EPT[I] [S] Shadow Mini Mafia - Page 10
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
| ||
|
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
On January 23 2014 16:28 VisceraEyes wrote: I was making dinner. I was interested, I just was frying fucking porkchops and that's labor intensive. Like, I don't know what else to say. I even asked you why you preferred Foolish over sandroba, you can't say I wasn't interested in the lynch. I just had other shit going on. And i was watching 2 football matches. So? Didnt stop me from doing shit at deadlune Ve, so you ask prome why he prefers a foo lynch over a sandro lynch...yet yor vote was on foo. That question you asked applies to you as well, why did you prefer lynching foo over sansro? Funny stuff, you badgering someone else about something before doing it yourself | ||
|
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
| ||
|
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
If VE isn't scum, who is? Me, austin, marv, Hapa, Prome are more townie based on the shenannies Foo seemed to get better. That leaves WoS, kita, VE and Toad. Out of ALL of those....VE is the most suspicious by far. And if he isn't scum, then stuff makes way less sense On January 23 2014 23:18 Promethelax wrote: Gonzaw, buddy, shall we dance? There are 9 hours left in the night phase I think. You and I could catch entire scum team in that time. I'll get home in 1 hour and something. Will read filters and shit there more carefully, and we can dance yes. I prefer salsa and merengue myself. Or are you a waltz type of person? That's coo' too. | ||
|
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
| ||
|
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
Could get interesting info about the players involved in that. Someone else analyze it please? I'm lazy. | ||
|
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
I don't really get it On January 23 2014 07:28 Promethelax wrote: Yes I think holy is a good lynch. My good lynch list is: holy, fool, Kita, sand, Austin. Unfortunately none of them are making me jump out of my skin and scream: scum! They are all scummy to the point of being willing to lynch them. Right off the bat, after he votes you, you put him in your "to lynch" list, and call him scummy. You don't address his vote, but well maybe you hadn't noticed it by this point. On January 23 2014 07:35 Promethelax wrote: It's because I'm kinda confused. It is what sand is pulling out in my filter. In pyp I had to do something to move town in the right direction (and had 140 pages of thread to work with) and things popped out to me. I had sheep to lead and scum to find. Here no one has made me really hard for their lynch. Although sand bringing in meta from my strongest ever town game is a little funny, I wish I was that good all the time. This is were I'm not really getting it. You acknowledge sandro's vote and case, but you say nothing of sandro. You apparently imply his case is bad and you are confused by it and how sandro applied it (i.e using your strongest town game as a meta argument against you). That doesn't make you any suspicious of sandro? In that specific post, why acknowledge his case, but not acknowledge sandro? I.e you ignore him? On January 23 2014 07:38 Promethelax wrote: Because I misread it. I thought he was misunderstanding the holy sub out. But he was commenting on an offhand post about sand being force replaced. Is sand scum for his vote on me: sadly not, sand can be this bad as town. He is worth lynching as a total lurker who has done nothing but not for his vote on me. A town sand is perfectly capable of being bad. The instant sandro made that vote I instantly found it scummy as fuck. I don't really get how you can INSTANTLY say it comes from town sandroba, when you are the recipient of that case! Sandro's case was "bad", even according to you, right? He's a lurker that hadn't posted in 30 hours, comes 30 minutes before deadline with a random case against you. From your own POV, you don't find this fishy at all? Really? Specially with sandro doing nothing later? If there is any time in the history of mafia games where an OMGUS is justified, it would be here How on earth can you instantly disregard sandro and call him "bad town"? You didn't even try to think and figure him out? You just straight up ignore him and give him a random town read? Then you say he is "worth lynching as a total lurker who has done nothing". I don't get it. You want him lynched and find him scummy at first, then he makes the scummiest move on the game. You somehow instantly say he's bad town, and STILL want him lynched, but not for being scummy as fuck, but for being a lurker? Please guide me through this Prome it makes no sense. On January 23 2014 07:40 Promethelax wrote: No one is above a four. Sand is more 3.5 along with kita/holy. Fool is a four. Sandro is "bad town", yet is 3.5, You say this of Foo + Show Spoiler + I simply cannot connect the idea of foolishness being a good town player and him being town while saying things so blatantly false about so many players in this game. There is only 0.5 between "town" and "obvious scum"? Or what? Again, post your thought process at the time please | ||
|
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
