[M][N] "SMB" Mini Mafia

On January 16 2014 16:03 thrawn2112 wrote:
And no, I don't have much confidence in either of them (grack+hopeless) flipping scum.

On January 16 2014 10:23 thrawn2112 wrote:
I wrote this a million times when I bussed grack in some normal.

He deflects suspicion by trolling/joking so don't let him get away with it.

On January 16 2014 10:21 thrawn2112 wrote:


yep you're scum

On January 16 2014 16:11 thrawn2112 wrote:
Oats, what are you driving at with this line of questioning? I can't tell if you think I'm scum, if you're mad that I'm not voting grack, or....?

On January 16 2014 16:00 Skanjab1s wrote:
Hiii. I'd be delighted if you kittens could indulge me in a brief questionnaire, it'll only take a little of your time.

(1) Do you prefer to play as town or scum?
(2) What will you be remembered for this game?
(3) How do you react to pressure?
(4) Is your play usually emotional, or reserved?

Joke answers = Totally scum, by the way.

On January 16 2014 15:43 thrawn2112 wrote:
By "go off" did you mean vote for or unvote Grack?

If it's the first then I don't understand the question. If you mean unvote, I didn't like how hopeless was treating Grack and wanted to give Grack some room to breathe if he's town. Having the entire thread pile votes on and yelling at someone isn't a very good way to figure out their alignment. See WoS from LXIV.

On January 16 2014 16:27 thrawn2112 wrote:
My initial vote on grack was because he was present for the trolling, and suddenly absent once people started playing the real game. Playing hearthstone is a perfectly good reason for him not to have posted during the time he was away, so my initial accusation doesn't stand up. My meta accusation was based on a single response from this game, and 1 scum game I played with him. That is not how you do meta. I realized all of the above, plus the other explanation I gave you, so I unvoted.

On January 16 2014 16:27 thrawn2112 wrote:


" I didn't like how hopeless was treating Grack"

that does NOT mean I was scumreading hopeless.

Oats please just fucking read.

On January 16 2014 16:27 thrawn2112 wrote:
My initial vote on grack was because he was present for the trolling, and suddenly absent once people started playing the real game. Playing hearthstone is a perfectly good reason for him not to have posted during the time he was away, so my initial accusation doesn't stand up. My meta accusation was based on a single response from this game, and 1 scum game I played with him. That is not how you do meta. I realized all of the above, plus the other explanation I gave you, so I unvoted.

On January 16 2014 16:34 thrawn2112 wrote:
Oats you have misread almost every single thing I've posted. If you put that quote in context..... you know..... a READING skill.... then you would understand. It wasn't about being nice. It was about not suffocating someone with so much pressure that if they're town, they will become more and more unlikely to cooperate. Also I realized my initial reason for voting was completely stupid.

What's frustrating about this is that only townies are capable of the stupidity you're displaying.

On January 16 2014 16:38 thrawn2112 wrote:
Oats the reason you dont understand how people can reread the thread and reevaluate their reads is because you never do either.

On January 16 2014 16:41 thrawn2112 wrote:
I'm forcing myself not to respond to you because doing so would likely get me banned. Good night Oats!

On January 16 2014 16:45 thrawn2112 wrote:


I've probably read the thread around 3-4 times.

Rayn is the scummiest because rayn is capable of being the most productive player. Is anything he did productive?



I withheld my reasons for no longer thinking he's scum because if he's scum, I do NOT want to let him feel any less pressure to post. Unfortunately you are too dense to realize this so you forced my hand.

On January 16 2014 16:03 thrawn2112 wrote:
And no, I don't have much confidence in either of them (grack+hopeless) flipping scum.

On January 16 2014 17:00 thrawn2112 wrote:


from what I remember koshi is a slow starter. I also remember that he stayed up late to see the game start and was likely very tired. both of those reasons make everything he posted non alignment indicative

On January 16 2014 16:57 thrawn2112 wrote:
my reasons for unvoting were simply because i downgraded him from scummy to null because I REREAD and THOUGHT about my reasons and realized they were stupid. that does not fucking mean i'm suddenly town reading oats, take a reading comprehension class. that reason COMBINED with me not wanting to demotivate a potential townie is why I unvoted.

On January 16 2014 17:09 thrawn2112 wrote:
Whatever Oats. Fortunately you've pretty much confirmed both of us as town at this point. I'm done talking to you for probably the rest of the game.

