EPT[S] Shadowed Mini Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
 | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
1) Everybody be extremely nice to each other. Only scummers are meanies. 2) Everybody make 40 posts a day. That's 2 pages filter a day. You are actually allowed to just count to 40. If you don't post 40 times in a day we lynch you. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
It's a great policy and it forces people to play the game. Even one liners can help town to follow your thoughtprocess and to screen on awkwardness. It's also a policy that will work wonders on Day 3 and so on. When we are all tunneled. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
On February 04 2014 07:13 JonnyLaw wrote: Half the game won't meet those requirements. Being nice is too hard. People are lazy. Lynching lurkers is fine but your 40 posts are ambitious. Who isn't going to meet those requirements? | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
LoL Pick your power league I was never close to being lynched. Scum tried though. And they died. Painfully. Due to my inventions. Glorious. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
Also. Mr. Stray Kitten. Just say what you think whenever you think it. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
Can't we just be friends? I just typed my policy without plan. and I was never actually believing that we would lynch based on a 40 post count policy. I just needed a number and 40 sounded nice. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
How do you feel about Jonny? | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
On February 04 2014 11:48 JonnyLaw wrote: Meh, okay so she dislikes everything I say. I think they mean the same thing. I guess it could be taken as she thinks im misguided sometimes rather than simply scummy. Her question seemed legit enough but balla's right. At the start of day 1 I want to see what someone is willing or able to bring to the game. There's no point saying much until they show what they're committing. At this point LM's first post was shit but says nothing about his alignment until other actions take place in the game. Koshi on the other hand created two pages of shit posting. This allowed LM and other LM like people to pop in, say nothing and fuck off out of here acting as though they participated in the game. How am I scum for things that other people do? JL says this: LM is null. Koshi is scum because LM acted like he participated in the game and then fucked off. There are other people like LM who are faking to participate in the game. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
On February 04 2014 19:44 LoneMeow wrote: Does this make JonnyLaw scum or just town using broken logic? I give him a point in the scum collomn. Don't know what Jonny his deal is but he has been hostile towards me from the get go. He answered pretty hostile on my policy thing, but that was null. But then he taunted me with the PYP Inventor thing and I was just "ok w.e". And now he is saying that due to my shitposting people can act scummy, but those people are null. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
On February 04 2014 19:56 LoneMeow wrote: What do you make of Balla24's vote/unvote on me? His reasoning made sense and playing so serious from the start is townie. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
On February 04 2014 20:17 LoneMeow wrote: Even though he unvoted without any new input from me and without providing pretty much any reason at all? I was talking more about the initial vote than the unvote. I guess he wanted to go for Shock Effect and thought that time had passed. Or he was gauging for reactions from other players. I am cool with Balla. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
On February 04 2014 22:00 Oatsmaster wrote: yes koshi is scum Is this where I have to pretend to be upset? Because I am laughing too hard. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
I would like Jonny to explain his arguments against me though. I am actually upset about the fact my early posting is "shitposting" tbh. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
1) LM said he was not going to vote for something just based on filter size but on filter content. This shows future commitment to the game. This is a town answer. But in 24 hours we can also use this to pressure him to give reads, or at least his town answer looks bad when he doesn't follow up. But I trust he will. 2) Balla same story. Instantly said yay let's do this and was worried about other people low content spam and not himself. Good + follow up ensured. 3) Jonny was angry and is still angry. There is no reason for that at all and I put him scummy. I also read his post better and found previously quoted post that does not make sense at all. ↨ 4) Hopeless said something and then fucked off. This is scummy and it is not my fault that he did this. If we lynch somebody we lynch Hopeless. 5) Suki her post was actually a wtf moment. The underlined part of previous sentence was my confusion. I think the rest of the people made similar comments but that's what my post generated. But nothing on it's own was scummy. Also I wasn't in let's solve this game right now mode yesterday right before bed. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
JayB is making sense this game. Voice of Reason. That's all. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
As in "guys let's be nice to each other and post a lot" But I called it a policy to get things going. At least Jonny and Oats aren't scum together. I can't believe 2 scummers pushing the most dumb argument ever. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
