• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 20:55
CEST 02:55
KST 09:55
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202530RSL Season 1 - Final Week8[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams2Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster Why doesnt SC2 scene costream tournaments
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame
Brood War
General
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL Corsair Pursuit Micro?
Tourneys
[CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET The Casual Games of the Week Thread
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 588 users

[M][N] Default Suspicions Mafia

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
Normal
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 18 2014 17:44 GMT
#30
/in
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 18 2014 20:53 GMT
#34
two more and we are set to go!
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 19 2014 03:00 GMT
#51
We lynch Koshi on D1 because 25% chance he is scum.
We lynch suki on D2 if her filter is not 9 pages on D1.

game ez!
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 19 2014 21:17 GMT
#116
On February 20 2014 02:22 marvellosity wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 20 2014 01:47 Koshi wrote:
On the record. I like all the people in this game. except prplhz because I don't know who that is and he hasn't got a cool name.

How is prplhz not a cool name. Cmon Koshi.

I actually think it's one of the coolest names i have seen.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 19 2014 23:48 GMT
#138
The quoted below is in addition to votes cast on D1 correct?
On day 1 each player will be randomly assigned a vote on someone else. No one will have more than 3 votes on them to begin with.



##vote: raynpelikoneet
I have a plan and i am not sure if this is the best plan because i have not thought it through from every angle yet but does anyone know what i am doing?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 00:03 GMT
#154
Okay so apparently the starting votes for the day don't mean shit if i read this correctly? Then it's... meaningless?
What's the point?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 00:06 GMT
#158
On February 20 2014 09:05 Toadesstern wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 20 2014 09:03 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Okay so apparently the starting votes for the day don't mean shit if i read this correctly? Then it's... meaningless?
What's the point?

the point is that you're not allowed to unvote at any point during the game, thus you can not start "unvoted" because you'd stay "unvoted" until you vote someone.

Well that's stupid. In that case my plan is foolproof and the best play.
At every time you are "not voting for anyone" your vote must be on yourself.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 00:06 GMT
#159
It's called "take a fucking stance or vote for yourself".
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 00:09 GMT
#164
It puts pressure on people who are considered lynch targets. And yes, if you are not pushing a lynch or have a stance on the current lynch targets you should vote for yourself then.

I don't understand your last question suki.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 00:13 GMT
#178
On February 20 2014 09:09 CuteFluffyPuppy wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 20 2014 09:03 Toadesstern wrote:
On February 20 2014 08:58 CuteFluffyPuppy wrote:
On February 20 2014 08:57 Toadesstern wrote:
On February 20 2014 08:48 raynpelikoneet wrote:
The quoted below is in addition to votes cast on D1 correct?
On day 1 each player will be randomly assigned a vote on someone else. No one will have more than 3 votes on them to begin with.



##vote: raynpelikoneet
I have a plan and i am not sure if this is the best plan because i have not thought it through from every angle yet but does anyone know what i am doing?

sounds good to me, I like this

##vote: raynpelikoneet

Why do you think Rayn voted for himself?

no idea

I actually thought it was for instant majority purposes first, because your vote will be on the player you voted last after the lynch and night kills. Then I realized it's not an IM game.

I thought the votes that are random on D1 and the mechanics that apply to the voting past D1 will be permanent.
Like if i had voted you on D1 end, on D2 you would have my vote on you in addition to normal votes cast on D2. I am bad at explaining this, hope you get what i mean.

As it seems like, this voting "mechanic" is useless and will not help any faction as it is. I don't understand the point of it. Like hosts make us cast a "random" vote at the start of every day? What's the point? To prevent people from being modkilled because of not voting? I don't see how this affects anything so there is no point in discussing it further, it's just useless mechanic.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 00:16 GMT
#182
I am taking no stance because there is no stance to take atm prplhz. If you are seriously saying you think someone is scum at this moment you are lying. Pressuring people is fine but what you are accusing me of is a straight out stretch.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 00:18 GMT
#187
On February 20 2014 09:17 Koshi wrote:
rayn, do you see any suspicious people or are you too busy with the thing with the standard votes that I don't understand.

not really, no.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 00:22 GMT
#193
On February 20 2014 09:21 prplhz wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 20 2014 09:16 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I am taking no stance because there is no stance to take atm prplhz. If you are seriously saying you think someone is scum at this moment you are lying. Pressuring people is fine but what you are accusing me of is a straight out stretch.

But who cares where your vote is at, why even bother to implement a plan that allows people to do nothing. No, I don't expect people to have big scum reads right now but that doesn't mean we need to implement a plan to virtually unvote in an unvote free voting system. It just serves absolutely no purpose.

Well apparently you care where my vote is at?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 00:23 GMT
#196
prplhz did you even read my posts?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 00:37 GMT
#209
On February 20 2014 09:35 Palmar wrote:
I agree with what prplhz is saying, and to the extend that I don't understand why people care where votes are parked. It's completely irrelevant, there is no pressure in a vote that isn't being actively pushed as a lynch target. No one cares. I have no idea why rayn seems to think we need a plan to address that non-problem. It's an extremely bad opening discussion point and serves no purpose.

Do you agree with prplhz's vote on me?

Actually this goes to everyone.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 00:39 GMT
#213
On February 20 2014 09:38 Toadesstern wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 20 2014 09:37 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On February 20 2014 09:35 Palmar wrote:
I agree with what prplhz is saying, and to the extend that I don't understand why people care where votes are parked. It's completely irrelevant, there is no pressure in a vote that isn't being actively pushed as a lynch target. No one cares. I have no idea why rayn seems to think we need a plan to address that non-problem. It's an extremely bad opening discussion point and serves no purpose.

Do you agree with prplhz's vote on me?

Actually this goes to everyone.

If you read my posts, you'll find that I actually said the exact same thing and that I as well have my vote on you. So yes.

So why is your vote not on me?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 00:41 GMT
#217
When marv comes in, he'll explain my posts to everyone. Trust me, he has do to that, even as mafia. Then we lynch mafia.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 00:44 GMT
#222
Palmar, especially you, i would like you to weigh the possibilities of what's my motivation behind my posts and give me your read on me. Read carefully and think.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 00:45 GMT
#223
On February 20 2014 09:42 Palmar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 20 2014 09:41 raynpelikoneet wrote:
When marv comes in, he'll explain my posts to everyone. Trust me, he has do to that, even as mafia. Then we lynch mafia.


How about you explain your idea yourself? I mean I posted the two options I saw, but you can probably elaborate better than I on your intentions.

Now this is the point. I already did. Why are you not reading?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 00:46 GMT
#226
On February 20 2014 09:45 Koshi wrote:
This game is above my paygrade atm.

Sleep time.

Don't worry just sheep me. I won't let you down.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 00:47 GMT
#228
On February 20 2014 09:46 suki wrote:
I agree that finding a way to 'unvote' is stupid. I don't think it makes me lean scum or town on rayn either way.

So what do you think. Is that all you see in my posts? Because if it is and you are right then i am pretty surely mafia because i am not some random noob who says irrelevant stuff as town.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 00:49 GMT
#230
On February 20 2014 09:48 Koshi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 20 2014 09:46 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On February 20 2014 09:45 Koshi wrote:
This game is above my paygrade atm.

Sleep time.

Don't worry just sheep me. I won't let you down.

Do I vote for you or on myself?

I'll tell you who to vote for later. You could help too.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 00:54 GMT
#236
Interesting. HAs anyone else have anything to say about this?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 00:55 GMT
#240
On February 20 2014 09:54 marvellosity wrote:
Hello everyone. Do I need to read before I go to bed? A quick skim of this page and everything looks super serious already.

On February 20 2014 09:41 raynpelikoneet wrote:
When marv comes in, he'll explain my posts to everyone. Trust me, he has do to that, even as mafia. Then we lynch mafia.

table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 01:05 GMT
#245
On February 20 2014 10:04 Palmar wrote:
Like I don't mind you asking questions, but please believe my answers. If I say I don't know if it makes rayn scum, then that probably means I don't know if it makes rayn scum.

How can you agree with prplhz's vote if you don't think i am necessarily scum?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 01:10 GMT
#249
My problem is that there are now at least 4 people who have no interest in thinking of my motives behind my posts. I'll make a clarification after marv posts anyways, but there is something i want out of marv first. I'll explain that too after.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 01:13 GMT
#254
On February 20 2014 10:11 Palmar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 20 2014 10:10 raynpelikoneet wrote:
My problem is that there are now at least 4 people who have no interest in thinking of my motives behind my posts. I'll make a clarification after marv posts anyways, but there is something i want out of marv first. I'll explain that too after.


I'm asking exactly for your motives. But for some reason you don't seem to want to tell me?

You are supposed to make educated guesses about my motives and post your conclusions about them. Apparently you don't understand them. That's technically fine. What's not fine is you blindly soft +1 prplhz and Toad while saying you don't understand what's going on.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 01:26 GMT
#267
So here we go (marv i would have expected a bit more from you, i am sad):

There are three possibilities about my motives and here they are:

1) I am town and this is my thought process; I misunderstood the setup as i have already explained and thought the votes from previous days are added to the current days votes. That's why i made my plan in the first place. Now this would have been the most pro-town plan because i would have later on brought up the fact that we should treat this as a majority lynch and at the end of the day people who are not in the majority wagon put their votes on themselves. In that way we would have eliminated any cons for the town in setup we possibly can, which is pretty much everything other than the randomness which we can't eliminate.

However, that was not the case. Now, i still stand behind my "if you "unvote", vote yourself" plan because of this. If we do not push this policy it leads to possibly stupid and irrelevant questions like "you don't think this dude is scum anymore, why is your vote still on him?". We don't want that because we benefit from clarity and it's beneficial we know exactly WHEN and WHY people drop their scumreads and where they head next. If they don't have next target they should inform that by voting for themselves. This prevents mafia from misrepresenting people because you can always back up your thoughts with your actions in thread (most importantly voting). Having no possibility to unvote is pro-mafia, if you't agree with that you need to explain me why. It's never irrelevant where your vote is at.

2) I did the same pro-town thing as mafia.

3) I just made all this up and and i was just saying shit for no reason at the start of the game.


Now here is my question, especially to prplhz, Toad, Palmar and suki;
Why did you not try to see what i was/am trying to do and how that would make me whatever alignment. What you did is you took some posts from me and painted them scummy without no thinking behind it. I want to know why.

If what i was doing was (1), then i am town.
If what i was doing is (2), you can't tell my alignment.
If what i was doing is (3), then you are saying i am some random noob which this post already proves i am not because i would have came up with a decent explanation on the fly.

So again, why am i mafia? Especially prplhz and Toad?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 01:44 GMT
#277
Palmar the problem is not that if you make it clear or not. It's if other people think you are being clear or not which is not always so easily said. You know how this shit works, scum misrepresent everything people do because that's how you lynch townies. Why not reduce the possible amount of misrepresentations by an easy policy that does no harm in any case?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 01:52 GMT
#280
Toadesstern do you think being able to unvote in general is pro-town or pro-mafia?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 01:53 GMT
#281
On February 20 2014 10:48 Toadesstern wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 20 2014 10:44 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Palmar the problem is not that if you make it clear or not. It's if other people think you are being clear or not which is not always so easily said. You know how this shit works, scum misrepresent everything people do because that's how you lynch townies. Why not reduce the possible amount of misrepresentations by an easy policy that does no harm in any case?

there's plenty of people throwing around votes in every single game, for fun, for policy, for random reasons or whatever else.
So if it's not a problem in any other game, why do you think it's going to be a problem in this one to the point that you think we should make a "no voting someone else unless you're super certain" policy?
Do you actually think it's something that should be policy in every game?

That's not what i am saying. Stop fucking twisting my words or l2read. I am already getting mad at you and that's not what i want.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 01:56 GMT
#283
Not yet Palmar.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 01:57 GMT
#285
Well you can!
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 01:59 GMT
#288
So why do you think i am mafia Toad?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 02:00 GMT
#289
Don't dance around the issue and make a clear case.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 02:03 GMT
#291
suki is probably mafia.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 02:06 GMT
#293
On February 20 2014 11:04 Toadesstern wrote:
I wasn't able to come up with a reason for you to propose what you did as town while being able come up with a reasoning for it as mafia despite it being a sketchy reasoning. So I wanted you to explain yourself.
It's basicly the same way I caught mafia the last game were you got me lynched. Remember the miller thing that I pointed out 3 hours into the game and I wasn't sure what to make of it early on? It's literally the same thing and I'm not liking it one bit.

Well i came up with a reasoning, why is my reasoning not possible and how does it not line up with my actions in thread?
Just because you don't understand something does not mean i can't possibly make sense.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 02:07 GMT
#294
I don't give a fuck about what you did last game because if you had "caught mafia" you would have lynched VayneAutority which you did not do.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 02:08 GMT
#295
##unvote
##Vote: suki
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 02:14 GMT
#297
Pro tip for any possible competent scum out there. Read my posts. I guarantee you get easy mislynches later on when you first eliminate townies that use their brain.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 02:28 GMT
#300
Simple question Toad. At this moment do you think i am mafia or not?

suki i am always serious.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 02:34 GMT
#303
wow prplhz is also mafia.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 02:36 GMT
#305
Okay suki let's try it this way.
Have you ever, as town, unvoted in a mafia game?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 02:39 GMT
#309
So what was your reasoning for unvoting as town or as mafia? I guarantee as mafia it's most likely "because i would do that as town" as in "i try to look townie" because that's why you do things as mafia right?

So we can exclude that part. What was your reasoning for unvote as town?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 02:43 GMT
#310
On February 20 2014 11:33 prplhz wrote:
I still think that raynpelikoneet's plan is completely useless and no townie has any reason to come up with or push it.

I also agree with marvellosity that it doesn't make sense that scum would hard push a silly slightly scummy plan in thread like this.

Also this is why prplhz is mafia. It's an obvious contradiction that makes no sense.

##unvote
##Vote: prplhz
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 02:48 GMT
#313
Just answer my question, why are you avoiding it? There is no reason to do so if you are town.
I am not voting for you so i don't need to explain anything.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 02:58 GMT
#317
On February 20 2014 11:51 suki wrote:
Oh really rayn? Why are you avoiding my question? There is no reason to do so if you're town. Who cares if you're not voting for me, you said your vote on me was serious so what's the big secret?

Answer to rayn's question:
I suppose most of the time when I unvote its when one of my cases falls flat and I don't have a basis to suspect that person anymore.

So then, you're arguing here that being able to unvote aids in transparency and shows exactly where I stand, which includes being neutral.

Which, I get.

But put in a situation where a town person can't unvote but they don't find X person suspicious anymore, the obvious move is to find their next target and then move their vote there. If they don't, people can pressure them to do so.
It is to town's benefit that everybody be forced to be accountable for their reads. If neutral is no longer an option, then everybody must take a stance on someone, which is where their vote is. People being forced to take a stance is pro-town.

Now, first of all why did you feel the need to spoiler your answer, it's really annoying. So i'll take it off the spoilers.
Secondly, if the bolded part is true why are you not pushing this policy in every game with normal mechanics?