On January 16 2014 19:02 Koshi wrote:
Feels like Skanjab is doing the same as in Hogwarts only more tryhard. But I like the case. So meh.

More interested in Oats atm. Not going to let him live because he is in people their face. It is proven he can do it as scum.

On January 16 2014 19:29 Koshi wrote:

I am simply stating that "Oats in the face" is not a towntell. At all.

But here is a question:
VA posted a gif in his first post, confirmed town?

On January 16 2014 20:32 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Oats why do you think Vayne is town?

On January 16 2014 22:05 kushm4sta wrote:
I think skan's case on sn0 is thin, but good.
##unvote
##vote sn0

And fuck no am I giving Oats a townread for that display. I think it was a huge overreaction.

On January 16 2014 22:17 kushm4sta wrote:
Oats it disconcerts me that a player known for having a much stronger scumgame than towngame is going all in your face tryhard.
Trying = scum usually for you.

On January 16 2014 22:33 Dandel Ion wrote:

Vote Count

Sn0_Man (2): kushm4sta, Skanjab1s, kushm4sta
Grackaroni (2): thrawn2112, kushm4sta, Grackaroni, Hopeless1der
raynpelikoneet (0): thrawn2112

Not voting (9): lotsa folks

Grackaroni is currently set to be lynched. Day 1 ends in

On January 17 2014 10:26 thrawn2112 wrote:
oats you think grack's vote is ok? this is the reasoning

1 koshi gets mafia depression as town whenever something bad for town happens

2 koshi is depressed

3 therefore koshi is scum?

even if he could show me how koshi is depressed the argument still doesn't work. I backed off grack to see what he would do while not under pressure, and the answer's nothing

On January 17 2014 11:44 thrawn2112 wrote:


kush+sn0, two people i'm town reading, seem to be the top lynch candidates. I can't just ignore that. not pushing my own lynch is just a failure on my part. i have tried though... i've voted grack, oats attacked me for it and i tried to get him to comment on my grack post. all he said was "grack isn't scum for the reasons he gave for voting koshi." i guess that's a failure on my part too because I should know by now that I can't expect Oats to cooperate

also i've stated this repeatedly, some of my reads are subject to change based on future posts from others. obviously i can't explain that until it happens. really vayne, you yourself are doing the exact same thing (not showing all your cards) so i expect some understanding. if D1 goes by and I ended up not trying to push a lynch then we can resume this conversation

On January 17 2014 15:24 thrawn2112 wrote:


Do you think any of them are scum? Or are you just saying that

On January 17 2014 15:40 Hopeless1der wrote:

Correct me if I'm wrong but I was under the impression that you were literate in the English language.

On January 17 2014 15:42 kushm4sta wrote:
what convinced you of my towniness, oats? cause honestly i haven't been that townie.

On January 18 2014 00:52 kushm4sta wrote:
Can someone post the filter from hopeless last scum game?

He is lynchbait as town almost every game. So it makes sense that he would be obliged to act somewhat scummy as scum.

Sadly switched when both rayn and Mig thought Grack's the better option.

On January 18 2014 13:54 kushm4sta wrote:

thanks oats but I dont need you to defend me. so back the fuck off me you scummer.

On January 18 2014 06:11 Sn0_Man wrote:
What the fuck ever.

You guys wanna lynch hopeless? Fine. Lynch hopeless.

##Unvote
##Vote: Hopeless1der

Its really not that I don't think he's scum, but we are gonna have these bullshit coinflip lynches later when grack and ceph and co continue to do fucknothign and those lynches are gonna be lylo or mylo or w/e and that shit sucks.

On January 18 2014 07:03 Sn0_Man wrote:
What happened to everybody being so certain Hopeless is scum?

I move my vote off of some incredibly useless player who has solid odds of flipping scum (especially if he slipped as toad seems to think) to Hopeless specifically because you guys are so fucking certain that he's scum, and as soon as I do everybody is like "abandon ship lets lynch some random person who we haven't even discussed at all in thread". For crying out loud at least give me a case to work with.

Otherwise I'm going to go right back to lynching Grack.

On January 18 2014 14:09 kushm4sta wrote:
look how hard oatsmaster is trying with his shitty cases lol.
I think he's scum.

On January 18 2014 17:21 thrawn2112 wrote:
Before someone says "vayne cant be scum because of meta" which is why I wrote him off early, I just looked at his play in sicilian and les (scum games) and found that he can be aggressive, or dickish, or whatever as scum, and he can post img macros as scum. So throw all of that meta out the window, it's a really dumb reason to never open his filter.