I prefer to lynch Jonny atm. Nothing he says connects to each other. He starts saying he wants to lynch all lurkers multiple times and that my "Policy" was a good conversation starter. On February 03 2014 10:10 JonnyLaw wrote: Three of them were lurkers in our games. We're lynching them d1 if they do nothing. On February 04 2014 07:54 JonnyLaw wrote: 40 posts is an arbitrary number that doesn't mean anything. It worked okay as a conversation starter but on Wednesday are you going to be sitting around counting people's posts since the game started? Somewhere Jonny must have read that I was actually serious about going to actually count the number of posts and then lynch somebody for it while I said that I wasn't going to do that. So normally Jonny shouldn't be going on about it then? On February 05 2014 00:38 JonnyLaw wrote: You posted something stupid that you admittedly don't want to follow through with in the end. If we take away everyone talking about your first post then maybe we'd have better content instead of discussion about post counts. This is his come back post in the thread many hours after he said my policy was all about the numbers. I have so many problems with every sentence in that post. You posted something stupid that you admittedly don't want to follow through with in the end. What is this? Am I scum for posting something stupid? Am I scum for not following up my stupid plans? I think it is pretty townie to not follow up stupid shit. Why is he trying to make me not following up stupid shit look scummy? If we take away everyone talking about your first post then maybe we'd have better content instead of discussion about post counts. Why is Jonny being frustrated with me about the fact that all the content is being shit content? I type in the start of the game "guys let's be nice and post a lot" and the guy replies with 'Fuck being nice because people are lazy and lynch all lurkers" but then keeps going on and on about "there is no content" . THERE IS ALWAYS CONTENT. Then there is Jonny and his talk about LM: On February 04 2014 07:54 JonnyLaw wrote: And what the fuck is that vote? Lonemeow's said the most sensible thing since this game started. On February 04 2014 10:20 JonnyLaw wrote: I agreed with his second post and dismissed the other one. That first one is an excuse for lurking. I dunno if that's scummy or not. Let's see how LM proceeds from here. Maybe I have a soft spot from him hosting one of our newbie games. [QUOTE]On February 04 2014 11:14 JonnyLaw wrote: LM hasn't given us quality or quantity yet. He says one thing then does another. It's early in the game for me to demand more quality of his posting. At least as far as considering lynching him. [QUOTE]On February 04 2014 11:48 JonnyLaw wrote: At this point LM's first post was shit but says nothing about his alignment until other actions take place in the game. Koshi on the other hand created two pages of shit posting. This allowed LM and other LM like people to pop in, say nothing and fuck off out of here acting as though they participated in the game.[/QUOTE] Just look at the progression: "How do you dare to vote LM, he said the most sensible thing in this thread" "LM his second post was really good, I didn't consider the other ones" "LM can be lynched" "LM posted like shit early game, but it really was Koshi his fault" It literally goes from this guy posted incredible pro town towards everything this guy posted was shit. And there is a post right after Jonny said "I can lynch LM" where Jonny give his scummy list and I am on top of the scummy list and not LM. This is the post that Jonny found protown at first but then said it was scummy btw: + Show Spoiler + On February 04 2014 07:40 LoneMeow wrote: Well, for starters I don't quite agree with your "minimum post count" thing. I'll support a lurker lynch if it's necessary, but based on amount of content, not number of posts. Which on itself is indeed a pro-town post. The problem just lied that LM right after this post said that he was going to do hardcore lurking and the posts didn't add up... Which Jonny still doesn't understand. And somebody needs to figure out what Jonny means with the "first post" and the "second post" etc, because I am pretty sure it doesn't add up as well. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
I prefer to lynch Jonny atm. Nothing he says connects to each other. He starts saying he wants to lynch all lurkers multiple times and that my "Policy" was a good conversation starter. On February 03 2014 10:10 JonnyLaw wrote: Three of them were lurkers in our games. We're lynching them d1 if they do nothing. On February 04 2014 07:54 JonnyLaw wrote: 40 posts is an arbitrary number that doesn't mean anything. It worked okay as a conversation starter but on Wednesday are you going to be sitting around counting people's posts since the game started? Somewhere Jonny must have read that I was actually serious about going to actually count the number of posts and then lynch somebody for it while I said that I wasn't going to do that. So normally Jonny shouldn't be going on about it then? On February 05 2014 00:38 JonnyLaw wrote: You posted something stupid that you admittedly don't want to follow through with in the end. If we take away everyone talking about your first post then maybe we'd have better content instead of discussion about post counts. This is his come back post in the thread many hours after he said my policy was all about the numbers. I have so many problems with every sentence in that post. You posted something stupid that you admittedly don't want to follow through with in the end. What is this? Am I scum for posting something stupid? Am I scum for not following up my stupid plans? I think it is pretty townie to not follow up stupid shit. Why is he trying to make me not following up stupid shit look scummy? If