Now to my answer to you;
Mafia does not usually call me mafia when i am town. Because that's a suicide. They call me stupid or whatever shit and try to discredit me. That's a better way because if you call me scum you get lynched. That's exactly what you did. Also you are calling my plan stupid, which it isn't. Now that's something i can get from people who are stupid. But i don't think you are stupid. And that's why i am now proving you calling my plan stupid is a way to not call me mafia because you know i am not mafia but rather to discredit me without calling me mafia.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 03:04 GMT
#319
On February 20 2014 12:03 VIVAX420 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 20 2014 11:52 prplhz wrote:
Why is VIVAX420 not talking more than he is?


when i have somehting to say i will talk?
~~~
rayn you coached suki right?

No i have no coached suki.
You should vote for prplhz, he's scum.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 03:07 GMT
#321
No it's a total contradiction. I guarantee you noone does that as town. He is mafia.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 03:10 GMT
#326
You say that me, as town, have no reason to come up with that plan, which means i am mafia. You also use absolutes to say so. In the next sentence you say you don't see why i would come up with such a plan as mafia, which is totally contradicting your last sentece because there was no way i would come up with the plan as town.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 03:12 GMT
#328
I mean you literally say "no townie has any reason to come up with".
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 03:12 GMT
#329
Stop calling me moron and tell me why you say incorrect shit then?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 03:24 GMT
#332
I do not want to lynch you for having an opinion. I want to lynch you because you say things that contradict each other and your thought process in your post can't come from a townie. Noone says "this is absolutely this" and say another thing in the next sentence as town. That is a fact.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 03:33 GMT
#339
so prplhz do you think i am mafia or not?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 03:35 GMT
#341
why are you voting for me?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 03:36 GMT
#344
Well you are voting for a person you think is not mafia so how about you vote for mafia instead then?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 03:39 GMT
#346
Also when exactly did you stop thinking i am mafia? Could you point out the post that made you think so. Normally i would think people stop thinking other people are mafia when they unvote the person but apparently it's impossible in this game because people are being retarded and i am being called stupid.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 03:46 GMT
#349
On February 20 2014 12:43 VIVAX420 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 20 2014 09:09 Toadesstern wrote:
Why are you actively looking for a way to pseudo-unvote? I don't even see a reason why someone should care about that.

thoughts on that?

Could you clarify the question? I don't understand what do you want.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 04:55 GMT
#360
On February 20 2014 13:33 Balla24 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 20 2014 10:10 raynpelikoneet wrote:
My problem is that there are now at least 4 people who have no interest in thinking of my motives behind my posts. I'll make a clarification after marv posts anyways, but there is something i want out of marv first. I'll explain that too after.


Also rayn, did you still want to explain why you wanted marv to explain first?

If marv does not understand what i mean then i can get other people do not aswell.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 05:26 GMT
#363
suki why are you not pressuring prplhz to take a stance with his vote? I thought that was what you were vouching for?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 05:32 GMT
#364
On February 20 2014 10:40 Toadesstern wrote:
@rayn: Can't be #1 because I have no idea how someone could have come to that conclusion based on the phrasing from our lovevly host.

On February 20 2014 11:12 Toadesstern wrote:
Your explanation is possible, that's the sad thing here.

Toad how do these two comments go together?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 12:06 GMT
#435
Hi! So this is what i don't get:

I understand that prplhz's contradiction is not a contradiction, which leads me to this; First he says i do something scummy. Okay i can get that. Then marv says it's not scummy. Then i give my reasoning for what i did what i did. Then prplhz says it's scummy but he also says it's not scummy because marv said so. My problem is why does he need marv say it's not scummy before he realises this? Also after this he STILL thinks it's scummy but not really. Can anyone tell me does prplhz really think it's scummy or not himself and why? My other concern is when exactly prplhz drops the scumread on me? Nothing one ever says is not necessarily scummy. The only reason that makes anything scummy is if there is no townie reason for saying something. prplhz is not even looking why i am saying what i am, he only looks the action itself and paints as something. That's the wrong way.

suki keeps talking about this and he doesn't even think it's scummy. Why? Why keep talking about something that's not helping? Not only that, she keeps attacking the ONLY person who actually agrees with him on this (Balla). Why? She is also not looking about "why" instead of "what". Balla made it very clear why he said what he did and i totally get that. It's not really hard to see why if you read Balla's posts.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 12:09 GMT
#436
Has anyone ever played with prplhz in a game where he is actually pro-active from the start as town? Because i can't remember one.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 12:19 GMT
#439
So if you read prpl's posts can you tell what he really thinks now? Because i can't. I don't know if he thinks my plan was scummy or not (btw that was not his reasoning in the first place for voting for me).
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 12:22 GMT
#440
The reason he gave for voting for me was literally because i did not want to vote for anyone 15 minutes into the game.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 12:26 GMT
#441
Palmar why do you think kush is town?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 12:29 GMT
#444
marv can you explain this:
Toad is passingly familiar enough with rayn to know that's not how rayn operates.

Because this is totally not true. I don't know where did you get this?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 12:32 GMT
#447
From prplhz/suki/Toad Toad looks the most townie to me. I actually get his vote and the reasoning and what he says (even the point marv voted him for) from townie perspective. The only post that looks really bad to me is this one:
On February 20 2014 10:48 Toadesstern wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 20 2014 10:44 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Palmar the problem is not that if you make it clear or not. It's if other people think you are being clear or not which is not always so easily said. You know how this shit works, scum misrepresent everything people do because that's how you lynch townies. Why not reduce the possible amount of misrepresentations by an easy policy that does no harm in any case?

there's plenty of people throwing around votes in every single game, for fun, for policy, for random reasons or whatever else.
So if it's not a problem in any other game, why do you think it's going to be a problem in this one to the point that you think we should make a "no voting someone else unless you're super certain" policy?
Do you actually think it's something that should be policy in every game?

Because this is totally not what i said and it proves Toad is not really even reading my posts or trying to understand me.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 12:35 GMT
#449
On February 20 2014 21:31 marvellosity wrote:
Dunno. Seems like it should be true. Toad's been around lately and you've been around.

I don't think i had a single conversation with Toad in that game and the SMB game proves he definitely does not get how i operate and actually demonstrates the same thing i see here, he is not reading my posts properly. Which apparently is not scummy for him.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 12:37 GMT
#450
btw if sidesprang does not do stuff we lynch him on D1. I am sick of this shit where people don't play.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 12:39 GMT
#452
Well the "he knows how rayn operates" is totally false.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 12:43 GMT
#454
Like this is exactly what happened in SMB game in chronological order:
- I have Oats as my #1 scumread, Toad as #2.
- Toad does something i think is scummy.
- I vote for Toad.
- Toad says "why don't you vote for Oats who is your top scumread"
- I tell him "because you did this that made me reconsider who is the scummiest and i think it's you"
- "No you are mafia because you are not voting for your top scumread"
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 12:45 GMT
#455
So yes, i can totally see town!Toad say what he did..
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 12:48 GMT
#457
On February 20 2014 21:46 marvellosity wrote:
those things are totally unrelated to what he did this game... ?

Well doesn't what he says make sense? I mean his explanation after you pointed out this:

1) "I'm not going after him seriously"
and
2) "but I need to hear from him about this"

1) is backing out of it and yet you're pushing it with 2)
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 12:49 GMT
#458
That's more like "at first i was not voting him seriously but now i want to hear more from him because of this stuff prplhz said" no?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 12:56 GMT
#460
On February 20 2014 21:55 prplhz wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 20 2014 17:39 Palmar wrote:
On February 20 2014 11:44 prplhz wrote:
On February 20 2014 11:39 raynpelikoneet wrote:
So what was your reasoning for unvoting as town or as mafia? I guarantee as mafia it's most likely "because i would do that as town" as in "i try to look townie" because that's why you do things as mafia right?

So we can exclude that part. What was your reasoning for unvote as town?

top kek

You don't think there was ever a scum who was like "Shit, I need to get my vote off of this guy because this vote is a little silly and it's attracting attention to me. I guess I'll try to do it in a townie way."

The whole "scum act like town so we can never catch them"-idea is silly. Scum can't perfectly act like town and the more we force them to act the less they look like town (ideally).


I don't agree with your logic prplhz. IF rayn is mafia he's not dumb enough to create an entire plan to simply get his vote off someone. If he is mafia the reason he did this is he thought the plan would be well-received in town and considered advantageous for town, thus giving him townie points for not really doing anything.

that wasn't my point, rayn said that unvoting is a townie thing and whenever scum do it it's because they want to look townie, then i said that that didn't matter because they would still do it in a scummy way

rayn thinks that unvoting is something townies do to make their stance clear and scum do it to emulate townies so it's a good thing if we implement an unvote plan because then townies can avoid having weird votes and we can't catch scums on it anyway because they're just acting like townies

my point is that scum ideally will not be able to act like townies all the time and forcing them to have an opinion and not unvoting is going to make it more likely that they'll slip and more likely that we'll catch them

i don't think that a scum rayn would create and push this plan for the benefit scum has from an unvote mechanism either. i just think the whole plan is more likely to come from a scum POV than a town POV. he is arguing for why it's a good idea for town (of course any scum would only push a plan if they think they can convince town it is good for them) but i think that's because of the conflicting "i am scum so i want to do something good for town but not actually" POV.

But you know, unvoting IS having an opinion.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 13:00 GMT
#464
On February 20 2014 21:59 Palmar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 20 2014 21:26 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Palmar why do you think kush is town?


I like some points he's made.

Show nested quote +
On February 20 2014 09:13 VIVAX420 wrote:
On February 20 2014 09:09 Toadesstern wrote:
Why are you actively looking for a way to pseudo-unvote? I don't even see a reason why someone should care about that.


wait so you are implying that scum is going to be afraid of the default votes enough to come up with a plan like that?


Show nested quote +
On February 20 2014 10:36 VIVAX420 wrote:
toad you are backtracking so hard. it's not serious, yet you gave shitty but serious reasons for it.


Show nested quote +
On February 20 2014 12:06 VIVAX420 wrote:
why vote prpl? just because of the contradiction in that post you quoted? it wasn't so much a contradiction as it was a realization that marv had a good point.

Show nested quote +
On February 20 2014 12:09 VIVAX420 wrote:
rayn nvm that garbage you are pushing. I think you are misunderstanding the intentions behind that post. It's like "hmmm this was my argument, but then again marv has a good point"
prpl seems really pro town so far.
~~
What do you think of toad?



Do you know that when kush is mafia he loves nothing more than being right?
If prplhz is town and Toad is scum oh boy how that fits into scum!kush.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 13:02 GMT
#468
There is one thing that makes me think kush is not really reading properly.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 13:05 GMT
#470
It's this post and the conversation that took place after that:
On February 20 2014 12:39 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Also when exactly did you stop thinking i am mafia? Could you point out the post that made you think so. Normally i would think people stop thinking other people are mafia when they unvote the person but apparently it's impossible in this game because people are being retarded and i am being called stupid.


On February 20 2014 12:43 VIVAX420 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 20 2014 09:09 Toadesstern wrote:
Why are you actively looking for a way to pseudo-unvote? I don't even see a reason why someone should care about that.

thoughts on that?


On February 20 2014 12:46 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 20 2014 12:43 VIVAX420 wrote:
On February 20 2014 09:09 Toadesstern wrote:
Why are you actively looking for a way to pseudo-unvote? I don't even see a reason why someone should care about that.

thoughts on that?

Could you clarify the question? I don't understand what do you want.


On February 20 2014 12:50 VIVAX420 wrote:
k that's a no. you have no thoughts on that.

Does it look like kush really cares about his question? Because the bolded part is an answer to his question.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 13:19 GMT
#472
I don't like Koshi.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 13:20 GMT
#474
On February 20 2014 22:19 Palmar wrote:
yeah, koshi has been a bit shit hasn't he?

Especially his last post with reads. It makes no sense to me.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 13:23 GMT
#476
On February 20 2014 22:22 marvellosity wrote:
I literally can't be bothered to think about Koshi. If it's a few hours before deadline and I'm not happy then I'll start to worry.

Yeah that was just an observation atm.

I also didn't like prplhz's last post. I want him to talk about something that's scummy in his opinion.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 13:25 GMT
#480
On February 20 2014 22:24 Koshi wrote:
Hey, why can't we love Koshi?

Because you should know kush better to not give him a townread and all your "lynchable" players are because of crap reasoning and you even put both suki and Balla to the same category which makes no sense.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 13:26 GMT
#481
On February 20 2014 22:25 Palmar wrote:
The one guy I need to read is this balla

Don't worry that's most likely gonna be quite easy.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 13:29 GMT
#483
On February 20 2014 22:25 Palmar wrote:
The one guy I need to read to post more is this balla
If Balla does not post a lot more content he is mafia.


table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 13:32 GMT
#486
On February 20 2014 22:29 Toadesstern wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 20 2014 14:32 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On February 20 2014 10:40 Toadesstern wrote:
@rayn: Can't be #1 because I have no idea how someone could have come to that conclusion based on the phrasing from our lovevly host.

On February 20 2014 11:12 Toadesstern wrote:
Your explanation is possible, that's the sad thing here.

Toad how do these two comments go together?

They go together as "#1 didn't cross my mind at that time because I have no idea how someone could come up with it, so I didn't take it into consideration before you mentioned it. Once you did mention it I figured it's possible"

wait wait wait. what?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 13:36 GMT
#489
##unvote
##vote: suki
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 13:38 GMT
#491
On February 20 2014 22:35 Toadesstern wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 20 2014 22:31 Palmar wrote:
Toad who is scum and why is it you?

I just got back in here finished reading... give me some time but it's actually up in there if you consider the fact that it's a write-up while reading and things changing a little

Show nested quote +
On February 20 2014 22:32 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On February 20 2014 22:29 Toadesstern wrote:
On February 20 2014 14:32 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On February 20 2014 10:40 Toadesstern wrote:
@rayn: Can't be #1 because I have no idea how someone could have come to that conclusion based on the phrasing from our lovevly host.

On February 20 2014 11:12 Toadesstern wrote:
Your explanation is possible, that's the sad thing here.

Toad how do these two comments go together?

They go together as "#1 didn't cross my mind at that time because I have no idea how someone could come up with it, so I didn't take it into consideration before you mentioned it. Once you did mention it I figured it's possible"

wait wait wait. what?

"why didn't you think it's blue? - I have no idea what blue is, so I thought it might be green or yellow and thought that's weird, once you explained what blue is I realized it might be blue"

So you are saying you didn't know how i came up with what i did after i said in thread why i came up with it.
Explain to me where in your opinion i explain why i came up with what i did.

In other words, what happened between the posts of your i quoted?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 13:45 GMT
#500
On February 20 2014 22:42 Toadesstern wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 20 2014 22:38 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On February 20 2014 22:35 Toadesstern wrote:
On February 20 2014 22:31 Palmar wrote:
Toad who is scum and why is it you?

I just got back in here finished reading... give me some time but it's actually up in there if you consider the fact that it's a write-up while reading and things changing a little

