| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
LoneMeow
Finland1396 Posts
VIVAX420 (1): Koshi (0): marvellosity (0): CuteFluffyPuppy (1): Oatsmaster (1): raynpelikoneet (0): Palmar (0): Toadesstern (5): prplhz (0): Balla24 (3): suki (1): sidesprang (0): Toadesstern is now set to be lynched! Next deadline: Deadline date: Saturday, Feb 22 12:00am GMT (GMT+00:00) | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
I shit on Oats for being bad, not you. | ||
|
suki
Canada1159 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
pls read. | ||
|
suki
Canada1159 Posts
| ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
On February 21 2014 23:11 marvellosity wrote: yes I said "his" because you were attacking Palmar and Palmar is championing toad, not because Palmar specifically started the lynch. it wasn't really an attack, it was just a "bah i don't like railroading anyone, not even toad, lets see if something odd is happening that i can prod at" and then palmar did something odd and i pointed it out. maybe he is championing it but i really still consider it your lynch because he's using your arguments. i guess in reality it the arguments' lynch but they're your arguments so it's kind of your lynch. doesn't matter all that much whose lynch it is though i guess. what do you think about oats? is he another "leave him be and we'll figure him out"? | ||
|
suki
Canada1159 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On February 21 2014 23:16 prplhz wrote: it wasn't really an attack, it was just a "bah i don't like railroading anyone, not even toad, lets see if something odd is happening that i can prod at" and then palmar did something odd and i pointed it out. maybe he is championing it but i really still consider it your lynch because he's using your arguments. i guess in reality it the arguments' lynch but they're your arguments so it's kind of your lynch. doesn't matter all that much whose lynch it is though i guess. what do you think about oats? is he another "leave him be and we'll figure him out"? yes it's irrelevant, i was explaining why i said his. ergo you said palmar was shady and palmar was championing toad. literally nothing more to it. i have no idea about oats at all. not sure we'll figure him out eventually either. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
On February 21 2014 23:16 prplhz wrote: it wasn't really an attack, it was just a "bah i don't like railroading anyone, not even toad, lets see if something odd is happening that i can prod at" and then palmar did something odd and i pointed it out. maybe he is championing it but i really still consider it your lynch because he's using your arguments. i guess in reality it the arguments' lynch but they're your arguments so it's kind of your lynch. doesn't matter all that much whose lynch it is though i guess. what do you think about oats? is he another "leave him be and we'll figure him out"? It matters tomorrow when I go 180 berzerk on marv for leading a mislynch on a townie. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
On February 21 2014 23:17 marvellosity wrote: yes it's irrelevant, i was explaining why i said his. ergo you said palmar was shady and palmar was championing toad. literally nothing more to it. i have no idea about oats at all. not sure we'll figure him out eventually either. I suggest the rope+tree investigative method. 100% success rate. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
suki: On February 21 2014 22:51 suki wrote: marv I take this to mean you think I'm scummy? I ask because you still haven't straight up said how Balla and I look even though you kept saying you had to go back and re-read our exchange. On February 21 2014 22:53 marvellosity wrote: that would be the interpretation yes. The 2nd exchange you had last night that I was able to pay more attention to/follow better had Balla looking better because he was doing the aggressive pursuing and you were quite defensive. On February 21 2014 22:59 marvellosity wrote: The problem is, suki, you ask questions like the one you just asked to Palmar, which come across as really odd. It seems kinda obvious that kush had just been in the thread spouting off about Oats and so at that moment Palmar was thinking about kush and Oats in relation to lynchings, so he just made that semi-throwaway comment. Further what possible answer can he give that might affect his alignment in any way? "oops I forgot you suki" "omg you must be scum for forgetting that I'm your #2 read"? I don't understand the angle of the question you're asking or what you're trying to achieve, and I don't think that's the only instance of that happening. Further still, you are a girl and I'm scared of girls. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