On January 18 2014 19:32 kushm4sta wrote:
that metaing is just wrong oats. He can be useless as scum very easily.
In fact, he knows people like you think his meta is that, so as scum he will naturally play the way that makes you read him as town.

On January 18 2014 23:14 Koshi wrote:



↑All quotes Oats thinks Mig is scum, There are like 2 other posts left in which Oats mentions Mig.

↓But who will die tonight? Mig.


And next post by Oats Mig is scum again.

On January 18 2014 23:44 Koshi wrote:

Are you say I am scum and vote me?

On January 19 2014 00:02 raynpelikoneet wrote:

I have absolutely no idea what this has to do with me because i have clearly said i don't think any of those three people are mafia.

On January 19 2014 00:39 Koshi wrote:
Like this reads to me:
"Even though I think Mig is scum, statistically Mig is more likely to roll town and if he is town he is likely to get shot."

On January 19 2014 00:44 raynpelikoneet wrote:

Fucking dumbass why am i supposed to call vigi shots on my townreads?
Explain this shit and don't just post crap as you have done all game.

On January 19 2014 01:22 Hopeless1der wrote:

I haven't flipped and if I do, bye bye "confirmed". Answer the question about why did you bs Rayn not having town reads?

On January 19 2014 02:03 Hopeless1der wrote:
Oats youve lost me. Again, like I'm five.

On January 19 2014 02:06 Toadesstern wrote:
why? I add stuff that's wrong every time I play mafia, stuff that I think my town-self would be likely to get wrong as well.

Gosh this game is awesome...

On January 19 2014 09:25 Cephiro wrote:
Also to add, if you thought I was the dayvig, why would you want to point this out in the thread if you were town?

On January 20 2014 00:48 Toadesstern wrote:
so what do you make of rayn harping on about how you and ska need to be shot while voting me?
Or not explaining why he wants me lynched at all despite being his main lynch candidate despite wanting to kill you and ska with deadly bullets.

On January 20 2014 01:15 raynpelikoneet wrote:
You are either making shit up or you don't know how to play mafia.
Other people can tell you how my thought process makes perfect sense, you know there is a reason the intelligent people who are town think i am town.

On January 20 2014 01:31 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I am not interested in talking with Oats in this game any more. All he does is intentionally try to just bullshit people for no reason. He is not even playing mafia here, he is just being a bully, and that's stupid.

So just ignore him and lynch him after toad because he fails to say anything intelligent that has to do with this game anyways.

On January 20 2014 02:02 Hopeless1der wrote:
How is that at all relevant to my alignment oats? Draw your own conclusion if you want to analyze my activity.

Furthermore rayn can say whatever the hell he wants about his play, it doesn't make it true or false, especially because its rayn. You are inferring that rayn is town. Is that correct?

On January 20 2014 02:21 Hopeless1der wrote:
So your piling onto toad as well because bad=scummy when talking about high skill players,yes?

On January 20 2014 02:28 raynpelikoneet wrote:

The problem with Toad's statement is that on D2 i have never said you or Oats is my top lynch target. He is twisting information to try to make me look bad. If someone can find a post on D2 where i say you or Oats is scummier than Toad then he can lynch me no probs. But the fact is he can't bak up his argument because it's not true, and he is mafia because he is making bullshit arguments that are not true.

On January 21 2014 00:38 Sn0_Man wrote:
After reading that little hate-fest and claim I understand toad even less than yesterday but I'm having a hard time calling him a good lynch. What kind of mafia fake-claims with like 2 votes on them and 12 hours to lynch?

Right now Oats and Skanjab are looking scummiest, I'd like to lynch one of them.

I promise this isn't pure OMGUS, but all Oats has done this last day is flame and discredit the shit outta rayn without actually trying to find scum. Then he's like "Lynch Sn0" without reasons simply cuz I'm not here to defend myself. Zero scumhunting or effort, just aiming for an easy target he can safely back off of once I'm back.

On January 21 2014 01:24 Sn0_Man wrote:

You guys have both spend the entire game posting 1-line snipes that are pretty much dedicated to starting flame-wars and self-defense. Zero scumhunting. There's nothing to quote from your filters because there's nothing in them. Skanjab's day 1 case is the only thing worth mentioning and it's ridiculous garbage built on nothing day 1. Doesn't count as scumhunting, does count as trying to look good.

