EPT/in
Golden Sun: The Lost Age Mafia Djinn Edition
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
/in | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
Or any of this thread thus far? | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On May 20 2014 15:53 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: should I read the OP? Or any of this thread thus far? I need an answer yo | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
Guess I might as well read the op then. Wave that was a mighty suspicious post, sounds like you're trying to make excuses for future bad play... | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On May 21 2014 06:13 27ninjabunnies wrote: Is this normal forum play to just vote whoever you want within the first five minutes of the game? Cause that seems kind of redundant, and stupid. Sadly, this is very normal for forum play. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On May 21 2014 06:15 WaveofShadow wrote: Lol now I'm honestly debating whether or not to seriously push this. If he's scum nobody's gonna lynch the guy so as much as I'd feel bad not letting him play, mebbe somebody shoot him or something just to remove all doubt?  I understand where the bolded logic comes from, in a normal game he wouldn't be lynched right away because scum wouldn't hop on the wagon. However in this game the same rules don't apply since there are more factions. I think it's very possible to see zero opposition wagons happen on scum. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
u wot m8 donchu eva git cheeky wit me m8 | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On May 21 2014 06:22 Valenius wrote: 9 player day 1's normally confuse me. gg. This is a total bitch post I don't like bitches in my game ##Vote: Valenius | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On May 21 2014 06:23 Xatalos wrote: That actually adds a pretty interesting element to the game. Connection speculation is less useful - or more precisely said more complicated. I agree that's it's gonna be more complicated which is why I'd rather not use it as a heuristic for a D1 lynch, after we see a few flips we can start speculating again but right now I think it's more distracting than useful and we should focus on simple behavior based scum hunting. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On May 21 2014 06:27 jampidampi wrote: You sound confident, enough that I think you have your eye on someone already. Care to share as to who it may be? Dis is some gud shit right here. Ninja bro I'd like to hear about this as well. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On May 21 2014 06:32 Blazinghand wrote: Look, I know you guys all hate RNG lynch but with 4 factions there's gonna be way more scum than usual, right? This means RNG has a much higher chance than usual of hitting scum. This is possibly the best time EVER for using RNg. Everyone lynch OdinofPergo, because statistically speaking he is scum. I was going to yell at you for the RNG nonsense but then I realized that you're right and even if you're scum, your plan has a decent chance of hitting other scum. HOWEVER, this is my first game in forever so fuck yo RNG, I'm gonna choose my vote the old fashioned way. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On May 21 2014 06:30 kitaman27 wrote: Hi everybody! ##Vote sqrtofneg1 Hey kita plz explain vote to me | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On May 21 2014 06:38 Blazinghand wrote: Or Instead of the old fashioned homeopathic non-vaccinated way, you could use your vote in the scientifically correct way and vote OdinofPergo! Vaccines cause autism tho /s | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On May 21 2014 06:42 kushm4sta wrote: i feel compelled to remind everyone to shut the fuck up because this is a 30 person game. I feel compelled to point out that this is a filler post telling everyone to shut the fuck up | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
I don't agree with Yellow love it how things work out sometimes | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
| ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On May 21 2014 07:02 Holyflare wrote: #logic So sexy Now do you have any other ideas other than that? | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On May 21 2014 07:05 Holyflare wrote: bunnies talked about mafia definitely being present in game so also mafia Mafia? In a game of mafia you say? ![[image loading]](http://media2.giphy.com/media/TbRXNJJJbgIkE/giphy.gif) | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On May 21 2014 07:08 jampidampi wrote: Meapak earlier you were interested in 27ninjabunnies, did you gather anything from my conversation with her? If you had to bet on her alignment, what would you guess? ehhhh I understand the part about gut reads, I've had them myself and I know how frustrating it is to try and explain them. I give her (is ninja a her?) a pass for now because her posts seem very unguarded and often early game is when scum are most uptight. