|
On April 22 2014 21:58 Koshi wrote:
iamp lynch
syllo lynch
LSB shot
basically.
Towncircle was killed last. Who was in it btw? Palmar/Sandroba/WoS/SnB/Dandel? Holyflare in the end?
The iamp and syllo lynch were apparently agreed upon in the 'circle' before I even got in there.
I love the fact that you think you can take credit for this game because you activated your power and took a shot.
Scum were scummy and easily caught by everyone, aside from sandro. That's basically it Koshi.
|
On April 22 2014 22:01 Koshi wrote:
Holyflare his list? Where did that come from?
Was it Holyflare or towncircle?
We were all on the same page.
The list was pretty damn obvious to everyone in the 'circle' at that point with a few minor disagreements between different members.
Edit: For example one thing I remember was some people wanted to assume VE was town because cop but I disagreed. Mebbe that was sandro? I don't remember.
|
On April 22 2014 22:15 strongandbig wrote:
I think geript and I are gonna go ahead and take joint credit for not letting this game die a slow painful death of apathetic ignorance in the last 3-4 cycles.
Also I'm gonna take credit for catching VE Day 1 and sticking on him until I got him dead.
So much credit.
Alright true I also pushed killing since day 1 but I only got to lynch one of those two in the end and I chose right.
I mean I also did protect a scum and give him a dayvig, but foolishness did the same thing so I don't feel as bad about that as I probably should.
That's probably the only reason I am ever killed in most games. 
|
On April 23 2014 00:13 syllogism wrote:
We considered having Oats kill WoS on the night he was supposed to use the invention. That, too, would have likely won us the game, but at the time it seemed a bit too brazen to have both inventions simultaneously go missing.
How so?
Oats killing me would have been a scumclaim either way I think, and it's not like BH being alive for the short time he was actually influenced anything at all (aside from forcing LSB to use his 'wish)
Edit: A funny thing to consider is if I hadn't been so hell-bent on getting BH vigged town would have been in a much better position (assuming BH actually was going to play/use his role) throughout the game as well.
|
The invention was worded so that it only rezzes the top person alphabetically. Dandel got super props for that one. Pro-towniest survivor ever.
You wouldn't have been able to rez scum with it.
|
On April 23 2014 00:33 syllogism wrote:
We didn't actually know that. I think hosts shouldn't allow town to make such built-in anti-mafia mechanics into their inventions. Just getting hands on the invention is extremely difficult.
I heard there were other way more ridonkulous iterations that were rejected. On-the-fly hosting is tough with regards to inventions, man.
|
On April 23 2014 00:41 syllogism wrote:Show nested quote +On April 23 2014 00:40 Crossfire99 wrote:On April 23 2014 00:36 syllogism wrote:On April 23 2014 00:34 Crossfire99 wrote:On April 23 2014 00:29 syllogism wrote:On April 23 2014 00:17 WaveofShadow wrote:On April 23 2014 00:13 syllogism wrote:
We considered having Oats kill WoS on the night he was supposed to use the invention. That, too, would have likely won us the game, but at the time it seemed a bit too brazen to have both inventions simultaneously go missing. How so? Oats killing me would have been a scumclaim either way I think, and it's not like BH being alive for the short time he was actually influenced anything at all (aside from forcing LSB to use his 'wish) Edit: A funny thing to consider is if I hadn't been so hell-bent on getting BH vigged town would have been in a much better position (assuming BH actually was going to play/use his role) throughout the game as well. Oats would have gotten the invention and we would have resurrected someone. Surely town would realize that something is up when mafia steals both inventions in one cycle? Right? The invention could only resurrect the first person alphabetically, hence BH was guaranteed to be resurrected. You could have asked LSB to change that restriction though. As for town realizing about something being up; if oats did exactly the same thing he did (trapping WoS) but did it a few hours earlier, I doubt people would have seriously suspected (probably will still be suspicions) because assuming if everything was the same, people would have seen oats flip and seen that he was telling the truth. Yeah extra suspicion would have been put on people in the circle, but that probably would have been better because you could have used LSB's favor to get another scum back in the game. It's completely different to do it after the invention has been used, but I suppose I'm giving town too much credit. Not sure what you're saying here, but all I was getting at was that if Oats trapped WoS a few hours earlier, he kills him the night he uses the item, but he steals it before he uses it. What I'm saying is that killing him afterwards doesn't make Sandro look suspicious, while killing him before does (not that we wanted Oats to kill WoS at all, definitely not when he did)
Eh I sort of disagree. I guess delayed suspicion happened in this case as opposed to being suspicious right away, maybe you're right.
