|
On March 04 2014 21:08 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On March 04 2014 21:07 Dandel Ion wrote:On March 04 2014 21:03 justanothertownie wrote: Random lynching is a good discussion starter but a terrible play itself while policy lynching has it's merits. Well that is just wrong Ok, I admit there is a certain entertainment value but that's not what I was talking about. And I'm saying it can't be that terrible if it has a higher % than normal lynching. Or are you against day1 lynches in general? IS THAT IT?
DO YOU HATE FREEDOM?
|
On March 04 2014 21:14 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On March 04 2014 21:11 Dandel Ion wrote:On March 04 2014 21:08 justanothertownie wrote:On March 04 2014 21:07 Dandel Ion wrote:On March 04 2014 21:03 justanothertownie wrote: Random lynching is a good discussion starter but a terrible play itself while policy lynching has it's merits. Well that is just wrong Ok, I admit there is a certain entertainment value but that's not what I was talking about. And I'm saying it can't be that terrible if it has a higher % than normal lynching. Or are you against day1 lynches in general? IS THAT IT? DO YOU HATE FREEDOM? Well, I have trouble believing this statistic. Especially if you take into account how many times scum was lynched day1 recently (without random lynching of course). Then you should make a counter-database so you can make up your counter-statistics.
|
On March 04 2014 21:15 justanothertownie wrote: Also it gives you no information at all if you random lynch. People defending the target could be his scumbuddies (if he is scum) or they just don't like random lynching. Deciding the lynch at the start of the day is the stupidest thing possible but I think you are well aware of that. Sentence 1: Not true Sentence 2: Applies to every lynch ever and kind of is the point of this game Sentence 3: If you want I can do some stupider things than that, would be worth it just to prove a point.
|
On March 04 2014 21:19 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On March 04 2014 21:17 Dandel Ion wrote:On March 04 2014 21:14 justanothertownie wrote:On March 04 2014 21:11 Dandel Ion wrote:On March 04 2014 21:08 justanothertownie wrote:On March 04 2014 21:07 Dandel Ion wrote:On March 04 2014 21:03 justanothertownie wrote: Random lynching is a good discussion starter but a terrible play itself while policy lynching has it's merits. Well that is just wrong Ok, I admit there is a certain entertainment value but that's not what I was talking about. And I'm saying it can't be that terrible if it has a higher % than normal lynching. Or are you against day1 lynches in general? IS THAT IT? DO YOU HATE FREEDOM? Well, I have trouble believing this statistic. Especially if you take into account how many times scum was lynched day1 recently (without random lynching of course). Then you should make a counter-database so you can make up your counter-statistics. I don't care enough. I won't random lynch anyways. Let's talk about more productive things - any reads so far besides boone? Yes, thank you for asking.
|
On March 04 2014 21:21 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On March 04 2014 21:20 Dandel Ion wrote:On March 04 2014 21:15 justanothertownie wrote: Also it gives you no information at all if you random lynch. People defending the target could be his scumbuddies (if he is scum) or they just don't like random lynching. Deciding the lynch at the start of the day is the stupidest thing possible but I think you are well aware of that. Sentence 1: Not true Sentence 2: Applies to every lynch ever and kind of is the point of this game Sentence 3: If you want I can do some stupider things than that, would be worth it just to prove a point. We can just agree to disagree if you are ok with that. This isn't helping anyone. Are you sure you don't want to see stupider things?
I wouldn't mind
|
On March 04 2014 21:22 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On March 04 2014 21:20 Dandel Ion wrote:On March 04 2014 21:19 justanothertownie wrote:On March 04 2014 21:17 Dandel Ion wrote:On March 04 2014 21:14 justanothertownie wrote:On March 04 2014 21:11 Dandel Ion wrote:On March 04 2014 21:08 justanothertownie wrote:On March 04 2014 21:07 Dandel Ion wrote:On March 04 2014 21:03 justanothertownie wrote: Random lynching is a good discussion starter but a terrible play itself while policy lynching has it's merits. Well that is just wrong Ok, I admit there is a certain entertainment value but that's not what I was talking about. And I'm saying it can't be that terrible if it has a higher % than normal lynching. Or are you against day1 lynches in general? IS THAT IT? DO YOU HATE FREEDOM? Well, I have trouble believing this statistic. Especially if you take into account how many times scum was lynched day1 recently (without random lynching of course). Then you should make a counter-database so you can make up your counter-statistics. I don't care enough. I won't random lynch anyways. Let's talk about more productive things - any reads so far besides boone? Yes, thank you for asking. Gonna share? If I wanted to do that, don't you think I would have?
|
On March 04 2014 21:29 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On March 04 2014 20:48 Dandel Ion wrote: Plammer why do you have a townread on rayn? did I say I had one? No.