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On May 21 2014 07:12 Tehpoofter wrote: Can you tell us more about your meta so we can read you correctly? Plz tell me this was sarcasm On May 21 2014 07:12 thrawn2112 wrote: nope. you guys just cant handle my brutal honesty anyways i'm probably going to dick around for a bit and start playing more seriously once the game gets going, similar to last game. Just what I expected sadly. On May 21 2014 07:13 Xatalos wrote: MZ and Tehpoofter I think mentioned that they liked what I said on the topic. Not that it was something über-useful, but definitely not "bollocks". Lol While I may have agreed with you xata, my post on the subject was actually trying to get people to drop it so it wouldn’t clutter the thread. Of course then people went and made it a thing -_- | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On May 21 2014 07:18 Holyflare wrote: why you hate things mz? things are good not hatin bro, I'm just livin the ez town lyf | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On May 21 2014 07:21 Steveling wrote: HF confirmed scum guys. Like 100000000000000000% Koshi and poofter pls vote him. steve mang gonna need more than that son | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
That's the most halfassed response I've ever seen Firstly you expect me to do work which is a nono Secondly you refuse to do work yourself which is unacceptable. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
Now where the fuck is Kita, I asked him a question and he never came back to the thread. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On May 21 2014 07:36 Blazinghand wrote: seriously though, the story you're going with is "I realized you're right, and even if you're scum, your plan will probably work and we'll probably hit scum... but I'm not gonna follow your plan, because of ill-defind reasons"? Actually yeah, I'm not even gonna argue with you. I play mafia for fun and us all picking an RNG then sitting back and seeing what happens doesn't seem fun to me. Plus I at least have enough faith in my own deduction and reasoning skills to think that I have just as good a chance of finding scum with analysis as RNG does. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On May 21 2014 07:40 jampidampi wrote: Unguarded? To me it seems that she is very defensive here: She has "a pretty damn good reason" to avoid my question, yet she anwears it. Earlier she said that "we definitely have a mafia or two" but now they are not necessarily scum. Brining out the newbie card, defending accusations that don't exist. I would definitely not call this post unguarded. Based on this I wouldn't clear bunnies so easily, but now you're interesting. What makes you think she was "unguarded" in this post? + Show Spoiler + For the annoyed thing, if she was slightly pissed at me, I would understand this kind of backlash. I agree that she made a terrible post there, my "unguarded" comment did not specifically relate to any one post in particular and more to her style of posting over all. My personal concern with her is actually her sudden clearing of me after I lightly defended her. It's waaaay too early in the game to say you won't lynch someone, even if you qualify it with D1. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On May 21 2014 07:44 Valenius wrote: + Show Spoiler + On May 21 2014 07:42 kitaman27 wrote: ![[image loading]](http://img3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20120309173425/goldensun/images/thumb/b/ba/GSHeart.jpg/240px-GSHeart.jpg) Chalis (ハート Heart) is an antagonist in Golden Sun: Dark Dawn. Together with Blados, she is one of the commanders of a secretive military nation named Tuaparang. All three are bad guys taunting us in the thread. I rest my case. LOL ##unvoted koshi btw Yo so anyone else wanna sheep me on this guy? @BH RE Shitstorm: personally I hate shitstorms because they scare away townies and allow scum to control the agenda. Yes it provides an environment for scumslips to happen but my concern is that they get swamped and it takes literally days of ingame time to fully flesh out what happened, at which time scum will be in total control of the game. I understand where you're coming from but I think the costs outweigh the benefits. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
| ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On May 21 2014 07:54 Hapahauli wrote: Two things: @ Holyflare Why are you playing as if you have a stick up your butt? @ Everyone Let's kill Valenius: + Show Spoiler + On May 21 2014 06:22 Valenius wrote: 9 player day 1's normally confuse me. gg. On May 21 2014 06:24 Valenius wrote: i thought you were hosting. wtf. ##vote: Koshi On May 21 2014 06:29 Valenius wrote: It was such a nice post, I wasn't going to correct it for you. On May 21 2014 06:50 Valenius wrote: I like that, I haven't thought it through - But I like it. RNG V2 On May 21 2014 06:52 Valenius wrote: Actually, won't it cause the same theoretical situation, just with votes more spread? On May 21 2014 07:44 Valenius wrote: + Show Spoiler + On May 21 2014 07:42 kitaman27 wrote: Chalis (ハート Heart) is an antagonist in Golden Sun: Dark Dawn. Together with Blados, she is one of the commanders of a secretive military nation named Tuaparang. All three are bad guys taunting us in the thread. I rest my case. LOL ##unvoted koshi btw On May 21 2014 07:48 Valenius wrote: If you add in newbie games, we just lynch town/any claimed power roles. ezpz 6 posts, all of them a mixture of "+1'ing" other people and irrelevant comments. His filter reads a lot like someone who's artificially trying to insert himself in discussion. ##Vote: Valenius ![[image loading]](http://static.fjcdn.com/gifs/Someone+gets+an+obscure+reference+I+make.