But either way I think the issue was that Oats decided to YOLOkill me in general rather than the usefulness of the invention (again, in the end it wasn't useful at all thanks to LSB---and even if you could have used LSB's ability for something else, it was super unpredictable considering how its use was resolved)---lol I could swear I remember Oats asking like a cycle before if he should YOLO as well. I would have died even earlier.
|
On April 23 2014 00:43 Crossfire99 wrote:Show nested quote +On April 23 2014 00:41 syllogism wrote:On April 23 2014 00:40 Crossfire99 wrote:On April 23 2014 00:36 syllogism wrote:On April 23 2014 00:34 Crossfire99 wrote:On April 23 2014 00:29 syllogism wrote:On April 23 2014 00:17 WaveofShadow wrote:On April 23 2014 00:13 syllogism wrote:
We considered having Oats kill WoS on the night he was supposed to use the invention. That, too, would have likely won us the game, but at the time it seemed a bit too brazen to have both inventions simultaneously go missing. How so? Oats killing me would have been a scumclaim either way I think, and it's not like BH being alive for the short time he was actually influenced anything at all (aside from forcing LSB to use his 'wish) Edit: A funny thing to consider is if I hadn't been so hell-bent on getting BH vigged town would have been in a much better position (assuming BH actually was going to play/use his role) throughout the game as well. Oats would have gotten the invention and we would have resurrected someone. Surely town would realize that something is up when mafia steals both inventions in one cycle? Right? The invention could only resurrect the first person alphabetically, hence BH was guaranteed to be resurrected. You could have asked LSB to change that restriction though. As for town realizing about something being up; if oats did exactly the same thing he did (trapping WoS) but did it a few hours earlier, I doubt people would have seriously suspected (probably will still be suspicions) because assuming if everything was the same, people would have seen oats flip and seen that he was telling the truth. Yeah extra suspicion would have been put on people in the circle, but that probably would have been better because you could have used LSB's favor to get another scum back in the game. It's completely different to do it after the invention has been used, but I suppose I'm giving town too much credit. Not sure what you're saying here, but all I was getting at was that if Oats trapped WoS a few hours earlier, he kills him the night he uses the item, but he steals it before he uses it. What I'm saying is that killing him afterwards doesn't make Sandro look suspicious, while killing him before does I agree that it makes him look a little suspicious, but if Oats pulled the exact same move, but actually claimed straight up that he needed Gandalf dead, it would have probably been less suspicious than a NK. Just pull a JAT, and claim that you think you're leaving the game or something, but have no clue when that doesn't happen.
Nah I still think that kill is a scumclaim considering how late in the game it was done---JAT's claim and the detail involved looks like legit 3P while the 3P Oats tried to claim especially considering how much he had lied to Palmar before looked shitty.
|
On April 22 2014 12:33 WaveofShadow wrote:Show nested quote +On April 22 2014 12:24 geript wrote:On April 22 2014 12:22 VisceraEyes wrote:
Whatever I dominated. Ever since you started playing Video mafia, you've stopped caring about playing forum. I don't get it. Like you used to be a goddamn amazeballs player and now you just come off as average. What happened? TO be fair VE I kind of agree....you haven't played like your old self since before Shadow mafia. I miss you bby You had perfect opportunity to do what Sandro did this game too and get revenge on me for Survivor series
Also I really don't think you would have been able to talk yourself out of the checks you say you made that late in the game. I can say for certain were I still alive you were my target at the very least.
|
On April 23 2014 05:37 austinmcc wrote:
GOOD.
A couple years back I had "Take a Chance on Me" stuck in my head off and on for about 2 weeks. I'm surprised my roommates never murdered me in my sleep.
Better than The Wiggles.
|
Daaaayummmm tha throwdown
|
lol you're totally right.
No you're definitely forgiven, but I still hate when people do that.
|
lol sandroba don't apologize.
You played really fucking well, it was just that last period of inactivity that fucked you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