kita makes that "joke-serious" post on sandro here: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=439137¤tpage=12#223 That alone doesn't really tell me much about kita though. Later, he keeps doing the "sandro is a good lynch vote him!" stuff, which could be odd if his sandro's buddy. But then he drops it so it's not really alignment indicative. Hmm, although it puts him in a more townie light. For example with this: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=439137¤tpage=14#268 http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=439137¤tpage=14#270 Kita's vote on sandro do seem to have a purpose, which is consistent with his posts up there. It is a discussion starter, it does pressure the lurker, etc. I don't find it likely scum kita would start his "game" at the coast of sandro like that. Not strong evidence, but my gut says it makes sense as town kita. Also, in a wifomy way, I think this makes Hapa very likely town (more than he is now): On January 21 2014 09:39 Hapahauli wrote: Normally, even early-game troll votes have some pretense to find someone suspicious/mafia (even if stretched alot). This post doesn't follow. It doesn't call Sandroba scum in any joking/trolling way. You're just calling his actions dumb, then voting for them. Which is a pretty scummy thought process. How are you constructing Sandroba's post to be scummy as opposed to just stupid? If you are scum, and your scumbuddy makes an "awful" first post someone votes him for....do you really chainsaw defend him in such an OBVIOUS manner? Hapa keeps up with this too, going against kita. It feels genuine. Also this: On January 21 2014 11:18 Hapahauli wrote: I don't understand your reasoning here. What does him being a "slow-starter" have to do with not wanting to vote for him? For example, wouldn't it be arguably good to put pressure on him early to determine his alignment? He even plays devil's advocate when someone defends sandro. He didn't hesitate to do this kind of stuff. I just don't see him doing this being scumbuddies with sandro at all. Of course, there's the rest of his play, but this I think basically convinces me to never lynch Hapa in this game. So, this is our foundation so far gonzaw austin Hapa These 3 are untouchables, remove them from any scumlist, or any "possible" scum list (at least until one of them does something utterly stupid or something). marvy marv is not untouchable yet. But to touch him, you have to do it softly and gently. | ||
|
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
On January 24 2014 01:36 Promethelax wrote: My 5 point scale puts 3 as null sand was on the scum side of null. I didn't find it totally impossible that town sand would come out with an ass backwards awful case on me. Syllo did the same thing in chronotrigger and the two of them are one person in my mind. He was never town in my head but he was scummy for lurking not for anything in particular. I don't think you know how to read though buddy. When I said that sandro was capable of bad play as town I meant he was capable of bad play as town not that he was, in this case, bad town. He deserved a lynch for being a lurker not for posting a bad case. Is sand scum for his vote on me: sadly not, sand can be this bad as town You just called him town there. Not scum = town. Or are you going with that weird "if he is scum, then the reason for him being scum is not his vote on me" reasoning there? If it's the latter it was worded badly | ||
|
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
It still seems a little bit strange. I'd have OMGUSed the shit out of sandro. | ||
|
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
On January 24 2014 01:56 marvellosity wrote: Why would mafia-Prome be less likely to than town-Prome?? Well, in my conspiracy theory, the Prome vs sandro thing was premeditated, where sandro "weakly" pushes Prome for the credz, while Prome disregards sandro (to not get sandro lynched). OMGUSing sandro would put the attention on 2 scum, and maybe put the lynch on either of those 2 unnecessarily, while by having Prome being weird regarding sandro, Foo would still get all the attention. | ||
|
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
Maybe he's SK!!!? :O | ||
|
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
| ||
|
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
| ||
|
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
On January 24 2014 02:06 marvellosity wrote: So what happens, right, is that it's kita/prome/sand sand knows that he's the liability so he's planning on getting lynched day 1 and making his team-mates look good for it. So kita votes him early so he has that nice early vote and makes sarcastic comments about how sandroba usually just afks. but kita can't vote for sand in the end because kita needs credz for later when Prome maybe flips, so kita votes for Prome so that kita and Prome are well distanced. Now Prome doesn't omgus sand because he's playing the "sand can be bad as town card" for cheesecake credit, but in the end joins in the shenannies at the last minute to look good, after sand comes in with a case on Prome so that sand is making a case on Prome who ends up voting for both kita and sand through the day and kita votes for both of them too but has his vote on Prome at the end so there's this massive big circle where none of them can be mafia but they are actually mafia because that's clearly what's going on. You forgot the part where Foolishness is a traitor and this is bastard game. | ||
|
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
On January 24 2014 02:09 marvellosity wrote: I'm very much the other way around. Hmm, actually I dunno. I don't want to think about it, makes my head hurt | ||
|
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
| ||
|
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
Does someone here think VE is NOT scum? Raise your hands please. | ||
|
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
| ||
|
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
On January 24 2014 02:42 Promethelax wrote: + Show Spoiler + On January 21 2014 13:16 VisceraEyes wrote: I think if he's town he's biased and it's bullshit to be so biased already, but whatever. It makes him more likely to be scum to me, but no, I'm reading him as town presently. So this post happened. VE thinks I am biased and that makes me more likely to be scum. And yet, for no reason, I am town to him. Hapa said he thought this was indicative of a townie who was bothered at being accused for something that didn't make him scum but I see it as just as likely to come from a scum mad at a townie calling him scum for a reason that he feels could be equally applied to a town player. I think he said that about Hapa, not you Prome | ||
| ||