I'm still asking why you have one.
|
On March 04 2014 21:32 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On March 04 2014 21:29 Dandel Ion wrote:On March 04 2014 21:29 Palmar wrote:On March 04 2014 20:48 Dandel Ion wrote: Plammer why do you have a townread on rayn? did I say I had one? No. I'm still asking why you have one. Because of dragons and such. But dragons are reptilians So they're like snakes So they're lying
Alternatively some "experts" suggest they're closer to birds. Bird brains are shit-small.
Why would you ever listen to a dragon
|
On March 04 2014 22:03 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On March 04 2014 22:02 raynpelikoneet wrote:Let's talk about it after robik answers me okay? data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt="" I think Dandel is town what do you think? I think he's a troll and I have no idea about his alignment.
On March 04 2014 22:05 Palmar wrote: tbh I haven't even bothered reading Dandel, I really cba going through that shit.
These might have something to do with each other.
|
Oats' post on austin was great
I'd say it was a 9/10 would read again
|
Except rayn's stuff on austin is worse than Oats' because that's not at all what austin said.
|
On March 04 2014 22:47 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On March 04 2014 22:45 Dandel Ion wrote: Except rayn's stuff on austin is worse than Oats' because that's not at all what austin said. Can you explain to me what austin said because that's exactly what he said. He asked for actual reads instead of wishy-washy general statements.
You're talking about stuff like the pool of newbies or whatever, I don't see anything like that from austin.
In fact, you are the only one in the game that suggested something like that, but here you are attacking austin for it when he didn't.
|
On March 04 2014 22:54 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On March 04 2014 22:49 Dandel Ion wrote:On March 04 2014 22:47 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 04 2014 22:45 Dandel Ion wrote: Except rayn's stuff on austin is worse than Oats' because that's not at all what austin said. Can you explain to me what austin said because that's exactly what he said. He asked for actual reads instead of wishy-washy general statements. You're talking about stuff like the pool of newbies or whatever, I don't see anything like that from austin. In fact, you are the only one in the game that suggested something like that, but here you are attacking austin for it when he didn't. I don't get a fucking thing about this post. Robik said: "I think boone, ggtemplar and killing seem all scummy because they are different than usually as town" austin: "can you elaborate on 1-2 of those reads"Robik: [stuff about boone] austin: "okay that seems reasonable" [some questions]What i picked up considering the red part is the starting point i don't get the green follow up. How is this how it didn't happen? Robik: "DM are scummy, everyone is scummy. Look at me I'm so town cuz I call everybody scum without calling anybody scum" austin: "Bro can you like actually read 1-2 people instead of throwing out useless fluff generalizazions" robik: "I'll give one thing that looks like a read and then just repeat how everyone is scummy anyways because I'm scum myself and it's hard to come up with actual reads" austin: "kk that's more clear and it really is my fault this happened because I shouldn't even have given "1 read" as an option jesus my name is austin and i dont know what i'm doing"
|
I don't think I've ever seen alakasalama post coherent and logical
|
Why do you care if people see you as a sheep? Why are you concerned about looking like a sheep if you're not even planning on sheeping anyway?
|
A counterclaim :OOOOOOOOOOOOOO
|
VE who's the third in your loveboat?
|
Interesting that none of you question boone's foundation QT claim
|
On March 05 2014 02:33 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On March 05 2014 02:32 Dandel Ion wrote: Interesting that none of you question boone's foundation QT claim It is weird but do we know for sure if there is only one? Fakeclaiming this as scum would be the most retarded thing ever. OP is in singular.
|
|
|
|
|