On February 20 2014 22:32 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On February 20 2014 22:29 Toadesstern wrote:
On February 20 2014 14:32 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On February 20 2014 10:40 Toadesstern wrote:
@rayn: Can't be #1 because I have no idea how someone could have come to that conclusion based on the phrasing from our lovevly host.

On February 20 2014 11:12 Toadesstern wrote:
Your explanation is possible, that's the sad thing here.

Toad how do these two comments go together?

They go together as "#1 didn't cross my mind at that time because I have no idea how someone could come up with it, so I didn't take it into consideration before you mentioned it. Once you did mention it I figured it's possible"

wait wait wait. what?

"why didn't you think it's blue? - I have no idea what blue is, so I thought it might be green or yellow and thought that's weird, once you explained what blue is I realized it might be blue"

So you are saying you didn't know how i came up with what i did after i said in thread why i came up with it.
Explain to me where in your opinion i explain why i came up with what i did.

In other words, what happened between the posts of your i quoted?

no I'm saying I didn't have the same misunderstanding you had about the phrasing, therefore what you innitially thought didn't cross my mind and wasn't part of my theories what you might be doing with that plan of yours. Once you cleared up that you thought those votes would add up I realized it might make sense given that misunderstanding.
I just never had that misunderstanding to begin with which is the reason I couldn't make sense of it.

My problem is this. And now, please answer this properly and in detail:

You make a post which says this:
On February 20 2014 10:40 Toadesstern wrote:
@rayn: Can't be #1 because I have no idea how someone could have come to that conclusion based on the phrasing from our lovevly host.

Then there is something that happens between here because you then say this:
On February 20 2014 11:12 Toadesstern wrote:
Your explanation is possible, that's the sad thing here.

Now what is that something that happens between these posts? Why do you change your mind and what's the particular post that makes you change your mind?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 13:57 GMT
#508
On February 20 2014 22:51 Toadesstern wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 20 2014 22:45 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On February 20 2014 22:42 Toadesstern wrote:
On February 20 2014 22:38 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On February 20 2014 22:35 Toadesstern wrote:
On February 20 2014 22:31 Palmar wrote:
Toad who is scum and why is it you?

I just got back in here finished reading... give me some time but it's actually up in there if you consider the fact that it's a write-up while reading and things changing a little

On February 20 2014 22:32 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On February 20 2014 22:29 Toadesstern wrote:
On February 20 2014 14:32 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On February 20 2014 10:40 Toadesstern wrote:
@rayn: Can't be #1 because I have no idea how someone could have come to that conclusion based on the phrasing from our lovevly host.

On February 20 2014 11:12 Toadesstern wrote:
Your explanation is possible, that's the sad thing here.

Toad how do these two comments go together?

They go together as "#1 didn't cross my mind at that time because I have no idea how someone could come up with it, so I didn't take it into consideration before you mentioned it. Once you did mention it I figured it's possible"

wait wait wait. what?

"why didn't you think it's blue? - I have no idea what blue is, so I thought it might be green or yellow and thought that's weird, once you explained what blue is I realized it might be blue"

So you are saying you didn't know how i came up with what i did after i said in thread why i came up with it.
Explain to me where in your opinion i explain why i came up with what i did.

In other words, what happened between the posts of your i quoted?

no I'm saying I didn't have the same misunderstanding you had about the phrasing, therefore what you innitially thought didn't cross my mind and wasn't part of my theories what you might be doing with that plan of yours. Once you cleared up that you thought those votes would add up I realized it might make sense given that misunderstanding.
I just never had that misunderstanding to begin with which is the reason I couldn't make sense of it.

My problem is this. And now, please answer this properly and in detail:

You make a post which says this:
On February 20 2014 10:40 Toadesstern wrote:
@rayn: Can't be #1 because I have no idea how someone could have come to that conclusion based on the phrasing from our lovevly host.

Then there is something that happens between here because you then say this:
On February 20 2014 11:12 Toadesstern wrote:
Your explanation is possible, that's the sad thing here.

Now what is that something that happens between these posts? Why do you change your mind and what's the particular post that makes you change your mind?


You asked me about my reasoning earlier on. The first part is talking about my stance on you and how I got to that stance from my PoV before you did this post:
+ Show Spoiler +
On February 20 2014 10:26 raynpelikoneet wrote:
So here we go (marv i would have expected a bit more from you, i am sad):

There are three possibilities about my motives and here they are:

1) I am town and this is my thought process; I misunderstood the setup as i have already explained and thought the votes from previous days are added to the current days votes. That's why i made my plan in the first place. Now this would have been the most pro-town plan because i would have later on brought up the fact that we should treat this as a majority lynch and at the end of the day people who are not in the majority wagon put their votes on themselves. In that way we would have eliminated any cons for the town in setup we possibly can, which is pretty much everything other than the randomness which we can't eliminate.

However, that was not the case. Now, i still stand behind my "if you "unvote", vote yourself" plan because of this. If we do not push this policy it leads to possibly stupid and irrelevant questions like "you don't think this dude is scum anymore, why is your vote still on him?". We don't want that because we benefit from clarity and it's beneficial we know exactly WHEN and WHY people drop their scumreads and where they head next. If they don't have next target they should inform that by voting for themselves. This prevents mafia from misrepresenting people because you can always back up your thoughts with your actions in thread (most importantly voting). Having no possibility to unvote is pro-mafia, if you't agree with that you need to explain me why. It's never irrelevant where your vote is at.

2) I did the same pro-town thing as mafia.

3) I just made all this up and and i was just saying shit for no reason at the start of the game.


Now here is my question, especially to prplhz, Toad, Palmar and suki;
Why did you not try to see what i was/am trying to do and how that would make me whatever alignment. What you did is you took some posts from me and painted them scummy without no thinking behind it. I want to know why.

If what i was doing was (1), then i am town.
If what i was doing is (2), you can't tell my alignment.
If what i was doing is (3), then you are saying i am some random noob which this post already proves i am not because i would have came up with a decent explanation on the fly.

So again, why am i mafia? Especially prplhz and Toad?

The second part you're quoting is explaining how I realized that your explanation (the above post) makes sense if we take the misunderstanding as a given, which I did not consider before you cleared it up simply because I did not have that same misunderstanding.

Now this can't possibly be true because your response to me is a response to the post where i explain myself.
I never asked you why you DID think i am mafia, i asked you why you DO think i am mafia given my explanation.

Like you really didn't understand that?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 14:15 GMT
#522
So here is what happened:
Toad: "you are mafia because of X"
Me: "This is why i said X from every perspective. #1 i am town and this is why i said it..."
Toad: "Well #1 can't be true"
Some random shit happens here.
Me: So do you think i am mafia or not?
Toad: Not necessarily because #1 can be true.

So this fucking shit does not make any sense to me because Toad is changing his mind based on nothing relevant to the discussion. I especially asked, based on my reasoning "which is it". Here, is this question so unclear Toad can possibly twist it into something stupid:

On February 20 2014 10:26 raynpelikoneet wrote:
1) I am town and this is my thought process; I misunderstood the setup as i have already explained and thought the votes from previous days are added to the current days votes. That's why i made my plan in the first place. Now this would have been the most pro-town plan because i would have later on brought up the fact that we should treat this as a majority lynch and at the end of the day people who are not in the majority wagon put their votes on themselves. In that way we would have eliminated any cons for the town in setup we possibly can, which is pretty much everything other than the randomness which we can't eliminate.

However, that was not the case. Now, i still stand behind my "if you "unvote", vote yourself" plan because of this. If we do not push this policy it leads to possibly stupid and irrelevant questions like "you don't think this dude is scum anymore, why is your vote still on him?". We don't want that because we benefit from clarity and it's beneficial we know exactly WHEN and WHY people drop their scumreads and where they head next. If they don't have next target they should inform that by voting for themselves. This prevents mafia from misrepresenting people because you can always back up your thoughts with your actions in thread (most importantly voting). Having no possibility to unvote is pro-mafia, if you't agree with that you need to explain me why. It's never irrelevant where your vote is at.

[.....]

If what i was doing was (1), then i am town.
If what i was doing is (2), you can't tell my alignment.
If what i was doing is (3), then you are saying i am some random noob which this post already proves i am not because i would have came up with a decent explanation on the fly.

So again, why am i mafia? Especially prplhz and Toad?

On February 20 2014 10:40 Toadesstern wrote:
@rayn: Can't be #1 because I have no idea how someone could have come to that conclusion based on the phrasing from our lovevly host. Can't be #2 either for same reason. Therefore I was asking myself if it's #3, #4 the "I'm paranoid" or #5 the "I'm missing something"

[.... here is where some random shit happens.....]
On February 20 2014 10:59 raynpelikoneet wrote:
So why do you think i am mafia Toad?

On February 20 2014 11:00 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Don't dance around the issue and make a clear case.

On February 20 2014 11:12 Toadesstern wrote:
Foolishness told me in pm's to wait a little longer and not just claim d1 to get him lynched
Your explanation is possible, that's the sad thing here.

Now, there MUST BE SOMETHING BETWEEN THE RED PARTS that makes Toad change his mind.
What is it?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 14:21 GMT
#525
On February 20 2014 23:20 Toadesstern wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 20 2014 23:15 raynpelikoneet wrote:
So here is what happened:
Toad: "you are mafia because of X"
Me: "This is why i said X from every perspective. #1 i am town and this is why i said it..."
Toad: "Well #1 can't be true"
Some random shit happens here.
Me: So do you think i am mafia or not?
Toad: Not necessarily because #1 can be true.

So this fucking shit does not make any sense to me because Toad is changing his mind based on nothing relevant to the discussion. I especially asked, based on my reasoning "which is it". Here, is this question so unclear Toad can possibly twist it into something stupid:

On February 20 2014 10:26 raynpelikoneet wrote:
1) I am town and this is my thought process; I misunderstood the setup as i have already explained and thought the votes from previous days are added to the current days votes. That's why i made my plan in the first place. Now this would have been the most pro-town plan because i would have later on brought up the fact that we should treat this as a majority lynch and at the end of the day people who are not in the majority wagon put their votes on themselves. In that way we would have eliminated any cons for the town in setup we possibly can, which is pretty much everything other than the randomness which we can't eliminate.

However, that was not the case. Now, i still stand behind my "if you "unvote", vote yourself" plan because of this. If we do not push this policy it leads to possibly stupid and irrelevant questions like "you don't think this dude is scum anymore, why is your vote still on him?". We don't want that because we benefit from clarity and it's beneficial we know exactly WHEN and WHY people drop their scumreads and where they head next. If they don't have next target they should inform that by voting for themselves. This prevents mafia from misrepresenting people because you can always back up your thoughts with your actions in thread (most importantly voting). Having no possibility to unvote is pro-mafia, if you't agree with that you need to explain me why. It's never irrelevant where your vote is at.

[.....]

If what i was doing was (1), then i am town.
If what i was doing is (2), you can't tell my alignment.
If what i was doing is (3), then you are saying i am some random noob which this post already proves i am not because i would have came up with a decent explanation on the fly.

So again, why am i mafia? Especially prplhz and Toad?

On February 20 2014 10:40 Toadesstern wrote:
@rayn: Can't be #1 because I have no idea how someone could have come to that conclusion based on the phrasing from our lovevly host. Can't be #2 either for same reason. Therefore I was asking myself if it's #3, #4 the "I'm paranoid" or #5 the "I'm missing something"

[.... here is where some random shit happens.....]
On February 20 2014 10:59 raynpelikoneet wrote:
So why do you think i am mafia Toad?

On February 20 2014 11:00 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Don't dance around the issue and make a clear case.

On February 20 2014 11:12 Toadesstern wrote:
Foolishness told me in pm's to wait a little longer and not just claim d1 to get him lynched
Your explanation is possible, that's the sad thing here.

Now, there MUST BE SOMETHING BETWEEN THE RED PARTS that makes Toad change his mind.
What is it?

Dude I just told you that the first red part you quoted is talking about my stance on you BEFORE you did that giant post explaining it and that the giant post you did is the thing that changed my mind. Do you just not believe it or do you ignore that? Because if you put it in that order it makes an awful lot of sense.

And i am telling you it can't possibly be tru because you literally reference the post and not talk about "before"!!!
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 14:24 GMT
#532
So in the first red part Toad answers to half of my post and reaches into conclusion "this is really scummy".
When i press it further he answers the rest of the post and reaches into conclusion "not so scummy any more".

Now, who the fuck answers only the parts of a post that suit his agenda? mafia.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 14:25 GMT
#534
##unvote
##vote: Toadesstern
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 14:26 GMT
#538
On February 20 2014 23:24 Toadesstern wrote:
how about marv explains the things that freak out rayn about me and rayn explains the things freak out marv about me and we're all happy?
Because I have still no idea what's the issue with anything here and it's getting quite frustrating to state it over again even if someone else already pointed the exact same thing out before I got in here again and explains how it's just pisspoor wording?

You are asked a very clear question and you answer it by only referencing a small portion of the explanation. You didn't even read the whole post of mine or you are intentionally leaving out the portion that does not suit your "rayn is scum" agenda.

Both of the explanations are extremely scummy.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 14:36 GMT
#543
But here is the thing. It's not that there are only three options (which is btw true in any case). Look at the options:
1) I am town and telling the truth about what i am saying here.
2) I am mafia and telling the truth about what i am saying here for some reason.
3) I am mafia and i am bullshitting here.

What other options there are? Because if you want to give another option it's "rayn is town and he is lying" which can't possibly be true.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 14:38 GMT
#546
Im fuckiong done with this shit because i am unable to write any fucking clear posts.
bye, my vote stands, see you aon D2.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 14:51 GMT
#554
##unvote
##vote suki
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 14:52 GMT
#555
On February 20 2014 23:48 marvellosity wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 20 2014 23:44 suki wrote:
I know Koshi hates rolling scum and doesn't feel like playing when he's scum. I think he is scummy because he is not analyzing people, not pressuring people and generally just calling people scum or town randomly and making it known he's going to be sheeping.

suki, explain to me how this is more likely to come from mafia than town, please.

also read the last sentence in suki's post.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 14:59 GMT
#562
On February 20 2014 23:57 Palmar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 20 2014 23:52 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On February 20 2014 23:48 marvellosity wrote:
On February 20 2014 23:44 suki wrote:
I know Koshi hates rolling scum and doesn't feel like playing when he's scum. I think he is scummy because he is not analyzing people, not pressuring people and generally just calling people scum or town randomly and making it known he's going to be sheeping.

suki, explain to me how this is more likely to come from mafia than town, please.

also read the last sentence in suki's post.


I don't see anything alignment indicative in that last sentence.

One of the reasons Koshi is mafia is because he says he'll sheep me or marv because he thinks we are town. suki makes a case on Koshi and in the end says she'll sheep onto Toad at the end of the day.

makes sense how?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 15:03 GMT
#571
On February 20 2014 23:41 Palmar wrote:
rayn are marv and I town?

marv pretty much yes, you idk yet.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 15:06 GMT
#574
On February 21 2014 00:05 VIVAX420 wrote:
rayn what specifically made you flip flop on toad?

I am honestly not interested in answering any of your questions because it does not achieve anything.
dealwithit.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 15:07 GMT
#575
The reason is whatever i say regardless of your alignment you say stupid stuff about me and until that stops there is no reason to interact with you kush. It's been a trend in the past ~5 games and it only makes me angry and it does not serve any purpose so i'll just ignore you.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 16:21 GMT
#624