You in particular oats, your main contributions were "huge flame war with thrawn" -> lurk "huge flame war with rayn". I fail to see how town!Oats does that exclusively instead of actually scumhunting. Your "lynch rayn" case boiled down to "he thinks i'm scum lol" no other reasons. Plus you dropped it in seconds as soon as I showed up.

Toad I still don't get but I don't want to lynch uncountered cop claim see above.
Hopeless does have a vet claim and his posts struck me as better going through the thread. If there's a serious push to lynch him as I mentioned I can go back and re-read his filter specifically. However, I don't feel the need to do that when you two are so clearly scum.

On January 21 2014 01:38 Sn0_Man wrote:

I'm not at all certain what you are referring to, but if its the "I'm a sheep" bit then thats pretty sad.

I voted grack. I was convinced he was the best lynch for a loooong time. Then, after a LOT of badgering from others, some of whom I trusted as town, opted to vote hopeless who at the time was still clearly one of my scumreads. When the hopeless lynch all of a sudden dissipated for reasons that I'm still not quite sure about (actually, I should go re-read that), I reverted to my original preferred lynch candidate (grack). Simple.

On January 18 2014 06:11 Sn0_Man wrote:
What the fuck ever.

You guys wanna lynch hopeless? Fine. Lynch hopeless.

##Unvote
##Vote: Hopeless1der

Its really not that I don't think he's scum, but we are gonna have these bullshit coinflip lynches later when grack and ceph and co continue to do fucknothign and those lynches are gonna be lylo or mylo or w/e and that shit sucks.

On January 18 2014 07:03 Sn0_Man wrote:
What happened to everybody being so certain Hopeless is scum?

I move my vote off of some incredibly useless player who has solid odds of flipping scum (especially if he slipped as toad seems to think) to Hopeless specifically because you guys are so fucking certain that he's scum, and as soon as I do everybody is like "abandon ship lets lynch some random person who we haven't even discussed at all in thread". For crying out loud at least give me a case to work with.

Otherwise I'm going to go right back to lynching Grack.

I move my vote off of some incredibly useless player who has solid odds of flipping scum (especially if he slipped as toad seems to think)

On January 21 2014 02:43 Hopeless1der wrote:

Thanks for bringing this up when sn0 was concerned about where his vote was going or how people might just strike off and vote their "top scum read" with no regard for attaining a town-wide consensus on who should be lynched. You're soo good oats.

On January 21 2014 02:39 Sn0_Man wrote:

See here you are back to your 1-liner snipes with no explanation because you know there isn't any.

Working with a townread is sheeping? I was willing to go with what thrawn and kush were saying because they were making the most sense at that time. I'd been fairly suspicious of hopeless all game. However, I wasn't gonna leave my vote on hopeless for no reason once it became clear he wasn't getting lynched so I moved back to my other preferred lynch. This all makes sense from a town perspective. The one that you obviously don't share.

On January 18 2014 06:11 Sn0_Man wrote:
What the fuck ever.

You guys wanna lynch hopeless? Fine. Lynch hopeless.

##Unvote
##Vote: Hopeless1der

Its really not that I don't think he's scum, but we are gonna have these bullshit coinflip lynches later when grack and ceph and co continue to do fucknothign and those lynches are gonna be lylo or mylo or w/e and that shit sucks.

On January 21 2014 12:44 Mig wrote:
Oats are you even reading the game lol. I was the only person trying to save the parity cop 1.5 hours before lynch. And then you say trying to save the parity cop is why you are town and I am scum. Funny.

On January 21 2014 13:18 Mig wrote:
Also you monkey, I was the first person who argued that toad probably wouldn't do this as mafia. Well before you, jimminy christmas.

On January 21 2014 13:23 Mig wrote:
I really have to wonder if you are reading the thread at all.

On January 21 2014 13:22 Mig wrote:
I voted for sno lol

On January 21 2014 05:51 Mig wrote:
It really is ridiculous that toad is still voting for himself and hasn't posted again.

If Toad is actually a town cop and he doesn't come back then 100% he should receive a ban for rage quitting and not playing for his wincon. There is no possible way that voting for yourself then afking less than 24h into day2 as the town cop is correct play. It is just a rage quit/sabotaging your own team.

Going to vote Toad and just assume he isn't that huge of a dick.

##vote Toad

On January 21 2014 16:16 Skanjab1s wrote:


The part where he unvoted and then voted sn0 with us, dummy.

On January 21 2014 00:32 Oatsmaster wrote:
nah toad is town.

And Rayn is destroying the thread.

