You weren't reading the exchange.

Marv calls it "rayn's lynch" (before the flip) when rayn is just sheeping me anyway, and then wants to be a prick after the flip and make it my fault Cora flips town.

Every need to be a dick about it. Fuck marv, and the rest of town, if that's how effort is to be rewarded.

Not read the rest of the thread except this last page.

yamato you are being totally ridiculous. Quite obviously you are no more to "blame" for the Cora flip than you were pre-flip. The difference is that you don't look swell from it because he didn't flip mafia.

This anger is totally unwarranted.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

February 12 2014 09:48 GMT

#1976

On February 12 2014 18:01 Palmar wrote:

Show nested quote +

I'm not going to go back to verify what you're claiming is true here Keirath, but I don't see how that is mafia mindset either.

Assuming your premise is true, that yamato initially wanted credit for the lynch, and then blamed cora, why would mafia do that? Mafia already knows there is no credit to be taken from the lynch, right? So why would scumyamato want credit.

If the rest of Keirathi's posting looks like this, I won't be particularly impressed

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

February 12 2014 10:21 GMT

#1977

##Vote: VayneAuthority

He's had ample opportunity to answer very simple questions from Palmar & I. Added to the fact he refuses to explain his stance which originally made me suspicious.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

February 12 2014 10:23 GMT

#1978

Keirathi, if you are in fact town, you should be coming with me on this one. VE has more chances to be town than VA, for sure.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

February 12 2014 10:24 GMT

#1979

Palmar, do you still think Wave's posting is reasonable?

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

February 12 2014 10:32 GMT

#1980

I can't tell if he's mafia or just town who's gone off the deep end and is irrationally angry with everybody.

When I'm one of the ones staying calm in a game something is really odd.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

February 12 2014 10:54 GMT

#1983

well VA is currently playing against wincon if he's town, so I assume iamp has warned him privately, and VA is continuing to choose not to play.

Ofc iamp almost certainly hasn't warned him privately, but his play if he's town is pretty much breaking "play to win" rules. He's done 2 things with his read on Oats and his comments on the nominees that he's refused to explain, and he refuses to explain why Holy is mafia. Whatchagonnado

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

February 12 2014 10:59 GMT

#1984

Keirathi - Palmar, rayn, and I all accepted yamato's explanation about the Vayne stuff as genuine.

It seem you do not.

What is causing you to disagree with all of us?

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

February 12 2014 12:39 GMT

#1987

I wouldn't be so bothered about VA refusing to explain himself if he hadn't done/said things that really need explaining.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

February 12 2014 12:40 GMT

#1988

Since when have you become more tolerant? I'm sure like 2 games ago you were pushing superhard for a policy lynch on someone for no reason when there was blatant mafia in the thread.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

February 12 2014 12:47 GMT

#1990

I think it was kush, I forget the game.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

February 12 2014 12:47 GMT

#1991

I mean I could go find out but it doesn't seem like that's useful to anything.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

February 12 2014 14:07 GMT

#1994

VE did talk sensibly on Day 1 at some point about yamato. I forget the content right now but it did exist as a thing. I'll happily engage him on yamato if he appears in the thread at some stage.

Not being funny Palmar, but what's the point of your post? What do you think it's demonstrating exactly, alignment-wise?