What's wrong in suki's case is that she says basically same stuff me, Palmar and prplhz talked about earlier. She is not interested in why we do not think that makes Koshi scummy, instead she makes a case where she already knows the stuff she is going to say is "right", it's a safe case because it's already agreed on before it's even posted. But in the end she expresses the thought "i know my case might not be good enough so i'll vote for Toad later on if you guys want to".

I don't see the "this is why Koshi is mafia" type of thing.
I see "here is a safe contribution".

That's my interpretation of that post.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 16:26 GMT
#630
On February 21 2014 01:23 Koshi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 21 2014 01:17 marvellosity wrote:
On February 21 2014 01:11 Oatsmaster wrote:


Suki is scummier in my opinion, felt really opportunistic and I think that koshi is somewhat townie cause of his few jovial posts. Also it was bad case with many things wrong.

Sidesprang pretty town for the vote on Balla because it stands out so much, why do that instead of self voting and hiding?

That might be a reasonable interpretation, however I find it more likely sidesprang simply wouldn't want to play as mafia than as town. It stands out but it also takes a grand total of zero effort.

I somewhat disagree. Sidesprang played scum first shadowed game and replaced out cuz no time on D1. Then he rolled scum reboot game and played his game.

I could.argue that he might be bush again and that he isnt replacing out on d1 because this time he is town and wants to play.

But he has to eventually start playing. Balla vote is somewhat strange anyway.

My problem is, which i expressed early on, that sidesprang is currently in two games. In both of them he apparently has no intentions of playing the game, regardless of his alignment. I don't like that.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 16:31 GMT
#634
I am kinda interested why you didn't want to be friends with me earlier Palmar.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 16:43 GMT
#645
On February 21 2014 01:31 Palmar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 21 2014 01:31 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I am kinda interested why you didn't want to be friends with me earlier Palmar.

Because you were saying dumb things. I can't be associated with such.

I only say wise things. You are dumb for not understanding me, that's the only conclusion.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 16:44 GMT
#646
On February 21 2014 01:43 Palmar wrote:
idk if this suki is bad lynchbait or scum.

She is definitely not a lynchbait.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 16:44 GMT
#647
In fact she is one of the best new players around imo. Perfectly capable of providing decent analysis.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 16:45 GMT
#649
I also like Oats so far.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 16:54 GMT
#653
Well that's an interesting interpretation..
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 16:57 GMT
#654
But marv, what IS your opinion on suki atm?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 17:21 GMT
#663
well that post from Toad is so really very incredibly bad.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 17:24 GMT
#666
No it does not make him post and it does not make you look like you are contributing.
Let's say it does, fine. You are now voting for him. Who else is mafia?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 17:25 GMT
#667
marv, what do you want to talk about? You don't seem like you want to talk about anything.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 17:27 GMT
#670
Okay Palmar is in fact my best friend.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 17:28 GMT
#673
bestest
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 17:30 GMT
#674
Toad i am going to tell you one thing:
That being said, from what I've seen so far it looks like Balla is a somewhat atypical kind of player. He's someone who plays calm and tries to avoid confrontation when rolling town while playing a lot more in your face when rolling mafia.

The opposite.... really, the opposite.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 17:31 GMT
#676
So i'd suggest you screw meta based purely on the fact that noone is going to buy a meta case so if you wanna get Balla lynched it has to be because of something other than meta.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 17:34 GMT
#679
On February 21 2014 02:30 marvellosity wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 21 2014 02:25 raynpelikoneet wrote:
marv, what do you want to talk about? You don't seem like you want to talk about anything.

can't tell if srs.

Yes i am serious.
You don't seem to think i am mafia.
Toadesstern - you wanted more from him
prplhz - you think he is town
Oatsmaster - idk, you are not interested in talking about him?
CuteFluffyPuppy - i'd assume you'd brought up something if you wanted to talk about him
sidesprang - useless, no need to talk before he posts more
VIVAX420 (kush) - not interested in talking about him?
suki - gave your opinion, but no talk?
Balla24 - idk, you have not brought him up
Koshi - let's see until eod 1
Palmar - not interested in talking about him?

so yes, i am serious, what do you want to talk about?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 17:37 GMT
#683
On February 21 2014 02:32 Toadesstern wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 21 2014 02:30 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Toad i am going to tell you one thing:
That being said, from what I've seen so far it looks like Balla is a somewhat atypical kind of player. He's someone who plays calm and tries to avoid confrontation when rolling town while playing a lot more in your face when rolling mafia.

The opposite.... really, the opposite.

how about you show me about that while I'm out, I'll come back, read up on it and give you my opionion about your opinion. Because funnily enough even Balla said he sees what I'm seeing when talking about his early posts in games.

This is a "case" i made on him in NMM, one of tha games you quoted:
On January 21 2014 23:26 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Like i just looked at his past games and:
  • town games - 19 and 23 pages of filter, a lot of oneliners, questions many people about his concerns, is clearly trying to find out what people think about what he thinks is important
  • scum game - 7 pages of filter, more big irrelevant posts that are inclined to talk about what X thinks of Y and how it's right/wrong. no real pushing of his own ideas.


If i don't even think about the motivation behind Balla's posts in this game and just look at what he has said it looks exactly like he played mafia and nothing like his town play to me.

table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 17:42 GMT
#685
Okay that does not really explain anything. Toad i'll give you a more detailed answer in ~15min, i got sauna rdy so brb.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 18:20 GMT
#696
Well Toad, that case was ~24h into D1...
lemme respond to you in detail now.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 18:22 GMT
#697
Balla who's scum besides sidesprang?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 18:26 GMT
#698
Okay not really going into more detail. Toad your case is based largely on meta and i don't see a conclusion that implies Balla's meta as you describe it supports him being mafia in this game.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 18:27 GMT
#700
Can you go more in detail why?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 18:49 GMT
#705
On February 21 2014 03:32 Toadesstern wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 21 2014 03:26 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Okay not really going into more detail. Toad your case is based largely on meta and i don't see a conclusion that implies Balla's meta as you describe it supports him being mafia in this game.

fine... at least it's not the same "you disagree with me so you're retarded" bullshit from last game so at least thanks for trying to not make me angry I guess.
I'll take a look at suki next and probably Balla24 (and the other towngame someone linked) again tomorrow and see how he's posting in there because I still think his opening's completly off.

Look, i am not trying to be an asshole towards you. I am trying to understand why you say things you do because i need to figure out if you are town or mafia. If i can't understand why, i am inclined to think you are mafia because.. well you know what i mean. I know i am really aggressive and shit, but i just want you to explain your motivations behind your posts when i don't get them as it helps me getting a better read on you. So please, if you are town, try to understand me.

I think Balla plays like his scum!meta suggests in this game. That's not where you are wrong imo. What's bothering me is i think you are misrepresenting his scum!meta and based on that (your interpretation) your case is incorrect. I am just not confident if this is evidence that's conclusive enough (which is why i had not brought it up on either way).

Basically that's why i called your post bad, but not scummy. I think you might be on the right track, but in order to get a better read on YOU and not on Balla i would like you to clarify why do you think his play in this game indicates he is playing towards his scum meta?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 23:31 GMT
#804
marv marv......
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 23:38 GMT
#808
you are scum..
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 23:38 GMT
#809
Is marv scum too?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 23:40 GMT
#813
tsk tsk.....
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 23:42 GMT
#816
I thought this was about Koshi? WHAT??!?!!!
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 23:44 GMT
#819
Okay this answer is scum.
marv is mafia.
##unvote
#vote: marvellosoty

OH GOD THIS IS SO GOOD!
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 23:46 GMT
#820
then, lynch suki after. 2 scum down.

EASY!
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 23:46 GMT
#822
sorry man.
#vote: marvellosity
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 23:48 GMT
#823
no prplhz, i get it. You gonna fuck over the game and never lycnh marv because of *suck*.
but he is scum, kill him. asap. plz.

ggnore
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 23:49 GMT
#825
no i am not, you are just scum.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 23:57 GMT
#828
what do you want to talk about?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 23:57 GMT
#829
marv.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 20 2014 23:58 GMT
#830
because now you talk shit. and onlt shit.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 21 2014 19:10 GMT
#1334
On February 21 2014 22:14 Palmar wrote:
I have a plan. If toad flips mafia we lynch Oats, if he flips town we lynch kush.

This plan is really bad because they are mosty likely all town.

I don't even know where my vote is at so:
##unvote
Vote: suki


Toad will flip town. There is no direction in suki's play, not before i left the thread and not after. marv does not see it and instead of saying so he ignores the scummy stuff suki does and "goes on to find something townie". He even said later on "when i find scummy things i pressure those people into posting what i want to totally make up my mind on them. That's not what he is doing with suki at all and it's either terrible or scum. Fucking 14 pages of filter is the only thing that makes me doubt myself... Balla is also most likely mafia.

trust me, Toad will flip town.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 21 2014 19:18 GMT
#1338
It's not an association theory of any sort. marv thought suki is mafia and was not interested in finding out more of her. Pretty simple shit. suki has made some bad cases, didn't push any of them and surprise surprise ended up on Toad.

Your posts are some useless chatting and inbetween there is a lot of big posts you do not follow up in any way. That's charcteristic to your mafia play as is defending me for no reason.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 21 2014 19:19 GMT
#1339
Toad's play makes no sense from mafia perspective and at the start of the game noone payed attention to marv's case on him enough to vote for him and now pretty much everyone is voting for him. Noone has even given any reasoning for their votes other than marv and Palmar.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 21 2014 19:26 GMT
#1343
On February 22 2014 04:20 Koshi wrote:
hmm. How about marv saying it is 100% likely that Toad is mafia but changing it a bit later into 95%.
Cheap trick to do it that as scum. Quite early as well.

Toad refuses to comment on anybody else but you and marv. Why is that?

Does this make sense from mafia!Toad's perspective? To refuse to comment on anything but ma and marv? Especially if we are both town?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 21 2014 19:27 GMT
#1345
suki stood by her cases and did push them. Not doing so here.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 21 2014 19:31 GMT
#1351
No Toad is not mafia.
Palmar is town.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 21 2014 19:34 GMT
#1356
Whatever, lynch Toad then. I am telling you he will flip town. I am not going to repeat myself so go ahead and lynch him then. Maybe you will listen to me after that.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 21 2014 19:36 GMT
#1357
On February 22 2014 04:32 CuteFluffyPuppy wrote:
Rayn, do you really think Balla can put all this effort in as scum? Have you seen a scum Balla game? The difference is night and day.

Yes i have seen his scum games. I have also lynched him on D1 and D2 in those games.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 21 2014 19:37 GMT
#1358
I am interested Fluffer. You have read those games i assume as you brought that up. Why do you not know this?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 21 2014 19:44 GMT
#1364
On February 22 2014 04:41 Balla24 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 22 2014 04:36 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On February 22 2014 04:32 CuteFluffyPuppy wrote:
Rayn, do you really think Balla can put all this effort in as scum? Have you seen a scum Balla game? The difference is night and day.

Yes i have seen his scum games. I have also lynched him on D1 and D2 in those games.

Based on those games I find it really hard to believe you actually think a lot of what you're saying right now about me and about suki....

This whole seems so convoluted from you rayn.

Then fucking vote for me.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 21 2014 19:48 GMT
#1365
Balla's scumread on Toad is so terrible it can't possibly come from a townie. It has nothing to do with what Toad has done in this game and how it makes him mafia.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 21 2014 19:51 GMT
#1367
Seriously, look at this:
Toad's only scum read seems to be me. That's pretty bad... especially considering his case on me was almost solely based on early game meta, and even though I agree that my early game could possibly be interpreted as similar to my scum games, I think he was purposefully misrepresenting both what I was saying in the early game, and the context which you can see what I said about it here:

I find it weird that someone would write a meta case on what LITTLE i had in the thread at that time, especially in comparison to what everybody else was doing in regards to me which was just "wait and see". I think it's a weak attempt to try to draw attention to someone who opened pretty weakly.

I think it's annoying that he focused so heavily on the rayn subject and responding to questioning about it. May not be his fault, but even if I was in his shoes I would have attempted to get my opinions out on somebody else as well. I wasn't around so I don't know how rapid fire this stuff was going on. As soon as it ended he wrote a case on me and then nothing else. Looking forward to his contributions in the rest of the day.

1) so he called something scummy scummy. it makes him mafia?
2) not scummy in the slightest
3) i don't even know what this is about. Toad did something and then did something else? That makes him mafia. WHAT THE FUCK?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 21 2014 19:53 GMT
#1368
The best part is you never even say why any of this is scummy!!
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 21 2014 20:06 GMT
#1372
1) wrong. He saw something scummy based one meta and called you out of it. You said you could play like this as scum. That makes Toad's argument not scummy. Maybe wrong, but you can't possibly say it's scummy to call something scummy scummy. That's just retarded.

2) It's not scummy, it's pressure. I don't need to tell you what Toad has done after that, that was not a part of your case. Don't change your argument in the middle of one. That's bullshit.

3) So what? That's not what you say in the last paragraph. You don't say it's scummy and you don't explain why it's scummy. You say you need to hear more from him. That's what you say, not "scummy", but "need to hear more".
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 21 2014 20:06 GMT
#1373
On February 22 2014 05:05 Balla24 wrote:
Rayn pls, 3rd time, what do you think of kush?

town.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 21 2014 20:07 GMT
#1374
Balla you are making a new case as we speak. Why don't you answer my concerns in your original case intead of making a new one? And if you think these new points you bring up are so good why were they not in your original case?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 21 2014 20:23 GMT
#1378
Example on suki:

In NMM:
Case on VE. Next ~17 posts are questioning VE or saying why other cases are not good enough.

This game:
Case on Koshi. One question to marv. No follow up. BAM! Case on Balla. Ask something about Balla (he already did answer - she's not even reading his top scumreads posts). Asks people about kush more than about Balla, who she is voting for. Then BAM! Vote on kush. No talking about kush at all and BAM! Case on Palmar. roflll.. Asks Palmar about her case, 3 minutes and BAM! Vote on Toadesstern.

wow, such townie.

Everything she does is a case -> move on to next target. She's not defending her cases, not trying to find out more about her targets, not discussing the cases with other people. Just case -> discuss someone else -> next case -> repeat.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 21 2014 20:28 GMT
#1382
On February 22 2014 05:26 Balla24 wrote:
In NMM:

Case on zarepath -> case on bum -> back to zarepath-> unvote -> case on someone else

Wow, such commitment.

Yes and in that game it was easy to see why she changes her mind on those people and she was genuinely confused especially about zarepath and bumatlarge. This game there is no confusion which would read as "i don't know who to vote for". There is a huge difference. Which you obviously don't see because you just look at posts and not the motivation behind them.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 21 2014 20:29 GMT
#1383
DUDE ZAREPATH FUCKING CLAIMED A ROLE WHEN SUKI STARTED DOUBTING HERSELF AND SWAPPING VOTES?!?!?!
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 21 2014 20:32 GMT
#1386
I don't read games i have not played in because i don't know what happened at the time in context and i don't wanna read the whole game because it does not help and it would take a day to get a decent grasp of all the important events in the game.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 21 2014 20:33 GMT
#1387
Why don't you explain why suki switches her votes and why does he not talk about her lynch targets at all if you know that so well?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 21 2014 20:38 GMT
#1391
