On January 11 2014 10:18 Xatalos wrote:
Is it a reasonable strategy to fakeclaim Miller? I've never heard of that being done, but is it within the realms of possibility?

On January 11 2014 10:19 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
the miller claim isn't worth discussing, it has nothing to do with what anyone should think of thrawn's alignment

Thoughts?

Hopeless1der

United States5836 Posts

January 13 2014 17:27 GMT

#1732

On January 14 2014 02:24 VisceraEyes wrote:
On what? Thrawn's miller claim?

yes especially in the context that xata immediately asks why would someone do that? Is it empty scum banter (thrawn=town miller) or coordinated scum distraction (thrawn fakeclaimed)

Hopeless1der

United States5836 Posts

January 13 2014 18:58 GMT

#1766

On January 14 2014 03:50 VisceraEyes wrote:

Anyway thrawn man. Miller claim. And shady business with his views on Xata. SHADY! Take a look!

VE i really dislike this answer, assuming it was at all related to my question/inquiry here

On January 14 2014 02:27 Hopeless1der wrote:

Show nested quote +

yes especially in the context that xata immediately asks why would someone do that? Is it empty scum banter (thrawn=town miller) or coordinated scum distraction (thrawn fakeclaimed)

It feels entirely unsubstantial.

Hopeless1der

United States5836 Posts

January 13 2014 19:24 GMT

#1778

On January 14 2014 04:23 yamato77 wrote:

Show nested quote +

It has nothing to do with your alignment and everything to do with not wanting to see you post anymore.

that's not scummy at all. no sir. towniest yamato to date.

Hopeless1der

United States5836 Posts

January 13 2014 19:36 GMT

#1781

On January 14 2014 04:30 yamato77 wrote:

Show nested quote +

You're in the same boat as BH

its a good thing you're not mayor then.

Hopeless1der

United States5836 Posts

January 13 2014 20:11 GMT

#1804

totes. if you really want, subpoena Gmarshall to IP check the username.

Hopeless1der

United States5836 Posts

January 13 2014 20:27 GMT

#1821

On January 14 2014 05:26 suchdoge wrote:

Show nested quote +

while I agree with you that Blazinghand and Hopeless1der have proved themselves two of the worst players on the forum through this game and I would wholeheartedly agree with killing them both just so that they'd stop posting there are better players to go after.

very dickmove (sorry DrH)

Hopeless1der

United States5836 Posts

January 13 2014 22:39 GMT

#1845

Assume Marv has cleared me and bh. Kthx. (At least until Marv calls us scum that is)

Hopeless1der

United States5836 Posts

January 14 2014 01:12 GMT

#2017

Hopeless1der

United States5836 Posts

January 14 2014 01:29 GMT

#2068

JAT chinstrap BC koshi

Hopeless1der

United States5836 Posts

January 14 2014 01:30 GMT

#2074

dang 3/4 between us koshi

Hopeless1der

United States5836 Posts

January 14 2014 01:32 GMT

#2083

jat, if i concluded you were scum, it would have been easy to lynch you. just sayin

Hopeless1der

United States5836 Posts

January 14 2014 01:33 GMT

#2088

On January 14 2014 10:31 Blazinghand wrote:
Well, I really fucked this one up guys. I'm sorry. I'll do better going forwards.

on that note

Poll: Did BH Fuck up?

Yes (10)

91%

No (1)

9%

11 total votes

Your vote: Did BH Fuck up?

(Vote): Yes
(Vote): No

Hopeless1der

United States5836 Posts

January 14 2014 01:36 GMT

#2101

okay i guess that poll was a bad idea. more to the point, I dont think the reasons for modkilling him/us were fair in light of the fact that this was a PM game and if we were scum, we could have easily faked the mod posts since the scum QT would have had the same posts in it.

Hopeless1der

United States5836 Posts

January 14 2014 01:42 GMT

#2125

On January 14 2014 10:37 Blazinghand wrote:

Show nested quote +

well, it's LSB's game, and in his position I probably would have modkilled me. I'm not entirely sure i'd have modkilled you and bum also, but it's his prerogative as a host to do what he thinks is necessary to protect the integrity of his game. Ultimately this could have been avoided.

Trying to avoid it is why I want to discuss it. I know whats done is done, and I'm not terribly upset that LSB wanted to enforce his rules, more that I would like him (and future players) to consider whether those rules actually make sense. I don't think the rules he enforced this game were entirely fair. I think that the concern that we'd have been too easily confirmed as town was an oversight on the balance of the game and that we as players were unfairly penalized for it.

It would have been a trivial difference to add the mod post to fake our mason qt if we were scum. At most an extra 10 minutes of adding in timestamps and proofreading once. I'd like to understand why it was considered such a big deal to begin with.

Hopeless1der

United States5836 Posts

January 14 2014 04:14 GMT

#2197

On January 14 2014 12:21 Balla24 wrote:
Just curious what happens when mayor makes mafia BG? It was talked about in thread but I didn't really get it...

they still have to protect the mayor if he's shot. but they could roleblock themselves to get around that. or kill themself, though that's illadvised tactics.

Hopeless1der

United States5836 Posts

January 14 2014 20:21 GMT

#2248

Though its not my call, I wouldnt have a problem with BH receiving a warning. If BH was to receive a ban, I'd have a problem with it. At any rate, until LSB decides he wants to take action, its not for us to discuss.

Hopeless1der

United States5836 Posts

January 14 2014 20:55 GMT

#2250

Because the host said so. Host your own game and hand out bans like candy if you like.

Prev 1 2 3 Next All

Please or register to reply.

Live Events Refresh