[M][N] Default Suspicions Mafia - Page 57

On February 21 2014 23:11 marvellosity wrote:

yes I said "his" because you were attacking Palmar and Palmar is championing toad, not because Palmar specifically started the lynch.

On February 21 2014 23:16 prplhz wrote:

it wasn't really an attack, it was just a "bah i don't like railroading anyone, not even toad, lets see if something odd is happening that i can prod at" and then palmar did something odd and i pointed it out.

maybe he is championing it but i really still consider it your lynch because he's using your arguments. i guess in reality it the arguments' lynch but they're your arguments so it's kind of your lynch. doesn't matter all that much whose lynch it is though i guess.

what do you think about oats? is he another "leave him be and we'll figure him out"?

On February 21 2014 23:16 prplhz wrote:

it wasn't really an attack, it was just a "bah i don't like railroading anyone, not even toad, lets see if something odd is happening that i can prod at" and then palmar did something odd and i pointed it out.

maybe he is championing it but i really still consider it your lynch because he's using your arguments. i guess in reality it the arguments' lynch but they're your arguments so it's kind of your lynch. doesn't matter all that much whose lynch it is though i guess.

what do you think about oats? is he another "leave him be and we'll figure him out"?

On February 21 2014 23:17 marvellosity wrote:

yes it's irrelevant, i was explaining why i said his. ergo you said palmar was shady and palmar was championing toad. literally nothing more to it.

i have no idea about oats at all. not sure we'll figure him out eventually either.

On February 21 2014 22:51 suki wrote:


marv I take this to mean you think I'm scummy? I ask because you still haven't straight up said how Balla and I look even though you kept saying you had to go back and re-read our exchange.

On February 21 2014 22:53 marvellosity wrote:
that would be the interpretation yes. The 2nd exchange you had last night that I was able to pay more attention to/follow better had Balla looking better because he was doing the aggressive pursuing and you were quite defensive.

On February 21 2014 22:59 marvellosity wrote:

The problem is, suki, you ask questions like the one you just asked to Palmar, which come across as really odd.

It seems kinda obvious that kush had just been in the thread spouting off about Oats and so at that moment Palmar was thinking about kush and Oats in relation to lynchings, so he just made that semi-throwaway comment.

Further what possible answer can he give that might affect his alignment in any way? "oops I forgot you suki" "omg you must be scum for forgetting that I'm your #2 read"? I don't understand the angle of the question you're asking or what you're trying to achieve, and I don't think that's the only instance of that happening.

Further still, you are a girl and I'm scared of girls.

On February 21 2014 23:19 Palmar wrote:


I suggest the rope+tree investigative method.

100% success rate.

On February 21 2014 23:19 marvellosity wrote:
problem is you get lynched in that scenario palmar

On February 21 2014 22:53 marvellosity wrote:
that would be the interpretation yes. The 2nd exchange you had last night that I was able to pay more attention to/follow better had Balla looking better because he was doing the aggressive pursuing and you were quite defensive.

On February 21 2014 23:22 marvellosity wrote:
I wouldn't even rage though, it'd be no fun.

On February 21 2014 23:24 Palmar wrote:

yeah, it needs to be an actual challenge for it to be fun.

On February 21 2014 11:23 suki wrote:


I do and I really like this analysis

##unvote
##vote Palmar

On February 21 2014 23:28 marvellosity wrote:



This vote came completely out of left-field. If we go back to the Koshi case that suki made, within that case Toad had no redeeming features at all still (and could be voted for later). But here Palmar is worth a vote for prplhz mentioning bad associative reads and that's it.

It's like it was one thing about Palmar which was perhaps semi-significant that was worth a vote without considering anything else that Palmar had done at all.

On February 21 2014 17:46 Koshi wrote:
CuteFluffyPuppy: this might be very coincidental but when I got heat he suddenly was on pages on which I was scummy and he said so, and then when marv got his little bit of heat CFP just had a quote in which he found marv scummy. I guess this guy needs to be read in his filter. Because reading him in the thread is just dumb because he is not following the flow. Which is actually scummy because the only person I remember doing this like this was BH as a smurf. And he was scum.

On February 21 2014 19:41 Palmar wrote:
Btw this is the most boring smurf I've ever seen. Goddamnit smurf.

On February 21 2014 20:40 marvellosity wrote:
ok, just carrying on looking through Smurf's filter. The biggest problem I have at the end of it is that after all his catchup posts he actually has no conclusions about anything, at all.

I have no real idea what Smurf thinks about anything.