So you call people who call you scum mafia. Also people you don't like. And people who are cased by your scumreads.

check.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 21 2014 20:39 GMT
#1393
Do you actually have any good reasons to call someone mafia?
Like not "he called me scum" or "i liked my scumread's case"?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 21 2014 20:46 GMT
#1398
On February 22 2014 05:42 Koshi wrote:
jow rayn. I am not totally following thread atm but tell me this:
Did scum marv already driven a lynch this hard as scum? Put his total weight behind the lynch? Own the lynch? I don't think he does that as scum.

Totally on Toad.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 21 2014 20:53 GMT
#1402
On February 22 2014 05:49 marvellosity wrote:
rayn what is my alignment?

I don't know.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 21 2014 20:55 GMT
#1404
I am not interested in this game for the next 3 hours.
I am just going to come in and say "i told you" after the lynch and then i figure out whose votes on Toad are most crap.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 21 2014 21:22 GMT
#1419
On February 22 2014 06:05 marvellosity wrote:
Basically town thought this dude called Rean was mafia at some stage. And then something happened and rayn lost the plot. And then rayn hard-defended Rean for the rest of the cycle and Rean ended up being mafia.

Here rayn literally attacked Toad for 50 posts. Toad does nothing to redeem himself. rayn is convinced he's mafia.

Then a flip switches and he suddenly thinks I am mafia and suddenly Toad is certain to flip town. It's just so fucking dumb.

Not true for either of the games.
But it doesn't matter, go ahead and lynch Toad.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 21 2014 21:33 GMT
#1425
There are two people who can easily lynch Toad. Me and marv. Let's says we are town and Toad is mafia. He attacks me, last time he attacked me for stupid shit i got him lynched regardless of his cop claim. Does his argument against marv look like he is just arguing with him for the sake of arguing? Well to me it does not. To me it looks like he genuinely believes marv is lying or misrepresenting him or whatever.

Game starts, Toad's scumplan:
"Let's attack people who are most likely gonna lynch me for it!"

Yes, makes sense!
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 21 2014 21:34 GMT
#1426
Like literally anyone else than me & marv are targets easier to argue against for Toad. Every singe person in this game. Yet he chooses to do pretty much nothing BUT the thing that gets him most likely lynched. No way he is mafia.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 21 2014 21:35 GMT
#1427
I am now going to watch Grubby vs Minigun because it's way more productive than this thread.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 21 2014 21:39 GMT
#1431
On February 22 2014 06:38 Palmar wrote:
Rayn should we lynch the smurf instead?

He would be my third pick for scum if marv starts being productive instead of just calling me stupid.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 21 2014 21:42 GMT
#1436
On February 22 2014 06:41 marvellosity wrote:
If you stopped being stupid I'd stop calling you stupid

it's a simple equation

We'll see about that after Toad flips.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 21 2014 21:46 GMT
#1445
On February 22 2014 06:43 marvellosity wrote:
Toad's flip is totally irrelevant to you being dumb

No it's not. All this has to do with is Toad's and suki's alignments and if i am right and you are not then you are the one who is being dumb because suddenly my questions are totally relevant.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 00:28 GMT
#1519
wow so some players are just fucking terrible. I thought people would be better than that.
Anyways i am not needed here, scum are lurkers because noone opposed Toad lynch.
Something like kush and sidesprang then.

waiting for tha next game, you got this marv.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 02:16 GMT
#1592
Slam too serious to be town.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 02:18 GMT
#1595
I'm sorry but until there is a game which proves this wrong it's most likely true.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 02:19 GMT
#1596
It's not my fault you fail to post a single coherent thought when you are town but not as scum.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 13:02 GMT
#1672
I still don't know why prplhz is town.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 13:08 GMT
#1677
Well this looks like town Oats:
On February 22 2014 21:14 Oatsmaster wrote:
the first one is real

Ok so the toad thing right. If toad is scum then good. If toad is town then I get to stick it in your face for the rest of the game.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 13:12 GMT
#1686
Well in the end it does not really matter. I get my fun from games because people try to play and arguing with scum is fun. Apparently in this game scum didn't try at all. This game is not fun. So basically marv, Palmar, Balla and Koshi have to be town. If i trust the read on prplhz fine. I also think Oats is town.

So kush, Slam, smurf and suki. Can easily lynch all 4, if there is a vigi, even better. There is no challenge in this game any more.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 13:14 GMT
#1690
On February 22 2014 22:13 marvellosity wrote:
why does Balla have to be town rayn?

I don't think Toad would make such a bad case on Balla if they were both mafia.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 13:15 GMT
#1693
Like the case has to be intentionally bad because otherwise Balla might get lynched, or if the case is intentionally bad Toad looks worse. I don't see the point in the first place.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 13:17 GMT
#1697
On February 22 2014 22:14 CuteFluffyPuppy wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 22 2014 22:13 marvellosity wrote:
why does Balla have to be town rayn?

Show nested quote +
On February 22 2014 04:41 CuteFluffyPuppy wrote:
On February 22 2014 04:36 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On February 22 2014 04:32 CuteFluffyPuppy wrote:
Rayn, do you really think Balla can put all this effort in as scum? Have you seen a scum Balla game? The difference is night and day.

Yes i have seen his scum games. I have also lynched him on D1 and D2 in those games.

Filter length on LXIV and Normal Mini Mafia (scum)
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading] [image loading]

Filter length this game:
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]

It's twice as long and we're not even done with D1 yet. Dude is town.


This does not really hold water because LXIV was a PM game and there was a reason Balla went afk in NMM.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 13:19 GMT
#1701
On February 22 2014 22:18 CuteFluffyPuppy wrote:
Rayn if you could read my filter and realize there's no way I can be scum that'd be dandy. I don't like getting mislynched even if we're near guaranteed to win.

It doesn't really matter what i think.
1) noone will listen either way
2) we win anyways
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 13:20 GMT
#1702
On February 22 2014 22:18 CuteFluffyPuppy wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 22 2014 22:17 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On February 22 2014 22:14 CuteFluffyPuppy wrote:
On February 22 2014 22:13 marvellosity wrote:
why does Balla have to be town rayn?

On February 22 2014 04:41 CuteFluffyPuppy wrote:
On February 22 2014 04:36 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On February 22 2014 04:32 CuteFluffyPuppy wrote:
Rayn, do you really think Balla can put all this effort in as scum? Have you seen a scum Balla game? The difference is night and day.

Yes i have seen his scum games. I have also lynched him on D1 and D2 in those games.

Filter length on LXIV and Normal Mini Mafia (scum)
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading] [image loading]

Filter length this game:
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]

It's twice as long and we're not even done with D1 yet. Dude is town.


This does not really hold water because LXIV was a PM game and there was a reason Balla went afk in NMM.

Balla has admitted multiple times that he has trouble creating content as scum. It is a tell for him.

Well then you maybe should have said so instead of pulling 3 filters and say "see the length".
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 13:34 GMT
#1720
Well if it's Wave i can totally see him being town.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 13:35 GMT
#1722
The set of posts kush made this morning (or last night i don't remember when i read them) was btw really terrible.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 13:37 GMT
#1724
Oh btw smurf, i thought kush is town because i thought Toad is town and his "i quit mafia if Toad flips town" was something i don't think he would never say as mafia if Toad was town.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 13:37 GMT
#1726
never = ever
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 13:38 GMT
#1728
On February 22 2014 22:37 CuteFluffyPuppy wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 22 2014 22:37 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Oh btw smurf, i thought kush is town because i thought Toad is town and his "i quit mafia if Toad flips town" was something i don't think he would never say as mafia if Toad was town.

You still haven't told me if you think Kush not reading the thread is town or scum since you made a big deal about it earlier.

Both. I don't know what to make of it. The one thing i pointed out seemed scummy to me.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 13:41 GMT
#1730
Like he usually doesn't read and that's not alignment indicative in general, but he asked me a question i did answer right before he asked it and he did not pay enough attention to even know i answered it.

So that's why i think it was scummy.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 13:43 GMT
#1732
If suki is mafia i want a Titanic I award for defending scum and pushing another scum. Also we can laugh with Balla a lot.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 13:46 GMT
#1735
On February 22 2014 22:45 Koshi wrote:
Toad is a quiter.

table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 13:46 GMT
#1736
But i didn't know he is a quter as scum too.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 14:11 GMT
#1737
marv are you here?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 14:11 GMT
#1738
Or Palmar, can you explain the prplhz read?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 14:14 GMT
#1740
He doesn't really talk about Toad at all, any point of the game.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 14:17 GMT
#1742
Well he tried to start the kush lynch unless i am mistaken, i doubt he is mafia if kush is but otherwise i don't see the towniness. Usually he is quite quiet as town and just makes good observations. I remember in RTP pretty much all he did was to ask "Why is Acrofales town" repeatedly, not pushing anything, and in Ego he looked quite scummy until the end. He was far more "productive" in Carnival Cruise where he was mafia.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 14:18 GMT
#1743
In my opinion prplhz is really good in evaluating which cases are good and which cases are not good. That's his strength as town. I don't see that here, at least yet.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 14:21 GMT
#1745
On February 22 2014 23:19 VIVAX420 wrote:
i understand why you think im scum, rayn, but you have to understand, I have no idea what's going on.

Well i suggest you figure out what's going on instead of saying you have scumslipped..
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 14:23 GMT
#1748
On February 22 2014 23:22 VIVAX420 wrote:
yea but i have until d2 as long as im not viged

Better start on N1, there is most likely going to be -1 townie which is gonna be marv/Palmar and i think both of them think you are likely to be mafia so they could use your help before they die.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 14:23 GMT
#1749
On February 22 2014 23:22 prplhz wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 22 2014 23:18 raynpelikoneet wrote:
In my opinion prplhz is really good in evaluating which cases are good and which cases are not good. That's his strength as town. I don't see that here, at least yet.

are you seriously still upset because i said your plan was rubbish?

No i am not, that's not what i am talking about. I am talking about everything that happened after that.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 14:34 GMT
#1753
This is weird btw:
Toad makes a case on Balla - February 21 2014 02:12
Balla says kush and smurf are his scumreads - February 21 2014 05:49
Balla makes a case on Toad - February 21 2014 14:49

Now, Balla's case on Toad is mainly because of the bad case on him. Why was that not a concern earlier?
I need to check what happened between here (at least Balla voted for kush) and if this can be a bus.
I really really don't like his defense on suki. It reads more like "i defend suki because Toad is flipping mafia and then i can call rayn scum" rather than "i think suki is town". Maybe he can still be mafia.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 14:35 GMT
#1754
On February 22 2014 23:32 Palmar wrote:
Tomorrow we lynch the smurf, he can only be scum.

The only reason you'd ever want to smurf to play normally is if you're an extremely good player who has limited time and is thus is afraid of being misjudged based on less time than usual. Thus it's fair to assume the smurf is an extremely good player.

Now smurf seems to have plenty of time, and he has done and said some incredibly dumb and bad things, so the only reasonable explanation is that he's scum.

Tomorrow we lynch him.

I don't think this hold water unless you can prove who the smurf is.
I've seen plenty of non-top-tier players smurf for various reasons.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 14:42 GMT
#1762
On February 22 2014 23:37 Palmar wrote:
We should just lynch rayn before he wifoms us into lynching the host.

Unfortunately you are probably right.
I should probably stop thinking people know how to play and that scum are not dumb.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 15:35 GMT
#1798
Who is mafia suki? You are really keen in telling who is not mafia, but who is mafia?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 15:38 GMT
#1803
rofl
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 15:44 GMT
#1806
Why is Slam mafia?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 15:51 GMT
#1812
That was what i was about to ask Palmar.
Also suki, unless i am mistaken Balla's "case" on me is that my case on him is bad (which is reasonable if he is town) and that my case on you is bad (which is also reasonable if we assume he is town and you are town), so again, assuming you are town why is Balla mafia? You can't really say he is mafia because my case is not bad, because him not being mafia makes your case invalid.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 15:52 GMT
#1813
Smurf could be thrawn. If that's true i don't know his alignment. Maybe leaning town.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 15:53 GMT
#1816
No it's not thrawn. thrawn does not do that kinda catch up's.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 15:55 GMT
#1817
Nevermind suki.
Is it possible Balla and kush are both mafia?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 15:56 GMT
#1819
On February 23 2014 00:42 suki wrote:
Obviously I'm looking at Kush being mafia, for having such a shitty read on Balla.

But his responses are coherent and make sense.

Taking another look at Balla's filter some things really don't add up. Calling marv questionable is a really weird thing. His case on toad also bad. His case on you bad. Bussing Toad is definitely a plausible move for scum Balla.

I guess I just liked the fact that he was hard defending me :|

Kush looks more townie to me right now from this exchange. Balla looks worse.

I do think Oats is town so scum suspect was kush and slam. Add Balla to the list now.

Okay this post makes absolutely no sense to me...
It's all over the place and has like three different conclusions inbetween.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 16:14 GMT
#1828
hey kush am i scum or not?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 16:17 GMT
#1830
that doesn't really help Palmar.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 16:18 GMT
#1833
On February 23 2014 01:17 suki wrote:
rayn, why is Palmar town?

Are you seriously entertaining the possibility of him being scum?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 16:20 GMT
#1836
On February 23 2014 01:19 suki wrote:
If Palmar can say smurf is scum for being bad, I can say that Palmar is scum because he's obviously a good player but his reasons for thinking I'm scum are bad, because I'm town.

Well then you are scum because by defaut i should be scum too but you don't say so.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 16:21 GMT
#1839
On February 23 2014 01:20 suki wrote:
no because you always shit on me rayn.

well that's not true. In NMM i never called you mafia.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 16:23 GMT
#1842
So you don't find anything Palmar has done good? Like the fact that he did want to lynch Toad and didn't push any other lynch?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 16:24 GMT
#1844
I am pretty sure noone but marv could find any good reasons why i am mafia if i was mafia. It has never happened before.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 16:25 GMT
#1848
On February 23 2014 01:23 suki wrote:
I think mafia can do that. Palmar wasn't the one who started the wagon against toad after all.

Is that the only reason he's town?

Yes. I don't know what would be a better reason than "lynched mafia godfather on D1 and didn't push any other case".
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 16:27 GMT
#1852
On February 23 2014 01:26 suki wrote:
So Palmar is town and he's just straight up wrong on me?

maybe. or he is right. that's kinda wifom'y reasoning for him to be mafia.
also your other reads are same like.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 16:30 GMT
#1855
On February 23 2014 01:27 suki wrote:
I mean mafia does crazy things all the time. Marv pulled shenanigans Day 1 and bussed sandroba and that lead them to victory because no one thought that scum would do that.

It's entirely different thing to lynch your scumbuddy who will most likely get lynched anyways later on because they are incapable of playing mafia aligned then to lynch a godfather from the start and not even try to do anything about it all D1.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 19:50 GMT
#1906
okay i am off. don't do stupid shit.
I know what i am doing.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 19:52 GMT
#1908
Balla you are funny. <3
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 23:20 GMT
#1931
I checked Balla.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 23:21 GMT
#1932
So, Balla. Reads. go!
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 23:24 GMT
#1933
Balla. I am waiting your reads in the next 55min. If you do not give them, and i got red. you die.
If you do not give them, and you go green, you still die. Because scum.

Thanks.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 23:27 GMT
#1935
reads. plz.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 23:28 GMT
#1938
because red. ezpz
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 23:29 GMT
#1939
balla reads. please?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 23:30 GMT
#1942
Balla is mafia.
It's quite clear from this:
I check him, he says:
"If you are town"..... defensive, SO FKN DEFENSIVE.

totally scum. 100% gg