On January 21 2014 07:10 Mig wrote:
The more I think about it the less likely it seems to me that Toad can be mafia.

For him to be mafia he would need to put a lot of effort into this game (10 page filter with a bunch of long posts) THEN fake claim cop less than 24 h into the day (which virtually never happens) THEN martyr himself and never return. Why would mafia ever do this? The game has been going amazing for them. All Toad needed to do to survive was to post a few times. If he were mafia, he wouldn't be emotional and I don't think he would just abandon his team like this. It just seems to incredibly unlikely.

##Unvote

On January 22 2014 09:43 Cephiro wrote:
I will answer that soon enough. Next one:

If I was scum, do you think I would have pulled off this claim without informing my teammates?

--> Follow-up: Do you think a scumteam I belong to would have agreed to let go on with this claim of mine?

On January 22 2014 10:34 raynpelikoneet wrote:

Funny that you say this. You havn't really been involved in the game at all. You have just said "lol x scum", "lol y scum", "lol z y x scum" - nothing else.

If they don't believe it and think it's someone else, the optimal play for their shot is to shoot me.

On January 22 2014 11:53 Cephiro wrote:
Vayne is very likely to be scum given my reasoning. If both vayne and mig were town, is it really worth it to shoot Mig just to make me look worse, and leave a town with a claimed roleblock alive?

--> Most likely this has not been needed to be compared, as if Vayne was scum, then there is no doubt that Mig is the best shot to make after my given scenario.

It is not 100% certain that Vayne is scum, but it is extremely likely. The fact that you believe that I could still be scum after reading that tells me more than enough.

Scumteam: Oats/Vayne/???

Keep going.

If both vayne and mig were town, is it really worth it to shoot Mig just to make me look worse, and leave a town with a claimed roleblock alive?

On January 22 2014 18:28 Skanjab1s wrote:
Ceph does silly things though, it doesn't make him scum

On January 22 2014 22:20 raynpelikoneet wrote:
##unvote
Does someone really believe Cephiro is mafia?

"Cephiro started playing so he is mafia."

but instead it was "Vayne is mafia and Oats is mafia"

On January 22 2014 23:24 raynpelikoneet wrote:

Also the bolded part.
This is a clear contradiction on what he has been saying all D3.
In his opinion Cephiro all inned as mafia and there is no other explanation. Now when someone presents another scenario (which is not bw all-inning) he asks "SO SCUM ALL-INNED, RIGHT?"

lololol

On January 22 2014 23:25 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Cephiro started this cool discussion that outed all mafia, that's my answer.

On January 22 2014 23:43 Cephiro wrote:
For clueless townies that haven't joined in yet, as you can see there is clearly a Koshi+Oats vs Rayn+Ceph match pairing going on here.

Read all the posts carefully, even without common sense you should understand that there is no way that what I and rayn are pointing out is by scum. Just my post alone should prove that, there is absolutely no reason for me to do such a play as scum when I was in no danger of being lynched. I was supposed to be the mislynch of today after scum saw my fakeclaim, and they can't back it up now after starting, which is why Koshi + Oats are pushing for us so hard.

Do the right decision and we will come back, lynch every scum in the following three days and win.

On January 23 2014 00:06 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Oats make a case on Sn0. People have been calling him mafia all game long and noone has been able to make a case on him besides the bad one at the start of the game.

On January 23 2014 00:23 raynpelikoneet wrote:

I don't have to.
Why the fuck are you trying to twist every fucking thing around?
I have a case on Koshi, i am voting for Koshi, i don't need to make a case on you.
Make a case on someone if you don't want to lynch Koshi.

On January 21 2014 10:56 Mig wrote:


I am pretty much agree with this. Would have been the easiest time ever for mafia to just sit back and do nothing. Can't say oats is 100% town or anything from it but seems like there should be better lynch choices for the next one.

On January 23 2014 00:27 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Yeah and the last 5 posts in his filter are wondering if you are reading the thread at all which does not seem like a town read.

He does not comment on anything that's been said in thread. He comments on his theory on how the game is playing out (but he does not really have one) and refuses to say anything on what's been said in thread.

On January 23 2014 00:31 raynpelikoneet wrote:

No i am not and neither are you.
The last post where he talks about you as a read is the one where he says you are his top 3 scumread. So fuck you.
Why is my case on Koshi bad?

On January 23 2014 00:36 raynpelikoneet wrote:

So you cannot read.
Koshi is voting for Cephiro who in his opinion is only mafia if Sn0 is mafia.

