EPTopinion on Chyz?
Cultured Mini Mafia - Page 2
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
opinion on Chyz? | ||
|
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
| ||
|
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
| ||
|
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
On February 27 2014 05:30 WaveofShadow wrote: I actually find his later posting is what makes me feel a little better---the post that turned me onto Vivax specifically. JJD you're around, aren't you? I'm around and I just went back and reread and it does seem like you're right about me seeming to follow thread sentiment. Don't know what to say about that except that I think the cases I brought up were mostly original @ least even if they were on people that were already being suspected. I can only suspect who I suspect. | ||
|
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
On February 27 2014 05:52 WaveofShadow wrote: IDK, I guess it isn't after thinking about it. Scratch that part then. My only defense about following thread sentiment is that it's coincidental. I dont know what else I can say.JJD why is originality of one's case important? | ||
|
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
Chz's last bunch of posts read pretty townie to me. | ||
|
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
| ||
|
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
On February 27 2014 11:05 gumshoe wrote: Ok even Moc changed his tune here and said he agreed w/ me about sukis post being lighthearted.From here on out, Jar mostly pushes me and Moc and at the foundation of this crusade is his staunch bilief in Suki. He claims her post was lighthearted, perhaps I was wrong in saying it was especially crafted, but thier is undeniably an element of 'try' in her initial post, that if not scummy, certainly shouldnt be considered townie. Yet this bilief in her, as I said, is the basis of most of his play so far. On February 27 2014 11:05 gumshoe wrote: Selective quoting much? I was confronted about my accusations against moc by moc? Here's the full quote:Here when confronted about his accusations against Moc, by Moc, he deflects saying I'm the scummy one. He stays this course for a time. Then as attention dies down on me he goes back to Moc. On February 26 2014 11:42 JarJarDrinks wrote: You call that being confronted? Moc made a mostly joke post. Don't try to imply my read on you was me responding to pressure or something like that.Lol, I thought rayn was the only person I always read backwards. But actually, I'm starting to come around on you being town because I feel like gumshoe is using you to try and get suki lynched. Like I think u've been acting kinda scummy mostly because of ur suki read. But it's way scummier to call you town and sheep that case. On February 27 2014 11:05 gumshoe wrote: Later on he asserts his Suki read without proof. I was asked so I answered. Again you're cherry picking parts of my posts. On February 27 2014 11:05 gumshoe wrote: Buddying seems like a strange term to use about 2 people you think are scumAlso, despite Jar Jar buddying her to extreme lengths, Suki has not once mentioned him. | ||
|
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
On February 27 2014 11:41 gumshoe wrote: 1: Find me an exact quote where he renounces specifically his initial suspicion of her post. On February 26 2014 17:29 Mocsta wrote: I like her attitude after my callout. I dont think a scum Suki had any need to maintain thread presence after I was getting hammered. Also, on a reread, I agreed with JJD that Suki was actually relatively light hearted. I completely misread that her dig on Toad was a retort to Toad calling her out, for example. There one or two other minor things, but I dont think its important to discuss them right now. | ||
|
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
On February 27 2014 12:16 gumshoe wrote: Then why did you ask me to find the post?gumshoe makes an argument. JJD answers the argument. gumshoe asks him to elaborate more on his answer. JJD proves his statement. gumshoe says "no that was not my argument, in fact it was this (something else)". That makes absolutely no sense. I never changed my argument, point out how I did, I just realized that Mocsta taking back his case doesn't change anything. | ||
|
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
On February 27 2014 08:04 Cavalinho wrote: So are you still waiting or are you satisfied?The only reason I'm not jumping on this Mocsta train is because I still want him to try and explain his reads. | ||
|
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
On February 27 2014 13:58 Cavalinho wrote: Um, to get an answer. Were you not planning on letting people know about your read on mocsta untill I asked?Yeah, he already gave me a pretty reliable answer for the moment. Why are you asking this question? Like you make these statements and then don't follow up on them. Like you're only trying to find the right thing to say @ the time. For instance: On February 27 2014 13:04 Cavalinho wrote: Have you filter dived yet? Any conclusions you'd like to share?At a glance, this seems like a pretty good case. I'm gonna look through her filter to see what's up. | ||
|
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