On February 21 2014 23:19 Palmar wrote: I suggest the rope+tree investigative method. 100% success rate. this one is quite funny. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
On February 21 2014 23:19 marvellosity wrote: problem is you get lynched in that scenario palmar challenge accepted. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
suki
Canada1159 Posts
On February 21 2014 22:53 marvellosity wrote: that would be the interpretation yes. The 2nd exchange you had last night that I was able to pay more attention to/follow better had Balla looking better because he was doing the aggressive pursuing and you were quite defensive. Sorry I missed this post. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
On February 21 2014 23:22 marvellosity wrote: I wouldn't even rage though, it'd be no fun. yeah, it needs to be an actual challenge for it to be fun. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On February 21 2014 23:24 Palmar wrote: yeah, it needs to be an actual challenge for it to be fun.  On February 21 2014 11:23 suki wrote: I do and I really like this analysis ##unvote ##vote Palmar This vote came completely out of left-field. If we go back to the Koshi case that suki made, within that case Toad had no redeeming features at all still (and could be voted for later). But here Palmar is worth a vote for prplhz mentioning bad associative reads and that's it. It's like it was one thing about Palmar which was perhaps semi-significant that was worth a vote without considering anything else that Palmar had done at all. | ||
|
suki
Canada1159 Posts
On February 21 2014 23:28 marvellosity wrote: This vote came completely out of left-field. If we go back to the Koshi case that suki made, within that case Toad had no redeeming features at all still (and could be voted for later). But here Palmar is worth a vote for prplhz mentioning bad associative reads and that's it. It's like it was one thing about Palmar which was perhaps semi-significant that was worth a vote without considering anything else that Palmar had done at all. Did you maybe miss the entire post that I made on palmar like just before prplhz's post? The one where I said here is why I find Palmar scummy? | ||
|
CuteFluffyPuppy
Afghanistan138 Posts
I'd like to hear which posts by Suki make you feel she's clearly town. As for Kush, I remember him asking a host in a game before participating if he would be allowed to play with one post a day. He's also had large filters as scum before. Activity is not a scumtell for Kush. I think the strongest thing that makes Kush scum is the contradiction on what Marv saw earlier. Happy with the Toad case. Could lynch for sure. Oats looks awful as well. He always does but he looks extra awful this game. On February 21 2014 17:46 Koshi wrote: CuteFluffyPuppy: this might be very coincidental but when I got heat he suddenly was on pages on which I was scummy and he said so, and then when marv got his little bit of heat CFP just had a quote in which he found marv scummy. I guess this guy needs to be read in his filter. Because reading him in the thread is just dumb because he is not following the flow. Which is actually scummy because the only person I remember doing this like this was BH as a smurf. And he was scum. I'm actually doing what Promethelax did in the original Shadow game because I felt it was a good method to catch up and show your reads as you develop them. Basically catching up for discussion I missed. It hasn't actually got me many scumreads to work with, but if it provides my thought processes and allows me to process the thread better, it's already worth it. On February 21 2014 19:41 Palmar wrote: Btw this is the most boring smurf I've ever seen. Goddamnit smurf. Sorry to disappoint  Don't like Toad's return into the thread. He said he was going to check out Shadow game, yet he responds to my post and drops his Balla read. On February 21 2014 20:40 marvellosity wrote: ok, just carrying on looking through Smurf's filter. The biggest problem I have at the end of it is that after all his catchup posts he actually has no conclusions about anything, at all. I have no real idea what Smurf thinks about anything. That's because I didn't really have any scumreads at the end. Strongest suspicion was on Suki. Currently it's on Toad. Too many scummy things, something that happened in Shadow as well yet everyone decided to not lynch him for it. The contradiction and his focus on defending himself, calling you a liar but not scum, all counts in for it. ##Unvote ##Vote Toadesstern | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 Counter-Strike Heroes of the Storm Other Games |
|
Replay Cast
Wardi Open
Monday Night Weeklies
WardiTV Invitational
Replay Cast
WardiTV Invitational
ByuN vs Solar
Clem vs Classic
Cure vs herO
Reynor vs MaxPax
Replay Cast
Sparkling Tuna Cup
|
|
|
EPT
