EPTOn March 08 2014 23:55 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Grack has done more than most of the players in this game.
Grack has done more than most of the players in this game.
For example?
[M][T] Foundation Mafia - Page 12
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
justanothertownie
16317 Posts
For example? | ||
|
justanothertownie
16317 Posts
On March 07 2014 09:53 Grackaroni wrote: I'm here but I don't really feel like posting right now. On March 07 2014 09:53 Grackaroni wrote:  This is all that Grack has done day2. Stellar contribution eh rayn? | ||
|
justanothertownie
16317 Posts
On March 09 2014 00:04 raynpelikoneet wrote: JAT let me ask you this; Who would you say has put us more close to lynching mafia on D2 than Grack? Like, who has contributed more towards lynching mafia than Grack has on D2? Everyone that posted some kind of opinion on anything. I don't even want to argue with you about if day2 has been good so far but that you are defending grack for "nobody else has been really good" is just ridiculous. | ||
|
justanothertownie
16317 Posts
On March 09 2014 00:09 Grackaroni wrote: Has anyone questioned Palmar on his thought process from the end of the day? Yes, but he just said he was confused... | ||
|
justanothertownie
16317 Posts
On March 09 2014 00:08 Grackaroni wrote: eh I'll do what I can. Bad week plus a lack of sleep from midterms and I haven't felt like playing mafia. Definitely was not going to bother arguing with Oatmaster. That's ok I can relate to that. | ||
|
justanothertownie
16317 Posts
On March 09 2014 00:08 raynpelikoneet wrote: Oats do you think Grack is more likely to lead the town than for example Palmar is? Also do you think Palmar has lead the town more than Grack has this game? May I answer this too? | ||
|
justanothertownie
16317 Posts
On March 09 2014 00:13 raynpelikoneet wrote: I am not defending Grack, i am trying to get a better read on you and Oats because your thought process clearly does not line up with mine and i want to know where this sudden "Grack is mafia" is coming from. Because i don't see it, Oats' reasoning for Grack being scum was bullshit in the first place and when he was called out for it he went "oh yeah you are right but Grack still scum for this other reason i didn't bring up in the first place" which is also bullshit. What I said is that it is very possible that he is scum and I think so because everything he did was a push on a townie day1. So you are sure that Grack is town? | ||
|
justanothertownie
16317 Posts
On March 09 2014 00:16 raynpelikoneet wrote: Because the new reason you came up with does not make him mafia. Pushing a lynch on a townie does not make anyone mafia, and when Grackaroni makes cases as scum they are not one liners like his "case" on VE. Do you disagree with this? I am not sure but i think he is more likely to be town than mafia. I don't know what kind of cases Grack makes as mafi because I never played with mafia grack if I am not mistaken. Why are you attacking me for entertaining the possibility of this if you yourself aren't sure about him? | ||
|
justanothertownie
16317 Posts
On March 09 2014 00:20 raynpelikoneet wrote: I don't see him pushing any agenda which he usually does as mafia. He seems just disinterested for whatever reason. Pushing a VE lynch isn't pushing an agenda? | ||
|
justanothertownie
16317 Posts
On March 09 2014 00:26 raynpelikoneet wrote: I have my vote on the person i want to lynch in case you have not noticed. And you really think scumrobik would put himself in the spotlight like that? He could never have thought that he would win if the lynch is between him and dandel. On top of that he attacked you for some very weak reasons (yeah, the act in itself is scummy but who does that when he knows that you will tear it to shreds later on?). This is suicidal scumplay. | ||
|
justanothertownie
16317 Posts
On March 09 2014 00:30 raynpelikoneet wrote: Tell me what i am supposed to do? Make a counter-case to a case that's on my top scumread and argue with myself that my #2 scumread is more likely to be mafia than my #1 scumread? really Oats? So you are supposed to just do nothing and pray that your lynch is on scum? | ||
|
justanothertownie
16317 Posts
Why do you need a case to discuss the alignment of someone? Since you seem to think your lynch is the one and only correct one today it should not be a problem to do discuss something else besides that. | ||
|
justanothertownie
16317 Posts
On March 09 2014 00:36 raynpelikoneet wrote: Oats is probably mafia. He knows me better than this. Sorry, but you are in anti-town mode right now if you are town. | ||
|
justanothertownie
16317 Posts
On March 09 2014 00:42 Oatsmaster wrote: The case you are talking about above is Dandel's case right? Yes. | ||
|
justanothertownie
16317 Posts
On March 09 2014 00:44 Alakaslam wrote: Which makes it WIFOM which makes it a smart move. Not if he could just avoid the whole thing altogether. Good that you are here slam - you think we should lynch robik today? Why? | ||
|
justanothertownie
16317 Posts
On March 09 2014 00:48 Alakaslam wrote: Yes probably, because of RAYNPELIKONEET's CASE!!! You all seem to forget he caught robik in a slip up that he still hasn't answered shortly before HIJOLE CHINGA LE SEMANA RAAAAA No, I know he did. But it is also in dandels case. Do you think this "slip" alone is enough to lynch him? | ||
|
justanothertownie
16317 Posts
On March 09 2014 00:50 raynpelikoneet wrote: You said it yourself at some point. If the case is so bad why could robik just debunk it? Why start a flamewar? I know I said that and I still think the case itself is really good. Sorry, that I am trying to gather more information and am willing to consider different explanations than "he is mafia, gg". | ||
|
justanothertownie
16317 Posts
| ||
|
justanothertownie
16317 Posts
| ||
|
justanothertownie
16317 Posts
On March 09 2014 01:11 Dandel Ion wrote: This is just getting better, now it's my fault he hasn't read austin's filter. How old are you dude? Enough dandel. Robik if you rage at this again I will lynch you. Just ignore the mocking and answer actual points if they are brought up. | ||
| ||
