[I] [S] Shadow Mini Mafia - Page 141

On February 01 2014 05:53 WaveofShadow wrote:

Oh horseshit.
What if I really was playing just this good of a scumgame?
It's honestly not that hard if you simply abandon 'mafia agenda' and just pretend to be town and absorb all the risks that come with it.

On February 01 2014 05:53 WaveofShadow wrote:

Oh horseshit.
What if I really was playing just this good of a scumgame?
It's honestly not that hard if you simply abandon 'mafia agenda' and just pretend to be town and absorb all the risks that come with it.

On February 01 2014 05:54 marvellosity wrote:

Yes it is. You're clueless.

Don't "it's honestly not that hard" me, I've played 10 of the fuckers.

On February 01 2014 05:53 marvellosity wrote:
austin, you selectively forget half my posts. No bueno.

On February 01 2014 05:55 WaveofShadow wrote:

Maybe I'm just better at scum than you then.

On February 01 2014 05:57 marvellosity wrote:

I've never seen one mafia maintain the type of giving a shit and interest that you have over the last 3 cycles. So like austin said with his toad read, gonna keep on trucking with that until I'm proved wrong. Which is unlikely given I've played 60-70 mafia games or something.

On February 01 2014 05:55 austinmcc wrote:
You have D1 anti-foolishness posts due to sandroba and generally feeling that Foolishness isn't active/townie/whatever.

But I promise you I had your filter open for a while this morning, and I'll bet if you start looking after Foolishness changes his mind on Promethelax, you're gonna find your suspicions on him are because of his WoS read.

On February 01 2014 05:59 marvellosity wrote:

There were plenty of other things that didn't mesh up. Such as Fool having the read on Wave, but conveniently disappearing from the thread right as Wave arrived posting walls. Obviously that was just Fool doing his thang, but in the context it looked horrendous. Wasn't only me that thought so either.

On February 01 2014 06:09 austinmcc wrote:
I assume there was more to it. And yeah, other people thought he was scummy. But:

Foolishness is doing A, and is mafia for that
Foolishness stops doing A, starts doing -A
Silence

Is smellz. Whether you had other reasons or not. Whether you had other reasons you didn't put in thread or not. Whether other people found him scummy or not. You specifically pointed out a thing he was doing, he did the entire opposite of that thing, and you continued to vote him and call him scummy with absolutely no mention of him doing the opposite of a thing you'd called him out on.

On February 01 2014 06:18 WaveofShadow wrote:
You know what's fun?
Rereading my own earlier Prome/VE cases and really liking them.
Why in blue fuck did they get shot down so many times and so quickly?

I do certainly notice a lot of the people under suspicion right now being very quick to be the ones to shoot me down based on things like 'hammers' and 'confirmed towniness.'

Is there even a point to doing this really?

Another interesting thing is Foolishness originally had me as town and Prome as scum way early on. Thinking of it now it seems way unlikely that a scum player would give that read early, flip flop on it entirely and then flip flop back again.

Ugh was way too tunneled and angry with Foolishness---at Toad too to some degree. I gotta stop doing that when people make bullshit cases on me, even if it is a good way to get people to see me as town.

On January 28 2014 21:23 WaveofShadow wrote:
Well I trust you guys to make the right decision come lynch then, my vote stays.
If you're both mafia, welp o.O

On January 28 2014 22:06 marvellosity wrote:
#distancing

On January 28 2014 22:07 Promethelax wrote:
#bigscumplays