EPT[M][N] Default Suspicions Mafia - Page 23
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43269 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43269 Posts
Toad is passingly familiar enough with rayn to know that's not how rayn operates. Because this is totally not true. I don't know where did you get this? | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43269 Posts
On February 20 2014 10:48 Toadesstern wrote: there's plenty of people throwing around votes in every single game, for fun, for policy, for random reasons or whatever else. So if it's not a problem in any other game, why do you think it's going to be a problem in this one to the point that you think we should make a "no voting someone else unless you're super certain" policy? Do you actually think it's something that should be policy in every game? Because this is totally not what i said and it proves Toad is not really even reading my posts or trying to understand me. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43269 Posts
On February 20 2014 21:31 marvellosity wrote: Dunno. Seems like it should be true. Toad's been around lately and you've been around. I don't think i had a single conversation with Toad in that game and the SMB game proves he definitely does not get how i operate and actually demonstrates the same thing i see here, he is not reading my posts properly. Which apparently is not scummy for him. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43269 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
"passingly familiar" hardly is false then is it? :> | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43269 Posts
 | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
<3 | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43269 Posts
- I have Oats as my #1 scumread, Toad as #2. - Toad does something i think is scummy. - I vote for Toad. - Toad says "why don't you vote for Oats who is your top scumread" - I tell him "because you did this that made me reconsider who is the scummiest and i think it's you" - "No you are mafia because you are not voting for your top scumread" | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43269 Posts
 | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43269 Posts
On February 20 2014 21:46 marvellosity wrote: those things are totally unrelated to what he did this game... ? Well doesn't what he says make sense? I mean his explanation after you pointed out this: 1) "I'm not going after him seriously" and 2) "but I need to hear from him about this" 1) is backing out of it and yet you're pushing it with 2) | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43269 Posts
| ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
On February 20 2014 17:39 Palmar wrote: I don't agree with your logic prplhz. IF rayn is mafia he's not dumb enough to create an entire plan to simply get his vote off someone. If he is mafia the reason he did this is he thought the plan would be well-received in town and considered advantageous for town, thus giving him townie points for not really doing anything. that wasn't my point, rayn said that unvoting is a townie thing and whenever scum do it it's because they want to look townie, then i said that that didn't matter because they would still do it in a scummy way rayn thinks that unvoting is something townies do to make their stance clear and scum do it to emulate townies so it's a good thing if we implement an unvote plan because then townies can avoid having weird votes and we can't catch scums on it anyway because they're just acting like townies my point is that scum ideally will not be able to act like townies all the time and forcing them to have an opinion and not unvoting is going to make it more likely that they'll slip and more likely that we'll catch them i don't think that a scum rayn would create and push this plan for the benefit scum has from an unvote mechanism either. i just think the whole plan is more likely to come from a scum POV than a town POV. he is arguing for why it's a good idea for town (of course any scum would only push a plan if they think they can convince town it is good for them) but i think that's because of the conflicting "i am scum so i want to do something good for town but not actually" POV. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43269 Posts
On February 20 2014 21:55 prplhz wrote: that wasn't my point, rayn said that unvoting is a townie thing and whenever scum do it it's because they want to look townie, then i said that that didn't matter because they would still do it in a scummy way rayn thinks that unvoting is something townies do to make their stance clear and scum do it to emulate townies so it's a good thing if we implement an unvote plan because then townies can avoid having weird votes and we can't catch scums on it anyway because they're just acting like townies my point is that scum ideally will not be able to act like townies all the time and forcing them to have an opinion and not unvoting is going to make it more likely that they'll slip and more likely that we'll catch them i don't think that a scum rayn would create and push this plan for the benefit scum has from an unvote mechanism either. i just think the whole plan is more likely to come from a scum POV than a town POV. he is arguing for why it's a good idea for town (of course any scum would only push a plan if they think they can convince town it is good for them) but i think that's because of the conflicting "i am scum so i want to do something good for town but not actually" POV. But you know, unvoting IS having an opinion. | ||
| ||