+subscribe+to+be_a8bb72_4277665.gif) | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On May 21 2014 07:56 jampidampi wrote: It still kinda baffles me that you could ignore such a heavy contrast to your generalization about bunnies play. Makes me think that you didn't actually put that much thought into it, which makes me think you might be scum. It's soon 2 AM here, so see you all tomorrow I mean if you want I can go through her filter and point out every place I thought she made an unguarded or off the cuff post. I don't think I'm ignoring the contrast, I'm just not condemning someone for one bad post (although I understand that's all you need sometimes). On the other hand, I do have serious reservations because of her buddying. Look she's probably not gonna be my D1 lynch choice right now, I'm trying to make myself as clear as possible. Have a goodnight, I'll be more than happy to answer further questions when you wake up. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On May 21 2014 08:01 kitaman27 wrote: It's because you enter games with posts like these! Also, if we start ignoring Blazinghand, maybe he will go away. KIIIIIITTTTTAAAAAA don't ignore me plz Tell me why you made your first vote | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On May 21 2014 08:06 Hapahauli wrote: Can we stop troll voting and talk about someone that's actually scummy? ![[image loading]](http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lwobmpkPmB1r6aoq4o1_400.gif) | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
Make a case and then leave for a bit to cool off. Kita your response only gave me a semi :/ | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On May 21 2014 08:22 Blazinghand wrote: You think a newbie like you has a snowball's chance in hell of pushing a lynch on a vet like me? How cute  BH I know you're not dying but from someone who started playing before you did, turn down the douche on the vet status. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
I would love to see more attention paid to Vilenius because that dude has not gotten any better since I first called him out. Also Wave bro, ilu but stop throwing your vet status around like a shield, it doesn't look good. I've tried it, I know it's fun, but more often than not I did it when I was scum and used it as a crutch defense. I'm just not getting the best vibe and it makes me sad, man  . Koshi and Marv are doing the same thing but I don't <3 them like I <3 wave so idgaf if they're scum. Bout to pass out, night kiddos, | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
Also BH, I need you to repeat after me "I am not as good at mafia as I think I am." Do that three times, get up from your computer spin around counter clockwise, spit over your left shoulder and sit down. Also ya'll are some spammy motherfuckers, steve and co. are making me wish I had a gun. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On May 22 2014 06:31 austinmcc wrote: MZ I guess same questions above to you. Quick look at Kitamang for me? I've actually prodded kita several times if you take a look at my filter. I have been mostly just disappointed tbh. Now I've single handedly caught scumkita before and he looked a lot different than this but then again that was probably 2 years ago now and I don't have a strong recollection of any scum games he's played since then (I blame my own inactivity). When I asked him about his initial vote, I was hoping for a lot stronger of a reason because I had actually agreed with it at the time. Instead kita was meh and played it off like no big deal. I didn't really like that interaction and his subsequent lack of caring about the game is a irritating. I guess ultimately it comes down to this: I'm used to scumkita playing very differently but his current filter leaves a lot to be desired. I'd rather not lynch him today in hopes that he's just busy atm but if he continues to be useless I have no excuses for him. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On May 22 2014 06:30 Blazinghand wrote: MZ is not as good at mafia as he thinks he is. MZ is not as good at mafia as he thinks he is. MZ is not as good at mafia as he thinks he is.  So I know out of game bets in order to advance an agenda are against the rules but can we have a bet on the outcome of an action in game? I'd like to have a sig bet, if you get Odin lynched (regardless of his alignment) I'll change my sig to whatever you want for a month but if you don't get Odin lynched you have to change your sig to "Vet status does not = god status: I am not as good at mafia as I think I am" for a month. Sound reasonable to you? | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On May 22 2014 07:17 Blazinghand wrote: Also if odin is shot by town it's a draw I can't be forced to vote for him, that'd break the rules of an outside bet influencing the game, but I agree to a draw if he's shot by the town. I will certainly vote him if I think he's scum which at the moment I think there are other people who I've previously discussed who are better choices. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On May 22 2014 07:20 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: I can't be forced to vote for him, that'd break the rules of an outside bet influencing the game, but I agree to a draw if he's shot by the town. I will certainly vote him if I think he's scum which at the moment I think there are other people who I've previously discussed who are better choices. EBWOP Also draw if he's shot by scum? | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On May 22 2014 07:26 geript wrote: Your return does not make my peepee hard Slam. I'm very unconvinced. I just read slam's filter and this post was the only one I found that had substantial content: On May 21 2014 15:05 Alakaslam wrote: Haven't even seen yellow, HF null, Steve town, Austin town, you see me talking about CEPHIRO I am trying to find out, haven't even seen anything NJB said except in CEPHIRO quote Slam's got some seriously weak ass shit going on right now, I think people should really reread his filter and not dismiss him as easily. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
| ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On May 22 2014 07:32 WaveofShadow wrote: This would be such an amazing game to be scum. Somebody besides Austin give me something to do mebbe? I dunno I feel like a dumb American watching a game of cricket right now. Hey Wave I have something for you, pick up your game You've made me so sad so far | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
| ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On May 22 2014 07:37 WaveofShadow wrote: Yay I was mentioned in a 5k post! I dunno I'm legit having a shit time right now. What have you got besides memorializing me forever in your milestone post? Who are the serious candidates right now that I should look into? I feel like layabout is one of them but to me that essentially amounts to lurker lynch I thinks. Who else? People I think could definitely be red: Layabout Val People I don't have good feelings about: Slam Bunnies One of these three is probably red but I don't feel like figuring it out atm: Steve HF Hapa Look at these people wave, that should give you something at least. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
You can look at him too Wave | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
@Kita, all sqrt had done was make lame setup comments and made one nonsensical vote. In my mind at that stage in the game that's a lot better reasoning to vote someone than some of the other reasons for voting people had provided. I had been hoping you'd come out and stand by your reasoning at the time but instead what happened was you tried to minimize it which just felt really off to me. It's less about your reasoning for voting and more about the way you defended the vote. Like if you were that meh about it why make it in the first place. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
I don't remember spongebob having that much blatant innuendo... | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
Simple, ya'll have been pretty aggressively shitting up the thread (or at least it seems that way to me) and I figure one of you is probably scum. Time will sort it out so I'm not going lynch hunting in that clusterfuck right now. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On May 22 2014 11:18 austinmcc wrote: I think that MZ is giving short shrift to the other thread shitters or attempted-thread-shitters. Actually upon further review of the play hapa is ok, I think I was mixing him up with someone else. On the other hand, I find your defensiveness on this subject rather interesting HF. I didn't call you scum specifically, I only mentioned that one of you three probably was. None of the other two jumped on it. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
| ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On May 22 2014 11:28 Holyflare wrote: so why does mz have such a warped view of the thread then? can you explain that? My friend you have an 11 page filter, no matter how you slice it there is truth to what I'm saying about you shitting up the thread. Whether you are scum or not is something I wasn't even going to get into today but since my poke has got you all riled up (which if you read my post is literally the weakest accusation I've made this game since it doesn't concretely point someone out), I suppose we can have this little dance today. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On May 22 2014 11:30 Holyflare wrote: up in arms? it's the opposite of defensive by the way, it's aggro at you for being so out-of-touch from the game My dear Divine Blaze, you are the very definition of defensive right now, I hardly called you out and you responded. If my accusation was as baseless as you claim you could have just let it go. I didn't even go after you in particular but you felt threatened. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On May 22 2014 11:36 Holyflare wrote: i don't think many scum people have high pages of filter of active participation so i'm wondering why that's a legitimate heuristic for mz to have Dude Dude Have you ever played mafia before? It's more than possible for scum to have large filters, and spammy and shitting up the thread is a legitimate scum tactic. Just because you're active doesn't mean what you are contributing is valuable or even helpful. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On May 22 2014 11:38 Holyflare wrote: no i'm not threatened i'm leaving no stone unturned and think you could easily be mafia for having no idea what's going on to be in the mind to even add that to a post of who you would lynch ohhh not a good post at all. First off you're OMGUSing. But more importantly, "leaving no stone unturned" is not actually protown in my experience because it shows an inherent guilt because you feel the need to defend yourself from every little thing. It's a scum mindset :/ | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
| ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On May 22 2014 11:49 Holyflare wrote: well then you need to rethink your scum mindsets there buddy and learn how i play the game See unlike some people in this game I'm not gonna pretend that I'm such a great mafia player I can tell how someone else thinks. However the way you reacted has not looked good at all for you. Furthermore your OMGUS makes it look even worse. I don't really care how you play tbh, if your play is scummy though I'm gonna have to poke further. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On May 22 2014 11:51 Holyflare wrote: no absolutely you go after me if you think i'm scum, don't drop it because a player whose alignment you have no idea about asks you to look elsewhere lol a) who said I'm going after you and b) who said I'm gonna stop poking you | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
OMGUS - Oh My God You Suck. -An OMGUS vote means a player vote another player simply because that player voted him - a vote back. Use in context: "Meapak suggested that HF might be scum so HF turned around and suggested that Meapak was scum for saying HF might be scum." Source: http://wiki.epicmafia.com/index.php?title=OMGUS | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On May 22 2014 11:58 kitaman27 wrote: Take your pick out of these four. Valenius Wave poofter BlueyD Well you already know my opinions on Wave and Val Here's my opinion on BlueyD: On May 21 2014 10:53 BlueyD wrote: Wasn't so convinced by the case on Valenius when I read it. His posts weren't pretend-contributions of the scummy type, they were just obviously irrelevant. [...] On May 21 2014 13:36 BlueyD wrote: Ehhhh I'm back. Don't like the case on bunnies, I feel like Ceph is stretching it. [...] On May 21 2014 13:56 BlueyD wrote: I don’t like that the case on mtamburini seems to rely on a single post. It’s a really bad post due to format and scope, but the rest of the filter reads okay. [...] On May 22 2014 09:58 BlueyD wrote: [...] Ritoky: I just don’t see a case for a lynch on him right now. There are better targets. The case by austin was bad, and his reads feel honest. Austin: One bad case, but he retracted it really quickly once some stuff was cleared up, so not much there. Mehhhh. I pretty much don’t have a good read on this guy. Vale: There’s really only one post to analyse here, and half of it is fluff. His townreads are yellow and bkq (and bh? I dunno, the wording made it sound really weak) which is just weird to me. His only scum read is “Light shades of pink” on cav. Come on... Going to just count this as a pretend-to-help-town post since there's nothing in it I really like. On the scummy side. I gotta be honest I have a huge problem with people who do stuff like this. Sure BlueyD has also said he finds Yellow and Tamburini lynch worthy, however there is no time spent pushing these reads. I have no idea why BlueyD's meta is but I could be swayed to a lynch on him today. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On May 22 2014 12:05 Holyflare wrote: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/440546-golden-sun-the-lost-age-mafia-djinn-edition?page=93#1852 here is the post where i call it scummy before you've even returned Dude your post is literally in response to a question about me calling you possible scum. That's about as textbook as it gets lol. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On May 22 2014 12:16 Holyflare wrote: What question....? You asked austin what he thought about me calling one of you/hapa/steve scum. Read what you post -_- I'm done with this for now, it's not going anywhere and I need outside opinions so I don't get caught in an echo chamber. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
| ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On May 22 2014 12:53 WaveofShadow wrote: It was me, I think you wanted me to talk about why i think BH is town. Essentially, as scum BH is way more arrogant, and way more shit-up-the-thread-happy. Maybe the recent game wasn't a good example because he was traitor and didn't know who scum was, but scum BH always actually scumhunts (or at least fakes it). This RNG discussion is shitting up the thread to some degree but not in the same way, and BH is being more or less completely useless, something he is way more likely to do as town and simply lie down and get lynched for (probably to preserve some sort of meta or whatever). I've seen him play this exact same way as town and I've lynched him for it once and tried to another time I believe. Just seems way more likely to me that BH is town here. It is of course entirely possible he's playing to his meta for this reason and is something I wouldn't put past BH, and the roleclaim is fairly bewildering, but I believe marv said that's pretty par for