On March 06 2014 04:17 Oatsmaster wrote: I also said that his reaction test felt real and it lead to reads on people which is good. Also lately he has ben trying to figure out the game.
Your turn JAT, why is ggtemp scum?
Those are really general statements. Give me quotes oats. Also I find it very telling that you know start to think his reactions tests felt real. Why didn't you say that much earlier when he wasn't in direct danger of being lynched? That has been out there for ages.
Why is that particular contradiction in Boone's filter super telling? THIS QUESTION SOUNDS DUMB BUT IT IS REAL. I would prefer you talk a little more about Killing, or more about that one contradiction, rather than just mention it and justify yourselves off that.
On March 06 2014 03:59 austinmcc wrote: oats, what useful stuff has alak posted? Like can you grab 2-3 posts of his that were useful? I want to peer into your soul here, because I've found him to not be useless, but ... I don't think slam has particularly pushed town forward or anything.
On March 04 2014 11:28 boonetown wrote: Hey guys! sorry I got here late, I see we've decided to let RNGsus pick our lynch. I want/ed to play with VE, so I'm going to just wait before jumping on the bandwagon if that's alright with you guys.
Do I just read every DM person scummy? Each one is reading the opposite of their town game. This is so weird. I'm usually the one who clears everyone ever and this game I just find everyone scummy. This is not a good sign.
Can you be specific with 1-2 of your reads?
Boone's entrance was scummy because of the way she said that she respected RNGesus but wasn't willing to vote VE yet cause she wanted to play more with him and Joey was scummy cause he trolls when he's mafia.
In general, I come in and clear a bunch of people for being super town off of small things, but this game all I see are really fucking scummy players.
That's not why she is scummy
"Sorry for X, I see town is doing something and I made the observation, look I contribute. I'm not going to act on it, caveat caveat IF THAT IS OK WITH TOWN DO NOT LYNCH ME DO NOT LYNCH ME"
On March 05 2014 18:20 Alakaslam wrote: Well here is where the hypocrisy speech of motivation comes in.
Boone, if you are town, best thing to do is either defend, or, if your position is indefensible, start forming scum reads and put them out there. Because if you are town, your flip will confirm everything you said- which has a huge impact if you had suspicions. There is even slang associated with this phenomena; "the dead hate Alakaslam" etc.
I think these are all pretty ok posts, although there is somewhat less than I expected and all focusing around boone.
Fully agree on the first.
The second two don't sway me. What rayn thinks is maybe neat, but Slam doesn't seem overly concerned with rayn in general, and appears to be saying "I am interested in your choice between these two because ___________, but I do not want to vote ggtemplar unless I'm convinced on him." While implying that...whatever rayn things about these two will bridge the gap in Slam's own reads, and allow him to choose. I don't understand why rayn's reads would be relevant towards slams decision of who to vote. It's relevant to slam's read on rayn, but shouldn't be relevant to slam's own decisionmaking about who is/isn't scum and who he votes.
The third is...general stuff. I like it better than the second, though.
Because at the time of Killing's post on boone there is a LOT of suspicion on boone. Not just a lot of people, but players that people are likely to listen to or sheep. And Killing comes in and says, in the same post, "I have no read on Boone" and "Boone is my top scumread". This is the very definition of wishy-washiness. He distances himself from the lynch by saying "Yeah well I don't know one way or the other" but adds his support to the wagon by putting her as his SOLE mafia read.
On March 06 2014 04:21 austinmcc wrote: VE and GGTemplar both.
Why is that particular contradiction in Boone's filter super telling? THIS QUESTION SOUNDS DUMB BUT IT IS REAL. I would prefer you talk a little more about Killing, or more about that one contradiction, rather than just mention it and justify yourselves off that.
In-of-itself it isn't _super_ telling, but it's the second time he gave some well thought out reads I thought, then threw a weak conclusion at the end.
Like he spent the time fabricating some arguments only to realize at the end that there was a ??? premise before the conclusion so he just pulled a
EPT