First off his case against me is garbage. He says things like I'm buddying to Suki even though he supposedly has us both as scum teammates. He selectively pulls quotes from my posts to make me look bad. Like he spends a ton of time talking about how I'm all in w/ suki On February 27 2014 11:05 gumshoe wrote: I dont like Jar Jar, much of his style has been mostly determined by an uncanny devotion to Suki. On February 27 2014 11:05 gumshoe wrote: From here on out, Jar mostly pushes me and Moc and at the foundation of this crusade is his staunch bilief in Suki. On February 27 2014 11:05 gumshoe wrote: Later on he asserts his Suki read without proof. On February 27 2014 11:05 gumshoe wrote: Also, despite Jar Jar buddying her to extreme lengths, Suki has not once mentioned him. On February 27 2014 11:05 gumshoe wrote: That's alll from his case against me. I think he mentioned suki more in that one post then I have the entire thread. All I said about her was how I thought Moc made a bad case against her and then later on when Moc asked me what I thought about her I said she read town to me.For now I'll switch my vote onto Jar, because the dudes based his accusations against me on my undying love for Moc, while his loyalty to Suki, which has defined his play for more than mine to Moc, is more so questionable and pretty much unexplained. Gumshoe is completely misrepresenting my play. Read my filter and tell me if you think "much of [My] style has been mostly determined by an uncanny devotion to Suki." It's a total horseshit case. I also think his townread on moc is just too disingenuous. He townread him real early in the game for terrible reasons and now he's basically treating him as confirmed town: He just can't possibly be that confident. | ||
|
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
On February 27 2014 23:11 JarJarDrinks wrote: And like, if you look @ GSL, he gave off that same air of confidence w/ his scumread on Mattchew. It may be a townread vs a scumread but he comes off very similiar.I also think his townread on moc is just too disingenuous. He townread him real early in the game for terrible reasons and now he's basically treating him as confirmed town: He just can't possibly be that confident. | ||
|
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
On February 27 2014 12:20 gumshoe wrote: Cause I couldnt, didnt really matter to me anyways, I just like to make you work on something other than destroying town and murdering its babies. On February 22 2014 02:56 gumshoe wrote: I did nothing but attack scum until Vivax raised a case against me, which is pretty much what I do every game that I dont uber lurk. I do play and think a bit "odd" and players both green and red usually pass that behaviour off as scummy. If you Vivax and everyone else start finding "unexplainable" motives here and there(as one enthuastic townie once said about my posts) theres not much I can do but sincerely ask you to reconsider ) : I'm not scum and from my view point, however skewed it might be, I've communicated that through my actions. I assure you I have a fantastic lurker meta to fall back on should I ever roll red, but thats not where I'm at this game, and it'll piss me off to no end if I get mislynched and am forced to imagine Matt's laughter roll across the vaulted ceilings of his super secret scum layer. | ||
|
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
On February 27 2014 23:57 Aquanim wrote: I think ur missing gumshoe voting for meVotecount Mocsta (2) - geript (1) - TheChyz (1) - Toadesstern (1) - JarJarDrinks (0) - gumshoe (1) - WaveofShadow (0) - suki (2) - Vivax (3) - WaveofShadow, Not Voting - Ange777, Cavalinho Vivax is currently set to be lynched. Day 1 ends in . If any votes are missing or incorrect please let us know! | ||
|
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
On February 28 2014 00:09 Vivax wrote: I'd say I'm null on you. Maybe leaning slightly town.JarJar what's your take on me? I'm a more likely candidate than gum atm. | ||
|
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
On February 28 2014 00:09 Mocsta wrote:  I was wondering whetherh you disappeared or chose to ignore my comment about Thrawn/Shoe. Guess its the latter Sorry, Didn't really see that as a question @ first On February 27 2014 23:16 Mocsta wrote: I think the real question should be whether scum gumshoe has any value to insert me as a town read at that point in time. You could argue he used me as a platform to leap onto Suki, but did this really go anywhere? Well my answer u probably wont like because it involves pre-flip association but here goes: I'm starting to suspect that suki may be GSs scumbuddy. It would explain why Gumshoe is trying to paint me in such a bad light for giving her a townread. It also explains his entry into the thead. Like Maybe he sees you jump on her for her posting style and he's all like "Fuck, she's caught already. Lemme go bus a little to try to get something out of this." Like I already pointed out (and you sorta agreed to), your case wasnt very good. And also as you said, nothing seemed to come of it. He threw a vote on her when no one else was voting her and took it off pretty quickly. | ||
|
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
On February 28 2014 00:13 Mocsta wrote: I don't think any of the cases against him are all that strong. The reason I'm leaning town as opposed to null is because him being scum doesn't mesh all that well w/ gumshoe as his scumbuddy.im keen to hear a bit more about this one. | ||
|
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
On February 28 2014 00:40 Holyflare wrote: Well OK. Then he's null for me.i suggest you refrain from any and all pre-flip associations and just vote people on the merit of their scummyness But ya know, I hear people say this shit all the time. I don't know where this idea came from but I think it's dumb to not take every bit of information into account when voting. | ||
| ||
