EPTTL Mafia LXIV: The Restart - Page 32
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
|
StorrZerg
United States13917 Posts
| ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
You like the choices I have for current lynch candidates, but you won't elect me ? Im glad to know that you just said you agree with my reads more or less but disagree with how I got them / what I shared of them and made a huge case trying to push the election away from me but didnt actually analyze and call me scum | ||
|
StorrZerg
United States13917 Posts
On January 27 2014 10:48 BloodyC0bbler wrote: storr so let me get this straight You like the choices I have for current lynch candidates, but you won't elect me ? Im glad to know that you just said you agree with my reads more or less but disagree with how I got them / what I shared of them and made a huge case trying to push the election away from me but didnt actually analyze and call me scum Just because i can agree with you that lynching lurkers is a great idea, doesn't mean your doing a good job. Again, your doing policy stuff from my perspective, you are not extending yourself and pushing for something you personally believe in. That is why you are scum. That is why you are a poor choice for a mayor. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17334 Posts
What say you VE, BC? Speak, ye wise | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7875 Posts
Mocsta has a very high chance of flipping scum imo. He is activeish via irc/pms but has been dodging the thread. Untop of that he was actively doing shennanigans on irc that are extremely suspect. BH ill hold off pushing to give him time to come back and be active, but hes also guilty of some very shifty shifty behaviour. Pope I still think is scum. He came in with very bleh contributions that myself and others have noticed felt insanely off, and since has vanished and done shit all while hes been under pressure. These three I think are currently our best bets for lynches. | ||
|
StorrZerg
United States13917 Posts
 | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
Finally caught up on the thread. (1) BC is dodgy On January 27 2014 11:33 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Mocsta has a very high chance of flipping scum imo. He is activeish via irc/pms but has been dodging the thread. Untop of that he was actively doing shennanigans on irc that are extremely suspect. Firstly, his accusation that I have been dodging the thread? Based on what? I have been open to everyone that I have been busy, too busy to read the thread. The commitment of PMs is significantly less than the thread. Further, I tried to engage in dialogue with BC yesterday with a straight forward ice breaker to be promptly ignored. Then he tries to slander my by talking about shennanigans. Again, explain the "extremely suspect" motive BC. Go on... I dare you. I agree with Storr, you are not a suitable mayor candidate; let alone a town read for me. Having played 3 or 4 games with you as both on the scum team, I am very much aware that you like to start off your scum games by picking on what you perceive as weak players. Quantom Pope fits this bill both in reputation on TL (unknown) and how you approached him as a scum read with the attack. I am curious to see these PM logs that VE state show you are looking after towns best interests; because everything I have seen publicly suggests otherwise. On January 27 2014 05:56 bumatlarge wrote: And can anyone explain mocsta faking to be other people in IRC? Why would you ever do that. That's by far the scummiest thing someone has done this game. I would lynch him. LOl... see above. Classic pants on head. So you didnt like what I did. I dare you to explain the scum motivation of pretending to be player X.. and then talking to player X saying I am player X. Heres a question for you: What do you make of BC bum? On January 27 2014 11:43 StorrZerg wrote: mocsta has not talked to me I left IRC on, but wasnt around. Feel free to PM me as I gotta shoot off after this post. On January 27 2014 06:22 Skanjab1s wrote: I don't think it's necessarily scummy to bluehunt in PM's. It's something scum COULD do, but town could do it just the same, and with many different motives. It's not very indicative in my opinion. BBYGURL, I am still waiting for an answer to the question last night... if its not clear: On January 26 2014 20:35 Skanjab1s wrote: Hi guys im town so if you could all just believe me and not be so untrustworthy then I'm conftown and this game will be great On January 26 2014 20:52 Mocsta wrote: Soon Whose been "untrustworthy" Also (1) I am not mason with Slam. I wrote that wrong. I meant generic PM ability mason. Sorry for the confusion that caused several people. Having said that, I disagree with Balla24 that slam should be lynched. He is doing something currently which I think is potentially very un-scummy and I would like to see how it unfolds. yes, slam has some sort of plan that he has told different snippets to differetn people. Through my mason circle I found that that there is some sort of synergy going on. Too convoluted to be scum Day1 in my opinion. (2) GG I think is town and the rolefishing is just him trying to bait responses. I think people forget hes a newish player (3) Quantum seems OK so far. Has a bluntness about him that I like. Thus, My current top two lynch candidates are VE whom I am not liking this cycle for a variety of reasons I will discuss below & potentially BC based on the above whom seems to be trying to take easy swipes at anyone and everyone. Regarding VE, my core issue is how he proceeded with the mayoral campaign. Its purely a sales pitch with no substance. Typically town VE receives support for the mayoral camapign precisely because he is actively scum hunting and involving people and elucidating his townieness clearly. It is true he has often lynched scum as town mayor. In this game however, he was resting on his past laurels as an accolade to the mayor seat and in my opinion not furthering the thread towards a scum lynch. When I call him out on it, he proceeds to then go into a tit-for-tat with me on IRC instead of actually try to understand my argument and do something about it. Frankly I find this an insincere attempt to run for mayor; and given his quick abandonment to then support BC I find this motive a scummy attempt to keep up appearances. So yes, if i was mayor I would be lynching VE. Ciao I will try to be back in a few hours. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
##unvote ##vote BC VE, why did you retract your campaigning? | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
[01:13] <Mocsta> call me scum pls 01[01:13] <thrawn> scum [01:13] <Mocsta> i wanna be scum [01:13] <Mocsta> YES [01:13] <Mocsta> THANK YOU 01[01:13] <thrawn> u duirty fukn scum [01:13] <Mocsta> ohh yes [01:13] <Mocsta> i love it when you talk dirty to me | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
Mainly that he thinks BC is not 'worthy' to be mayor and ggtemp is. And that BC is scum for choosing generic inactive scum candidates. Care to comment? | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On January 27 2014 13:59 Oatsmaster wrote: so storrzerg pmed me and said a lotta interesting stuff. Mainly that he thinks BC is not 'worthy' to be mayor and ggtemp is. And that BC is scum for choosing generic inactive scum candidates. Care to comment? He's been saying the same stuff to me in PMs. He's got strong opinions. Or he's pushing agendas. I haven't decided which yet. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On January 27 2014 14:01 Oatsmaster wrote: OR BECAUSE BOTH YOU AND BC ARE SCUM!!?!?!?! Why would I run in the first place if we're both scum? If I'm not gonna run why wouldn't I just let BC run? Stop being silly Oats. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Or :OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO I don't have any strong reaction to the case against me. | ||
| ||