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 23:31 GMT
#1944
balla is totally!!!1
d2 lynch. gogo.!!!!

ezpz

marv, look at it! <3
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 23:33 GMT
#1947
check him. -> "if you are town"

dude. That's so DEFENSIVE. It's scum. so scum
scum
scum

scum
scum
so scum ^^
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 23:33 GMT
#1948
kill it
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 23:34 GMT
#1952
marv i am telling you, balla is 99% mafia. that's way more than 95%. ^_^

i am SURE!!!
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 23:35 GMT
#1954
okay 100%. GO!
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 23:37 GMT
#1960
There is going to be a red check on you so stfu..
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 23:38 GMT
#1964
^_^
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 23:39 GMT
#1965
You can go framed shit if you want to but t_T
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 23:49 GMT
#1978
shoot me!
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 22 2014 23:51 GMT
#1982
shoot me <3
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 23 2014 02:07 GMT
#2088
hi Balla.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 23 2014 02:07 GMT
#2089
are you voting for me?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 23 2014 02:12 GMT
#2091
Hey Balla you have perfect reasons to vote for me. Why is your vote not on me?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 23 2014 02:14 GMT
#2093
Okya. cya in 24h.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 23 2014 02:15 GMT
#2094
inbetween make a case plz.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 23 2014 02:18 GMT
#2097
##unvote
##Vote: Balla24

You gotta do better than that and you know it.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 23 2014 02:18 GMT
#2098
On February 23 2014 11:15 Balla24 wrote:
NO explain your fake check or claim or whatever now..

no.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 23 2014 02:20 GMT
#2099
Let's see if you can get me lynched Balla.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 23 2014 02:21 GMT
#2101
On February 23 2014 11:20 Balla24 wrote:
Explain why i need to do better than that, because as far as i'm concerned you haven't done ANYTHING to justify any of your actions that I am talking about in that case yet.

no.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 23 2014 02:21 GMT
#2102
And for the record this is going to be my answer to all your questions. Again:
Let's see if you can get me lynched.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 23 2014 02:27 GMT
#2104
One thing i am going to answer is this shit:
On February 23 2014 04:28 Balla24 wrote:
On rayn:

Look I don't understand what people are misunderstanding about my attack on rayn, the main main reason I'm scum on rayn is because he comes back into the thread after an unexplained vote on marv and goes HAM on suki/marv/me with very very little reasoning.

I don't believe he ACTUALLY believed the read on suki/me (like I said I don't know his relationship with marv), therefore the only reason he would do this is to shit up the thread and cause chaos. He had a reasonably good town read from most people before this, so it's a decent way to spend that as scum.

He then went on to misrepresent my case on toad by ignoring key points:

Show nested quote +
On February 22 2014 04:51 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Seriously, look at this:
Toad's only scum read seems to be me. That's pretty bad... especially considering his case on me was almost solely based on early game meta, and even though I agree that my early game could possibly be interpreted as similar to my scum games, I think he was purposefully misrepresenting both what I was saying in the early game, and the context which you can see what I said about it here:

I find it weird that someone would write a meta case on what LITTLE i had in the thread at that time, especially in comparison to what everybody else was doing in regards to me which was just "wait and see". I think it's a weak attempt to try to draw attention to someone who opened pretty weakly.

I think it's annoying that he focused so heavily on the rayn subject and responding to questioning about it. May not be his fault, but even if I was in his shoes I would have attempted to get my opinions out on somebody else as well. I wasn't around so I don't know how rapid fire this stuff was going on. As soon as it ended he wrote a case on me and then nothing else. Looking forward to his contributions in the rest of the day.

1) so he called something scummy scummy. it makes him mafia?
2) not scummy in the slightest
3) i don't even know what this is about. Toad did something and then did something else? That makes him mafia. WHAT THE FUCK?


I already pointed out how he was misrepresenting it during the moment here:

+ Show Spoiler +

On February 22 2014 05:13 Balla24 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 22 2014 05:06 raynpelikoneet wrote:
1) wrong. He saw something scummy based one meta and called you out of it. You said you could play like this as scum. That makes Toad's argument not scummy. Maybe wrong, but you can't possibly say it's scummy to call something scummy scummy. That's just retarded.

2) It's not scummy, it's pressure. I don't need to tell you what Toad has done after that, that was not a part of your case. Don't change your argument in the middle of one. That's bullshit.

3) So what? That's not what you say in the last paragraph. You don't say it's scummy and you don't explain why it's scummy. You say you need to hear more from him. That's what you say, not "scummy", but "need to hear more".


If you can't see why I think that his case is scummy for misrepresenting me and using meta on a small amount of contribution then you're not going to be convinced.

2) What are you talking about thats exactly the point. It might be pressure but it also could be fake contribution and to me it looks like fake contribution considering what I think of 1)

3) THATS EXACTLY THE POINT THOUGH. I wanted to see more contribution because all he's done at the point of my case was what I said. He hasn't done anything else now so it just proves my point that he's for some reason hesitant to talk about anything else.

Show nested quote +
On February 22 2014 05:07 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Balla you are making a new case as we speak. Why don't you answer my concerns in your original case intead of making a new one? And if you think these new points you bring up are so good why were they not in your original case?


That's just wrong. I'm not making up new points, you are making it out to be but i'm not so go somewhere pls.

##vote raynpelikoneet

Everything since you came back is so convoluted and just shitting up the thread. I think you're scum and I think you know toad is town so you want to springboard onto marv/suki/me after toad flips. I don't think your views on toad are consistent, earlier you were voting him. Literally the only reason you think toad is NOT SCUM is because you think marv/suki and I are scum which is total bullshit, especially on suki and I. I don't know your relationship with marv so I don't know how bullshit that is.

Wrong, nothing else to say. This is shit.


I also think his vote on suki is a total cop-out and he had no intention of lynching either of us: the votes were something like

Toad(7):me, suki, marv etc etc
Balla(3): toad, oats, sidesprang
Suki(1):rayn

Why wouldn't he have tried to get me lynched, especially AFTER our exchange in which he thought was so bad. All he did was chainsaw defend toad and then leave a useless vote on suki. If this was really town rayn and he actually thought I was scum he would have gone HAM on me after that exchange and tried to get me lynched so hard. Instead he gives up, "lynch toad idc".

Wrong, this is also shit.

I find his town read of kush here (which I had to ask him 3 times for):

Show nested quote +
On February 22 2014 05:06 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On February 22 2014 05:05 Balla24 wrote:
Rayn pls, 3rd time, what do you think of kush?

town.


Completely baseless and still baseless considering kush had done ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to that point. Let's look at what town rayn had to say about kush doing nothing in normal mini:

+ Show Spoiler +

On January 20 2014 23:08 raynpelikoneet wrote:
kush is probably scum because he has a big pile of non-explained townreads that can't possibly be based on any real evidence.


On January 21 2014 03:33 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 21 2014 03:31 bumatlarge wrote:
Do you have more on Kush rayn? If you have something more, I'd like to hear it. I find him difficult to read.

And I believe Barristan is the last person that needs to post. I'd suggest people start to vote now so we can see where we are at. I think there is enough content that people should be able to make some reasonable reads.

What i have on kush is what i have said.
He has a townread on half of the people in the game and refuses to explain why. If he is town he has reasons for his reads. If he is scum he has not. Seems like he has not.

On January 21 2014 04:41 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I dunno. kush is way scummier than any other person in the game atm.

On January 21 2014 04:57 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
I find it hilarious how both your points already counter one another. In the first you say you pointed out a mistake in Kush's reasoning so you can't both be scum, in the second you say a scum should lay into you.

I am not saying anything like that.
I was saying i pointed out kush's bad reads and was wondering why you said you liked that about suki but not about me and that was the reason i asked you why you were not reading my posts. Then i realized that was not what you were saying in the first place.

You don't need massive cojones to bus if you already know you can't get your buddy lynched, but anyways, i agree with you on bum.



When kush didn't have any reasoning for his reads. How is this game not similar for kush? Especially on day1, his reasonings were so non-existent. Other people already pointed out how rayn was light pushing kush earlier in the day too so town-reading him at that point was somewhat contradictory.

Oh god, i see a trend. shit.

Last thing:

Show nested quote +
On February 21 2014 03:49 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I think Balla plays like his scum!meta suggests in this game. That's not where you are wrong imo. What's bothering me is i think you are misrepresenting his scum!meta and based on that (your interpretation) your case is incorrect. I am just not confident if this is evidence that's conclusive enough (which is why i had not brought it up on either way).


This is in response to toad. He says i'm playing towards my scum meta yet never never ever elaborates on that. Come on now rayn, if you really thought this way you would have pushed really fucking hard for lynch. ESPECIALLY after our back and forth.


shitshithsit.

Hey, that was your case.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 23 2014 02:28 GMT
#2105
I am willing to get lynched if you lynch Balla after that, he is shitscum.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 23 2014 02:36 GMT
#2107
I'm soory. I should elaborate more. This is another case from Balla where he does not tell why someone is mafia, but rather why something does not make sense to him.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 23 2014 02:36 GMT
#2108
Replace all "shit" with "this deos not make me mafia and you didn't explain why it does".
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 23 2014 02:37 GMT
#2110
All but his case on Taod, that was pure shit. Like really horseshit.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 23 2014 02:38 GMT
#2111
On February 23 2014 11:37 Balla24 wrote:
Tell me rayn if all that is so shit:

- Justfiy your townread of kush, even if its different today I want to know why you thought kush was town yesterday.
- Elaborate on how I am playing toward my scum meta, or at least how I was yesterday.
- Explain to me why you decided NOT to push me for a lynch instead of toad if you thought toad was so townie.

If it's shit then you should easily be able to explain all of this with EASE.

no.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 23 2014 02:38 GMT
#2112
You are so gonna get lynched scum. good night <3
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 23 2014 20:20 GMT
#2239
On February 23 2014 21:09 marvellosity wrote:
rayn - you need to stop being so snippy and actually engage with Balla please. What you're doing isn't very helpful.

No i don't, especailly when the case is "you did something i don't understand and that's why you are mafia". Well no shit, what am i supposed to say? "no you do understand"?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 23 2014 20:29 GMT
#2241
WHAT AM I SUPPOSED TO SAY?
Yes, i did those things. Because someone does not udestand why it does not make me mafia for fucks sake. Read the fucking case, it's crap because it is "you did X and i think you would not do that as town".
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 23 2014 20:30 GMT
#2243
I have explained everything you hae nrought up. Read the fucking thread scum.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 23 2014 20:34 GMT
#2245
He is being right for very wrong reasons and he makes cases that are not about why someone is mafia, and when he's been questioned about them instead of answering he makes new cases.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 23 2014 20:35 GMT
#2246
We should probably lynch kush for claiming mafia. But i don't really care so.. just something to think about.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 24 2014 17:14 GMT
#2509
##unvote
##Vote: Alakaslam


Oats is probably scum if Balla is town.
He's making a case based on same stuff i was town for earlier.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 24 2014 17:25 GMT
#2512
Well the reason i am scum for isn't the ones in your case then now is it?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 24 2014 17:34 GMT
#2514
not really, it does not make sense if he is scum.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 24 2014 19:41 GMT
#2518
So i guess nothing is happening this game.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 24 2014 19:50 GMT
#2520
Did anyone even read Balla's case and how bad it is? Or Oats' case?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 24 2014 19:57 GMT
#2522
Well i don't really need to. Apparently Oats thinks Slam is town.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 24 2014 19:58 GMT
#2524
Oats is far better lynch than Balla. Maybe Balla is just dumb and does not know how to write cases. Yes i am being honest here, i don't know how i am supposed to answer his case because he says i did some stuff and it makes me mafia but not how. Yes i did some stuff, so what?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 24 2014 19:59 GMT
#2525
But Oats makes a case based on stuff he has called me town for earlier on D2.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 24 2014 20:11 GMT
#2529
On February 23 2014 04:28 Balla24 wrote:
On rayn:

Look I don't understand what people are misunderstanding about my attack on rayn, the main main reason I'm scum on rayn is because he comes back into the thread after an unexplained vote on marv and goes HAM on suki/marv/me with very very little reasoning.

I don't believe he ACTUALLY believed the read on suki/me (like I said I don't know his relationship with marv), therefore the only reason he would do this is to shit up the thread and cause chaos. He had a reasonably good town read from most people before this, so it's a decent way to spend that as scum.

He then went on to misrepresent my case on toad by ignoring key points:

Show nested quote +
On February 22 2014 04:51 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Seriously, look at this:
Toad's only scum read seems to be me. That's pretty bad... especially considering his case on me was almost solely based on early game meta, and even though I agree that my early game could possibly be interpreted as similar to my scum games, I think he was purposefully misrepresenting both what I was saying in the early game, and the context which you can see what I said about it here:

I find it weird that someone would write a meta case on what LITTLE i had in the thread at that time, especially in comparison to what everybody else was doing in regards to me which was just "wait and see". I think it's a weak attempt to try to draw attention to someone who opened pretty weakly.

I think it's annoying that he focused so heavily on the rayn subject and responding to questioning about it. May not be his fault, but even if I was in his shoes I would have attempted to get my opinions out on somebody else as well. I wasn't around so I don't know how rapid fire this stuff was going on. As soon as it ended he wrote a case on me and then nothing else. Looking forward to his contributions in the rest of the day.

1) so he called something scummy scummy. it makes him mafia?
2) not scummy in the slightest
3) i don't even know what this is about. Toad did something and then did something else? That makes him mafia. WHAT THE FUCK?


I already pointed out how he was misrepresenting it during the moment here:

+ Show Spoiler +

On February 22 2014 05:13 Balla24 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 22 2014 05:06 raynpelikoneet wrote:
1) wrong. He saw something scummy based one meta and called you out of it. You said you could play like this as scum. That makes Toad's argument not scummy. Maybe wrong, but you can't possibly say it's scummy to call something scummy scummy. That's just retarded.

2) It's not scummy, it's pressure. I don't need to tell you what Toad has done after that, that was not a part of your case. Don't change your argument in the middle of one. That's bullshit.

3) So what? That's not what you say in the last paragraph. You don't say it's scummy and you don't explain why it's scummy. You say you need to hear more from him. That's what you say, not "scummy", but "need to hear more".


If you can't see why I think that his case is scummy for misrepresenting me and using meta on a small amount of contribution then you're not going to be convinced.

2) What are you talking about thats exactly the point. It might be pressure but it also could be fake contribution and to me it looks like fake contribution considering what I think of 1)

3) THATS EXACTLY THE POINT THOUGH. I wanted to see more contribution because all he's done at the point of my case was what I said. He hasn't done anything else now so it just proves my point that he's for some reason hesitant to talk about anything else.

Show nested quote +
On February 22 2014 05:07 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Balla you are making a new case as we speak. Why don't you answer my concerns in your original case intead of making a new one? And if you think these new points you bring up are so good why were they not in your original case?


That's just wrong. I'm not making up new points, you are making it out to be but i'm not so go somewhere pls.

##vote raynpelikoneet

Everything since you came back is so convoluted and just shitting up the thread. I think you're scum and I think you know toad is town so you want to springboard onto marv/suki/me after toad flips. I don't think your views on toad are consistent, earlier you were voting him. Literally the only reason you think toad is NOT SCUM is because you think marv/suki and I are scum which is total bullshit, especially on suki and I. I don't know your relationship with marv so I don't know how bullshit that is.


I also think his vote on suki is a total cop-out and he had no intention of lynching either of us: the votes were something like