On January 23 2014 00:39 raynpelikoneet wrote:

You are really fucking dumb Oats if you don't see how Koshi's logic makes no sense at all.
Or mafia, leaning on mafia, heavily.. While you can be a massive idiot as town as well. But it's okay, i am used to losing because you majorly fuck up as town and it does not bother me. Just try to fucking read if you are town.

i am used to losing because you majorly fuck up as town and it does not bother me.

I have good reason to believe oats is the mafia roleblocker at this point. There was no roleblock today as far as I can see and Oats always forgets to send in night actions, I think this is pretty likely.

On January 24 2014 16:17 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I can't believe someone thinks the setup could possibly be parity cop vs vigi + roleblocker.
Absolutely noone is that stupid, even if they have not read a single page of this game.
So i treat that as a scumclaim.

On January 24 2014 16:22 raynpelikoneet wrote:
So Oats make a case on Skanjabs. A full fucking case and no bullshit one-liners.

Also this sounds pretty funny now:

Why indeed Oats, answer your own question?
Or rather, why did you ask the question in the first place?

On January 24 2014 16:46 raynpelikoneet wrote:
YOU WERE SURE CEPHIRO WAS SCUM ONE DAY AGO!

On January 22 2014 09:26 raynpelikoneet wrote:
##unvote
##Vote: Cephiro
So no explanation = no town.
If he is SK we have lost already and he hadn't claimed most likely, so i am going with mafia.

On January 24 2014 16:08 Oatsmaster wrote:
ok I revise my reads.

Hopeless and skanjabs are scum.

Sn0 is town. Vayne is town.

On January 25 2014 00:38 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Both, to have a better clue of your alignment AND to convince me of your scumreads.
Do you realize he is an un-cc'd blue in a game that mafia had 2 "blues"?? If Hopeless is not a veteran there MUST be another town power role. Otherwise the game is imbalanced. Man use your brain...

On January 25 2014 12:49 Hopeless1der wrote:

i already claimed blue oats. die please.

On January 25 2014 13:36 Hopeless1der wrote:

If that is your true and honest opinion you are a horrible person.

On January 26 2014 02:06 Hopeless1der wrote:
rayn didnt own the lynches. We all had to reach a consensus on who to vote and both grack and toad played in spectacularly antitown fashion that deserved to be lynched. Short of modconfirming them town, I'd lynch them every single time for the way they played. You have done precisely dick all game long Oats, which hasnt been actively harmful to town but I cant say what alignment you are with any confidence. Save your own life if you are town by proving to us that you can find scum and stop pawning the responsibility onto the one player who consistently gives a shit.

On January 26 2014 02:11 Cephiro wrote:
I'd like to remind you rayn was the only one that saw through my thinking as a fellow townie and enabled the thread to go from "omg ceph is scum from fakeclaiming SK" into lynching scum. There is no single player that causes a lynch. We made bad decisions as town, and some townies (looking at you Toad), decided it would be best to lynch themselves.

I am fairly sure all three players on Oats are town right now. 4th town player please step in and vote for Oats also.

As for Oats, why I don't believe you at all is because of your previous reactions that are so giving away. You also have been throwing suspicion and theories toward everyone for the whole duration of the game, but when asked to provide something, you again change the focus of the discussion into what you prefer it to be.

On January 26 2014 02:47 Hopeless1der wrote:

easy there captain hindsight i might lynch you out of spite at this point.

On January 26 2014 02:55 Hopeless1der wrote:

that does nothing to determine your alignment. if youre scum you know they arent scum. you didnt stop their lynch. you didnt substitute scum in place of their lynch. get over yourself. also vote skanjab1s if you arent already doing so.

On January 26 2014 02:59 Cephiro wrote:
Just because I agree with rayn on you being scum does not mean I am sheeping him.

Or do you think it's a better idea to vote for someone else than whom I think to be the most scummy person in the thread, to "not sheep"?

On January 21 2014 18:41 Skanjab1s wrote:
Much more fuuuun

The Koshi thing was how he said he'd solved the game (thinking about a Toad SK theory) but then in his next post realised that it didn't make much sense and went back on it.

I really don't see scum saying they've solved the game and then pretending to have had a theory that they realised is silly but then still posting the theory. It just seems rather nonsensical.

That's the koshi thing, it's a small thing but I really doubt he'd do that as scum..

He's also just like, really indecisive and paranoid and second-guessy in a way that is really hard for scum to fake.