we take away everyone talking about your first post then maybe we'd have better content instead of discussion about post counts. Why is Jonny being frustrated with me about the fact that all the content is being shit content? I type in the start of the game "guys let's be nice and post a lot" and the guy replies with 'Fuck being nice because people are lazy and lynch all lurkers" but then keeps going on and on about "there is no content" . THERE IS ALWAYS CONTENT. Then there is Jonny and his talk about LM: On February 04 2014 07:54 JonnyLaw wrote: And what the fuck is that vote? Lonemeow's said the most sensible thing since this game started. On February 04 2014 10:20 JonnyLaw wrote: I agreed with his second post and dismissed the other one. That first one is an excuse for lurking. I dunno if that's scummy or not. Let's see how LM proceeds from here. Maybe I have a soft spot from him hosting one of our newbie games. On February 04 2014 11:14 JonnyLaw wrote: LM hasn't given us quality or quantity yet. He says one thing then does another. It's early in the game for me to demand more quality of his posting. At least as far as considering lynching him. On February 04 2014 11:48 JonnyLaw wrote: At this point LM's first post was shit but says nothing about his alignment until other actions take place in the game. Koshi on the other hand created two pages of shit posting. This allowed LM and other LM like people to pop in, say nothing and fuck off out of here acting as though they participated in the game. Just look at the progression: "How do you dare to vote LM, he said the most sensible thing in this thread" "LM his second post was really good, I didn't consider the other ones" "LM can be lynched" "LM posted like shit early game, but it really was Koshi his fault" It literally goes from this guy posted incredible pro town towards everything this guy posted was shit. And there is a post right after Jonny said "I can lynch LM" where Jonny give his scummy list and I am on top of the scummy list and not LM. This is the post that Jonny found protown at first but then said it was scummy btw: + Show Spoiler + On February 04 2014 07:40 LoneMeow wrote: Well, for starters I don't quite agree with your "minimum post count" thing. I'll support a lurker lynch if it's necessary, but based on amount of content, not number of posts. Which on itself is indeed a pro-town post. The problem just lied that LM right after this post said that he was going to do hardcore lurking and the posts didn't add up... Which Jonny still doesn't understand. And somebody needs to figure out what Jonny means with the "first post" and the "second post" etc, because I am pretty sure it doesn't add up as well. Some lone posts I find troubling: On February 04 2014 12:05 JonnyLaw wrote: I'd say it could feel like bussing scum buddy. This is about JayB and Sidesprang. Never to be mentioned again. On February 04 2014 12:41 JonnyLaw wrote: Anyway, I'm not waffling on anything. I'm trying to figure out the game. If you have firm convictions this early you're an idiot or a god. When people say "I am not waffling" they are waffling. Also, did people think he was waffling? I don't even see where he was waffling. That's what they call inherent guilt. He looks at his own posts and sees the flaws in them, or at least he thinks they are there. ##vote: JonnyLaw | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
On February 05 2014 04:39 Alakaslam wrote: Koshi! Lampshades everywhere! Explain plz. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
His stance on you. Did it feel natural to you? Or did he just followed thread sentiment. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
On February 05 2014 06:06 Alakaslam wrote: You are lampshading people's early efforts to say some kind of pro town thing and then call that same act scummy later. In fact so am I Indeed it is odd. Wait a minute! We all are somehow?!?! Is it possible? I am not following you. At all. I also don' know what Lampshading is. Jonny his read on me is too absolute. Agree? | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
On February 04 2014 09:33 Balla24 wrote: Because he opened by saying something super ambiguous and unclear as to what he meant for no reason instead of just saying what he thought. About which post was this and can you clarify this for me. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
This is the post that Jonny is going ham about. He likes post 2 and think that is a protown post. He still does. I think you (Balla) are talking about this post. On February 04 2014 07:40 LoneMeow wrote: Well, for starters I don't quite agree with your "minimum post count" thing. I'll support a lurker lynch if it's necessary, but based on amount of content, not number of posts. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
On February 05 2014 07:19 Balla24 wrote: In response to this: 2 posts up. Do you still need clarification now that you know the context? If so, what's confusing about it? I meant what post from LM. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
That is a fucking normal response. Like wtf??? That's even nullier than null. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
He says "dude, you know I don't really do that' that's what you people are going ham about? Really? | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
But it is the Stray Kitten. Here is Noir. Which is pretty funny because he starts with asking if somebody ever got policy lynched and then gets lynched day 2 for having no filter and even claiming doc made another town fakeclaim doc to get him lynched. And here is LXIII in which he has a 6 page filter after 8 days. Like wtf? | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