Toad(7):me, suki, marv etc etc
Balla(3): toad, oats, sidesprang
Suki(1):rayn

Why wouldn't he have tried to get me lynched, especially AFTER our exchange in which he thought was so bad. All he did was chainsaw defend toad and then leave a useless vote on suki. If this was really town rayn and he actually thought I was scum he would have gone HAM on me after that exchange and tried to get me lynched so hard. Instead he gives up, "lynch toad idc".

I find his town read of kush here (which I had to ask him 3 times for):

Show nested quote +
On February 22 2014 05:06 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On February 22 2014 05:05 Balla24 wrote:
Rayn pls, 3rd time, what do you think of kush?

town.


Completely baseless and still baseless considering kush had done ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to that point. Let's look at what town rayn had to say about kush doing nothing in normal mini:

+ Show Spoiler +

On January 20 2014 23:08 raynpelikoneet wrote:
kush is probably scum because he has a big pile of non-explained townreads that can't possibly be based on any real evidence.


On January 21 2014 03:33 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 21 2014 03:31 bumatlarge wrote:
Do you have more on Kush rayn? If you have something more, I'd like to hear it. I find him difficult to read.

And I believe Barristan is the last person that needs to post. I'd suggest people start to vote now so we can see where we are at. I think there is enough content that people should be able to make some reasonable reads.

What i have on kush is what i have said.
He has a townread on half of the people in the game and refuses to explain why. If he is town he has reasons for his reads. If he is scum he has not. Seems like he has not.

On January 21 2014 04:41 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I dunno. kush is way scummier than any other person in the game atm.

On January 21 2014 04:57 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
I find it hilarious how both your points already counter one another. In the first you say you pointed out a mistake in Kush's reasoning so you can't both be scum, in the second you say a scum should lay into you.

I am not saying anything like that.
I was saying i pointed out kush's bad reads and was wondering why you said you liked that about suki but not about me and that was the reason i asked you why you were not reading my posts. Then i realized that was not what you were saying in the first place.

You don't need massive cojones to bus if you already know you can't get your buddy lynched, but anyways, i agree with you on bum.



When kush didn't have any reasoning for his reads. How is this game not similar for kush? Especially on day1, his reasonings were so non-existent. Other people already pointed out how rayn was light pushing kush earlier in the day too so town-reading him at that point was somewhat contradictory.

Last thing:

Show nested quote +
On February 21 2014 03:49 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I think Balla plays like his scum!meta suggests in this game. That's not where you are wrong imo. What's bothering me is i think you are misrepresenting his scum!meta and based on that (your interpretation) your case is incorrect. I am just not confident if this is evidence that's conclusive enough (which is why i had not brought it up on either way).


This is in response to toad. He says i'm playing towards my scum meta yet never never ever elaborates on that. Come on now rayn, if you really thought this way you would have pushed really fucking hard for lynch. ESPECIALLY after our back and forth.


1) I don't believe he ACTUALLY believed the read on suki/me (like I said I don't know his relationship with marv), therefore the only reason he would do this is to shit up the thread and cause chaos. :
Well then you don't believe it, wtf am i supposed to say? Yes i did believe suki is mafia, yes i did believe you are mafia. I explained why i thought so.

2) I find his town read of kush here (which I had to ask him 3 times for) completely baseless and still baseless considering kush had done ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to that point.
I explained my townread on kush. It was because i didn't think he would say he would quit mafia if Toad is town in case Toad was actually town which i also did believe. You don't buy it? Well shit, then there is nothing i can say.

3) He says i'm playing towards my scum meta yet never never ever elaborates on that. Come on now rayn, if you really thought this way you would have pushed really fucking hard for lynch.
Yes you are, i explained how. Only after i did so you started doing things like you do as town - not defending me for no reason, posting more, etc. And no i wouldn't. I would not because when marv is pushing a lynch there is nothing you can do about it. Also i did not give a shit.

So, i have actually explained everything you ask me to explain. If you don't think my explanations are good enough that's another thing and there is nothing i can do about it. So how about you cut the fucking bullshit and stop the "you need to explain this and that"?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 24 2014 20:16 GMT
#2530
And only after suki kill you start going "look how wrong rayn was on suki".- Well fucking everyone thought she was mafia, other than you. I think that's a bullshit reason to call me mafia (being wrong) and you are using something that is not scummy to attack me. In fact you are fucking scummy because of it as i don't see how you could possibly think suki is town.

You brought up shit like "i can see the reasoning behind her reads, you are bad because you can't". Well the reasons were not what you thought, and they were bad. So you had no intention to figure out her actual reasoning, you just said right things. Things you can't possibly know they are right if you are town.

So you are either mafia or playing really bad because you assume things you should not assume in the first place. You are not trying to figure out things, you just assume something and say stuff based on that. And it makes sense from mafia pov if you switch the word "assume" with "know".
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 24 2014 20:19 GMT
#2531
You actually did the same thing with me on D1. You assume you know what my reasoning behind something is, and defend me for it. When i call you out on that (because that's what you do as mafia), you start attacking me. Fishy fucking much?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 24 2014 20:33 GMT
#2535
On February 21 2014 03:49 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I think Balla plays like his scum!meta suggests in this game.

Then i quoted a post from NMM as Toad asked me to elaborate more.

After that you started posting.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 24 2014 20:36 GMT
#2536
kush you have a permission to shoot me on N2.
Then you can lynch Oats.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 24 2014 20:36 GMT
#2537
I know you want to shoot me anyways so...
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 24 2014 20:38 GMT
#2538
Maybe you are telling the truth Balla and just missed all those posts. Who knows.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 24 2014 20:39 GMT
#2540
I can understand your point on suki and that's not alignment indicative for either of us because we were talking about a different thing.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 24 2014 20:43 GMT
#2541
On February 25 2014 05:29 Balla24 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 25 2014 05:19 raynpelikoneet wrote:
You actually did the same thing with me on D1. You assume you know what my reasoning behind something is, and defend me for it. When i call you out on that (because that's what you do as mafia), you start attacking me. Fishy fucking much?


Look dude, what do you want me to do? You dropped a vote on marv completely unexplained, I tried to understand what you were doing and I posted it in the thread, I wasn't defending you whatsoever. I thought I saw what you were doing and it turned out it wasnt that at all, so when you start going ham off of it then it shoots off red bells for me because I didn't expect you to do that whatsoever.

Well i thought suki was mafia. marv thought suki was mafia. i know how marv operates and he seemed to be operating like he does as scum, having someone as a scumread and not talking with them. Hell he even said later on that's what he does as town (if he finds someone scummy he questions them more to find out if they are actyually scum or not). marv to me didn't seem like he was interested in questioning suki about her scummy stuff, but instead said "well i'll go see if i find something townie". .That's what i saw.

Now why do i need to make all these posts again because i have explained all this?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 24 2014 20:43 GMT
#2542
Okay that wording was confusing, hope you get what i am trying to say.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 24 2014 20:46 GMT
#2544
Like here:
rayn: "suki is mafia because of xyz"
marv: "yeah, suki might be mafia"
marv: "hmm i gotta go read the balla/suki exchange at the start of the game (which i maybe did not pay much/enough attention) earlier"
marv: "when i think someone is scummy i question them a lot about their posts" - (this is what i already knew)

didn't look like town!marv to me.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 24 2014 20:48 GMT
#2547
On February 25 2014 05:46 marvellosity wrote:
but rayn, it is literally 100% impossible for me to post that much as mafia. Don't ever make that mistake again, I'll be annoyed.

This one was your mulligan.

Well tbh about half of your posts in the first 14 pages of your filter are crap.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 24 2014 20:53 GMT
#2550
On February 25 2014 05:49 Balla24 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 25 2014 05:43 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On February 25 2014 05:29 Balla24 wrote:
On February 25 2014 05:19 raynpelikoneet wrote:
You actually did the same thing with me on D1. You assume you know what my reasoning behind something is, and defend me for it. When i call you out on that (because that's what you do as mafia), you start attacking me. Fishy fucking much?


Look dude, what do you want me to do? You dropped a vote on marv completely unexplained, I tried to understand what you were doing and I posted it in the thread, I wasn't defending you whatsoever. I thought I saw what you were doing and it turned out it wasnt that at all, so when you start going ham off of it then it shoots off red bells for me because I didn't expect you to do that whatsoever.

Well i thought suki was mafia. marv thought suki was mafia. i know how marv operates and he seemed to be operating like he does as scum, having someone as a scumread and not talking with them. Hell he even said later on that's what he does as town (if he finds someone scummy he questions them more to find out if they are actyually scum or not). marv to me didn't seem like he was interested in questioning suki about her scummy stuff, but instead said "well i'll go see if i find something townie". .That's what i saw.

Now why do i need to make all these posts again because i have explained all this?


Totally understood, now understand my PoV:

What you see about marv to me, is very very little and is pretty circumstantial. It might be on purpose it might not be, I can't tell. So when you go ham about it and disregard everything you said about toad before because you think marv is mafia and marv is trying to get toad lynched. It doesn't make sense to me, maybe it's because we have a different approach to the game or something but I wouldn't do that at all.

Toad looks scummy, marv has something that could be scummy as well, I would point it out and question marv about it then try to decide which of marv or toad looks scummier instead of flipping my reads like that off of something so small.

Does this make sense?

Yes i am not arguing you are not making sense from any point of view.
I am arguing that i can't argue about this because there is nothing to argue about. I am also arguing that i find it weird that you question me about things i have already explained, and that is your case.

You can't make a case based on "this doesn't make sense to me" if i have explained my reasoning behind those things. You should make a case "this is what he did, this is why, and this is why it does not make sense from town pov".

That's why the case is bad and that's why there is nothing to argue about.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 24 2014 20:56 GMT
#2551
It's the easiest thing as mafia to say someone did something that looks like a contradiction or stupid and just say "this is why he is scum". The hard thing is to twist something someone did as town to look like it's mafia motivated because it can't be so.

So again, whatever have i done, why as mafia?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 24 2014 21:07 GMT
#2555
I am really worried about the fact that marv dies tonight and one of Oats/Slam is town and people will never lynch prplhz.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 24 2014 21:09 GMT
#2556
Yes Balla, i know, and that's what i lack. I hate things i find stupid and that's my fault.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 24 2014 21:10 GMT
#2557
On February 25 2014 06:07 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I am really worried about the fact that marv dies tonight and one of Oats/Slam is town and people will never lynch prplhz.

EBWOP: I don't think it's a fact one of Oats/Slam is town, to clarify.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 24 2014 21:12 GMT
#2559
The nightkill was really weird. I don't know what does it mean because the only people who pushed Balla at the start of the day were me and marv, we are both town and i don't remember any other reason why Smurf was hit than Balla = mafia or Balla = framed as mafia.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 24 2014 21:15 GMT
#2560
Oh fuck he actually called Balla town and was interested in prplhz/Slam/kush.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 24 2014 21:17 GMT
#2562
But he was a suspect. For a lot of people, like basically to everyone. That hit is really weird.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 24 2014 21:17 GMT
#2563
I totally expected to see Palmar dead.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 24 2014 21:21 GMT
#2567
If i was scum i'd take my chances and kill marv.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 24 2014 21:22 GMT
#2568
On February 25 2014 06:21 Balla24 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 25 2014 06:20 marvellosity wrote:
On February 25 2014 06:17 raynpelikoneet wrote:
But he was a suspect. For a lot of people, like basically to everyone. That hit is really weird.

He was town to me t.t

Yep, the fact is even if he was suspicious to some people. He was not high on ANYBODIES list except palmar lol... so it's a decent kill out of that pool that i'm talking about.

Yeah but Palmar tunnels and smurf's posting style makes Palmar tunnel him. Did noone notice this on D1?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 24 2014 21:32 GMT
#2573
On February 25 2014 06:31 marvellosity wrote:
he's an extremely strong townie and he had just pushed a godfather lynch with me.

this.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 24 2014 21:46 GMT
#2579
Interesting question; Let's find confirmed townies.
Does anyone know where i breadcrumbed cop on N1?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 24 2014 21:47 GMT
#2580
On February 25 2014 06:40 Balla24 wrote:
Sure.

I don't see any experienced player reasonably deciding to hit the smurf over you or palmar.

So why was there a case and a vote on me by you?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 24 2014 21:57 GMT
#2583
That's not really an answer. You either think it's important or not. At the start of D1 you didn't think it's important now you do. Why?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 24 2014 21:57 GMT
#2584
EBWOP: D2
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 25 2014 00:22 GMT
#2609
Called it at the moment he posted. <3
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 25 2014 00:23 GMT
#2613
no roleblock confirms pretty well.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 25 2014 00:24 GMT
#2617
roleblock is better.
It actually does confirm more. If mafia wants to no-kill that's fine too.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 25 2014 00:51 GMT
#2646
yeah okay that makes sense.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 25 2014 02:32 GMT
#2652
So mafia basically can't win unless kush is mafia and i doubt he knows how to do it.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 25 2014 02:40 GMT
#2653
btw Palmar's plan is bad, this one:
On February 25 2014 10:33 Palmar wrote:
kush you prplhz or balla I do oats or rayn

Both of you target into the pool of me/Balla/prplhz/Oats.
One of you is going to die, so don't give mafia any clues on who you are targeting. For example, if i am mafia, scum knows kush is gonna get a 50% check on me, if i am framer, i am obviously gonna frame Balla, etc.

It does not matter if you target the same person because only one of you is alive at the start of D3.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 25 2014 02:41 GMT
#2654
I messed up with the names but you got the idea anyways.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 25 2014 02:51 GMT
#2657
Oats is the last mafia btw.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 25 2014 02:52 GMT
#2658
There is this really bullshit part in his case about Slam which is designed to make me look worse. Like i ask someone about Slam, i think Slam is town?!?!? t_T
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 25 2014 02:55 GMT
#2660
On February 25 2014 00:43 Oatsmaster wrote:
slam.
Oh yeah he never really talks about slam at all other than,
Show nested quote +
On February 22 2014 11:16 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Slam too serious to be town.

Show nested quote +
On February 22 2014 22:12 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Well in the end it does not really matter. I get my fun from games because people try to play and arguing with scum is fun. Apparently in this game scum didn't try at all. This game is not fun. So basically marv, Palmar, Balla and Koshi have to be town. If i trust the read on prplhz fine. I also think Oats is town.

So kush, Slam, smurf and suki. Can easily lynch all 4, if there is a vigi, even better. There is no challenge in this game any more.

so he's attacking slam right?

Then he defends him obliquely.
On February 23 2014 00:44 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Why is Slam mafia?

And never follows up on this. Odd? yes.



lol
i asked suki why she thinks why Slam is mafia because he called ~5 people mafia when someone brought them up. That does not make me think Slam is town. It also does not matter i didn't follow it up with because i got an answer that was reasonable.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 25 2014 02:56 GMT
#2662
In other words i was trrying to get a better read on suki and not on Slam. Which can easily be seen if you look at the context where the question was asked in. Oats has just opened my filter and tried to find something he can call scummy.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 25 2014 02:57 GMT
#2663
Like i fucking called Slam mafia the moment he started posting.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 25 2014 03:01 GMT
#2665
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=443848&currentpage=125#2494
This post, same shit than with you Balla. I have explained all of this. Oats is only looking for the actions.
His case is basically "you defended mafia and called marv scum". Well, yes i did, does not make me mafia.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 25 2014 04:58 GMT
