Why is everyone assuming that scooby doo is ANTI-town? It helps me figure out alignments, it has generated A LOT of discussion over it for analysis and you can all have fun in the process! That is the most pro town thing that can be done. You also quite clearly have not read this game up to date if you think it has wasted any time at all, coupled with the fact that you think I haven't been participating my previous read on you is rapidly dwindling.

Holyflare

United Kingdom30775 Posts

January 10 2014 12:00 GMT

#284

On January 10 2014 20:58 Derrida wrote:
Good reply.

Read the game before you make a case.

Derrida

2885 Posts

January 10 2014 12:06 GMT

#285

Please share the alignments you have figured out so far with the help of your scheme. Who are the two scums according to your analysis? EVEN IF you are townie, a game that helps only one person to figure out alignments does not benefit the town at all. As an inexperienced mafia player it has only clogged the game for me.

Anyway, previously you stated you have a townie++++ read on me, yet reply to Mocsta's calling me out by

I'm sure your words are reaching him.

What the hell is this supposed to mean?

Derrida

2885 Posts

January 10 2014 12:06 GMT

#286

So I must have not read the game as you don't like my sense? Good logic.

Derrida

2885 Posts

January 10 2014 12:08 GMT

#287

EBWOP: not sense, case. Still sleepy, my bad.

Artanis[Xp]

Netherlands12971 Posts

January 10 2014 12:10 GMT

#288

On January 10 2014 20:35 Derrida wrote:
As I told you guys before, I am town. Please do not waste your precious time on analyzing my posts. Derrida confirmed town.

*barks aggressively*
*barks aggressively*
*barks aggressively*

I am assuming two scums to put significant distance between each other. I am putting Holyflare as my #1 scum candidate

*barks aggressively*

because the town does not gain anything from the Scooby Doo scheme and we have lost about 12 hours from its trolly fluff. This would be a win-win situation for the Mafia goons because: (1) town loses time and discussion is dulled; (2) the other scum will position himself in opposition of the game making it hard for townies to provide a clear read.

On January 10 2014 18:19 raynpelikoneet wrote:
IML = instant majority lynch.

So, who was it that took the most critical position towards Holyflare and setup? GGTemplaR. Just look at his filter and his conversations with Holyflare, I bet they are laughing their asses off in the scum quicktopic like we did last game.

Any way, based on my first game as scum, I am extremely sure that one of the scums are pro scoobydoo, and the other is anti. I ask all townies to consider this insight and provide their insights as to who they think could be scums in such a scenario.

*barks aggressively*
##Vote Derrida

Holyflare

United Kingdom30775 Posts

January 10 2014 12:10 GMT

#289

On January 10 2014 21:06 Derrida wrote:
Please share the alignments you have figured out so far with the help of your scheme. Who are the two scums according to your analysis? EVEN IF you are townie, a game that helps only one person to figure out alignments does not benefit the town at all. As an inexperienced mafia player it has only clogged the game for me.

Anyway, previously you stated you have a townie++++ read on me, yet reply to Mocsta's calling me out by

Show nested quote +

What the hell is this supposed to mean?

Mocsta "officially called you out" rofl. What benefit does typing that post have on the game in any way? Does it make you arrive at the thread any quicker? No. Does it propose new ideas on why he thinks you are scum? No. Does it solve the rest of the game if you are scum? No.

It was a totally useless post that filled time and had no net benefit to posting it - something scum typically do.

Also, If you don't know who I am calling scum THEN YOU HAVE NOT READ THE GAME. I have 4 pages of filter and all you have to do is click on it and find out that really, the last 2 pages of my filter have been almost all analysis on trying to solve the game. So to return to the thread with your half-assed accusation on me with blatant disregard to the entirety of what's gone on in your absence really REALLY makes me reconsider my read on you.

Holyflare

United Kingdom30775 Posts

January 10 2014 12:16 GMT

#290

I know you're new and are learning the ropes but a connection theory between 2 unflipped players is generally regarded as really bad in the community as you are basing your entire read on unknown information. So when you come back saying that I am your scum read so there has to be a scum who take takes the opposite stance to me is verging on the crazy. You can't possibly know that UNLESS 1 of the scum is actually taking a stance against me and you are using that information for your attack on me.

I would be gathering A LOT more information from people playing scooby doo if they actually played along instead of criticising it. I have already gained much information based on responses though so it has most definitely had a net benefit.

Derrida

2885 Posts

January 10 2014 12:20 GMT

#291

Jesus, I have read your god damn filter.

Mocsta seems very buddy buddy with giggle, weirdly so.

I can see a team of Giggle/Mocsta/Templar (obviously eliminating one) although judged on exp of mafia games (I don't think i've seen templar play?) he looks more tunelled than anything else and also seems confused about the implications of the setup whereas Mocsta definitely knows better. At an early stage such as now a Giggle/Mocsta team is looking mighty plausible.

This is not analysis, this is just babbling. Do you honestly expect two scums to act like buddies at the start of the game? I don't think anyone can be this naive, you are just swinging wild accusations based on what? "exp of mafia games"? what does that even mean? Please provide clear and logical analysis before accusing people of not reading the game.

*goes into a pet shop, buys scooby snacks and a clicker*

Holyflare

United Kingdom30775 Posts

January 10 2014 12:33 GMT

#292

I consistently play with half of the people in this game so when I say something is off about a player many of the people can also spot that and so I do not need to elaborate. You are misconstruing what I mean by buddying because you aren't trying to make these connections yourself. I have quite clearly analysed when i say a player acts differently towards one player than all the rest and yes buddying on that micro scale is a very common subconscious trait for scum to do.

You are also ignoring a lot of what has been going on. If I am scum, why does templar then become scum too? You state that the person that is most against scooby doo is most likely scum but that was not templar as he /in'd to the game. That would be giggle and thus I must be bussing which is also retarded in this setup. When you misquote my actual analysis to make it look worse you are only looking worse yourself when people reread the game

Derrida

2885 Posts

January 10 2014 12:37 GMT

#293

So you claim that your analysis is correct and mine is faulty based solely on the fact that you are the more experienced player and that you "consistently play with half of the people in this game" and that I am unable to make the connections that you are able to due to your experience. If this is not just scummy town manipulation, I don't know what is. I rest my case.