the course as far as BH goes. Would not lynch today at the very least, town at the very most. I gotta be honest, the way you describe BH's scum behavior is exactly the way he's acting this game. It's not like you to miss something like that. Goddammit wave | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On May 22 2014 13:04 WaveofShadow wrote: MZ compare this to Carnival Cruise. I caught BH in Ver's game and it's night and day. This game is more like Thug Life. The claim and the fact that BH is often hyper-aware of his own meta muddles things a bit but I do not for a second believe what I said is wrong. Ok. I wasn't in any of those games but the fact that you've actually given me concrete examples warms my heart considerably. I still think BH is worthless but at least your position on him makes sense. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On May 22 2014 14:20 geript wrote: How do you know burini is scum bro? Can't be a bus without burini being scum. Tking out the editorial flare that geript gave his post he actually has a decent point, why are you calling burini a bus? That implies you think/know burini is scum and you suspect/know other scum are on the list voting for her. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
gogo I believe in you turbo vet + Show Spoiler + it's a turbo 'vette | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On May 22 2014 14:52 Blazinghand wrote: Man who'd put a turbo on a vette? A big engine like that can be NA. There is no replacement for displacement. Glad u like it Brb dinner Get your ass back in here and contribute... and speaking of ass: | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On May 22 2014 14:56 Blazinghand wrote: *silence as everyone reads my glorious profile* That silence could be filled by you posting equally glorious reads... | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
Mafia Acronyms 102: Bus (Bussing) -Bussing is when a mafia member backstabs a fellow mafia to get the trust of the town, usually by supporting (and possibly even leading) a lynch against his fellow mafia. Use in context: "Steveling knew that tamburini was scum and when he saw the people voting for her, he knew it was a bus." Source: http://wiki.epicmafia.com/index.php?title=Bus | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
| ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
Mafia Acronyms 103 Bandwagon (Bandwagoning) -A bandwagon occurs, when someone decides to vote someone during the day phase as their lynch target, and the whole town follows, without having substantial evidence. Use in context: "Steveling thought that the votes on Tamburini were a bandwagon and not a bus like he had previously stated." Source: http://wiki.epicmafia.com/index.php?title=Bandwagon | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On May 22 2014 15:44 Steveling wrote: Ey I'm newbie I don't deny it, that's basically my 2nd town game. Ok didn't know. Look dude, in that case lemme give you some free advice, take it for what it's worth I'm not trying to be condescending. It's not always necessary to be the guy doing the talking and if someone starts shit with you often times the towniest thing to do is give a response and walk away. Several times filter length has been mentioned and I'll say this; baring very few exceptions, the best, towniest players are not the guys with the longest filters. /soapbox | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On May 22 2014 15:41 Blazinghand wrote: RIP Kenpachi BH if you don't wanna hunt scum then give me 1 one (1) good reason not to lynch you. Remember that's one (1) good reason, it should be easier than the three (3) good scum reads I asked for. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On May 22 2014 15:51 OnceKing wrote: so which is it, is he trying to manipulate it or is he misusing it? Honestly I'll buy the newbie excuse with him. He had been talking a big game and shit earlier so I assumed he had at least played more but if this is really his second time I can see where the mistake would happen. HF on the other hand is manipulating because he is more experienced and is being intentionally thick but w/e, because of the general feel of the thread I've dropped that for now. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On May 22 2014 15:53 Steveling wrote: Alright then. But then what should I do if someone is talking shit? Let them. Who gives a fuck it's online mafia. If they're making rational arguments and you're town then you should be able to refute them, if you're scum well good luck, sometimes you argue your way out sometimes you don't. But if the person coming after you sounds like a madman then nobody will listen and everyone will probably think that person is scummy. But if you think the person is a madman and everyone else is agreeing with them I'll give you a hint, it's probably not them it's you. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
I wasn't going to say anything But yeah I'm pretty sure Palmar is one of the founders of our current meta which is always oh so civil and lovely. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