On February 05 2014 07:28 Balla24 wrote: Koshi wtf? I find this really hard to believe that you 1. had no idea what I was voting about. 2. thought my vote was good, without knowing what i was voting about 3. forgot that you basically said the same thing I did when he posted that, but I voted for it Why do you think I'm going ham? I've barely discussed it. I voted for it, provided my reasoning, unvoted when discussion died down and haven't talked about it since. Seriously? No I had no idea because I read over it and thought it was about the second post from LM which actually was ambitious knowing he doesn't post a lot or give the greatest analysis about content. That would have actually made sense. Jonny has about 6 posts in which he mentions LM and it is because he said 4 words in the start that indicated he has a lurking meta? ok. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
On February 04 2014 08:04 Koshi wrote: It is a good post to quote in 40 hours ;D It was about the second post ofc... | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
Ugh, I kinda botched the Jonny case. I am going to reread everything again tomorrow. Normally I don't make these kinda mistakes but it just doesn't make sense that it was all about LM saying he has a lurking meta. I have to see if Jonny his filter looks better now that is clear. Everything just didn't make sense, it might do now. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
The part about him being scum.is.because he is not trying to read me. In bed atm sleeping. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
I slept till now and got to work. Have caught up and Hopeless is the best lynch for today. I played with him in resistance and smb and he had in both games way more thread presence than here on D1. ##unvote ##vote: Hopeless | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
Why do you refuse to play this game? | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
On February 06 2014 01:32 Hopeless1der wrote: you were mod confirmed mason? Or was this LXIII? Also I read your case on Jonny as pointing out a progression of "LM totes town" to "I could lynch LM". Jonny never actually gets all the way to the end of that progression. This is the post that is closest to saying he'd lynch LM, but that is only to plant the thought that its a possibility, not that he'd actually do it: LXIII, when rayn was pushing LM for forgettign the Night Kill. Ok. My Jonny tunnel was ridiculous. I even misread that I think... Let's forget everything I ever said about Jonny. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
On February 06 2014 01:48 jaybrundage wrote: Does anyone else think that Hopeless being gone for twenty four hours. Coming back and getting on the popular sentiment of oats being scum and the two cases on him. While also OMGUS'ing Oats is a bit suspicious? It seems like he made was just pushing Oats back cause he needed to come back in the thread with something. After calling Oats scummy. He made up his own case so he wouldn't be blatantly sheeping. I was thinking the same. But then he started a fresh conversation on Cakeman and that looked very good. I was just going to ask him about his other reads but it was 1700PM and had to go home. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
On February 06 2014 01:50 suki wrote: Koshi, what do you think of cakeman? tbh, I thought he was a blue when reading him earlier. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
His response to the case from jayB was: Why not Hopeless who is equally scummy? That doesn't make sense at all. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
##vote: LoneMeow | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
![[image loading]](http://www.vinowalt.be/images/mosselen-friet.jpeg) My vote is also on the right place so life is good. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
On February 06 2014 05:22 jaybrundage wrote: hmm I think I would still prefer lynching hopeless cause I think he could be a strong scum player. Lonemeow is a decent lynch but lonemeow is a lurker and not difficult to lynch regardless of alignment. Having to lynch hopeless would be more of a chore and I think he still might be scum. This is such a bad post. Just wow. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
On February 06 2014 05:34 jaybrundage wrote: O.o is explaining my thought process a bad thing? It just reads incredible wrong. Red bells everywhere. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
On February 06 2014 05:42 Alakaslam wrote: This is a legitimate concern if anyone is wondering. Read "Extractor trick mafia" for an example. Or "Back to the Basics". wtf? :D | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
On February 06 2014 05:50 Alakaslam wrote: The heck is up with this lone wagon? I want to lynch him and then jayB tbh. That soft defense into voting LM is just too much. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
On February 06 2014 06:56 Hopeless1der wrote: Votecount? There's no host....oh gawd.. Just move off jay. He is NEVER going to vote me and claim doc as scum. NEVER | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
On February 06 2014 07:59 jaybrundage wrote: Welp... I can explain.... Maybe Just give up your teammates and we lynch you last. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
I really like marv because my real daddy sandroba never showed me love. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
scum was just so awesome they lynched both doctors. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
On February 06 2014 19:53 raynpelikoneet wrote: wow Koshi i read your case on JL and thought you were mafia. JL was town before the game even started.  Yes. I was pretty mad at that. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
| ||
