29 Tehpoofter wrote: Explain to me how this vote is bad? I saw marv point out a good scummy post on paperscraps that directly related to me. I am familiar with paperscraps play and him going back on a read for no reason is not something I would say that he does often and even more rarely as town. Paper went from "Tehpoofter is townie" to "hey guys attacking poofter thats dumb this is his null game" when I literally didn't post in between.... like what changed his mind? I'd love for further clarification why is it bad or even more so "the worst vote in existence" Well, I don't really see any evolution of thought in your filter about this at all. In fact, I really don't see much evolution of any of your reads. What I did see was you agreeing with marv after earlier thinking he was highly likely mafia or something of that sort. | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
On April 06 2014 08:52 Holyflare wrote: No it's not at all rofl. Someone posts some convincing post, I'm like 100% confident people will sheep it. Over justification is a mafia tell regardless of the players alignment. So no yamato, it really isn't. Marv's reasoning isn't the end-all-be-all, nor will it ever be. It might be good, but other people can have their own reasons, too, and also be perfectly town. This is not even an argument. | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
| ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
On a side note, anyone can PM me, I'll be around tomorrow. | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
Question is, who should we lynch first out of syllo, iamp, poof, djo, or Hopeless? I say syllo. | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
| ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
| ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
| ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
| ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
| ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
| ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
| ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
On April 07 2014 06:11 Tehpoofter wrote: Not oppossed to that also iamp is a good lynch tahts who foolishness was on and he died at night (maybe he was a town kill but idk) My favorite people to look at is (aside from my red check) is iamp/LSB/yamato the fact yamato threw dirt on my claim before i even claimed is a weird thing to do. No it isn't. You're a suspicious character this game and your claim should come under scrutiny. If you knew anything about me at all you'd know that I hate claims in general and I never trust them. I lost a game as town once because of this trait. Regardless, if people think LSB is mafia, I'd like a solid reason why. I don't particularly expect his reads to be good, nor do I expect him to be very involved, so it would have to be pretty extraordinarily convincing. | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
| ||
| ||