I have a quick line of questioning I need you to answer and I want fast responses from you. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On May 22 2014 16:35 Blazinghand wrote: I'm fine lynching geript It took you two hours to come up with this? ![[image loading]](http://media3.giphy.com/media/MjeLFmy6Lx8di/giphy.gif) | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On May 22 2014 16:42 Blazinghand wrote: Ok vr ddjbb err brb. C Bo 63 odin. What has he done for towbn. Why would he invite me. He's proof dc in scum. Ring worked I don't buy this bullshit at all BH. My patience is running thin. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
I actually don't give a fuck, Kita already disproved any role=alignment nonsense. How badly do you want to test your unlynchable claim? | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
| ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
| ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
| ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
Let's let the mods do the work on Odin and lynch Mtam. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
| ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
No vote used to be a modkill... | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
BH you should have agreed to the bet, you would have won lol | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On May 23 2014 04:59 Blazinghand wrote: I did it!!!!!! Should have made the bet lol | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
![[image loading]](http://media1.giphy.com/media/v12FFFTON0WgE/200.gif) | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
And BH if you don't die tonight I'm going to consider that the equivalent of a scum claim. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
Actually yes I will. If you are somehow town I'd advise you to do as much work as you can to ensure that scum shoot you tonight. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On May 23 2014 06:07 mtamburini wrote: So when doing voting histroy and analysis you must keep in mind of that there is more than just town and mafia in this game, a common strategy for mafia generally from what Ive heard (correct me if Im wrong) is to spread out their votes if they can so they all do not look scummy for voting together. Having said that think about the win condtions that the non threatening town aligned people could have. The limitations for that faction are endless, I was thinking about it while I was at work. What if a win condition was something along the lines of protecting certain players? This could make them look really bad if that person ends up getting lynched and flip scum by assosiation. Another thing I was thinking about is possible 3rd party win conditions. Correctly lynching/shooting someone from each faction. Or something like killing off an entire faction (town or mafia) Just something to think about when doing the analysis as this is not a "normal" game I actually have something to say on this subject as well. For starters, in order to find scum in the last second vote switches one of the leading candidates has to be scum, so in our case that means Val or Mtam. Now in a game this size, there are usually going to be several scummers who have been lurking along and are going to need to make up bad reasons for why they're not voting for the actual scum. This is where voting analysis usually catches them. However for this game, teams are likely gonna be a lot smaller which means that there will be less scum who are out cold and have to manufacture a reason to vote for the townie. So why do I bring this up? Because it's dangerous to make cases based solely off of voting patterns in this game. While I'm not clearing any of the people who flipped at the end, I'm saying the case against them needs to encompass more than just their vote. Also another reason I'm bringing this up is that a lot of people who are now trying to do analysis had expressed doubts to the scummyness of Val and Mtam so I'd like to remind them that in order to give scum a reason to last second switch, one of those two has to be red. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On May 24 2014 01:19 Alakaslam wrote: Yellow is either an incredibly trusting individual or scum BlueyD falls into this category as well. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
| ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On May 27 2014 05:46 marvellosity wrote: Problem is you have 4 mafia on day 1 who won't even be behaving like mafia because they're not a team that makes the game unbelievably depressing for town to play I guess this is my overall problem with the game. D1literally is worthless for the town. Don't get me wrong, I enjoyed it and it made me remember how much I enjoy mafia, however I'm glad I died or it would have got really frustrating really fast. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
| ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
Not town then w/e. You still reacted too strongly to someone casually saying you might be scrum. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On May 27 2014 06:45 WaveofShadow wrote: MZ (or somebody?) needs to host that game from the obs QT. Would play that in a second and I imagine after this game many others would too. It's Ver's original setup, for anyone interested I'd suggest they read responsibility mafia. I'd be willing to run it although I also want to play it. If I were to run it I'd talk with Ver to make it somewhat different than last time. | ||
| ||
