EPTOn January 29 2014 22:50 Skanjab1s wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
It's very obvious why this is weak. And it does not make sense from a town perspective because you say right here that you are suspicious of me because I started considering coag scum. not because I didn't give reasoning.
It makes no sense for a townie to be suspicious of someone ONLY because they think the same person is scum, that's not logical.
Wait what? This is a direct contradiction to what you just said before.
You just said that "Some things that Oats have done you consider quite townie (I.e. emotionally invested in the game)
And now you are saying that his emotional investment is a SCUMTELL?
You've slipped, dear, the cracks are starting to show, you're contradicting yourself.
Bum's activity level has dropped, according to you.
Balla's activity level has dropped, according to you.
I'm mixing apples with apples and you're trying to convince me that I'm wrong on my fruit.
It is up to the person making the claim to provide evidence.
You lied about Coag's meta. Now when I call you out on the lie (which is very obvious, because I (and kush) have played many more games with Coag than you have, and we both agree that your meta point is wrong) you tell me to provide evidence? (1) That's silly, and thats not how claims work. (2) Kush has already provided this evidence for you.
Baby seals pls.
I was going to retort but I couldnt stop laughing at:+ Show Spoiler +
On January 29 2014 22:19 Mocsta wrote:
Explain why it doesnt make sense from a town perspective, and moreso why it is weak.
I have a specific reason why Coag came into my mind. You instead randomly conjure him as a scumread -- one that I think is accurate as well. In my quote I actually argue your sentence actually applies to yourself.
Explain why it doesnt make sense from a town perspective, and moreso why it is weak.
I have a specific reason why Coag came into my mind. You instead randomly conjure him as a scumread -- one that I think is accurate as well. In my quote I actually argue your sentence actually applies to yourself.
It's very obvious why this is weak. And it does not make sense from a town perspective because you say right here that you are suspicious of me because I started considering coag scum. not because I didn't give reasoning.
It makes no sense for a townie to be suspicious of someone ONLY because they think the same person is scum, that's not logical.
On January 29 2014 22:19 Mocsta wrote:
I dont give a shit how Oats plays on OMGUS. He has a commonly accepted specific meta tell to his scum play and that is emotional investment. Again refer to PyP LoL, a game where Coag, oats and myself were all scum. oats was lynched BECAUSE of emotional investment.
I dont give a shit how Oats plays on OMGUS. He has a commonly accepted specific meta tell to his scum play and that is emotional investment. Again refer to PyP LoL, a game where Coag, oats and myself were all scum. oats was lynched BECAUSE of emotional investment.
Wait what? This is a direct contradiction to what you just said before.
You just said that "Some things that Oats have done you consider quite townie (I.e. emotionally invested in the game)
And now you are saying that his emotional investment is a SCUMTELL?
You've slipped, dear, the cracks are starting to show, you're contradicting yourself.
On January 29 2014 22:19 Mocsta wrote:
The most interesting thing I see here is the bolded, specifically: the scum team according to you is Coag, myself and now Oatsmaster.
Please outline why Oatsmaster is scum as this is the first I have heard of it from you.
How are Bum and Balla following similar paths in this game. You are cherry picking phrases to mix apples and oranges.
If you need it paraphrased: I state that I can't get an updated read on Balla because hes ignoring me.
If this continues into Day2 I will find it scummy he is avoiding me.
The most interesting thing I see here is the bolded, specifically: the scum team according to you is Coag, myself and now Oatsmaster.
Please outline why Oatsmaster is scum as this is the first I have heard of it from you.
How are Bum and Balla following similar paths in this game. You are cherry picking phrases to mix apples and oranges.
If you need it paraphrased: I state that I can't get an updated read on Balla because hes ignoring me.
If this continues into Day2 I will find it scummy he is avoiding me.
Bum's activity level has dropped, according to you.
Balla's activity level has dropped, according to you.
I'm mixing apples with apples and you're trying to convince me that I'm wrong on my fruit.
On January 29 2014 22:19 Mocsta wrote:
The icing on the cake:
Explain. An easy statement backed up by nothing.
The icing on the cake:
Explain. An easy statement backed up by nothing.
It is up to the person making the claim to provide evidence.
You lied about Coag's meta. Now when I call you out on the lie (which is very obvious, because I (and kush) have played many more games with Coag than you have, and we both agree that your meta point is wrong) you tell me to provide evidence? (1) That's silly, and thats not how claims work. (2) Kush has already provided this evidence for you.
Baby seals pls.
Wait what? This is a direct contradiction to what you just said before.
You just said that "Some things that Oats have done you consider quite townie (I.e. emotionally invested in the game)
And now you are saying that his emotional investment is a SCUMTELL?
You've slipped, dear, the cracks are starting to show, you're contradicting yourself.
You just said that "Some things that Oats have done you consider quite townie (I.e. emotionally invested in the game)
And now you are saying that his emotional investment is a SCUMTELL?
You've slipped, dear, the cracks are starting to show, you're contradicting yourself.
If you can not comprehend the intent of what I wrote, its not even worth continuing this discussion.
Other than... Coags meta. (I am in the middle of a post about that) but lets play a game anyways.
Pretend I lied about Coags meta.
Again why is that scummy. Meta is subjective by nature.
Am i voting Coag?
Am i asking the thread to vote for Coag?
Explain to me, what I am doing that is promoting a scum agenda...