#2670
lol that post is hilarious.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 25 2014 17:55 GMT
#2755
no Koshi, Oats.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 25 2014 18:02 GMT
#2760
On February 26 2014 02:59 Koshi wrote:
And I legitimately believe prplhz is scummier. Or at least he should be.
Maybe meta would help.

This is what i tried to say but apparently noone cares so i believe Palmar and marv.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 25 2014 18:06 GMT
#2762
On February 22 2014 23:18 raynpelikoneet wrote:
In my opinion prplhz is really good in evaluating which cases are good and which cases are not good. That's his strength as town. I don't see that here, at least yet.

table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 25 2014 18:08 GMT
#2763
Btw i am at Oats 85%, prplhz 14%, Balla 1% mafia.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 25 2014 18:10 GMT
#2764
Oats says i am scum because i never pushed Slam lynch and implied i think he was town (which i didn't). Then he makes a posts where he quotes his posts about Slam which fit exactly to what he says about me.

So from his perspective he is calling himself mafia too.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 25 2014 18:11 GMT
#2765
Also in the end my vote landed on Slam and Oats' vote landed on me who was scum by association to Slam's alignment.
bad, very bad.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 25 2014 18:14 GMT
#2769
Oh yeah i forgot about kush. Kush said he didn't read the day post properly. Well doesn't matter now, if there is no-kill kush's alignment is confirmed the next night.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 25 2014 18:15 GMT
#2771
ezpz, if there is no-kill we can have kush vig the next night as we got +1 death allowed. kush is confirmed by that way.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 25 2014 18:17 GMT
#2773
120% scum!
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 25 2014 18:19 GMT
#2776
Koshi you should stop thinking i am mafia in these games when i am not. You make me less likely to ever talk to you for realz.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 25 2014 18:25 GMT
#2780
Oats oats oats...
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 25 2014 18:27 GMT
#2783
Yeah i wanna hear that too.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 25 2014 18:28 GMT
#2785
Koshi i am sad, i didn't think you are scum on D1.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 25 2014 18:30 GMT
#2787
On February 26 2014 03:28 Oatsmaster wrote:
Because he wants to avoid getting lynched.
HAH.!

Or maybe because i played BW until 7 am or smth and just woke up?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 25 2014 18:30 GMT
#2788
On February 26 2014 03:29 Oatsmaster wrote:
This game rayn hasnt made an impact at all in. Nothing. You barely remember that he is even in this game.

That's what i do as scum, right?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 25 2014 18:32 GMT
#2791
Oats do you realize i am the reason Toad got lynched in the first place?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 25 2014 18:37 GMT
#2793
Now this is the reason you are scum. You are not reading my posts. I have told why. You should also know what i said is true if you did not ignore it.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 25 2014 18:43 GMT
#2796
On February 26 2014 03:42 Balla24 wrote:
the last scum is within rayn/oats they are trying way too hard

Don't be dumb Balla.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 25 2014 18:47 GMT
#2798
Palmar what you are supposed to do is to track/rb me.
In case you die and i am not confirmed town marv will go lazy and Koshi wants to lynch me. That way we can lose.
In case there is a no-kill you can lynch me. No probs. Then you just vig Oats - lynch prplhz and Balla, gg!

If i am confirmed town we will solve this with marv. Oats needs to do something that's not his tunnely "town meta". Then we can figure out which one of prplhz - Oats is mafia with marv and marv will actually listen to me.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 25 2014 18:48 GMT
#2799
yeah not trach but roleblock.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 25 2014 18:48 GMT
#2800
Also Koshi stops being dumb.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 25 2014 18:49 GMT
#2801
You know what happened in Survivor series game, don't make me lynched because dumbass Koshi/Oats. Please.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 25 2014 18:50 GMT
#2802
Like, if Oats is town he is now beyond delusional. I am not sure, sadly he can actually be this fucking dumb as town, just look at my signature. rofl.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 25 2014 18:57 GMT
#2803
Okay Balla is not mafia. Palmar roleblock me and i tell you we win this gmae 100%.
Thanks!
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 25 2014 23:09 GMT
#2817
Please say you roleblocked me Palmar.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 25 2014 23:11 GMT
#2818
Well either way. No night kill = lynch the roleblocked dude and if they flip town confirm kush by shooting someone next night. Lynch the rest of "non-confirmeds" = gg.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 25 2014 23:12 GMT
#2821
no you didn't?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 25 2014 23:13 GMT
#2825
can you actually be serious?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 25 2014 23:38 GMT
#2853
btw marv, your plan was bad. both kush and palmar roleblocking was the best plan.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 25 2014 23:40 GMT
#2858
On February 26 2014 08:39 marvellosity wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 26 2014 08:38 raynpelikoneet wrote:
btw marv, your plan was bad. both kush and palmar roleblocking was the best plan.

i think kush copping and palmar roleblocking was pretty correct, the 1vs2 ability thing still stands

nope. kush could win if he was mafia by guessing correctly a miller.
if they both roleblock there is no chance of any scum winning if Koshi is town.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 25 2014 23:41 GMT
#2860
Even this is a better plan than kush copping someone.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 25 2014 23:41 GMT
#2862
On February 26 2014 08:40 marvellosity wrote:
no he couldn't rayn, because kush would have to roleblock the night after.

???

no he can confirm someone.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 25 2014 23:43 GMT
#2865
7-1. kush cops, palmar tracks.
mafia kills. palmar dies.
6-1, kush claims guilty let's say on me, we lynch me, i flip miller.
5-1, kush "roleblocks" let's say Balla, mafia kills you.
4-1, we lynch into prplhz/Oats - both town, kush kills Balla, we lynch the other one, kush wins 1-1 gg.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 25 2014 23:44 GMT
#2866
OH THE MESSAGE. yes you are right. sry im dumb.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 25 2014 23:45 GMT
#2871
OR Koshi. What about Koshi Koshi?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 25 2014 23:47 GMT
#2874
yeah we lynch Oats.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 26 2014 00:01 GMT
#2883
##Vote: Oatsmaster
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 26 2014 00:01 GMT
#2885
##unvote:
##Vote: Oatsmaster
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 26 2014 00:05 GMT
#2892
On February 26 2014 09:04 Balla24 wrote:
2 minute days pls

only after kush is out of ban.
until then cya.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 26 2014 05:59 GMT
#2897
On February 26 2014 13:12 Oatsmaster wrote:
Last post of this game, you guys totally gonna make this go to lylo and lose.

Well that means you think Koshi is mafia so no.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 26 2014 07:26 GMT
#2899
Actually we can't lose now:
After lynch 5-1. me/Balla/Koshi/kush (4) unconfirmed.

Assuming kush is town and the NK goes through:
leaves us in 4-1 with 2 unconfirmed, can lynch both

Assuming kush is town and the NK does not go through:
leaves us in 5-1 with 4 unconfirmed, can lynch 2 and kush vigs one and confirms himself as town/mafia in the process.

Assuming kush is scum:
kush outs himself if there is no roleblock next night.

So could the mafia please just concede, because nobody wil lever convince anyone to lynch marv and i am willing to admit defeat if he is mafia?
I am town.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 26 2014 07:34 GMT
#2900
On February 25 2014 09:17 marvellosity wrote:
We decide our top 2 scum candidates, kush rb one, Palmar track the other.

This, i am too tired atm. Tomorrow i look into this a bit more because this is a bad plan.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 26 2014 07:43 GMT
#2901
nvm i am just too tired.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 26 2014 20:52 GMT
#2986
Well it's probably going to be kush because other people would have given up already.
Everyone with half a brain as mafia knows the game is lost if you (marv) are town.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 26 2014 20:53 GMT
#2987
Or someone is banking on kush not coming back for good.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 26 2014 23:35 GMT
#2989
btw the correct play for scum was to kill kush.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 26 2014 23:35 GMT
#2990
that actually makes me think kush is scum.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 26 2014 23:54 GMT
#2994
On February 27 2014 08:50 Koshi wrote:
But really. How did he guess trip JoaT. Pure luck?

Well he didn't read suki was JoaT so it makes sense from his own words.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 26 2014 23:55 GMT
#2995
He also claimed before Palmar.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 26 2014 23:56 GMT
#2996
No actually it does not make sense. meh..
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 28 2014 01:48 GMT
#3114
You can also roleblock Koshi if you want to.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 28 2014 08:27 GMT
#3116
kushm4sta you are roleblocking one of me/Balla/Koshi no questions asked. It does not matter which one and if you do something else you die.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 28 2014 08:28 GMT
#3117
Roleblock mafia and maybe you get to shoot scum the next night! <3
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 28 2014 08:46 GMT
#3121
kush playing the Blazinghand card of doing everything he can to win the game and getting himself banned in order to not having to prove his claim.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 28 2014 09:26 GMT
#3126
On February 28 2014 17:54 Koshi wrote:
I think Kush can even roleblock marv.

But Kush just fucking ROLEBLOCK THE LAST SCUMMER IF THE LAST SCUMMER CAN'T DO A NK WE WIN IN 24H.

JUST FUCKING PLAY THE GAME AND RB LAST SCUMMER. IF YOU THINK THAT IS ME. RB ME.

no he can't.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 28 2014 10:28 GMT
#3134
Maybe suki blocked kush on N1?
Why would she not use any powers on N1?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 28 2014 10:37 GMT
#3136
I secretly hope Koshi is mafia but tbh it's gonna be Balla.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 28 2014 11:29 GMT
#3151
Koshi is a snake.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 28 2014 11:30 GMT
#3153
scummer snake
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 28 2014 11:32 GMT
#3154
marv answer truthfully. are you in posession of mafia gunz and ammo? If you lie we can't be friends.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 28 2014 11:33 GMT
#3156
yes.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 28 2014 11:34 GMT
#3157
but only few
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 28 2014 12:13 GMT
#3159
lol koshi is a noodle place and a river in Nepal.
i am bored.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 28 2014 12:20 GMT
#3162
I believe in Balla.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 28 2014 12:26 GMT
#3167
I don't believe you are scum, Koshi does.
This game is gonna be so lame if marv is scum.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 28 2014 12:27 GMT
#3168
Remember to lynch marv in LYLO.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 28 2014 12:46 GMT
#3173
It's a Ball.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 28 2014 12:47 GMT
#3174
That drum shit in GSL player introduction when game starts is really annoying.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 28 2014 23:18 GMT
#3225
Yes the vigi ensures noone can win but you as scum.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 28 2014 23:28 GMT
#3226
I am not really sure why you bring that up now though...
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 28 2014 23:29 GMT
#3227
Can we change the lynch format to IML and nights to end "whenever actions are in"?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 28 2014 23:30 GMT
#3229
idk. Koshi is btw not any more confirmed than me / Balla are.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 28 2014 23:32 GMT
#3231
Well it's literally impossible i am mafia.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 28 2014 23:45 GMT
#3235
I am also gonna post my townie seal.
[image loading]

just because i can
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 28 2014 23:55 GMT
#3238
On March 01 2014 08:54 Koshi wrote:
not as shiny as coag townie seal.

Yes but it's not fake. Sidesprang tried to fake a townie seal but it was not a seal so it was fake.
This is a seal so it is real.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
February 28 2014 23:58 GMT
#3241
On March 01 2014 08:57 Koshi wrote:
Well. Posting seals as town should be bannable.

Only if it's a babyseal and not a townie seal.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
March 01 2014 00:01 GMT
#3244
I was not roleblocked, at least yet.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
March 01 2014 00:13 GMT
#3247
So that means you or kush is mafia.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
March 01 2014 00:57 GMT
#3253
well good thing is scum can't literally win this game now.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
March 01 2014 00:59 GMT
#3254
On February 22 2014 09:28 raynpelikoneet wrote:
wow so some players are just fucking terrible. I thought people would be better than that.
Anyways i am not needed here, scum are lurkers because noone opposed Toad lynch.
Something like kush and sidesprang then.

waiting for tha next game, you got this marv.

table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
March 01 2014 00:59 GMT
#3255
It's gonna be kush.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
March 01 2014 01:08 GMT
#3259
If Balla claims he was not roleblocked we lynch kush.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
March 01 2014 01:17 GMT
#3262
Who did you try to roleblock?
##unvote
##Vote: kushm4sta
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
March 01 2014 01:19 GMT
#3263
Roleblocks resolve simultaneously so the person you tried to roleblock is confirmed town because they could not make the night kill if you are telling the truth (which you are not).
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
March 01 2014 02:00 GMT
#3273
If a mafia roleblocker and a town roleblocker block each other and the mafia roleblcoker sends in the night kill does the night kill go through?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
March 01 2014 02:03 GMT
#3276
He said he tried to roleblock Balla, what are you talking about Koshi?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
March 01 2014 02:04 GMT
#3278
wait. i need to think about this. But the truth is kush or Koshi is mafia.
Is lynching kush the right move, that i don't know.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
March 01 2014 02:05 GMT
#3279
yeah it's the right move. If there is mafia roleblocker alive kus hwill just get roleblocked again and again.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
March 01 2014 02:17 GMT
#3282
kushm4sta you need to promise me to play if you are town because if what i assume is correct prplhz is mafia.
If mafia roleblocker rb's town rb who rb's mafia rb does not make affect mafia NK suddenly noone is confirmed and night kills make no sense for anyone other than prplhz to be scum.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
March 01 2014 02:30 GMT
#3286
No Koshi, it makes sense.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
March 01 2014 02:34 GMT
#3289
On February 17 2014 18:53 Sylencia wrote:

Role FAQ
  • All roles with (X-Shot) mean they may either be in have limited or unlimited uses.
  • If two roleblockers roleblock each other, they will both be notified. In this case, it counts as both roleblocks succeeding, and thus tracks and watches may work.
  • Roleblocks will block night kills.
  • Roleblocks resolve simultaneously. Thus anyone who was targetted by a roleblock will be blocked.
  • Roleblocked X-Shots and JoaT roles will have their power use refunded.

This is how i interpret it. It doesn't matter because i asked the host to clarify it and when they do we know for real.
If it does not negate mafia NK then noone is clear and prplhz is most likely mafia purely because i can't see anyone than him make those night killls. Why the fuck would you shoot marv who is not 100% confirmed instead of prplhz who is?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
March 01 2014 02:35 GMT
#3290
And who the fuck shoots smurf on N1 except for prplhz who he was suspicious of.
Who the fuck shoots Palmar over kush and reduces his chances of winning? prplhz who also roleblocks Palmar to ensure he does not do anything else like yolo-vig someone (which Palmar could do).
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
March 01 2014 02:41 GMT
#3294
Yes it's highly likely kush is town and we are lynching him today regardless of the answer. But if mafia NK can go through in that case prplhz is mafia, noone is confirmed.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
March 01 2014 02:41 GMT
#3295
EBWOP: kush is mafia
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-03-03 02:14:14
March 03 2014 02:13 GMT
#3335
Your case was really bad because it didn't even say why you think i am mafia. You jsut said i did some stuff you did not understand.

And btw that was what i said in the first place.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
March 03 2014 02:28 GMT
#3336
Like he ies what you did:
rayn does stuff he does not explain
Balla: "I think i get what rayn is doing" (multiple times)
rayn: "Balla looks like scum because he is defending me for no reason and that's what he does as scum"
rayn does more stuff
Balla: "rayn is scum because i don't understand what he is doing"

fishy much??
table for two on a tv tray
Normal
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 9h 5m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 161
SpeCial 108
ProTech64
StarCraft: Brood War
NaDa 70
Aegong 59
Dota 2
monkeys_forever1064
LuMiX1
League of Legends
Cuddl3bear3
Counter-Strike
Coldzera 384
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox458
AZ_Axe118
Other Games
tarik_tv8733
Day[9].tv1162
shahzam712
C9.Mang0278
ViBE210
Maynarde173
Livibee70
Liquid`Ken6
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1462
BasetradeTV29
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• RyuSc2 43
• rockletztv 33
• HeavenSC 1
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Doublelift4981
Other Games
• Scarra1601
• Day9tv1162
Upcoming Events
Esports World Cup
9h 5m
ByuN vs Zoun
SHIN vs TriGGeR
Cyan vs ShoWTimE
Rogue vs HeRoMaRinE
Clem vs Solar
Reynor vs Maru
herO vs Cure
Serral vs Classic
Esports World Cup
1d 9h
Esports World Cup
2 days
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
CSO Cup
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Online Event
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.